Yeah sure, now let me tell you why you're so full of bull**** now.
This is funny.
Rosalina controlling a Luma from afar is simply an IDEA created by Masahiro Sakurai
No, it's actually not.
EDIT: Oh, you said afar. What, suddenly DISTANCE matters?????? It automatically becomes an original idea on account of 2 inches?
ALSO! Notice that Luma being by Rosalina's side is actually significant to her, unlike items which are not significant to Toad save for the fact that he
sometimes runs the shop where you get them.
for a SMASH BROTHERS game. She's NEVER willingly sent out one of her children to fight, she's NEVER been able to spawn one out of nowhere, she's NEVER shown the ability to have the cosmos under her dress.
What is your point you apparently are trying to make? I never said Toad didn't use items. I said they aren't significant or unique to him. Cosmos and Lumas are significant to Rosalina very much so.
Rosalina's existing moveset makes no sense when it comes to Mario canon.
Canon is irrelevant. Significance to a character is however. Everything Rosalina does is significant to her. Items are only significant to Toad in some games, so if you had one or two minor moves involving it that's fine, but you're suggesting an entire move set.
But Sakurai thought of it, so it is obviously okay now because he made it since he is the greatest totally and all is now canon
okay then.....................................
what?
Toad utilizing power ups for a potential moveset is simply an IDEA created by SMASH BROTHERS fans. When in reality Toad HAS used power-ups in previous games, Toad IS the one who runs the stores that HAS the power-ups, Toad IS the one that GIVES the items to the Mario Bros.
I disagree. The items just seem to be more significant to the game itself, not to any specific character. I don't think Toad selling items sometimes is really a reason to do so. It's not like Toads are specifically known for being item people or anything.
Toad's proposed moveset MAKES SENSE when it comes to Mario canon.
Putting stuff in caps isn't really necessary.
But no it's terrible and will never happen since some smash fan made it what a nerd
I don't think you're correctly perceiving my position in this argument.
Oh you think Dixie Kong should use hair if she was playable?? lolnope not gonna happen because some smash fan thought of it
A: I like how you're just taking that one sentence out of the quote. Ignoring the other statements connected to it.
B:
I'm pretty sure RareWare came up with it. Not Smash fans.
He has an affinity to GIVE power-ups. Why shouldn't he USE them if need be?
Why can't the RETAINER use the items he RETAINS?? How is that NOT a big enough connection for you? The ITEM specialist should use the ITEMS.
Again with the caps.
>Implying I was referring to those specifically
>Ignores immense power and ability to spawn mushrooms and release spores
Sorry, I just assumed you weren't actually suggesting he spawn mushrooms given how horrible of a proposal it would be. That's suppose to be potential???
But, nonetheless I don't really want to continue this. No offense, but I just don't really want to take the time to respond to these arguments as I don't find them very plausible and they just seem to loop and loop through the same argument.
