Power Rankings
Ok guys, time to discuss the power rankings. T!mmy, being the great guy he is let me use his power rankings discussion he wrote. I believe it is a great template of getting things started... I'm not going to start a new thread because of what has happened to oregon. I modified his a little bit, but not much.
-----------------------------------------------
Idaho Power Rankings
I want to see this done correctly so we can contribute to the community and provide information that other states can access. As such I'm asking for help from Oregon players active on these forums to provide intelligent discussion, valued opinions, and other assistance in accordance to the Regional/State Power Rankings Regulations.
Important Notice:
Any inclusion of off-topic, "flaming", "spam", or otherwise non-proactive posts will be flagged and reported to a moderator.
Since the PR List is under development, we must establish the foundations:
1. Administrator
2. Panelists (3)
3. Mission Statement
4. PR Criteria
1. Administrator
The administrator must be respected in the community, and it can be a panel member.
2. Panelists
As per Regional/State PR Regulations, we are required to have a minimum of three (3) panelists. Volunteers for this position are currently open to anyone with knowledge and experience of SSB who are currently residing in the state of Oregon. Panelists will be chosen by general acceptance of the Oregon Smash Community, and, if necessary, by majority vote.
3. Mission Statement
I have provided a Mission Statement. Any addendum or amendment is up for discussion within this thread and is subject to approval by Panelists and Regional Administrator.
4. PR Criteria
A preliminary criteria for placement within the Power Ranking is included in the Mission Statement. Changes and additions are up for discussion within this thread and is subject to approval by Panelists and Regional Administrator.
__________________________________________________ ___________________________________
Mission Statement
Need mission statement
Administrator - Open
Panelists
1. Position Currently Open
2. Position Currently Open
3. Position Currently Open
Power Rankings will be posted after Panelists have been chosen and rankings have been decided.
-------------------------------------
My input...
1. Administrator...
Since I'm pushing so hard, I'll be the owner of the thread...I'll give that right up to buzz>josh>dom...
2. Panalests..
I remember this was decided
1. Buzz
2. Dom
3. Josh(gnosis)
again, if anyone doesn't want to be a panelist,
3. Mission Statement.
Not a good worder..as you see there. something about influencing a competitive nature among the growing Idaho community.
Now...about the citera. I belive a point system should be in order to a top 5 or 7. Lets say we do a top 7. The point system should be 7 points for 1st and 1 point for 7th. The reason for the point system will be for 3 categories based on rankings.
1. The Ladder.
If we use a ladder system for some point rankings, it will increase competitiveness, with the first defending his title, and the others trying to take it. We should make a rule you cannot go up more than two spots on the ladder. (thus if lets say the 7th is not active for a month, things still can change). The hardest part is starting the ladder.
2. Tournament Rankings.
This point system is bases on tournament rankings IN THE PAST 6 months. Only in the past 6 months will take someone who has lost their edge off the rankings, like they should be. The exact method is currently unknown to me, still a gray area. Still will be based on who they played, who they beat, etc.
3. Overall Skill-Personal Vote.
This is the 3rd and final vote of who is the best. This will take in account of friendlies, tourney, MM ,etc. I know in friendlies people do screw around and try new things and never look their best. But the panelists should know who is the best. Because we are a small community, this can work out.
-------------
Now, if I were on the panel, here would be my rankings. My tourney results are based on both the utah and the little 8 person tourney we held for rankings...
Ladder: (predertimened) ------ Tournament Rankings:------- Personal Vote:
1. Qraq -----------------------1.Qraq ----------------------- 1. Qraq
2. BC ----------------------- 2. BC ----------------------- 2. BC
3. Josh ----------------------- 3. Josh ----------------------- 3. Josh
4. Knuttz ----------------------- 4. Knuttz ----------------------- 4. Buzz
5. Buzz ----------------------- 5. Buzz ----------------------- 5. knuttz
6. Lemon ----------------------- 6. Kinx ----------------------- 6. lemon
7. Kinx ----------------------- 7. Lemon ----------------------- 7. Kinx
Total Points:
1. Qraq 7 + 7 + 7 = 21pts.
2. BC 6 + 6 + 6 = 18 pts.
3. Josh 5 + 5 + 5 = 15 pts.
4. knuttz 4 + 4 + 3 = 11 pts.
5. buzz 3 + 3 + 4 = 10 pts.
6. Lemon 2 + 1 + 2 = 5 pts.
7. Kinx 1 + 2 + 1 = 4 pts.
Then with the other 2 panelists the points will add up to a total points, kind of like college football. Note that the ladder will be the SAME for all three panalests. Everyone all has different tournament results "equations" and personal opinions.
Also, i believe we should update results every two or one month!
Share opinions...lets get this thing on the move!