Z25 scum slipped when he suggested that any mayor that claimed at that point of time was likely scum. His goal was to eliminate any player he could to fulfill his win condition. I recognized this right away, and rightfully so. This is not a "forgettable" reason. It means that my eyes are keener than yours, I guess. I backed off because I thought he was just being noob-town, a mistake I will not allow to happen again. There was another reason, but one I'm not ever going to divulge. Either way, I am more concerned with reading people correctly than lynching anyone I can for bad reasons, which seems to be your main MO. Where is the scum intent in unvoting an Indy when Z25 was looking to be a lynch candidate moving forward?
This is really bizarre posturing on your part. For one thing, as I've brought forward already toDay, you never had a vote on Z25. To say that you regret backing off when you never got on is bonkers, and to say that you unvoted him when you didn't shows how forgettable it really must have been. The scum intent from your Day 1 was not only not having a vote on anyone at the end of the Day, but not ever having made a single vote outside of the initial RVS. That is not the definition of having keener eyes than a player who voted on and lynched the person you claim to have had eyes on. What it is, is exactly what I've accused you of: a Day 1 without stepping on any toes. That's continued in the next point, though.
Also, "I'll never divulge my cool secret!" is not what anybody wants from you right now.
"BarDulL is being too nice and not stepping on enough toes, he must be scum lol." Do you know how irritating it is to hear this? You are using meta from eons ago that simply isn't correct and you're clinging onto it like it's some universal truth, as if my brain isn't capable of adapting or changing in any significant way.
Here's an example of my adaptation: I explicitly did not try to engage you very much on D1 because of how you reacted in the last game when I did. I had intended on letting you do your own thing and waiting for something more conclusive. You brought the fight to me, not the other way around.
And yet, you did manage to say the same things as in the previous game, just in a chummy, inconsequential way that attempts to spur others to act instead. "Ooh, I'd like to get that pesky Nabe character, but I'm just not allowed! Isn't he bad news, everyone?"
I also DID have initiative and interacted with many slots, so I don't get where you're coming from with this; you are pulling things right out of your tush. I had more fruitful interactions than most players on D1, so I'm completely perplexed by your weird tunneling and rationale to pursue my slot.
The argument is that you didn't vote, but we can go one further: asking Nabe-style survey questions, explaining game mechanics and voicing soft stances isn't "fruitful interactions" with anyone.
This is silly. I warned people, and then the Indy flipped, and EVERYONE CAN SEE IN THE INDY'S ROLE PM THAT THEY WERE AFTER CERTAIN PEOPLE. How clearly do I need to spell it out for you and everyone else that character claims were NOT a good idea? I did my due diligence, and now you're trying to turn that against me as if it's some kind of scummy thing to do. Are you kidding me, dude?
I'll just straight up say it: of course I knew to some degree about the indy's win condition. I did it because I am one of the people he was after and my PM suggested as much. Claiming weapons would narrow down the Indy's line of approach significantly. Claiming I knew this would be highly suspect and attract the attention of the Indy, which is why I DID NOT CLAIM AS MUCH ON D1.
We also don't know with any certainty if there is a player that is connected to the Indy in some way. Read the Indy PM very carefully. Do not ask any additional questions about this, for you will get no answers.
Suspicious, mysterious,
electric. Again, "I'll never divulge my cool secret!" is not what anybody wants from you right now.
Also, just in general, it boggles my mind that you're not aware of this, but claiming weapons is a really terrible idea because helps the Mafia in alpha strike situations, or situations where it is simply too difficult to narrow down who the culprit could be in the event of an accidental hammer. There may even be abilities we don't know of that can adversely affect the weapons of players. This is actually INCREDIBLY likely. You are a bane to Town's existence.
If you think weapon claims should be left to an alpha strike situation, you should say that. If you don't think they should ever be claimed at all, you're saying town shouldn't know if and when things will go south.
I tried to engage you in conversation, and you straight up disappeared and never responded to me once directly in the thread on D2. D2 was 2.5 hours long, not just 10 minutes, you exaggerating goose.
Am I exaggerating, to say that you could have said something more direct to me than, "I'm patiently waiting"? Then, when I immediately support requested you when I saw that the Day ended, and you accused me of ghosting you, that's not exaggeration, right?
I don't think you understood what I meant. You were claiming a COP role to players. It is very likely that you would have continued to do this up until the Cop's inevitable death. Claiming Cop may have been an attempt on your end to gain trust from other players.
Again, Pokechu will confirm that I told him my plan to
say in thread everything that went on in the PM relating to the cop claim. I would have continued on requesting support with Pokechu Night 2 if the Day hadn't ended abruptly, because we would have had people's reactions to the gambit to talk about. Without that having happened, it was a better choice to diversify and hear from someone new -- you.
What if Pokechu was a doctor, or some other kind of protective role or investigative like a watcher? You would obviously be attracting them to your slot fruitlessly. And what was your plan if you accidentally engaged THE REAL COP and told him that you were the cop, causing him to CC you in the following day phase? It's such an egregious and selfish oversight if you're Town.
If Pokechu had claimed doctor to me, I would have sent him to Kon, the guy who already claimed a protective role Day 1. Why would he choose anyone else to begin with, outside of your thoughtbox without context? And if I had hit cop, I would have said "oops" and told him my real role, but out of 13 other players that didn't seem likely.
Yeah, uh, get off your high horse buddy, you did not put any real thought into your actions if you're Town and you're going to have to hold this L. Not a debate, you are on the chopping block. Whether or not I want you gone for sure today remains to be seen
Yeah, uh, get off your high horse buddy, you did not put any real thought into your actions if you're Town and you're going to have to hold this L. Not a debate, you are on the chopping block. Whether or not I want you gone for sure today is crystal-clear.