K.Mac
Smash Lord
Trains suck.
</end>
</end>
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Get out.Dooan, you've let the EM down. If I can make it surely you can make it too.
considering you managed it on £40 last time... I mean wut. I spend more getting to/from andy's >_>
I'd come and win it for you :3I need to start thinking about getting a railcard or something,
I might try and make it to GT2 to be honest,
Just out of curiosity, if I held a Brawl and Melee tournament in Congleton, who would come down?
Depends when and how much it costs me for travel. I'm currently skint and need to save up for Trio's fest next week and for SmashGT2.I need to start thinking about getting a railcard or something,
I might try and make it to GT2 to be honest,
Just out of curiosity, if I held a Brawl and Melee tournament in Congleton, who would come down?
Some dittos, sure. but when you get like, a falco or a D3 ditto it's kind of hard to take seriously. :3i dont get why so many people in the uk dont take dittos seriously or see them as uncompetitive or w/e.
50/50 match-up=bad?
Falco and D3 have a plethora of useful moves to stop the opponent from getting a grab, but this obviously takes skill, as does getting a grab, hence my point.lol, just really who gets the grabs first
I'm thinking; and I disagree.Infact when you thik about it (i mean really thik about it) dittos don't tend to mean that much.
If you plan to win, how is it not just as important as learning another match-up?How much time you you take to think how to beat your main, especially when your main is not a top tier like snake, d3 or falco.
Right; and lack of match-up experience means you're not as skilled as you otherwise would be (this also goes for all match-ups).If you think of someone like lucario (myself as an example), i fail so much in lucario dittos because everyone i play has lucario experience but i don't because no one plays him
Adaption is a key part of playing ANYONE.Thing is as well, dittos is all about who can alter their playing style enough to beat their character.
If the spammer fails to adapt vs the ROB player he is likely not good enough to win on a high scale, ditto for the "close combat" style TL in a ditto.Eg, tlink. Lets say one tlink plays another, one of them is phenominal at spam and the other is better at close range. these 2 will fare differently against say a ROB (the close range guy probably doing better) but the spammer will most likely win the ditto
One Of Us One Of Us One Of Us, EM stop claiming me.
You took the words right out of my mouth with the "friends playing each other to know playstyles inside out" bit, that's what I was going to say to respond to your other point.The best dittos are Ganon Utilt/NeutB only onessooooo pro
Ok Alex, some of your points, fair enough, adaptation and all that. some people are simply better at adapting than others. Eg, Brad says he goes even against willz but does far worse than him in tournies. To me that says that will is better at adapting himself than brad. I concede that it's always a bit different when friends play each other, after all they know each other playstiles inside out which means that some people do better in those circumstances.
I King must defend his Crown, even if it under terms he is not agreeable toSmudge hates king dittos as much as I do, so I doubt he'd agree to it :D
Dittos are about as serious as teams to me.
Obviously, but we're talking about ridiculous ideas here. so if C beat A then we'd have this crazy A>B>C>A thing going on. where would we be then?Well, naturally A>B>C would also suggest that A>C.![]()
That's the thing, there's no loop like that. Inui logic suggests that if player A beats player B, and player B beats player C that:Obviously, but we're talking about ridiculous ideas here. so if C beat A then we'd have this crazy A>B>C>A thing going on. where would we be then?
Dayum, i wanna pick up a new character, its between 2 of em, i just need to decide which i prefer to use. Basicly luigi has been pretty much dropped entirely from tourny use now (i only used him in one tourney anyway)
It's not s simple as applying skill values though. if it was a case each letter represents a number we wouldn't be having this discussion. Those 'values' are represented by letters because this discussion isn't as simple as 3>2>1. Each other those 'players' plays differently against the other players and under different circumstances. To add to this as well stage choice comes in there too, we're getting freaky *** crazy here now. Lets assume all of the players are exact equal in skill but each ones plays better onone the 3 main neutrals (A on FD B on BF and C on SV) Which stage is played on will alter the results because each of those players knows how to make their prefered stage work to their advantage.That's the thing, there's no loop like that. Inui logic suggests that if player A beats player B, and player B beats player C that:
Player A will be better than player C.
and
Player A will beat player C.
Also, think about it numerically. Give them "skill values", how is A>B>C>A possible then? >_> Therefore in that case, A>B>C would suggest A>C.
True, but that's how Inui logic works, so that's how I represented it.It's not s simple as applying skill values though. if it was a case each letter represents a number we wouldn't be having this discussion. Those 'values' are represented by letters because this discussion isn't as simple as 3>2>1.
I agree that other factors greatly vary the results, it's not as clear cut as A>B>C.Each other those 'players' plays differently against the other players and under different circumstances. To add to this as well stage choice comes in there too, we're getting freaky *** crazy here now. Lets assume all of the players are exact equal in skill but each ones plays better onone the 3 main neutrals (A on FD B on BF and C on SV) Which stage is played on will alter the results because each of those players knows how to make their prefered stage work to their advantage.
Ok.Lets just forget that everyone should know how to play smashville considering whenever you stage strike SV is always left (as dooan proved at trios when he watched me stage strike with 3 different people, and this was with the 5 neutrals too, and result in SV every time
That's exactly what I was getting at.At what point did I say they we're not to be taken seriously? every match in a tournament is.
What I think was meant by "They don't mean anything" is that if D3 player A beats D3 player B, It doesn't make D3 player A a better D3 player overall, just that he was beater in that match.
I mean, I don't think I've ever won a D3 ditto, I've lost to D3's that haven't even entered a tournament, yet I've placed top 8 in countless tournaments, top 4 in some and even won a few, does that make the guy who's not entered any tournaments better than me? no, not at all.
Hahaha, me and my cousin always end up on smashville.The_Rake said:Lets just forget that everyone should know how to play smashville considering whenever you stage strike SV is always left (as dooan proved at trios when he watched me stage strike with 3 different people, and this was with the 5 neutrals too, and result in SV every time