Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
The white wolfos level was one of the best in the game. I remember trying it over and over because of how ridiculously fun it was. I suppose because it really did the whole "waves of enemies" idea justice, unlike the moldorm stage.
Perhaps they'll include the crossbow in Zelda Wii?
I was in a similar situation with LA for a while. I also started it when I was young, like 6 or so. It took me 12 years to beat it. For a while, it was because I just wasn't that good at games yet, and it really did take that long. But by the end, I was putting off progressing because I was enjoying the game too much. Instead of progressing it, I'd go redo dungeons and go through them, even though half of the stuff in them didn't happen anymore. I loved exploring that world, and probably still know just about every screen by heart that isn't in the very end of the game. But eventually I was ready to finish it, and it was great.
TP is pretty great. Though remember, it was designed for the Gamecube, so its graphics aren't the best the Wii can do. Not trying to be nitpicky, but this just means that Zelda Wii will (hopefully) look even better than TP does.
Obviously if the only Zelda game you played and enjoyed was Twilight Princess..... You're not a true Zelda fan.
Really? That's a first for me. Personally, I though WW's graphics made that game. Its unique, toon feel somehow helped create a story and experience that immediately grabbed my attention. The look, style, and events that take place all fit perfectly, and as I progressed through the game, the storyline, with the addition of the cel-shaded graphics, grew all the more epic, especially when you discover that
If you let graphics ruin a game, then you arent a gamer.
I've played a link to the past (it was alright, but not a huge fan of it)
I agree with the premise of your comment (graphics are the icing on the cake and not necessary in great games), but I agree with his assessment. I think it is totally valid to dislike the art style or art direction. It is a different argument than "I dislike this game because the graphics are 'inadequate' (low polygon count, textures, etc.)". Personally, I was not a fan of Wind Waker either for that very reason, but I do love the gameplay.
Look at the Zelda Wii Thread for any information. So far we don't have any news about a release date or a title. I wouldn't even expect any information on either of those for the next couple of months.
This is very true. OoT is my favorite game of all time, and its graphics are kind of sad compared to modern games (although when it came out, they were decent, although there were some very blurry textures, which is why I'm doing a texture pack, but that's beside the point). But it was an amazing game regardless. But about WW, its graphics really shouldn't be held against it. Even if you don't like cel-shaded graphics, they're still quite nicely done, and it's thought by many to be one of the best Zeldas yet.
That should fix it :D
It's funny that you say that, because the art style is part of what made Wind Waker for me. It gave the game its own unique look and flavor, almost as if I was playing through a Hylian poem/painting of the events of WW. When I played through the game when it first came out (I was about 10 I think?) I thought that it was meant to be exactly that - you weren't playing through the story first hand like in OoT or WW. Instead, you were playing through a retelling of the story, hence why the art-style looks so much different.
You mean those five scattered moblins on the world map weren't hard enough for you? Man, you guys are getting too good at these
Hehe.You mean those five scattered moblins on the world map weren't hard enough for you? Man, you guys are getting too good at these
Obviously not, I mean I am a member of this forum which is a video game forum....is it not?
They were really hard at first. I mean, Epona trampling them wasn't even a one-hit kill! I had to turn around and finish the job!You mean those five scattered moblins on the world map weren't hard enough for you? Man, you guys are getting too good at these
Wizzerd is a huge Tingle fan. Though, I'm not entirely sure he's even played the game.
Word. Contrary to what many believe, I found Majora's Mask to be far more tedious than every aspect of Wind Waker. I loved all of the slight differences seen throughout the game, such as making the first dungeon fire-based, and the second forest-based rather than vice versa; the third dungeon somewhat water-based, but not a true "water temple" (you would think that it would be located at Great Fish Isle, but it's destroyed), the simple aesthetic change to the hammer to give it a skeletal design rather than generic metal (great move Nintendo, I dug the hammer loads), and numerous other points of interest.
That's something I never got to do. Connect the GBA and activate the Tingle-Tuner
At least I didn't like Tingle all that much.
I will agree that the time limit thing in MM is quite tedious but you had to go back in time alot less in MM then you had to sail in WW.
Yea but by that point I had basically explored the whole world as much as I could so to go on this horrible fetch quest goosechase got old pretty quick. I wouldn't have minded if it was less pieces to get and if you didn't have to do all the map BS.
I can sum this up in with one comparision.
