Also McMurphy shows a few signs of being a bit of a psychopath (even though that sentence is too harsh) He doesn't care about the general morals or rules of society, and he is somewhat self-absorbed in the beginning
And in here we see the issue being proposed.
The thing that always struck me odd about psychology was it was based on the idea that there is a 'norm,' and that this norm is what is considered healthy. In order for someone to be considered insane, you must first claim that there is a base, and that his mind is set different than that base. So, is being labeled as insane nothing more than saying that you don't conform to societies ideals? What if I were to take you out of your culture, and into another one far different from your own, do you become considered insane then, since your way of thought and life goes directly against the norm? Are the Japanese sexually insane because of their cultures different views on sexuality, that stem as small as boob jokes in their most successful children show to the legal age of consistent being 13 years old? Are our customs insane, in that children are to be sheltered and not ever suppose to acknowledge sex until they are considered an adult, where then they are left to find mostly for themselves, as our culture sees nothing wrong with intense sexuality in the 20s to 30s range?
But, despite this problem, what answer does the book offer? McMurphy is the answer. Though he may not be a typical man, arguably insane by the standard I had set above, he attempts to not change the way these people are, nor shelter them from the world, but instead improve on what they already have, achieving a middle ground by allowing their train of thought while attempting to teach them to function socially with other individuals.
This book was just Okay. If I wanted to read a book that was heavy handed and full of implied messages, I'd rather read Lord of the Flies.