#HBC | Dancer
The nicest of the damned.
Kary, Rockin or Nabe? Would you join either of those wagons if I voted them instead right now?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
You even get some of this wrong. In 2645, I clearly say "I shouldn't be lynched", not anything about wanting to be voted for.Here is some examples from Super Heroes Mafia. Double spoiler tags come up for some weird reason.
First off, Zen mentions that an indy wouldn't want to attract as much attention as Nabe has. #2668
Zen asks in frustration, why he is playing like a jester. #2671
Example of Nabe acting like a jester. He states "I want you to vote for me because idk". Not very convincing, even when he himself wants to be lynched. #2645
Nabe states that his reasoning for not voting Radfic, is because Nabe would want to be the lynch that day. #2522
Acts confused when accused of bluffing about wanting to be the play. #2566!
Zen states that Nabe wanted to be the play, yet didn't vote himself when asked to. He also states that Nabe came out of no where with an option to vote Red Ryu after the previous day, when he had hammered Radfic "because he got tired of arguing". #2572
I think this shows what I am talking about.
Hasn't done jack and there's enough dirt on him to get him lynched. I know a lot of people don't oppose his lynch.You want to join . . . . . . what wagon now? Rockin? Any reason to believe others will join it?
@Ran & BarDull: You guys willing to go Rockin? Or are you convinced in Nabe?
Soup, would you go Nabe?
There's nothing to elaborate on. These are the people I would see lynched, and the reason I would do so is because what they say and the way they say it doesn't agree with me. It's Day 1, after all.I think Bardull explained it well. You come in, and don't really elaborate much on your suspects. You know, Circus and Hilt. You just post little jabs like #540. It just didn't seem like a genuine observation, but more like an opportunity for you to fake content. It also seemed like you were doing little, trivial things like this because you had to, since you were inactive. You know, little quips like my playing differently, which you don't really explain if it was of suspicion to you or not... I don't really see the reason in going through that if you didn't really suspect me.
So in this very believable scumteam, I was like, "hey, Swords, you know how my posts suck?"From you not really doing much, when it comes to explaining your stances.
But why would it be odd that he didn't vote for me, when your vote on me made 1 vote? There were three wagons with 2 votes each, and one wagon (Bard) with 3 votes. It's not "Swords voted Circus instead of Nabe", it's 'Swords voted Circus instead of a bunch of other wagons". But you make it sound like Swords made a binary decision.I voted Circus because I wanted a bigger Wagon and was content with voting Circus at the time, but I still thought it was odd he voted Circus when I had voted Nabe already, and I changed my mind about just staying on Circus, and instead pushing towards you since we got an extra day. (Which is why I asked him why he voted Circus instead of you)
Sorry, one sec while I fix something.Nabe, looking over your posts, if you're not scum, I'm unimpressed with your ego. I hope you don't think the lot of us are intellectually inferior because, if you do, you made the crucial mistake of letting that kind of behavior slip.
So, yeah. I'm not sure where you would get that idea.Nabe, looking over your posts, if you're not scum, I'm unimpressed with your ego. I hope you don't think the lot of us are intellectually inferior because, if you do, you made the crucial mistake of letting that kind of behavior slip.
I think it's hilarious that you put on the Kefka avatar, but you're only digging your own grave.So, yeah. I'm not sure where you would get that idea.
Please re-upload your own avatar so we can go at this like proper full-avatared gentlemen.I think it's hilarious that you put on the Kefka avatar, but you're only digging your own grave.
1. I still think that you were trying to 'point out notable events' to seem like you were being productive while being inactive for so long. You saying that you will certainly do it doesn't justify it as a good reason to.There's nothing to elaborate on. These are the people I would see lynched, and the reason I would do so is because what they say and the way they say it doesn't agree with me. It's Day 1, after all.
I am certainly going to point out notable events, such as "if X is scum, this leads to Y" when I am currently voting for X and <24 hours to deadline suggests X is about to be lynched.
I pointed out that I thought your play was off from the norm. You told me it wasn't, and the fact of that was agreed upon by others. That makes the point moot, and leaves nothing to be said about it. Obviously it was suspicious -- someone playing differently than they should be is suspicious. But you're apparently not playing differently. Therefore, subject dropped.
Of course I didn't. If you read over the language you used, which includes calling and implying that Ran is of inferior intelligence than yourself, I can't take your level of questioning seriously.Graphic.
Are you going to respond to my post on the last page? :B
Of course I didn't. If you read over the language you used, which includes calling and implying that Ran is of inferior intelligence than yourself, I can't take your level of questioning seriously.
To be clear, we're talking about 673? I've responded to a post that didn't need responding to, twice, and Ran has tossed the point. Bard, 673 has nothing to do with Ran, and everything to do with you.I just took that as him trying to make me look like a fool instead of actually replying to me seriously, which he did after getting some votes.
Also, Clarification: You saying you certainly will do it anyways, doesn't mean it's not suspicious.
Ran: I was voting for Bard, and in the very foreseeable future, he was going to be lynched. This fully justifies saying, "what's next?"
So, did he convince you by now? Also explain how he did or didn't. Then follow up with a vote.Nabe, convince me not to vote you.