Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Alright, numbers 1-4 or correct, so I don't need to say anything about them.thedocsalive said:Let me start the ligolski/pregnant woman argument from scratch. Point out any mistakes. I think frozen still disagrees here, so I'm posting this. Oh, and it's kinda late. If there's anything I was supposed to address but didn't, point it out and I'll check it out tomorrow (done with high school!).
1) The pregnant woman is not mafia, and is probably pro-town. She COULD be independent, but I really doubt it.
2) It is good for the mafia if they have the pregnant woman when she gives birth.
3) We assume that "having her" is performed by capturing.
4) While it would probably benefit the mafia to have her dead, as it's another pro-town (or possibly independent) player dead, it appears more helpful to capture her when she gives birth.
5) If we believe four to be true, then our goal should be to protect the pregnant woman from being captured, as a primary goal. As a secondary goal, we should try to protect her from being killed as well.
6) ligolski claims pregnant woman.
7) There is no definitive evidence as to the truth of 6). However, I see no reason to disbelieve ligolski unless there is a counterclaim. Therefore, at the moment, I believe ligolski to the pregnant woman.
8) Assuming 7) is true, we should wish to achieve the goals of 5). These can be accomplished by throwing ligolski in the hatch at night. He cannot be captured, nor killed while in the hatch.
No, it wasn't a dire situation. Should he have claimed that early? Probably not. Would he have had to claim eventually today? Probably.[/quote]Yes I was putting pressure on him but that doesn't mean anything. HE HAD NO VOTES ON HIM. It doesn't matter how suspicious someone is of you, your don't truely have any pressure until people start voting for you. And even if I was able to vote for him, one vote doesn't mean anything, atleast nto when it takes 6 vote sto lynch. Notice how I wa sreally the only person convinced enough that ligolski was mafia to vote for him, which means he STILL would not have been under extreme pressure even if I could vote. And yes you're right, even if he had only said "I can't join events because of my role but I can't tell you anything else", I still would not have asked him to roleclaim becaus ethat would only complicate matters. I knew that by telling him to counterclaim, I was essentially allowing him as a mafia member to draw out an important town role in the form of a counter claim. I tried desperately to prevent this as you all saw but unfortunately my efforts went unrewarded; Ligolski's plan succeeded.thedocsalive said:As I've said before, you were putting him under some pretty heavy pressure. If it weren't for the fact that we were in the middle of an event at the time, you would have been voting him and he would have had to claim. And again, for all the points you brought against ligolski, if he responded with only "I can't join events for a role-related reason, but I'm pro-town," I REALLY doubt you would have trusted him at all. Hell, I would have been suspicious of that too. But a claim as specific of that HAS to be believed, unless countered. And yes, I've defended ligolski, because I believe him to be pro-town. This is a role we can almost guarantee is in the game, and can guarantee that it is not mafia. At this point, lynching a townie could have very bad effects.
Well atleast you don't think I'm mafia. You're higher than the rest of the people who have bandwagonned me with no reaosning.thedocsalive said:Oh, and a vote count was formed while I was typing this. Um...the bandwagon on frozenflame went from zero to lynch minus one hella fast. I have differing views from frozenflame on several issues (at this point, all the major topics of discussion ), but I really don't think he's mafia.
My theory was not weak. We were never even able to test it! How can it be disproven if we never even tested it?! I said that it was highly probable that one of the mafia members had the ability to join events, and that turned out to be true. What does an independant being able to join an event have to do with ANYTHING? I never said that independant couldn't join events. And what's this? More uncertainty? You say my theory is weak because there COULD be town roles that can't join events. So it is ok to be uncertain about things and still use them in an argument in this case, but I'm not allowed to be uncertain when I make an argument? I'll say it once again; hypocrisy pains me.thedocsalive said:His theory was weak, and now pretty much disproven, but I had something like that myself. His stubbornness in trying to push it is something I disagree with though. We've seen a mafia on events (someone who wasn't really accused all day, IIRC), independents, and towns. There could be other roles that restrict event joining, such as the pregnant woman.
I've been defending my ideas for pages now, yet no one seems to be able to comprehend my reasoning, which is understandabel seeing as how everyone who has voted for me has no good reasons. However, seeing as how this is lynch or lose (10 uncaptured players, 4 mafia, 6 town [assuming there was only one independant.] Lynching me = -1 town, mafia nightkill= -1 town which means 4 town- 4 mafia which means game over, mafia wins.) a full role claim is in order.thedocsalive said:frozen has already nameclaimed on that event, but hasn't roleclaimed (unless I missed it?). Given the votecount, a nice defense and/or full roleclaim appears to be in order.
Ligolski, I am sick and tired of your "oh lets all be ethical and nice to each other" crap. It has no context to teh game whatsoever. This game is supposed to be about debating whether or not people are likely to be mafia and WHY. The way someone chooses to respond to other's points has nothing to do with that. Its the POINTS that someone makes, NOT the way they make them that matters. You don't have to agree with they way I post, but you need to deal with it. If I was doing anything seriously offending, the mods would be doing something about it. As for your completely pointless lecture about teh definition of mature, I'll tell you this: I don't care whether the person has an authority position over me or not, if they disrespect me in any way (which includes wasting my time and effort) I will most certainly NOT respect them. Oh and another point, I don't think anyone in this game has ADD (and if they do this really isn't the game for them) therefore that pathetic analogy is pointless. Ok, so you find teh way I treat people who are disrespectful of me absurd? Well I find your criticism of me and yoru defense of them absurd. See where this discussion is going? Nowhere. Want to know why? Because it is based completely on opinion and has nothing to do with this game. Now for the love of god stop bringing it up.ligolski said:I will address everything, I hope, in order...
1.) frozen that was very out of order with the swearing and mass amount of caps...soUV is new, though he has said he has followed this game along I disagree with the level of your response...I know you hate to repeat yourself as many others do too but that was way too out of line...
let me define mature for you: Suitable or intended for adults
now would you say all that to your teacher swear words and the tone that you apply...absolutly not, therefore YOU are the one who is inmature no matter how irresponsable one is >the way you speak to someone is more important...and if you are not having fun then leave this game...everyone should be respectful to everyone else...here is an anology> do you yell and swear at a kid with ADD (no offense to anyone what so ever) for having to repeat yourself severel times...NO...you deal with it as a normal, polite, respectful person would...The way you have acted towards this forced repitition is absurd and unrespectful to everyone in this thread whether directed at them or not...
*teehee* You're funny, mister.Typh said:if You Want Any Points, Go For Something Else.
LOL-Me and my friend were talking about this phrase last night..kirbyphreak said:TIE OMGWTFBBQ!!!!!
Half points do not count. I just use them as visuall cues. But your round was up so you could have voted for this.pezaddict said:If 1 of my ideas is used, do I get to be back in the game, or no?