Wikipedia
Smash Lord
Posting 700 posts in 8 days.Yes we can!!!
Hell, if 2,000 posts in 3 months ain't a monkey, then what is?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Posting 700 posts in 8 days.Yes we can!!!
Hell, if 2,000 posts in 3 months ain't a monkey, then what is?
I nominated that person!Posting 700 posts in 8 days.
And Youko...Why are Gimpyfish and Mic_128 in almost half of the categories?
Sorry I like my eyes
P.S: Who uses that Smashboards layout?
Ewww.
I know that now...I didn't even know what it was 3 hours agoForum monkey has nothing to do with post count
Sorry I like my eyes
Forum monkey has nothing to do with post count
Well, apparently we both fit the bill for the job. As well as Gimpyfish. And some guy named Banks, who I don't know.I know that now...I didn't even know what it was 3 hours ago
Wow someone tell that guy this isn't a chat!Posting 700 posts in 8 days.
The point of the screen shot was to show that it really doesn't have anything to do with post count, or else the guy in the screen shot would be a nominee. Unless, you were not talking to me, Eor.Forum monkey has nothing to do with post count
He didn't get nominatedHmm, wow, these polls actually turned out a big waste of time.
The vastness of this board hinders the overall relevance of these. The same 10 people are all represented, and it's just not effective or correct. I'm sorry, but like some people said, half of these nominees show NO qualities of some categores. It's just the people that are in the spotlight the most, which doesn't prove anything.
I certainly will not vote. It's my choice, anyway.
You're taking it way too seriously.Hmm, wow, these polls actually turned out a big waste of time.
The vastness of this board hinders the overall relevance of these. The same 10 people are all represented, and it's just not effective or correct. I'm sorry, but like some people said, half of these nominees show NO qualities of some categores. It's just the people that are in the spotlight the most, which doesn't prove anything.
I certainly will not vote. It's my choice, anyway.
I knew someone was going to say this, and yeah, it's partly this. Mostly it's the thing I said above, but you know the mods in EVERY category won't get my vote. ADDER FOR FORUM MONKEY!He didn't get nominated
It's all for the spirit of the forums...plus some people are getting on my nerves in the Brawl General Discussion. Enough with the speculation!You're taking it way too seriously.
Then why vote for Gimpyfish? People gotta learn to read.I was talking with Kiki and he said that people often don't read the definitions for the categories and it was assumed that Forum Gamer meant the best Gamer on this Forum.
I'm kind of sad that Scav's fairy pic didn't win..Oh neat, another Best Writer nomination. But who am I kidding? I'll just lose out to Scav again. Somehow. Even though he's not in the running. That trickster!
Very agree, as well as Banks for Forum monkey.Also vote:
Best Forum Name- <3
Best Location: Dazwa
Most Improved: Cort
Friendliest Member: flaco
Best Artist: _milketea
I've been using it for years. It adapts to my wide display. The original has a set width, so the outer margins are wasted.Holy....****ing.......hell.
P.S: Who uses that Smashboards layout? Ewww.
Oh, really, you saw their names listed 5 times in each category?I mean I can see them being nominated in some of them, but really I saw there names in nearly every single category at least 5 times. That concerns me if it's just going to be a moderator awards ceremony for 2008 awards.
*chuckles*Oh, really, you saw their names listed 5 times in each category?
No I meant I saw their names atleast 5 times. One of them appeared atleast once in nearly 5 catagories.Oh, really, you saw their names listed 5 times in each category?
But attempting to "fix" that would be equally unfair. You just have to get over it.Eh no my issue wasn't with users voting vs moderators. It's just being a moderator, you are bound to become popular, thus setting you higher in votes easily.
But you are hoping for a paradox situation! If the community disliked this situation, they would clearly vote for non-mods. Obviously, the mods are people the community likes.Well in that case moderators and what not will win every year. But if that is how you/they like it, then I suppose nothing can be done.
Well I said moderators were in nearly all. not all.But you are hoping for a paradox situation! If the community disliked this situation, they would clearly vote for non-mods. Obviously, the mods are people the community likes.
I'm not a mod, and I made it in. It just takes hard work.
This addresses another point. Since a moderator is usually overlooking all forums, they'd know who is "most improved", " most helpful", and what not. Being a user, they usually stick to one sub-forum. That means, that users who never leave their sub-forum, such as Pool Room, never gets to really see what user actually had potential. That is why I think a moderator should once in awhile choose, not vote, since they generally migrate.
Just a suggestion from other forums.