DS (Touch Generation) Character?

[burrito]

No. The icons represent franchises, not characters.

I don't know how people came to the conclusion that the icons immediately confirm that a character will appear for that franchise.

Some people do think that, but that wasn't what this thread was saying. This is merely speculating the possibility of a DS character.

 

[PsychoIncarnate]

I'd say if any representative was to fill in as the icon 21 slot it would be dr. Lobe

But this is stupid, people and their theories. A stage does not mean a character has to come with it. what this thread is completely based on is making theories to support a theory. That's stupid guys and this stage =/= new character (DS or otherwise)

1) That's just an assumption

2) I never said there WAS going to be a character. I just created this thread to open up people's minds to possibilities to characters they shut out because "They don't believe they are worthy in Smash"

 

[KAFOR]

I apologize for my digression.

On topic, no, I don't think a Touch Generation character will appear, like I mention in an earlier post on this thread...

 

[Darkraid]

Maybe this icon will allow characters with smaller franchises to appear in brawl.

 

[LX120]

If a Touch Generation character actually did make it, I actually think Dr. Lobe would be a pretty neat idea. The success of Nintendo's training games shouldn't go unnoticed, and I think Dr. Lobe is at least deserving of a spot merely for that reason. Otherwise, EBA characters are also good choices - although I doubt anything more will really come from this.

 

[PsychoIncarnate]

I need to get some of the touch generation games...I have a DS with only 3 games...but have played the touch gen games and had fun...

Hella good a Sudoku!!!

...Saving money for Wii games though...**** lack of money...

 

[Talendime]

I think you guys just gotta get over the probable (for now) fact that an icon doesn't necessarily yield another character.
Exhibit A: Animal Crossing.

Just leave it for now, seriously.

 

[PsychoIncarnate]

I think you guys just gotta get over the probable (for now) fact that an icon doesn't necessarily yield another character.
Exhibit A: Animal Crossing.

Just leave it for now, seriously.

Ok now that's just a close minded assumption. Unless you can provide any kind of evidence it won't have a characterr

 

[smashbro29]

well its safe to assume because on the site minor things have the smash symbol so why just make a stage also its like that in the other smash games so people must have gotten really used to seeing a sybol with a character

 

[Talendime]

Ok now that's just a close minded assumption. Unless you can provide any kind of evidence it won't have a characterr

I'm not saying I can provide evidence that it won't have a character.
I'm saying nobody can provide evidence that it will have a character. So just don't worry about it for now.

 

[MegatronPwnsYou]

This whole boards is about speculating, why not worry about it?

 

[Sponge]

IF Somehow this icon has a character to represent, Something tells me its gonna be Mii's.

That music list was just too suspicious.

 

[freeman123]

What if they add "Sir Stylus" or whatever you want to call him as a DS character, and then icon #22 is the Wii logo and they add Mii as a Wii character. Then they'd have a character to represent Wii and a character to represent DS. That doesn't sound that unreasonable, does it?

 

[skullkidd]

I can't believe this is serious!
Maybe every stage just has it's own logo, not every character?

Nevermind, a DS that shines lights, pokes with a stylus, and snaps its screens at you definitely should be playable.

 

[PsychoIncarnate]

I can't believe this is serious!
Maybe every stage just has it's own logo, not every character?

Nevermind, a DS that shines lights, pokes with a stylus, and snaps its screens at you definitely should be playable.

Wow you seriously did not read the first page or any of the posts and decided to be a smartass before posting, didn't ya?

 

[burrito]

1. This thread never asserts that every icon has to have a character to represent it!!!

2. For you close minded people who keep saying that a character like this would never be in Brawl, give me one good reason why not. How about some reasoning?

 

[PrettyGoodYear]

1. This thread never asserts that every icon has to have a character to represent it!!!

2. For you close minded people who keep saying that a character like this would never be in Brawl, give me one good reason why not. How about some reasoning?

1. It sure is all over the place then.

2. My claim is, there won't be any character under THIS icon.

 

[freeman123]

1. This thread never asserts that every icon has to have a character to represent it!!!

2. For you close minded people who keep saying that a character like this would never be in Brawl, give me one good reason why not. How about some reasoning?

Their reasoning is that they think any character that doesn't show up on every character prediction list on ever place on the internet doesn't have a chance. God forbid anyone unexpected show up. It's not like Snake and Pokemon Trainer are in the game.

 

[PsychoIncarnate]

1. It sure is all over the place then.

2. My claim is, there won't be any character under THIS icon.

1) Read the first post

2) That is just an assumption and some people can have an opposing opinion. We won't know for certain until later

 

[burrito]

2. My claim is, there won't be any character under THIS icon.

Why couldn't there be a character under that symbol.

Their reasoning is that they think any character that doesn't show up on every character prediction list on ever place on the internet doesn't have a chance. God forbid anyone unexpected show up. It's not like Snake and Pokemon Trainer are in the game.

So far, it does seem that way. Really people, you do realize we are talking about Brawl, right? We are talking about the same game, right?

 

[PrettyGoodYear]

Why couldn't there be a character under that symbol.


So far, it does seem that way. Really people, you do realize we are talking about Brawl, right? We are talking about the same game, right?

Because it's a DS... it's hardware. What character would be under that symbol? It's hardware...

 

[Sonic The Hedgedawg]

also a reason isn't necessary.

There might not be a reason that it CAN'T be a character, but there is certainly no reason that it WILL be either.

it's completely neutral either way

 

[PsychoIncarnate]

also a reason isn't necessary.

There might not be a reason that it CAN'T be a character, but there is certainly no reason that it WILL be either.

it's completely neutral either way

Yes, exactly but there is always the possibility

 

[Sonic The Hedgedawg]

Yes, exactly but there is always the possibility

yeah... I'm just saying that it's using faulty logic to say that because there is a symbol there might be a character.

The possibility of a character is completely unnefected by the symbol.


are we in agreement? good.

 

[PsychoIncarnate]

yeah... I'm just saying that it's using faulty logic to say that because there is a symbol there might be a character.

The possibility of a character is completely unnefected by the symbol.


are we in agreement? good.

No I'm not...How can it be faulty when all I am saying is it is possible and no evidence to prove it's not possible?

 

[Brockman5]

well there could be a character because there is a symbol...
But true there is no evidence and I dont think there will be a character...

 

[Sonic The Hedgedawg]

No I'm not...How can it be faulty when all I am saying is it is possible and no evidence to prove it's not possible?

because there's no evidence to suggest it's more likely now... whether or not there is a character with that symbol is completely independent of the fact that a stage uses that symbol. it is niether more nor less likely and so saying that the stage has that symbol cannot be an effective argument on either side of the issue

 

[PsychoIncarnate]

because there's no evidence to suggest it's more likely now... whether or not there is a character with that symbol is completely independent of the fact that a stage uses that symbol. it is niether more nor less likely and so saying that the stage has that symbol cannot be an effective argument on either side of the issue

I never said there was going to be, I just suggested a possibility.

 

[Andy4Brawl_911]

Dr. Lobe can't use the symbol bedcause they released one of his games on the Wii, whilst if EBA was in im sure they'd have their own symbol, the symbol could be either for a made up character like Mr. Doodle(wasn't Mr. Game & Watch made up), It;s the symbol for Nintendo (which could be the Miis), You need to use your DS for the thing to be available or their just it's just a one of symbol

 

[PsychoIncarnate]

Dr. Lobe can't use the symbol bedcause they released one of his games on the Wii, whilst if EBA was in im sure they'd have their own symbol, the symbol could be either for a made up character like Mr. Doodle(wasn't Mr. Game & Watch made up), It;s the symbol for Nintendo (which could be the Miis), You need to use your DS for the thing to be available or their just it's just a one of symbol

Well since Wii music is using the DS Icon I don't see why that matters

 

[PrettyGoodYear]

Well since Wii music is using the DS Icon I don't see why that matters

But they kinda HAD TO since the DS has no music.

And this is a DS icon, not a Touch Generation icon.

 

[PsychoIncarnate]

But they kinda HAD TO since the DS has no music.

And this is a DS icon, not a Touch Generation icon.

Well either or...whatever. We don't really know what exactly it means until we get more updates

 

[PrettyGoodYear]

Well either or...whatever. We don't really know what exactly it means until we get more updates

What what means?

 

[burrito]

Because it's a DS... it's hardware. What character would be under that symbol? It's hardware...

Use your imagination, I know that Sakurai does.

also a reason isn't necessary.

There might not be a reason that it CAN'T be a character, but there is certainly no reason that it WILL be either.

it's completely neutral either way

A reason is necessary for those people who come and treat this thread as if it were blasphemy.

Otherwise, I wish people would stop with the OMG ICON =/= CHARACTER talk. Leave it to speculation please.

 

[Andy4Brawl_911]

I reckon it would make sense that if it has that DS ymbol it's only unlockable if oyu connect your DS

 

[Chidosengan]

You know what I just realized?

As soon as one small thing comes up that supposedly gives chances, even something that doesn't connect to anything, everyone jumps aboard the band wagon and agrees.

But if its something that hints a character may not be playable, everyone protests, and look for alternatives.

Isn't fanboyism awesome?

 

[PsychoIncarnate]

You know what I just realized?

As soon as one small thing comes up that supposedly gives chances, even something that doesn't connect to anything, everyone jumps aboard the band wagon and agrees.

But if its something that hints a character may not be playable, everyone protests, and look for alternatives.

Isn't fanboyism awesome?

Are you implying I am a fanboy? Because I don't even own any of these potetial characters games

 

[PrettyGoodYear]

Use your imagination, I know that Sakurai does.

Fine, let's create a support thread for Mr. Dual Screen ¬¬

 

[Doggalina]

The Icon could stands for the "Touch Generation" (Which unfortunately fits with the Icon Theory)

That's that crazy alphabetical "theory". The real icon theory goes like this:

THE REAL ICON THEORY IS THAT:

1: Smash Bros.
2-11: Series introduced in Smash 64.
12-14: Series introduced in Melee.
15 and up: Series introduced in Brawl.

This has not been disproved so far. The only thing this can PROVE is that Game & Watch is in Brawl somehow.

The DS icon, (#21) is NOT in a seperate section. If it was, that would mean there is only one more series to be represented in Brawl, and there are too many for that too be possible. (Pikmin, Golden Sun, Megaman, etc.)

 

[PsychoIncarnate]

That's that crazy alphabetical "theory". The real icon theory goes like this:

Yes, the Alphabetical part is bull****...I realize that. I was one of the first people to say that but they stuck by it