• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Brawl+ renamed to brawl: insert idea here?

jalued

Smash Lord
Joined
Mar 16, 2008
Messages
1,813
Location
somewhere cold and dreary
After trying to convince alot of people who are against brawl+ from the start (its great fun btw, go to AIB chat and try and convince them :p) it becomes clear that the name "brawl+" is leaving a rather bad impression on the community. To me the plus just makes it sound arrogant and cocky, as though anyone who plays normal brawl is a ****** and should see the light. but thats not what brawl+ is about...

brawl+ is a collection of all 3 smash games so far (64,melee and brawl) and incorperated the best part of each game to make the ultimate smash game. some may feel that brawl is a disapointment, but this project has to seem alot friendlier if u honestly expect the majority to actually try it and love it (cause omg it is so much fun!!!) There is also the problem that i bet aroud 80% of vbrawl smashers think that brawl+ is trying to be melee 2.0, and that it has MAD etc, which is a biproduct of old version of brawl+ that everyone agrees was a major mistake

This thread is designed to be a suggestion point of what the finalised version of brawl+ shoud be called (the version that waits for tourney results), because i honestly feel that the name brawl+ is heading in the wrong direction.

after chattin on the gamesurge chat for a while last night with a few of the programmers, a few good suggestions came up:

brawl:
remix
fisticuffs (no idea why so many people like this, but whatever lol)
clash (its a fighting tem and also suggests the idea of the 3 game coming into one, apparently though it may already be taken)
collision
showdown (seems to be favourite so far)
conflict
reload(ed)
duel
riot (think its a bit too aggressive this one)
universal


I hope to get this as a vote system eventually, and hope that everyone will voice their opinion in the matter, and offer any suggestions, support for previous suggestions etc

hope this works and u all agree change is needed
thanks
jalued
 

jalued

Smash Lord
Joined
Mar 16, 2008
Messages
1,813
Location
somewhere cold and dreary
melee just had alot of good point about it, so it may seem that way. but alot of things come from 64 as well, people just dont notice them lol. and ur feeling is exactly why it needs a change, case its not melee 2.0 at all, its an attempt at the ultimate smash game.

yeah they do, i think the new PAL codes for 4.0 are already out. they are just a few weeks behind the NTSC codes, so dont worry, europe is not getting left out at all, there are just less programmers working on it, so it takes a bit more time
 

Mic_128

Wake up...
Administrator
BRoomer
Joined
Jun 19, 2002
Messages
46,181
Location
Steam
It's Brawl + Modifications. Brawl+ seems fine to me.

And I can tell you, regardless of the name, people will still complain.
 

jalued

Smash Lord
Joined
Mar 16, 2008
Messages
1,813
Location
somewhere cold and dreary
It's Brawl + Modifications. Brawl+ seems fine to me.

And I can tell you, regardless of the name, people will still complain.

people will always complain, its impossible to make everyone happy. but hopefully it will make less people complain, and make more people try it before they judge. and i really need to get mack to maths revision atm haha, really bad timing to make this thread..aw well, it needed to be made
 

Greenpoe

Smash Ace
Joined
Nov 6, 2007
Messages
852
Super Smash Bros. Joust
It sounds better than those other names. Melee was the perfect name: Only two syllables and it rolls off the tongue nicely. A lot of potential names have too violent of connotations to be used. Even Brawl isn't a great name, because it's a little awkward to pronounce, but Joust rolls quite nicely.
 

Revven

FrankerZ
Joined
Apr 27, 2006
Messages
7,550
Location
Cleveland, Ohio
We're not changing the name.

We're too far into the game to change it suddenly when youtube videos already have Brawl+ as the name for the matches, combo videos, and etc. If we change the name, and videos pop up with a different name people will be confused "What happened to Brawl+?"

Yeah, no, not changing the name.
 

jalued

Smash Lord
Joined
Mar 16, 2008
Messages
1,813
Location
somewhere cold and dreary
We're not changing the name.

We're too far into the game to change it suddenly when youtube videos already have Brawl+ as the name for the matches, combo videos, and etc. If we change the name, and videos pop up with a different name people will be confused "What happened to Brawl+?"

Yeah, no, not changing the name.
i think that is a mistake falco, i dont mean changing it atm, i mea the finalised version being changed, once all of the tweaking has been done. cause the name brawl+ has got alot of bad rep atm, u seriousl should consider before u try to close this thread. u were there in the chat last night i think, and if u want to be convinced, go to the AiB chat and ask people what they think of it.

and about the youtube vids, why not just make it so that the final name isnt like brawl+ 5.7, but more brawl: "insert idea here". then u dont have to change any of the videos online, but it has a friendlyer feeling to it and the game can be released with a fresh start that it kinda needs
 

Hyrus

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
226
Location
Central US
cause the name brawl+ has got alot of bad rep atm, u seriousl should consider before u try to close this thread. u were there in the chat last night i think, and if u want to be convinced, go to the AiB chat and ask people what they think of it.
There's nothing offensive or derogatory about "Brawl +". If a bunch of overly sensitive geeks want to whine about a generically positive name of a private project, tell them they can take their warped ego's elsewhere.
 

jalued

Smash Lord
Joined
Mar 16, 2008
Messages
1,813
Location
somewhere cold and dreary
There's nothing offensive or derogatory about "Brawl +". If a bunch of overly sensitive geeks want to whine about a generically positive name of a private project, tell them they can take their warped ego's elsewhere.
and u want to get the majority to play brawl+ with that attitude?? and its not possitive cause it has + in it. it makes it sound like it is better than brawl, and people who play brawl alot dont want to hear that. im sorry that u think that way, but brawl has a massive crowd, and u cant just expect thm to go for a game because it says its better, as better is a very loose word that is more fact than opinion. so by making the title brawl+ u are kind of suggesting that peoples opinions dont matter, and that is counterproductive
 

|RK|

Smash Marketer
Moderator
Joined
Jan 6, 2009
Messages
4,033
Location
Maryland
I see no problem with changing the name. After all, ever heard of tentative titles, Falco? Just change it to Brawl: Competitive Edition, or Brawl: Competitive Plus, or something that comes off explaining the project so people don't think it's just Melee 2.0. Brawl+ is bland and has already given the wrong impression to many people. Besides, there are still people who don't know what Brawl+ is. There are plenty who have to explain it to them. So do that.
 

Revven

FrankerZ
Joined
Apr 27, 2006
Messages
7,550
Location
Cleveland, Ohio
and u want to get the majority to play brawl+ with that attitude?? and its not possitive cause it has + in it. it makes it sound like it is better than brawl, and people who play brawl alot dont want to hear that. im sorry that u think that way, but brawl has a massive crowd, and u cant just expect thm to go for a game because it says its better, as better is a very loose word that is more fact than opinion. so by making the title brawl+ u are kind of suggesting that peoples opinions dont matter, and that is counterproductive
The "+" in the name is to suggest that we're adding stuff. Anyone who thinks it means otherwise is just stupid and doesn't deserve to even try the game out. They are purposely flaming the project by saying what you just said. You really can't expect people to try it out when you tell them about it online. You have to give them links, links to videos, links to the FAQ. If they are STILL not caring or protest about it, don't bother, you've given them all the info they need to know about the project.

I don't know how you can derive "Brawl+" as it meaning it's better than Brawl. It just sounds like they are purposely not interested in it (which is true, EVERY Brawl player isn't interested in Brawl+ until they try it out). I'm telling you, just telling people about it isn't enough, they have to try it at a tourney or with a friend who may have it.

It sounds to me like you didn't give them any links and just tried to explain it to them yourself which isn't the route to go.

I don't see the need for a name change despite what you say.
 

jalued

Smash Lord
Joined
Mar 16, 2008
Messages
1,813
Location
somewhere cold and dreary
basically, people are stubborn and unwilling to change.it needs to be more clear, becasue ur kinda not really adding stuff to brawl, ur changing it. for instance ur talking away camping (i know its really lame, but some people must like it somewhere), and that is still taking away something. you took away chaingrabs as well. i just think that it could be a bit more informative than brawl+, that the + isnt really telling anyone who doesnt know about the game any information about it. and to be quite honest brawl+ sounds dull and if i was just a brawler, i wouldnt feel intregued to find out what the plus is. people are lazy and dont want to have to do all the work themselves for finding things out, and with a name that gives a bit more in terms of information i think would go along way.

brawl: competative is a nice one btw, thanks for that, its added
 

Foresight

Smash Rookie
Joined
Mar 26, 2009
Messages
22
Location
Georgia Tech
Listen, the people that are complaining about the name are never going to play Brawl+ in the first place. They think that vBrawl is fine the way it is and are happy playing vBrawl. They aren't going to play the game, regardless of what we call it, because that would admit that vBrawl was flawed and needed improvement, and that doesn't jive with their blind fanboy view of the game.

Why should we try to appease people who are never going to play the game? Changing the name isn't going to change why they don't want to play it. Anyone who plays this game for 5 minutes will easily determine if they like it better or not, regardless of the name. Besides, most of the complainers never even tried the game, so why should we respect the opinions of someone who bashed Brawl+ based only on the name or the goal of the project, without ever trying the game in the first place. If the name of the project is the only reason why they don't want to try the game, then they are very close-minded and will most likely never make the modifications to their Wii that are needed to play the game. Brawl+ is fine, as it is instantly recognizeable, and only requires an extra character to differentiate it from vBrawl.
 

Mic_128

Wake up...
Administrator
BRoomer
Joined
Jun 19, 2002
Messages
46,181
Location
Steam
basically, people are stubborn and unwilling to change.
Including your opinion that it needs a name change.

Foresight's got it right, no matter whether the name is changed or not, the same people will dislike it.

Not to mention the name's you're coming out with are more likely to piss people off than Brawl+. Your latest suggestion, Brawl: Competative? Why not just make a thread in Brawl disc saying that Brawl isn't competitive and see what the reaction is.
 

jalued

Smash Lord
Joined
Mar 16, 2008
Messages
1,813
Location
somewhere cold and dreary
Including your opinion that it needs a name change.

Foresight's got it right, no matter whether the name is changed or not, the same people will dislike it.

Not to mention the name's you're coming out with are more likely to piss people off than Brawl+. Your latest suggestion, Brawl: Competative? Why not just make a thread in Brawl disc saying that Brawl isn't competitive and see what the reaction is.
im not being stubborn, i think brawl+ needs a change title, but am willing to listern to any opinion otherwise. and haha its just a suggestion, i just mean something along the linesof brawl: anything u can think of i the right way to go. and yeah i guess ur right, ill get rid of that one. but i jst think that brawl+ isnt the right title for the game, and if it is, then it has been overshadowed by past versions of the game that have MAD etc, and made people stick to the idea that it is melee 2.0, which needs to be straightened out.

and yeah falco u are right about vids and stuff being showed to vbrawl players, ill try my best in it :)
 

|RK|

Smash Marketer
Moderator
Joined
Jan 6, 2009
Messages
4,033
Location
Maryland
Super Smash Brothers: Universal Brawl

It fits, since you're taking stuff from all of the Super Smash Bros games and mashing it into one final product.
 

Revven

FrankerZ
Joined
Apr 27, 2006
Messages
7,550
Location
Cleveland, Ohio
Listen, the people that are complaining about the name are never going to play Brawl+ in the first place. They think that vBrawl is fine the way it is and are happy playing vBrawl. They aren't going to play the game, regardless of what we call it, because that would admit that vBrawl was flawed and needed improvement, and that doesn't jive with their blind fanboy view of the game.

Why should we try to appease people who are never going to play the game? Changing the name isn't going to change why they don't want to play it. Anyone who plays this game for 5 minutes will easily determine if they like it better or not, regardless of the name. Besides, most of the complainers never even tried the game, so why should we respect the opinions of someone who bashed Brawl+ based only on the name or the goal of the project, without ever trying the game in the first place. If the name of the project is the only reason why they don't want to try the game, then they are very close-minded and will most likely never make the modifications to their Wii that are needed to play the game. Brawl+ is fine, as it is instantly recognizeable, and only requires an extra character to differentiate it from vBrawl.
Including your opinion that it needs a name change.

Foresight's got it right, no matter whether the name is changed or not, the same people will dislike it.

Not to mention the name's you're coming out with are more likely to piss people off than Brawl+. Your latest suggestion, Brawl: Competative? Why not just make a thread in Brawl disc saying that Brawl isn't competitive and see what the reaction is.
These.

No name change, evar. Brawl+ is fine.
 

Yeroc

Theory Coder
BRoomer
Joined
Feb 28, 2004
Messages
3,273
Location
In a world of my own devising
Most of the people whose decision making skills have gotten the project as far as it is have already weighed in on the issue, at least privately. The Brawl+ brass, if you will, has no intention of changing a rather innocuous project title just because of some flamebait trolls. People have mistaken assumptions about the project direction because of past mistakes, and enlightening them will solve that, not rebooting the project under a new name to appease a small group of people who, as Foresight said, probably will never touch it anyway.
 

Junahu

Smash Ace
Joined
Nov 15, 2005
Messages
899
Location
Shropshire Slasher
Although this topic will inevitably fail to change the name of brawl+, I would like to chime in my own opinion on the matter. Please note that I actually play and like Brawl+

Any suffix on the title 'brawl' will always come across as sounding superior to the original, regardless of what it is. Adding a + on the end in particular implies that whatever Brawl was, this Brawl+ is more than that and therefore better
Since what Brawl+ is is more of a modification than an addition, I think the + is pretty misleading.



I also object to the usage of the term vBrawl to describe the original, unmodified version. Unlike Brawl+, vBrawl is clearly a slander, implying that the original is ordinary and boring and inferior.
 

jalued

Smash Lord
Joined
Mar 16, 2008
Messages
1,813
Location
somewhere cold and dreary
fine, god, **** this. im not going to fight both brawl and brawl+ players. god u guys are both ***** though, whoever said smash bros had a good community was an idiot. **** this. thread closed, i dont know why i even bother tbh
 

Rikana

Smash Champion
Joined
May 16, 2006
Messages
2,125
Are you pms'ing? Those who complain about Brawl+ hardly ever complain about the name itself. You say you're not being stubborn yet you keep forcing the idea of a name change. Stubborn much? Brawl+ is fine the way it is. + does not need to be interpreted as something added. I just interpret it as a modification.

Any by letting the people decide, there's gonna be so many suggestions that there's no point. I bet even if suggested, majority is going to choose Brawl+ in the end. We're known as Brawl+ now, why need to change the name? Hate it or love it, we're still Brawl+.

Let's get dramatic over a name change before finishing our codesets.
 

CloneHat

Smash Champion
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
2,130
Location
Montreal, Quebec
Brawl+ makes sense. People who think the + implies it's better are correct. Even if you did change the name "officially", everyone would still call it Brawl+.
 

jalued

Smash Lord
Joined
Mar 16, 2008
Messages
1,813
Location
somewhere cold and dreary
no im not pmsing, but i am annoyed cause u all seem to be very aggressive. and i had no evidence before that everyone was happy with brawl+ as a name, so stop lecturing me. everyone makes mistakes, no need to try and drill people into the ground about it
 

Foxy

Smash Master
Joined
Jul 28, 2007
Messages
3,900
Location
Raleigh, North Carolina
Back about a month after Brawl's release, when I and GofG were making the very first steps towards Brawl hacking, I already had a specific name for the vision.

Super Smash Brothers: Renaissance

It might sound a bit uppity but I always thought that calling it the "revival" of smash would be somewhat accurate, cool, and it makes a good acronym (SSBR).

See what you think of it.
 
Top Bottom