Oblivion129
Smash Lord
I now grant Sakurai permission to reveal Shulk as a playable character.
(I wanted to have this before his reveal )
(I wanted to have this before his reveal )
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Yes, there are "more Nintendo" and "less Nintendo" characters, games and series. You can divide those in cathegories.pls. True Nintendosity... this makes me sick. Everything Nintendo is Nintendo. There's no "more Nintendo" or "less Nintendo".
"Because they are both first-parties" LOL. Pokemon, developed by a 2nd Party, is more Nintendo than both Fire Emblem and Xenoblade, developed by a 1st Party. You shouldnt brought 1st Party - 2nd Party against something like me, you know.Design wise. You can't possibly tell me that MOST people think of Fire emblem when they hear Nintendo. Marth is NOT more Nintendo than Shulk, because they are both first-parties.
Know YOUR place.
Mindless hate? I do actively support some REALLY MINOR Nintendo characters in the Nintendo Pyramid of series and i know my place.I think you should leave, don't come here starting fights, no Nintendo character is more "Nintendo" than another Nintendo character, Take your mindless hate somewhere else.
A Nintendo character looks like a Nintendo character. First party... Yeah, i never heard of "2nd party" being inferior to 1st party.Except that the look of Nintendo characters stretch among all Demographics. Tell me. What does a Nintendo character look like?
Shulk is a first party character from Monolith Soft who is owned by Nintendo.
Actually the first time i used "Nintendosity", but now i use just Nintendosity, because it seems a legit word ;P."Nintendosity"?
You just made that word up, didn't you? I'm actually laughing. Incredible.
Beautiful. I can only imagine if this were actually real how Sakurai would put up with it.Hello Shulk people. I thought i'd share my drawing i made today here since it features your character!
Hope you like!
You continue to ignore the evidence we put up.Yes, there are "more Nintendo" and "less Nintendo" characters, games and series. You can divide those in cathegories.
"Because they are both first-parties" LOL. Pokemon, developed by a 2nd Party, is more Nintendo than both Fire Emblem and Xenoblade, developed by a 1st Party. You shouldnt brought 1st Party - 2nd Party against something like me, you know.
Mindless hate? I do actively support some REALLY MINOR Nintendo characters in the Nintendo Pyramid of series and i know my place.
A Nintendo character looks like a Nintendo character. First party... Yeah, i never heard of "2nd party" being inferior to 1st party.
Actually the first time i used "Nintendosity", but now i use just Nintendosity, because it seems a legit word ;P.
Havent you readed anything? "First-Party" or "Second-Party" means little.You continue to ignore the evidence we put up.
Here is proof that Shulk is First Party:
http://nintendo.wikia.com/wiki/Category:First_party_developers
Government Documented Proof:
http://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=77749675&caseType=SERIAL_NO&searchType=statusSearch
All you have is an opinion on what makes a character look Nintendo.
Shulk is as Nintendo as Mario is. They are both first-party after all. Try to prove me wrong, I dare you. Pokémon is less Nintendo than Xenoblade, and that is a fact.Yes, there are "more Nintendo" and "less Nintendo" characters, games and series. You can divide those in cathegories.
"Because they are both first-parties" LOL. Pokemon, developed by a 2nd Party, is more Nintendo than both Fire Emblem and Xenoblade, developed by a 1st Party. You shouldnt brought 1st Party - 2nd Party against something like me, you know.
Mindless hate? I do actively support some REALLY MINOR Nintendo characters in the Nintendo Pyramid of series and i know my place.
A Nintendo character looks like a Nintendo character. First party... Yeah, i never heard of "2nd party" being inferior to 1st party.
Actually the first time i used "Nintendosity", but now i use just Nintendosity, because it seems a legit word ;P.
PROFOUND SADNESSHypothetically, let's say that Shulk is revealed as an AT. How would you react?
I'd be legit surprised, and in utter shock, and incredibly upset. My purchase of Smash Bros. relies heavily on Shulk's inclusion.
.....? That is an opinion and nothing more, but even if it isn't, it does not bode well in your argument.Havent you readed anything? "First-Party" or "Second-Party" means little.
Well, enough.Shulk is as Nintendo as Mario is. They are both first-party after all. Try to prove me wrong, I dare you. Pokémon is less Nintendo than Xenoblade, and that is a fact.
Do my eyes deceive me, or is Monolith Soft not listed there?.....? That is an opinion and nothing more, but even if it isn't, it does not bode well in your argument.
A First Party character has more chances, because it is synonymous with the people who own it. The First Party studios work more closely with those who own them.
Mainly with Nintendo, these are the First Parties:
Brownie Brown (Now 1-UP Studios)
Project Sora
Intelligent Systems
Nintendo Entertainment Analysis and Research
Nintendo EAD
ND Cube
........Do my eyes deceive me, or is Monolith Soft not listed there?
It's not there, and Project Sora no longer exists.Do my eyes deceive me, or is Monolith Soft not listed there?
Dude, the rest of the thread ended it a while back. You bringing dead topics up again and then trying to "be the good guy" and end it isn't gonna go straight. You lost, accept it and move on.Well, enough.
Yeah, who turned up the gamefaqs in here?I've just come back from the rumours thread.....is it just me or is Smashboards in a really argumentative mood tonight? All the conflict is getting me down.
S'why I came back here. We're always in a great mood! Hope we can win #HappiestSmashboardsSubforum2014 by the end of the year.Yeah, who turned up the gamefaqs in here?
It...would just involve a friend of mine and I sobbing uncontrollably into eachother's arms, and cursing Sakurai's name.Hypothetically, let's say that Shulk is revealed as an AT. How would you react?
I'd be legit surprised, and in utter shock, and incredibly upset. My purchase of Smash Bros. relies heavily on Shulk's inclusion.
He did that in every Pokemon sub-forum. Good for him.
But it isn't a legit word; it's stupid. Using made up words that have no real meaning isn't going to support or back up your argument. If it did, we'd all be doing it.Yes, there are "more Nintendo" and "less Nintendo" characters, games and series. You can divide those in cathegories.
"Because they are both first-parties" LOL. Pokemon, developed by a 2nd Party, is more Nintendo than both Fire Emblem and Xenoblade, developed by a 1st Party. You shouldnt brought 1st Party - 2nd Party against something like me, you know.
Mindless hate? I do actively support some REALLY MINOR Nintendo characters in the Nintendo Pyramid of series and i know my place.
A Nintendo character looks like a Nintendo character. First party... Yeah, i never heard of "2nd party" being inferior to 1st party.
[bold]Actually the first time i used "Nintendosity", but now i use just Nintendosity, because it seems a legit word ;P.[/bold]
That is what happens when a recent Deconfirmation happens. People fear their candidate is next.I've just come back from the rumours thread.....is it just me or is Smashboards in a really argumentative mood tonight? All the conflict is getting me down.
I've already had that experience today since Takamaru got de-confirmed except I was crying alone.It...would just involve a friend of mine and I sobbing uncontrollably into eachother's arms, and cursing Sakurai's name.
In that case I really hope this isn't an AT themed week of updates, or Smashboards will be a wasteland by the end of the week.That is what happens when a recent Deconfirmation happens. People fear their candidate is next.
Basically, yeah. I love how the Op is completely taken out of context just to make it seem like I think Pokémon is bad or something.Don't worry guys, I'm going through and reporting Raetah's posts. I suggest y'all do the same. I mean, the topics dedicated to attacking Solfiner.
It seems like he is trying to pit the Xenoblade Chronicles fans and Pokemon fans against each other:
from Raetah"According to Solfiner, Pokemon is less Nintendo than Xenoblade.
↑
Shulk is as Nintendo as Mario is. They are both first-party after all. Try to prove me wrong, I dare you. Pokémon is less Nintendo than Xenoblade, and that is a fact.
Click to expand...
Im tired to prove that he is wrong. You can find him in Shulk thread support. it would be helpful."
I would rather say "If anything, Pokémon is "less Nintendo" than Xenoblade" since GAME FREAK really only develops for Nintendo ATM. Pokémon is a central part of Nintendo.Shulk is as Nintendo as Mario is. They are both first-party after all. Try to prove me wrong, I dare you. Pokémon is less Nintendo than Xenoblade, and that is a fact.
The thing is that he claims that certain franchises are more "Nintendo" than others. He took my comment completely out of context and made threads in every pokemon subforum about it too.So uh...
Apparently there was an argument in here?
tbh I only knew because Raetah claimed you used the Xenoblade comment against Mewtwo specifically and I have to agree that's dumb, but... Just cool it. You'll make us look like the Ridley thread at this rate.
BTW Raetah, I can see you watching this thread.
That one scene in Heavy Rain where you cut your finger off... Then move on with life.Hypothetically, let's say that Shulk is revealed as an AT. How would you react?
Yes, I can see that. But likely thing is, they'll get infractions for bringing arguments into other threads. I don't need to see any other people get infractions for continuing the arguments in those threads. Or continuing this argument in general.The thing is that he claims that certain franchises are more "Nintendo" than others. He took my comment completely out of context and made threads in every pokemon subforum about it too.
We think alike. It's such a one-sided argument anyway.Yes, I can see that. But likely thing is, they'll get infractions for bringing arguments into other threads. I don't need to see any other people get infractions for continuing the arguments in those threads. Or continuing this argument in general.
Just a reminder from your friendly neighborhood Titan.
Seeing characters get deconfirmed gets some supporters worrying about their own Candidate, and the only way to forget about the negative thoughts is to vent, or to get the anger out.For f*** sake people (I'm referring to the site as a whole), calm down! Light some candles, read a book, listen to Bob Ross and relax. I don't get how a character disconfirmation can make people this nutty. Like I said before, if anything this helps your character's chances because there's less competition.