Big post incoming. Forgive me if I'm a bit rusty, its been a while.
To answer Swords, my particular actions are just to give further information into what I've been noticing. a good example is Ronike, I was talking to him recently about his own actions. Notice what he did with his recent vote, he voted me only a few moments after you voted me; my 'ooh ohh lynch me' comment probably went off as a 'easy lynch' thought. He pulled up some stupid information (none of which were true, he says i jump on the wagon that's most convenient, however iirc my last vote on d1 was on you wasn't it OS?) Then ignores his mistake after the vote has been cast.
Lol Roxy, nice try. Learn to play please. Let's take a look at my vote post.
And then theres Roxy. Let's f*ckin lynch this moron please. He hasn't read the **** thread, he jumps on whatever wagon is convenient, and he's just f*ckin annoying.
Unvote Vote Roxy
Yes, it does say that his jumping is a reason [which he does BTW, cover that in a minute], but also that he skims which is just as big of a point to me. Further more, when OS questioned me about my vote, I further explained my reasons:
Ugh, smashboards killed my big post... Cliffnotes:
Roxy hasn't made any stances he can't really take back by saying "lol, just kidding" nor will he if we let him continue this posting style
The color thing was super scummy to me.
His uselessness is different that say, Gordito's. At least the latter is trying and could get better.
He's just posted nothing besides the color thing. And in mafia nothing is something.
So its far from just the wagoning.
Now, onto the points themselves:
You don't post metadata, period. The post PM information such as the color of my pm role is posting metadata imo. Would a mafia member be able to post the correct color in comparison to a townie? No, therefore it's unfair. Claiming is fine because in the end, a mafia can do the same thing as you.
How and in what way is this pro-town in any way? You say it's unfair, well not really. Chances are the mod has taken precautionary actions, such as not giving out colors or having the town color in the OP. And if not, well then we get a free mafia member. 1. Single. It's not like we get the whole team, so its hardly game destroying, so there's no real reason for you to be flipping out this much. Unless you're scum tryna protect your scumbuddies.
Ronike said:
His uselessness is different that say, Gordito's. At least the latter is trying and could get better.
I don't really care about this game, even when I do the information is overlooked or small things that should've already been picked up.
Alright, so it's time to step it up. I was on the verge of quitting because god dammit, OS your posts are like a large piping pile of obnoxious.
Who cares, we're killing swords right? les goooo.
EBWOP: I'm just going to troll until I find something else that OS can say is dumb.
4 different posts where you admit yourself that you don't care about this game [well 3 and 1 that's enough of a troll to show you don't care about this game]. People that "don't care" about the game tend to be mafia giving excuses for not contributing, mafia that is bored because they don't have to hunt for town or their scumbuddies are boring or w/e, or in worst case an utterly useless townie. More than willing to lynch this.
Ronike said:
He's just posted nothing besides the color thing. And in mafia nothing is something.
Before I made this post, find me one place where you contributed to the game. I dare ya.
Ronike said:
he jumps on whatever wagon is convenient
You don't have to vote to jump on a wagon. Saying your behind the wagon, throwing suspicion onto the wagon, or even just nudging people, its all the same as jumping on the wagon, its just less traceable, so MAFIA tends to do it.
Now for examples:
To answer Swords, my particular actions are just to give further information into what I've been noticing. a good example is Ronike, I was talking to him recently about his own actions. Notice what he did with his recent vote, he voted me only a few moments after you voted me; my 'ooh ohh lynch me' comment probably went off as a 'easy lynch' thought. He pulled up some stupid information (none of which were true, he says i jump on the wagon that's most convenient, however iirc my last vote on d1 was on you wasn't it OS?) Then ignores his mistake after the vote has been cast.
Btw X1, My plays are still Gordito and Swords just for the principle of not helping, Ronike on a close lynch though.
3 wagons here, me Gordito, and swords.
First off, Tom said he was going to check up on his ability to drop out of this mafia game, and hasn't really come back to do anything. Even for the time period he was here, his posts weren't of much help (questions with no weight, etc.). Now he hasn't even come back. We'll definitely either need a replacement soon or for him to step it up. (i know this is a quality -everyone and their grandmother- can see from this thread, i just wnted to point it out).
Secondly, this is more of a hunch, but this whole thing with everyone agreeing so, calmly, really gives me this edge that most of our perceptions are in the wrong direction. Many people in this game are having this odd aura of invincibility. OS and Swiss being the main two i'm pointing towards. While I understand that they were, in fact, the most active plays in the game, it bugs me that everyone seems overly willing to not approach them in any form. On top of this, gheb was a strong player, however wasn't OS also a 'strong' player by his knowledge? Why wasn't he the night play. ;X
Nudging Tom and OS wagons here.
Wow absolutely no one wants to give OVerswarm or swiss any vote love.
Vrael's at L2 regardless of everyone talking **** about swords.
OS and Swiss
I'm interested in how you can call me more useless than say, gorditoboy69, who's read didn't show any strong leads towards anything.
Nudging GBoy.
So that's 7 wagons you've nudged or been on in spirit. And I'm not even counting the multiple times you've tried to push OS [3] and Swords [at least 4, if not 5]. So don't go sayin you aren't jumpin on every wagon.
Now just to address your most recent post in full:
Alright, let's see what's going on here in this thread.
For starters, I will answer Swordancer's question, because that's the first question I saw this morning. This game is boring, with the delicate blend of inactivity and ignorance it's not very easy to scumhunt efficiently. We find ourselves looking too hard into thing,
[collapse=a good example of looking too deep into bull****]for example OS won't vote Swords because of 'three dumb people on the lynch'. And? Hunches are hunches, and sometimes they lead in the right direction, especially if a large deal of the group agrees on swords' scummy actions, why would "three dumb people" -truly- be a viable reason to not lynch someone you think is scummy. [/collapse]
I don't really care about this game, even when I do the information is overlooked or small things that should've already been picked up.
A] Why would you collapse anything, it just makes it hard for some people to read?
B] This game is NOT inactive at all. So don't go complainin. Certain people are inactive, but the game itself has plenty of activity to draw scum tells from.
C] There's ignorance in every game, so again, not a valid point. In addition, just because people don't agree with you does not mean they are ignorant, just that you've made a bad point. Therefore, I doubt there's anywhere near as much ignorance as you think there is.
D] There's no such thing as looking too hard into something
E] He didn't say he WON'T vote swords, just that he is reluctant due to the people on the wagon. There's a big difference. I do believe he has agreed the swords is scummy, just that we have other roads to explore ATM.
F] Things are missed in every game, that's why you bring them up later. Invalid point.
G] If you hate this game so much, ****in replace out instead of complaining.
I wouldn't consider anything i've done to be anti-town (except for one instance i will discuss later). Most of what i've done is fluff, responses to people's questions, or discussion about people's play habits or inconsistencies. The only thing that could possibly be considered anti-town would be me saying "ooh! ooh! Lynch me!" a page or two back. This is merely me -not liking- this game and trolling like I like to do sometimes. While I agree it's anti-town, I wouldn't take it as 'omgz scum kill im'; Vrael literally pulled the 'I give up lynch me" card and look where that got us.
A] Fluff IS anti-town. Its distracting from points, and it makes it impossible to draw scumtells. Hence, anti town
B] So you're saying the color thing is in no way anti-town? o_O
.
