Louie G.
Smash Hero
Ike isn't even comparable to Lucas.Lucas never had any transformations though, so I don't see any reason for why he should be cut, especially since Ike managed to come back.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Ike isn't even comparable to Lucas.Lucas never had any transformations though, so I don't see any reason for why he should be cut, especially since Ike managed to come back.
I don't think thats true. Remember, all playable characters were chosen at the beginning of development, possibly because Sakurai wants to make sure that he will have enough time to finish them all. So if Lucas was chosen at the beginning of development, hes guaranteed.Exactly. He wouldn't have enough time. Lucas is the (sadly, as a Lucas main) least necessary character from Brawl, and would get cut if Sakurai does not have enough time to put in the rest of the characters. Time constraints, right?
As far as objective reasons, it's unclear at this point. To add though, Lucas is much more like Ness is than Ike is like Marth. Lucas wasn't a complete clone (far from it), but similarities were there. Perhaps that was enough for Sakurai to deem him unnecessary/low priority.Lucas never had any transformations though, so I don't see any reason for why he should be cut, especially since Ike managed to come back.
If Lucas is indeed cut, I think it will be because of this. To have two characters with similar moves is one thing (that people already go into conniptions over), but to have two characters with such similar moves that each have 3 customizations on them is just getting ridiculously redundant. Toon Link is an exception, in my mind, because he is visually extremely different and represents a solid half of a hugely iconic franchise.Just because starters were never cut in the span of three games doesn't mean it will never happen.
I mean, it's only three games. Patterns will be broken.
Well customization exists.
I'm sure Ness would have Lucas's specials as custom moves and vice versa.
Mewtwo, Roy, and Dr. Mario were chosen at the beginning of development because Sakurai thought he had enough time, so they're guaranteed-- oh wait.I don't think thats true. Remember, all playable characters were chosen at the beginning of development, possibly because Sakurai wants to make sure that he will have enough time to finish them all. So if Lucas was chosen at the beginning of development, hes guaranteed.
Everyone thought Ike would be cut, but he's back.
I thought everyone expected Ike to be gone because everyone expected Chrom to replace him, kind of like how he (may or may not have) replaced Roy in Brawl.Everyone thought Ike would be cut, but he's back.
While I somewhat agree with Falco, Ganondorf's in a league of his own as far as iconicness. He's in no danger.If Lucas is indeed cut, I think it will be because of this. To have two characters with similar moves is one thing (that people already go into conniptions over), but to have two characters with such similar moves that each have 3 customizations on them is just getting ridiculously redundant. Toon Link is an exception, in my mind, because he is visually extremely different and represents a solid half of a hugely iconic franchise.
However, all that applies to Lucas here also applies to Falco... (and even, dare I say it... Ganondorf...)
I think (emphasis on think) that Sal/his leaker mentioned they were considering it hours before E3 happened.How are we so sure there's DLC?
Isn't it also a possibility that those 3 were unused because Sakurai decided against them? Well...maybe not Mewtwo and Roy.Mewtwo, Roy, and Dr. Mario were chosen at the beginning of development because Sakurai thought he had enough time, so they're guaranteed-- oh wait.
Sal, basically. Have you read the third Sal leak? It's in there.How are we so sure there's DLC?
Why would he take the time to start developing them and then immediately just decide "nope, never mind"? There's no way he started development and then decided against them, whilst in development.Isn't it also a possibility that those 3 were unused because Sakurai decided against them? Well...maybe not Mewtwo and Roy.
Gematsu's leaker says there will be character DLC, that's how.How are we so sure there's DLC?
It still seems dumb to cut Lucas, considering that Toon Link is similar to Link, and yet he returned. Likewise, Falco's specials are similar to Fox's.As far as objective reasons, it's unclear at this point. To add though, Lucas is much more like Ness is than Ike is like Marth. Lucas wasn't a complete clone (far from it), but similarities were there. Perhaps that was enough for Sakurai to deem him unnecessary/low priority.
Oh, I agree about Ganondorf. I'm sure (as sure as I ever get when speculating, that is) that he'll be back; I'm just making comment that if Lucas or anyone else is cut because of redundancy but Ganondorf stays the same, Lucy's gonna have some 'splanin to do. (cookies for getting my references)While I somewhat agree with Falco, Ganondorf's in a league of his own as far as iconicness. He's in no danger.
You forget Toon Link's importance to the Zelda series, it's probably the reason why Toon Link returned.It still seems dumb to cut Lucas, considering that Toon Link is similar to Link, and yet he returned. Likewise, Falco's specials are similar to Fox's.
There y'go.Thanks guys and Forbidden Seven?
They could've been a little more creative with his moves..You forget Toon Link's importance to the Zelda series, it's probably the reason why Toon Link returned.
Lucas is a main protagonist himself though, and Mother 3 is a mainstream game as well. Sure, the franchise may be dead, but keeping Lucas around would at least maintain some dignity for it.You forget Toon Link's importance to the Zelda series, it's probably the reason why Toon Link returned.
You can blame Sakurai's views on the necessity of a Child Link for that.It still seems dumb to cut Lucas, considering that Toon Link is similar to Link, and yet he returned. Likewise, Falco's specials are similar to Fox's.
I Love Lucy for Smash.Oh, I agree about Ganondorf. I'm sure (as sure as I ever get when speculating, that is) that he'll be back; I'm just making comment that if Lucas or anyone else is cut because of redundancy but Ganondorf stays the same, Lucy's gonna have some 'splanin to do. (cookies for getting my references)
I'm just tossing assumptions around. Maybe it seemed like a good idea at one point.Why would he take the time to start developing them and then immediately just decide "nope, never mind"? There's no way he started development and then decided against them, whilst in development.
You can probably tell why I hate leaks, because they make people think that everything is set in stone, when in truth, we can't really predict the future at all.You can blame Sakurai's views on the necessity of a Child Link for that.
But regardless, whether or not it's dumb, it's more than likely happening. Poor Lucas. :/ Ah well, there's DLC for that.
Not gonna main them because Wario will forever hold that spot, but I'll use them.If the Chorus Boys are announced as characters, I'm totally going to main them!
It may not be set in stone, but considering how well this one holds up, it should probably be taken as basically fact at this point.You can probably tell why I hate leaks, because they make people think that everything is set in stone, when in truth, we can't really predict the future at all.
A little. I remember when Brawl's roster was leaked people cried foul on the leak. "PFFFF no way in hell would they cut Mewtwo." And "there's no way Sakurai would disappoint us like that. Mewtwo is a completely original character and fan-favorite." The fact of the matter is...well yes, he could.Is it wrong that I believe the Gematsu leak is fake because of them predicting Lucas isn't returning? Just asking because cutting any character at this point, especially Lucas, is a little dumb.
Like dude, like this leak, like, I **** you not dude, sounds like this dude needs to like retake like 5th grade grammar class dude. I'm sorry I can't take this leak seriously because I can't take the way he "speaks" seriously.Found the image of the leak.
Personally, this is my favorite leak. Just the irony of this dude potentially being the one to leak info. So if I'm a little too nice to it, just know it is because I find it hilarious
It still may have been though. Maybe something seperate but connected? I dont know. My brain works weird. But for some reason it lines up that info with this leak. Stupid brain
I know it wasn't entirely clear, but honestly, I don't consider Mewtwo as guaranteed to return, nor would do cry if he don't make it. Overall, yes, Lucas being cut is my biggest doubt at this point.A little. I remember when Brawl's roster was leaked people cried foul on the leak. "PFFFF no way in hell would they cut Mewtwo." And "There's no way Sakurai would disappoint us like that. Mewtwo is a completely original character and fan-favorite." The fact of the matter is...well yes, he could.
Whether or not Lucas is cut remains to be seen since it was only brought up as a possibility. Even then, the wording of "get the cut" isn't even entirely clear.
Neither do I. I was trying to draw a comparison between your statement and the reaction to the Brawl leak. Basically I don't think it's a good idea to dismiss it just because a fan favorite character could possible be cut, because people did the same for the Brawl leak which said Mewtwo was cut.I know it wasn't entirely clear, but honestly, I don't consider Mewtwo as guaranteed to return, nor would do cry if he don't make it.
Hmm, that would be quite the surprise. I'd also be disappointed if that's ALL we got Monday. How would he not be a clone? I see Dark Pit as being just an alternate skin for Pit.Dark Pit will be revealed monday. i can see it
No it should not. It will be treated as fact once it is fact, there is not a logical reason to "essentially" treat it as fact. In fact, we should treat it as false until it is proven to be true because it is a LEAK. Technically, each and every leak that asserts that their leak pertains to the Gematsu leak would have to (essentially) be treated as fact in that event. You can see why that is fallacious, no doubt.It may not be set in stone, but considering how well this one holds up, it should probably be taken as basically fact at this point.
And if he said it, I'd probably believe it. He's been spot on so far, so I don't see what you're trying to say here."Goomba's going to be playable in Smash! Sal Romano said so!"