Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
EPIC FAAIIILLLerr, What's Up With Luigi Having His Own Color?
"green Means The Character Is Luigi"
NSS why do you hate Roy_R so much? unless if thats with a 'joking' attitude. and i'm gonna ask again, cus my question was a little back and may be no one will see it, does the tournament have to have only competetive players?
I'm joking lol >_>.NSS why do you hate Roy_R so much? unless if thats with a 'joking' attitude. and i'm gonna ask again, cus my question was a little back and may be no one will see it, does the tournament have to have only competetive players?
This guy is so polite and loving. There should be more people like this on smashboards.Ankoku,
I would like to sincerely thank you for your continued effort into this list. I feel that your doing the community a huge favour by both centralizing tournament data, but also processing it into an easy to interpret and understand format. This will let the community dis spell myths and re-enforce facts both alike.
I check this thread everyday, but have never actually posted in it, nor shown my gratitude... so...
Thank you. ^^
I'm cool like that. I blame it on my Canadian upbringing though. =PThis guy is so polite and loving. There should be more people like this on smashboards.
sorry for lack of understanding, but what is 2008 syndrome?
Like me mirite?I think it's the whole new group of n00bish people that spawned from the Brawl release. Most people that joined in June and July are less annoying (lucky you) but May and March join dates usually have little important to say despite their enormous post count.
I don't actually believe in it, since I've seen lots of great people who joined in '08.
BTW h4rdcor3, what's the competitive scene like at Joker's tournaments?
I don't mind cocky and egotistical. A lot of vets are like that too (*cough*Yuna*cough*). However, I hate the cockiness and egotism when they have no useful input and continue to insist that they do.
2008 syndrome refers to the influx of egotistical and cocky 2008 posters that came with the debut of Brawl. Now, although some of those posters have proven to be highly intelligent and useful to the communities growth, many of them choose to learn nothing nor contribute anything to the community. It has made much of the board turn into a caliber that is much lower then it was back in Melee's days.
I don't mind cocky and egotistical. A lot of vets are like that too (*cough*Yuna*cough*). However, I hate the cockiness and egotism when they have no useful input and continue to insist that they do.
Wrong-o, we don't care about who's doing ****ty, we want to see how often they are making it to the top. And I dont think we are adding too many noob tourneys dood, if we are, I'm out, >.>^ i disagree with that. don't get me wrong its a nice list (thank you Ankoku for doing this) but the list does not take into account how many of each character was there. i mean if there is a tournament with 20 people and 10 are snake and only 2 snakes make it to the top 8 this list would show that snake is did great when really he did not do very well in that tournament. i know this is a little bit of an extreme example but it does get the point across.
Also the list does not (b/c it would be impossble to) take in to account how good the players who were there were. one great player who plays pikachu could win a tournament against bad people using mk,snake and ddd.
once again let me say i really like this list and think it is great i am just saying why this is not a end all be all list for a tier list
^ i disagree with that. don't get me wrong its a nice list (thank you Ankoku for doing this) but the list does not take into account how many of each character was there. i mean if there is a tournament with 20 people and 10 are snake and only 2 snakes make it to the top 8 this list would show that snake is did great when really he did not do very well in that tournament. i know this is a little bit of an extreme example but it does get the point across.
If you want to contribute tournament results, please provide the following:
MAKE SURE IT WAS AT LEAST 16 PEOPLE IN THE TOURNAMENT
Number of entrants
Entry fee
Where it was (what state it was in, or something)
Top 8, with character main for each of the top 8
Link to tournament page or results page
you guys missed the point i was just saying why this is not a tier list thing. and i know snake is not a bad character. and i know its accurate list i am just pointing out it takes more then this list to make a tier list b/c there could be some problems with it. also how do you know a couple of noob tournaments have not slipped in? Also just b/c i joined smash boards this year does not mean i am new to tournaments.
and of course popularity plays into how well some one will do. i mean mathematically you are wong the % chance a character will do better goes up with the more people who play them. its simple math here
I hate to break happy time, but Yoshi is unranked again according to the "most up to date" list.No fighting please. This is a happy time, Yoshi is actually ranked.
In melee Ice Climber and Jigglypuff were unpopular but were still **** good characters. People knew they could do well, it's just there wasn't enough good Ice Climbers and Jigglypuffs to go around.
Statistics class would teach you that results fix themselves over time. The more data Ankoku collects, the better the data will be. Unpopular character are unpopular for a reason. If they are effective characters that can win tournaments, they will climb. If they are okay characters, they stay in the okay amount of usage. Even this early, we can see some patterns forming. After a year, this list will be the most effective list there is, period.
Sure, at this point, its fairly obvious that the middle section and down is very inconsistent right now, but frankly, that part of the list doesn't really matter. The top and high portions, dealing with the characters that I'm most likely to run into tournaments, is the part thats really important. I come to this list so I can ask myself "what matchups do I really need to prepare for?" when I decide to go to tournaments outside of my immediate area. Thats what tier lists are practically for. Merely telling us who's better isn't veyr useful. Whats useful is telling us which matchups to prepare for, which this list does the BEST out of any list that you can possibly make.
Any list created from Matchups and theory is only useful for showing parallels with the tournament data. Nothing else matters when your using the tier list for its practical purpose...
We only knew they were good characters because select players were winning tournaments with them. But not everyone could pick them up and win tournaments. But, because we knew that Mango and Hylian could absolutely **** with those characters, we knew that they COULD be viable.In melee Ice Climber and Jigglypuff were unpopular but were still **** good characters. People knew they could do well, it's just there wasn't enough good Ice Climbers and Jigglypuffs to go around.
We already ****ing know it's not a tier list you fool..you guys missed the point i was just saying why this is not a tier list thing.
I'm glad I stopped something from getting hit by a 2x4. Especially if it was going to be a person.We already ****ing know it's not a tier list you fool..
Fish Keeper Timmay is not rude, wtf are you smoking.
FishKeeperTimmay, having people like you around kinda eases my urge to hit something with a 2x4.
i was telling the guy before my 1st post it was not a tier list and/or might not be more accuare then a tier list when it is madeWe already ****ing know it's not a tier list you fool..
Fish Keeper Timmay is not rude, wtf are you smoking.
FishKeeperTimmay, having people like you around kinda eases my urge to hit something with a 2x4.