Nu~
Smash Dreamer
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2012
- Messages
- 4,332
- NNID
- EquinoXYZ
Doesn't a certain SmashChu want to apologize?
Last edited by a moderator:
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I know. It just seems odd that they'd confirm Pac-Man, but NOT have an actual screenshot of him in the game.Dude, it's confirmed on Nintendo of America's Twitter.
This is real. This isn't something someone made up.
Uhm, that's what I'm saying, there are literally 33 confirmed playable characters.That's not what that says.
I tried closing and reopening the tab a few times; it's working now, though.
They'll have some right after this, no doubt.I know. It just seems odd that they'd confirm Pac-Man, but NOT have an actual screenshot of him in the game.
Like I said early. They did the same thing after the digital event. They do the whole event/round table and then after is when they update the website and so on and so forth. It's not odd for them to do thatI know. It just seems odd that they'd confirm Pac-Man, but NOT have an actual screenshot of him in the game.
I'm sad this was the only character related content we got. The people asking questions really disappointed me"All of the characters to consider were on our internal roster from the beginning of development. We had a slot for a new Pokemon reserved, but did not way for X and Y. We decided to use Greninja well before X/Y came out, based on early reference drawings."
So that ends that debate.
I agree, I was really hoping someone would ask how the character decision process works.I'm sad this was the only character related content we got. The people asking questions really disappointed me
You have to realize, Sakurai wouldn't have answered those questions even if they did come up. The reporters are probably very good at their job to have made it into a round-table discussion with the director of what could be the biggest game of the year. They asked questions they knew they would receive answers to, and that could provide interesting information. It's a sneaky game they have to play in order to get anything real out of him.I'm sad this was the only character related content we got. The people asking questions really disappointed me
well uou have to realize that being a journalist includes getting answers that people most likely wouldn't find sometimes. And journalism is a sneaky job lol. You have to play the game to get some answers. Just like the greninja question was simple enough for him to answer but it also allowed for us to get questions to some of the other questions we hadYou have to realize, Sakurai wouldn't have answered those questions even if they did come up. The reporters are probably very good at their job to have made it into a round-table discussion with the director of what could be the biggest game of the year. They asked questions they knew they would receive answers to, and that could provide interesting information. It's a sneaky game they have to play in order to get anything real out of him.
Oh, okay.Uhm, that's what I'm saying, there are literally 33 confirmed playable characters.
I don't think as many people hate Pac-Man as one would think, just that those who do are incredibly vocal about it. That being said, I think he's a mediocre choice, personally. Not because he's actually a poor choice, but because he's not my first choice. There are dozens of characters I would prefer to have seen, but I'm fine with Pac-Man. I think a lot of people fall into the same category.Ok, can somebody tell me why people hate Pac-Man so much? I can understand the method of reveal was strange, same with the fact that he was leaked so the surprise was lessened. However, he's not a bad choice at all and makes sense since you know, Namco-Bandai. It's just that Pac-Man appears to be a puppy-kicking hitler who is also cancer and is also a talentless hack, judging from people's reactions.
Think of it like this: an investigator doesn't get 25 minutes and one question with the victim of assault. They can sit around asking them dozens of questions to get a description of the person and the events. I don't think asking him one question that you can't even follow-up thereafter is a very viable method of receiving a plethora of information. Like I said, you have to ask questions that will get an answer to. When somebody didn't, i.e. the guy who asked about the Ice Climbers directly, he was ignored.well uou have to realize that being a journalist includes getting answers that people most likely wouldn't find sometimes. And journalism is a sneaky job lol. You have to play the game to get some answers. Just like the greninja question was simple enough for him to answer but it also allowed for us to get questions to some of the other questions we had
As stated in the Pac Man thread, no gloating please. Further trolling will result in infractions.Doesn't a certain SmashChu want to apologize?
Ah, of course. The vocal minority was the obvious answer I overlooked for some reason.I don't think as many people hate Pac-Man as one would think, just that those who do are incredibly vocal about it. That being said, I think he's a mediocre choice, personally. Not because he's actually a poor choice, but because he's not my first choice. There are dozens of characters I would prefer to have seen, but I'm fine with Pac-Man. I think a lot of people fall into the same category.
I apologize. I got the memo late, and I just felt that he needed to apologize for calling us all "13 year olds who don't know any better" You can read the post in the pacman forum if you would like to.As stated in the Pac Man thread, no gloating please. Further trolling will result in infractions.
Why people keep saying 33 character? there are 34 and now 35 with Mr. Game and WatchUhm, that's what I'm saying, there are literally 33 confirmed playable characters.
I was wondering this myself. The way he was shown in the video points to him returning as playable, I believe, but I have my doubts as well. It wasn't terribly... conclusive. And he hasn't shown up on the main website yet, either. All in all, I'm not really sure about his fate right now.So... what about Mr. Game&Watch?
We know that Shulk is comming so almost 43 prediction wins for me I guess.
I'm not saying you ask specifics. That's ridiculous of course he's not gonna answer that. But it would've been nice to have seen more questions like the greninja one where we figured out that the slots were already decided for characters.I don't think as many people hate Pac-Man as one would think, just that those who do are incredibly vocal about it. That being said, I think he's a mediocre choice, personally. Not because he's actually a poor choice, but because he's not my first choice. There are dozens of characters I would prefer to have seen, but I'm fine with Pac-Man. I think a lot of people fall into the same category.
Think of it like this: an investigator doesn't get 25 minutes and one question with the victim of assault. They can sit around asking them dozens of questions to get a description of the person and the events. I don't think asking him one question that you can't even follow-up thereafter is a very viable method of receiving a plethora of information. Like I said, you have to ask questions that will get an answer to. When somebody didn't, i.e. the guy who asked about the Ice Climbers directly, he was ignored.
Well they already said that Mr. Game & Watch is comming back as a playable character so don't worryI was wondering this myself. The way he was shown in the video points to him returning as playable, I believe, but I have my doubts as well. It wasn't terribly... conclusive. And he hasn't shown up on the main website yet, either. All in all, I'm not really sure about his fate right now.
The other 2? you mean Palutena and the Miis?I'm okay with Pac-Man. The other two, not so much.
*sigh* Official Super Smash Bros website wise there are currently 33 confirmed playable characters regardless of any character alluded among them. When Mr Game&Watch gets his own page there will be 34.Why people keep saying 33 character? there are 34 and now 35 with Mr. Game and Watch
Probably from the game where Pacman is a jerk to everyone. Pacman 2 on SNES probablyCouple of questions about PAC.
1) what's the fire hydrant move from? (Sorry I don't know my PAC man very well lol)
I dislike both Palutena and Miis. While I knew both were pretty much inevitable, it doesn't mean I have to like their inclusion.The other 2? you mean Palutena and the Miis?
But Palutena is a popular character and a lot of people was expecting her, and the Miis... well we knew they were comming