POKEMANSPIKA
Smash Master
They are a Japan based company.And Japan has always been Nintendo's primary market.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
They are a Japan based company.And Japan has always been Nintendo's primary market.
You're making quite a few assumptions here about the business between Microsoft and Nintendo. Microsoft could very easily overcharge Nintendo for Banjo, especially when you get into things like the Amiibos where a share of the profits would have to go back to that company. Plus, nothing says that they'd be willing to allow their games in Nintendo systems as they have nothing to gain in allowing that and could just as easily refuse to put them on Nintendo and keep them on their systems so that fans interested in Banjo would go to them.If Microsoft wants Banjo in, they'll be very cooperative. This would likely include a low licensing fee, I'd bet all the 3rd party characters had generous licensing fees. Because they want their character in smash.
How on earth would that make it hard for Banjo to be in future smash games? It'd make it as easy as it could possibly be.
Nintendo isn't aiming for "highest profit of all DLC characters", if they were they wouldn't have made Roy. That being said, Banjo and Kazooie would turn titanic profits, especially when you throw in Amiibo sales and potential VC titles. Mewtwo and maybe Ridley might beat them in terms of sales.
All your concerns would be quite valid if Microsoft had not already expressed interest in Banjo being in smash. The only assumption I'm making is that Microsoft wants Banjo in, which we know to be true.You're making quite a few assumptions here about the business between Microsoft and Nintendo. Microsoft could very easily overcharge Nintendo for Banjo, especially when you get into things like the Amiibos where a share of the profits would have to go back to that company. Plus, nothing says that they'd be willing to allow their games in Nintendo systems as they have nothing to gain in allowing that and could just as easily refuse to put them on Nintendo and keep them on their systems so that fans interested in Banjo would go to them.
I don't see how this helps anyone. If a company wants money/advertisement/is smart, they will jump at the chance to have their character in Smash.All your concerns would be quite valid if Microsoft had not already expressed interest in Banjo being in smash. The only assumption I'm making is that Microsoft wants Banjo in, which we know to be true.
And nothing about that says they'll be easy partners in it, the only thing it says is that it'd be cool to have him in (and of course they'd say that, what do they have to lose?). The fact of the matter is the quote says nothing about fees, negotiations, Amiibo support (if any), among other things, and pretending they don't exist is just ignoring all of the potential problems that Banjo very well may have.All your concerns would be quite valid if Microsoft had not already expressed interest in Banjo being in smash. The only assumption I'm making is that Microsoft wants Banjo in, which we know to be true.
I think there is some kind kind of communication error here. You say that like I don't know, but not only do I know, it is the foundation of my case. MS would practically bend over backwards to make Nintendo amicable to this deal for exactly the reasons you just said.I don't see how this helps anyone. If a company wants money/advertisement/is smart, they will jump at the chance to have their character in Smash.
No.I think there is some kind kind of communication error here. You say that like I don't know, but not only do I know, it is the foundation of my case. MS would practically bend over backwards to make Nintendo amicable to this deal for exactly the reasons you just said.
I was being hyperbolic to illustrate my point. My point is that negotiating would not be that difficult because Ms would be cooperative. Nintendo is in a good position because MS wants banjo in smash more than Nintendo does.No.
You're assuming things.
They may like the idea, but that doesn't mean they're gonna bend over backwards.
You're equating things that aren't equatable.
What if Nintendo doesn't even want Banjo in Smash for the reasons before. Then Banjo has no chance.I was being hyperbolic to illustrate my point. My point is that negotiating would not be that difficult because Ms would be cooperative. Nintendo is in a good position because MS wants banjo in smash more than Nintendo does.
Do you know this for a fact?My point is that negotiating would not be that difficult because Ms would be cooperative.
Definitely possible, but I doubt it.What if Nintendo doesn't even want Banjo in Smash for the reasons before. Then Banjo has no chance.
Yes.Do you know this for a fact?
What if they don't agree on the licensing fees? What if they want to get involved in DLC/Amiibo price cuts? There are so many factors with things like these, especially something unprecedented with two first party companies cooperating.Yes.
They want Banjo in smash.
Therefore...
They'd be cooperative.
That is how negotiation works.
This is amplified even further by it being Microsoft, not a third party.Adding third-party characters should be considered a very special case. In the last game, when we added Sonic and Snake, there were lots of different hoops to jump through as far as getting approvals and making sure all the parties involved were happy with the way things went. You can consider it a very special circumstance for that to happen.
1. MS and Nintendo cooperating on Rare Ip is not unprecedented. Heck, you can see that from Spencer's post.What if they don't agree on the licensing fees? What if they want to get involved in DLC/Amiibo price cuts? There are so many factors with things like these, especially something unprecedented with two first party companies cooperating.
http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/06...ters-receive-no-priority-for-super-smash-bros
This is amplified even further by it being Microsoft, not a third party.
Why would Nintendo go through all of this trouble to license a character that won't even perform exceptionally well in their home country?
And the fact that unlike K.Rool, Banjo's ****ing deadNintendo will only consider Banjo if he gets enormous support(like, twice or three times that of the second most voted character). Otherwise, adding a first party character just is the easier thing to do, expecially considering that one of the most voted first party characters, King K. Rool, shares a lot of fans with Banjo as they're both characters made by Rare.
I feel like Shovel Knight has more of a chance, just a feeling thoughHe has a chance but his chances about as unlikely as Shovel Knight's. And worst than Shantae and even Rayman who I'm super low on.
Congratulations, you are now Mr Obvious! However, popularity is the most important thing when selling DLC. Sakurai will likely look at the top 5 or so and pick the most unique onesWell for the ballot thing
The suposive leak with
Waluigi
Paper mario
King k rool
Chibi robo
And considering
Takamaru
Wolf
Inkling
Well i still think its fake due to the assist teophy characters but.
Now i may want to consider this but, I think we jumped the gun slightly sakurai may not just go with the most voted for.
He may also pick fan picked characters for unquieness and popularity from the ballot not just most voted for
The king fits the bill because hes all of that unquie and popular.
So everybody lower than wolf and king k rool and isaac shoulden't be pushed asided as failed immediatly
What im saying is deeper than that.Congratulations, you are now Mr Obvious! However, popularity is the most important thing when selling DLC. Sakurai will likely look at the top 5 or so and pick the most unique ones
It's almost the same thing everyone has been thinking with one single exceptionWhat im saying is deeper than that.
Top 10-20 most voted for and pick the most unquie and ones not deconfirmed already and probably throw away the veterans that not pre-planned (except wolf or snake if voted for enough.)
I know what a comma is! I will now use one.It's almost the same thing everyone has been thinking with one single exception
Seriously, does no one know what a ****ing comma is anymore?
Agreed.It's almost the same thing everyone has been thinking with one single exception
Seriously, does no one know what a ****ing comma is anymore?
I type too fast but I'm easily ticked off when someone usesAgreed.
So I fixed it.
And its due to typing too fast and not bother with puncuations.
Very first 2 words of this videoI type too fast but I'm easily ticked off when someone uses
HEIL DIE GRAMMATIK!
Implying most of us actually care about the functionally and don't just collect them to be giant man children.Banjo's amiibo will be about as worthless as & but none of the extra help like being on extra Nintendo games.
My god, was all that necessary? Anyway, I wonder if this whole leak thing is indeed true would it eventually lead to a Waluigi game. Wishful thinking but yeah, I wonder. I'm also wondering how everyone forgot about Dig Dug (Taizo Hiro) when considering what would be Namco second rep if they were to get one.It's almost the same thing everyone has been thinking with one single exception
Seriously, does no one know what a ****ing comma is anymore?
On one hand, we have Dig DugI didn't forget about Dig Dug.
I just massively prefer Nightmare.
Fair enough.I didn't forget about Dig Dug.
I just massively prefer Nightmare.