FlareHabanero
Banned via Warnings
For those that haven't seen the new trailer.
(I always loved that voice.)
(I always loved that voice.)
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
That is one of the things I've been thinking. Given, Sakurai is a lot picker than they were with PSABR.Well seen how Fat Princess got in PSABR as the PSNetwork rep it is actually possible. Maybe with a Pushmo/Crashmo stage/assist.
That's not entirely true. If done better, a Playstation All-Stars roster could have been awesome, maybe even better than Brawl. It's Superbot's fault if they preferred some 3rd party characters like Big Daddy or Isaac Clarke over true PS icons like Crash, Spyro or Lara Croft for example. Also they didn't put any Team ICO rep, and Square Enix basically told Sony to go **** itself. So obviously to make an acceptable roster they were bound to add some obscure character. Jak & Daxter, Ratchet & Clank, Sly Cooper, Sir Daniel alone are great characters. The game simply wasn't supported at all and it turned out mediocre at best (not only for the roster, the gameplay itself it's broken more than Brawl's). And anyway a lot of retro Nintendo characters are a one-game character like Mach Rider or Balloon Fighter, do you really think they deserve the spot more than Dillon, which is new and with a second game on the way?Of course Sakurai is pickier than what PSABR chose: Nintendo has a huge library of lovable franchises and characters that Sony could only dream of. PSABR kinda looked like they were scraping the bottom of the barrel for characters.
Anywho, the trailer is nice but I would like to see more gameplay footage in a future trailer, especially showing off how StreetPass will work and giving more reasons why Dillon should be considered for Smash.
I think we all do.So who at this point shares my opinion of Dillon being pretty dang likely?
I doubt itThat's not entirely true. If done better, a Playstation All-Stars roster could have been awesome, maybe even better than Brawl. It's Superbot's fault if they preferred some 3rd party characters like Big Daddy or Isaac Clarke over true PS icons like Crash, Spyro or Lara Croft for example. Also they didn't put any Team ICO rep, and Square Enix basically told Sony to go **** itself. So obviously to make an acceptable roster they were bound to add some obscure character. Jak & Daxter, Ratchet & Clank, Sly Cooper, Sir Daniel alone are great characters. The game simply wasn't supported at all and it turned out mediocre at best (not only for the roster, the gameplay itself it's broken more than Brawl's). And anyway a lot of retro Nintendo characters are a one-game character like Mach Rider or Balloon Fighter, do you really think they deserve the spot more than Dillon, which is new and with a second game on the way?
Lol c'mon it's obvious you're biased. I mean you consider Ratchet & Clank two over muscled dark action stars? Lol. You don't like Sony's IPs, more like you don't know Sony's IPs.I doubt it
The ONLY character playstation has that I have ANY interest in is sackboy. The rest are just over muscled actions stars and dark and serious crap.
I don't like sony's IPs
I like Nintendo more too but you're opinion simply sound fanboy. Did you ever own a Playstation system? Did you ever played Sly Cooper, or the first three Spyro games? C'mon really.I also don't care about them.
But there is no way Sony has anything that would match Nintendo
The first three games (the only ones which count) are exclusives. We're OT but you're avoiding the subject anyway, so we should simply stop talking.Spyro is not a Sony IP
Well then Sly Cooper, Jak & Daxter, Ratchet & Clank, Sir Daniel Fortesque are. What do you have to say about them? They're too manly? You're arguments are like the ones who say that Nintendo characters are all for kids. It's stupid and ignorant, simply.I had no interest in talking about it in the first place. Doesn't matter if they were exclusive. They aren't Sony characters
While the roster selection of Sony Smash is bad, that's not the only reason it was bad. Still, the selection doesn't help. One of the reason Sakurai has stuck to the focus on Nintenod is coherency and uniqueness. When you can pick any character on the planet, it feels a lot less interesting.That's not entirely true. If done better, a Playstation All-Stars roster could have been awesome, maybe even better than Brawl. It's Superbot's fault if they preferred some 3rd party characters like Big Daddy or Isaac Clarke over true PS icons like Crash, Spyro or Lara Croft for example. Also they didn't put any Team ICO rep, and Square Enix basically told Sony to go **** itself. So obviously to make an acceptable roster they were bound to add some obscure character. Jak & Daxter, Ratchet & Clank, Sly Cooper, Sir Daniel alone are great characters. The game simply wasn't supported at all and it turned out mediocre at best (not only for the roster, the gameplay itself it's broken more than Brawl's). And anyway a lot of retro Nintendo characters are a one-game character like Mach Rider or Balloon Fighter, do you really think they deserve the spot more than Dillon, which is new and with a second game on the way?
Funny thing, long ago, I wanted Spike from Ape Escape to be in Super Smash Bros. because I loved Ape Escape to my heart and that Spike looked like a character from Nintendo, until years later I realized Spike was a Sony character.Well then Sly Cooper, Jak & Daxter, Ratchet & Clank, Sir Daniel Fortesque are. What do you have to say about them? They're too manly? You're arguments are like the ones who say that Nintendo characters are all for kids. It's stupid and ignorant, simply.
...I noticed right off the bat. Lol
Evil intentions.Why didn't you say anything?
WatTuco Benedillon Pacifico