WeirdChillFever
Smash Hero
I feel like people only go against the grain because they vehemently oppose people liking Crash or something. Honestly, I don’t even mind cyclic debate as long as it isn’t this self-aware charade. I still think there’s potential in a Pokémon debate, Master Chief still would be cool to see regardless of how many times we talk about him.It's not even about people disagreeing with you. It's just that all discussion has been done ad nauseam for the past few years for almost every character, and with the lack of leakers this time, it's even more obvious that the discussion has been extremely stall.
Sure, sometimes you have someone who pops up and suggest another character, but that doesn't last forever.
I really wish now that they would do a double-reveal. I'm not going to say that I don't care at all, but clearly not as much as two years ago. More characters is always cool but without massive gameplay changes, I'll only play the character for a week, play its classic mode and move on.
Now if they added Smash Run 2.0...
Cynicism has no place in my speculation anymore. If people play to win or think they’re above hype because they’d rather be vindicative and right instead of enjoying shilling their faves like Sakurai playing a Fire Emblem game, be my guest but I won’t appease to them in my speculation.
Again, I don’t mind the cyclic debate. It just gets tiring when people turn all Family Guy about it and become self-aware to drive the point home how tiring it is and how diverse speculation would be if they were the king of anything.We've already seen how this thread functions.
1-2 people isn't going to be able to steer this thread's direction for any meaningful amount of time, and even if it does for awhile, the entire rest of the speculation community off-site will be no better, if not worse.