TeenGirlSquad
Smash Master
If Ganondorf gets a sword this time around, Demise might be a good alt. But not a playable character.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Wait, how is pulling out your sword, aka something Ganondorf does as a taunt, work as a gimmick or a moveset base=???I agree with this sentiment, Ghirahim is at the very least, popular in a Smash related context. However, I would assert that his move-set potential is more observable than his popularity as most of the other Legend of Zelda candidates are fairly popular themselves. He could introduce a gimmick that enables him to pull out his sword (or an additional disposable sword) with his neutral special.
There is actually a precedent that establishes that that sentiment is not entirely the case. In Brawl, Sakurai was going to include Toon Zelda and presumably Toon Sheik (I cannot recall) in addition to Toon Link.I don't think they will add 2 clones for the same series as new characters (so is Impa or Demise and i don't think they will take Demise over Impa)
stance change, akin to character transformations:Wait, how is pulling out your sword, aka something Ganondorf does as a taunt, work as a gimmick or a moveset base=???
Like, how=???
.....a stance system.Wait, how is pulling out your sword, aka something Ganondorf does as a taunt, work as a gimmick or a moveset base=???
Like, how=???
Honestly, what the hell is up with your hatred towards Ghirahim and your ignorance to those who are his fans?only if he was popular or if Sakurai himself considered him
http://smashboards.com/threads/sakurai-sans-character-selection-process.361953/
Sounds sort of like Litchi, with the empasis on switching between two different playstyles on the fly.Wait, how is pulling out your sword, aka something Ganondorf does as a taunt, work as a gimmick or a moveset base=???
Like, how=???
It could change the properties of Ghirahim's Smash attacks; similar to the Levin sword in Robin's move-set, albeit that is more about additional damage than drastically altering the properties of moves (if I am not mistaken, of course there is an electrical property). Ghirahim is seen without any swords, with one sword, and with two swords. So he could start off the match without a sword, and have either no Smash attacks available, or Smash attacks that do not pertain to his sword (such as a fabulous back-handed slap). If you use his neutral special, he could pull out his first sword (assuming he does not already have one by default). I envision that he might have some different attacks based on the notion that he has now incorporated a sword into his stance. After that, if he is dual-wielding both blades, those moves might change yet again (or they are locked and he must throw one of them before he can use Smash attacks again). It was just an idea.Wait, how is pulling out your sword, aka something Ganondorf does as a taunt, work as a gimmick or a moveset base=???
Like, how=???
Are you saying that someone actually suggested a 2 or 3 movesets for Ghirahim in a stance system AFTER we lost multiple attacks in one input and transformations removed entirely from smash=???.....a stance system.
No Sword style, Single Sword style, Two Sword style.
Even I got that by what was being said.
@Are you talking about 2 or 3 movesets for Ghirahim in a stance system AFTER we lost multiple attacks in one input and transformations removed entirely from smash=???
Because if so...
(seriously guys, half the Chrom thread suggested that, and look how THAT turned out!)
I agree that it is not entirely likely, but it is more or less relevant to Ghirahim's "character," whereas Chrom's character is not commonly associated with stance switching (he predominantly uses Falchion).Are you talking about 2 or 3 movesets for Ghirahim in a stance system AFTER we lost multiple attacks in one input and transformations removed entirely from smash=???
Because if so...
(seriously guys, half the Chrom thread suggested that, and look how THAT turned out!)
Having in mind that Robin have different attacks based on the tome he's using..., is not something completely crazy.Are you talking about 2 or 3 movesets for Ghirahim in a stance system AFTER we lost multiple attacks in one input and transformations removed entirely from smash=???
Because if so...
(seriously guys, half the Chrom thread suggested that, and look how THAT turned out!)
We were debating characters. I feel most people get shot down without giving them fair shot.Honestly, what the hell is up with your hatred towards Ghirahim and your ignorance to those who are his fans?
I apologize if I was not clear, please remind me which other character pulls out a sword to use in their move-set? If you cannot, that is EXACTLY what makes it so "special." I WAS suggesting a throw-able sword (as one of the hypothetical moves), does Ghirahim not do precisely that?!Morbid, when you're saying a character pulls a sword out, explain what's so special about doing that. If you're going to make a point, make it clear. For all I knew, you were suggesting a throwable sword.
The stances are not seen as separate characters and are part of a greater whole. More than transformations ever did anyway.@Big-Cat
You know more about fighting game styles than I do.
Can you explain how a character using a stance system isn't the same as transforming mid-match like Zelda/Sheik and Pokémon Trainer pre-Smash 4?
You must not be paying much attention if you think Ghirahim is treated as a guarantee.We were debating characters. I feel most people get shot down without giving them fair shot.
Girahim is treated as a guarantee, like Chrom was treated like a guarantee.
Need i remind you what happened?
I think my sig and avatar are clear enough, but: Robin made it in.
So far, the only move we've seen changed based on tome is jab finisher. That isn't much.Having in mind that Robin have different attacks based on the tome he's using..., is not something completely crazy.
Noone think Ghirahim is a guarantee, he's just a likely character, noone see him as we saw Chrom in the past, so.... noWe were debating characters. I feel most people get shot down without giving them fair shot.
Girahim is treated as a guarantee, like Chrom was treated like a guarantee.
Need i remind you what happened?
I think my sig and avatar are clear enough, but: Robin made it in.
I know how you feel bro, but you know what???!?!!?! Tingle is already deconfirmed :D He was already shown as an ATI don't hate Girahim, He's personally my second choice for a Zelda newcomer. I want ANY Zelda newcomer that's NOT Tingle.
Also noone is shutting down plausible ideas, they are saying that Ghirahim doesn't have an unique moveset posibility, when we all know that he have, also others are saying Demise over Ghirahim... and we all know that's not going to happen (it would be fun if it actually happen)Stop shutting down plausable ideas rather than spamming your own and I think everything will work a lot smoother.
It seems everyone around here hates facts, as the INSTANT I pull out some articles or numbers, people start calling me a hater.
hahahahahaha![]()
How does taking out a sword make him so special? What is the difference between having and not having a sword for when it comes to Ghirahim?I apologize if I was not clear, please remind me which other character pulls out a sword to use in their move-set? If you cannot, that is EXACTLY what makes it so "special." I WAS suggesting a throw-able sword (as one of the hypothetical moves), does Ghirahim not do precisely that?!
![]()
The difference is those are different INPUTS and they don't give Robin any extra attacks.Having in mind that Robin have different attacks based on the tome he's using..., is not something completely crazy.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/specialHow does taking out a sword make him so special? What is the difference between having and not having a sword for when it comes to Ghirahim?
You're leaving a lot of blanks, and you're not convincing me of Hhirahim. TumblrFamous has convinced me though.
Swords using swords... How perverse...It could change the properties of Ghirahim's Smash attacks; similar to the Levin sword in Robin's move-set, albeit that is more about additional damage than drastically altering the properties of moves (if I am not mistaken, of course there is an electrical property). Ghirahim is seen without any swords, with one sword, and with two swords. So he could start off the match without a sword, and have either no Smash attacks available, or Smash attacks that do not pertain to his sword (such as a fabulous back-handed slap). If you use his neutral special, he could pull out his first sword (assuming he does not already have one by default). I envision that he might have some different attacks based on the notion that he has now incorporated a sword into his stance. After that, if he is dual-wielding both blades, those moves might change yet again (or they are locked and he must throw one of them before he can use Smash attacks again). It was just an idea.
Um, you were the one who repetitively says "Ghirahim won't make it in". Don't make me fish out the times you said it when people talked about him. I remember last night when we were debating Vaati and Ghirahim, many people, yourself included, completely shot down Ghirahim's chances in favor of Vaati.Stop shutting down plausable ideas rather than spamming your own and I think everything will work a lot smoother.
"Stance switch" in the sense shared across SWF (as in a character has MORE ATTACKS than the rest; literally the only time that's true is Z-airs, which over half a dozen characters have had thus far in smash) is dead.@Big-Cat
You know more about fighting game styles than I do.
Can you explain how a character using a stance system isn't the same as transforming mid-match like Zelda/Sheik and Pokémon Trainer pre-Smash 4?
If it's a possibility and you have nothing much to say on it, then either just say that or keep your mouth shut.http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/special
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/special
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/special
It makes him special by definition, I suppose.
Edit- It was first and foremost, a suggestion. If I wanted to "convince" anyone of his unique play-style, I would have probably thought of something better. It is a move-set that I would not mind seeing, a possibility. Nothing more, nor did I insinuate it do be.
Thank you.The stances are not seen as separate characters and are part of a greater whole. More than transformations ever did anyway.
How fully fleshed out a stance is depends on the character.
If it's a possibility and you have nothing much to say on it, then either just say that or keep your mouth shut.
couldOr even Gamma Charge!
I agree with this sentiment, Ghirahim is at the very least, popular in a Smash related context. However, I would assert that his move-set potential is more observable than his popularity as most of the other Legend of Zelda candidates are fairly popular themselves. He could introduce a gimmick that enables him to pull out his sword (or an additional disposable sword) with his neutral special.
Correct. The issue in the past has been that we have dealt with characters as stances of sorts. These characters have functioned fully on their own. Even if they were meant to be used in tandem, the character design didn't allow this as is the case with Sheik and Zelda. Stances in other fighters are tools, not characters.Thank you.
So you would agree that with someone like say, Ghirahim, switching between No Sword, Single Sword, and Two Swords styles on the fly, if fleshed out to where each style complements the other or provides enough depth to be useful, is not a bad idea like what JohnKnight is trying to discredit it as, correct?
I think we know someone who has the knowledge and power of a dictionary...We're literally arguing over definitions.
Guys, I'm sorry, but dictionaries won't be playable in Smash 4.
So essentially, Mega Man's Leaf Shield taken to a full extreme? My concern is of how broken that could end up being. If Ghirahim has to keep his diamonds up at all times to be effective, surely that would in part mean that while diamond are up, they're very effective at causing rapid passive damage, yes? If so, it seems like Ghirahim would end up as something of a Smash version of the Pokemon Aegislash: Split versatility between being offensive or defensive, and if played right, essentially both. Competitive players are currently holding a suspect test to ban Aegislash too, after the top players give their input after a few weeks of playtesting, on part of how characters that have timing-situational access to high offense/defense often mean they have both.@God Robert's Cousin
For Ghirahim, I think you can create a moveset heavily focused on a mixture of supreme defensive capabilities and trade-off for power. His ability to use those "diamond blades" were executed in SS as a defense mechanism, like a counter. The diamonds blocked attacks by Link. He eventually was able to dispatch those defenses as an attack.
If developers wanted to stay true to his ability in the game, his diamonds can act as a support, a defense for Ghirahim. At any time, he can trade off his defenses for using it as an attack. This would allow him to either be one of the most defensive characters the game has seen, or a very versatile fighter who manages his defenses well until the right moment when he can trade it for power and damage. Superb Ghirahim players will learn how to keep his defenses high and sturdy, and will use his defense at a perfect time to strike. I essentially see Ghirahim being a super defensive tank with proper use of his diamonds.
"Defense is the Best Offense"
LOL, anyone who thinks that Vaati has a ghost of a chance compared to Ghirahim is a rube.Um, you were the one who repetitively says "Ghirahim won't make it in". Don't make me fish out the times you said it when people talked about him. I remember last night when we were debating Vaati and Ghirahim, many people, yourself included, completely shot down Ghirahim's chances in favor of Vaati.
Honestly, I feel as though Vaati, at the very least, stands a ghost of a chance compared to Ghirahim. Not necessarily by much, of course, but still a "ghost of a chance."LOL, anyone who thinks that Vaati has a ghost of a chance compared to Ghirahim is a rube.