So I take it you play melee then? You do? Then why are you discussing whether or not MK warrants a ban? If you dont, why are you suggesting melee in the first place?
So, you mean to tell me that, if I take the time to survey everyone that has played and quit brawl within a reasonable playing career, you can honestly say that you're mind will change completely and you'll be pro ban?
I could bring you a Personal live recorded interview with every player that quit brawl within a reasonable tourney playing time, and still, someone would bring up another random fact that would be impossible to document and the discussion would find a new place to go to.
^^^ Reply is Above^^^
You'd be butthurt too if you'd paid $600.00 usdollaz to get Geyed. (nothing personal metagey's). Don't try to imagine how people would feel unless you'd walked in their shoes...and be geyed like they did.
He does, and even more when it comes to REAL fighting games, anyway's. When he gave examples about Tekken 4, 5, 5: DR and 6 (if you actually bothered to read anything and didn't just started to quote what the last person of the thread suggested), he was actually speaking from experience when it came to it.Kasht said:
I don't think you're at a position to say what does and doesn't go on in SF. It has more history than Brawl and Melee combined.
If that was a Hypothetical example, it was terrible. No one in Pound used Zelda to My knowledge's extent. They did Pick K DDD, Wario, Falco, Kirby and others. The Fact that neither of them placed top 10 is a whole different story.
Ur not D only 1. Every one's found a counterpick for most characters that give theirs bad match ups: MK. That's part of the main problem. He's a solution for most problems, but that's questionable because, he doesn't have a counter or bad match up as is. When realizing that is when the thought of "why not just main him" kicks in and there's another MK on the bandwagon.
You're talking about early stages of playing; the learning stages; WI FI (lolwut?). Pound and many other OoS tournaments are more serious tha those examples, because there's more at state/there are more sacrifices involved to able to attend them. Try and multiply your previous frustrations x10 and the result might be what the metaplanked pound victims might feel lol.
Many people dedicated and practiced and tried and lost. Not just PR players, but many US players as well (for the most part).
by the by, it's real easy to ask for concrete evidence for our arguments and demand the counting of heads to found YOUR arguments, which are that he doesn't warrant a ban beacause he hasn't won a certain amount of tournaments or because he's actually beatable, but how about the anti banners show evidence as well. This isn't a one way street.
That's all where getting. Crockpot Theories and scrubish thoughts. Which leads me to believe that most antibaners do it for the lulz.CommonAntibanLudocrismz said:
Pics or it didn't happen (how is he beatable[not who beat who, but how])
Don't be lazy and search for it yourself. Why do we have to show you real concrete cyber data to show you where right, but you can barge in sayin whatever you want not expecting to be asked to do the same? wtf? Give us Data on how atendance is pretty **** good why don't you?
You'd be surprised on what 4-5 months can do. As far as I'm concerned, 2009 didn't end in August.
Honestly, this point was valid into, I don't know, like 5 or 6 months brawl in. Maaaybe at One year Old. But it's been 2 Complete Years and He's STILL questionable for a ban. There hasn't been a counter character or Tech Found; He still dominates every one in the game by a reasonable margin. What does he need, a personal wavedash to convince every one?
With brawls mechanics, I highly doubt that anything game-changing would be found that would make him less Powerful. Whether it be 5 months or 5 years, it wouldn't make much of a difference to be frank. The difference would be the minds of the players at best, but not the game or the character itself.
Yo Bro, Street Fighter franchise has been out way more than Melee and other competitive fighters and its STILL changing now we can enjoy all the fun of Ryu Dittos in the grand finals but I'd love to see your stand point 2 years in SF.
I can use SF to counter ur game too? No. Why? Because they're different games.
And correct me if I'm mistaken, but Wavedash was discovered 2 years in if my memory does not serve me wrong. But the point is, stop trying to compare Melee standards with brawl standards because they are obviously very different games. If you love it so much, go and play it and don't participate in the discussion at all lol
First, we have proven nothing. Ally and ADHD have. Second, what they've proven is that they can beat out everyone; not Snake or Diddy. If that where the case, you'd see more snakes, or at least, more Diddy's top 10 in Pound (which is the tourny example you're using since you metioned Diddy). We can however prove that MK is the obvious majority when it comes to top placings seeing as not just 1 player got top 10 with him: 8 did.
