The Duck Hunt fallacy is a weak crutch to discredit Banjo-kazooie's viability as a fighter. Aesthetics is the only thing closely resembling each other and even then it is just bird pecks. Anyone who knows even base knowledge of B-K and B-T know that there is way more to them than just that. Duck Hunt is an amalgamation of classic SNES with references to Hogens Ally, Clay pigeon shooting, and the zapper as a hidden 3rd fighter. Banjo-kazooie is the dynamic of a Bear using a large bird as a combination rifle, bayonet, drill, hammer, transport and best friend.
https://youtu.be/QLWLdO9GLWM
Looking at the Nuts and Bolts trailer is the best counter-argument to the Duck Hunt fallacy because in the trailer, Banjo creativity uses Kazooie as a lock pick, and then a CHAINSAW! Those moves aren't even in the games and yet it showcases the creative potential Sakurai can use to make them a unique and viable fighter.
The other best way to shut down the Duck Hunt Fallacy is to point out fighters that have similar moves and ask why they are allowed. Ask why is Ganon and Incineroar allowed when Bowser has a side b command grab? Mention why is Chrom allowed when he has moves from all the current Fire Emblems in the roster.
Not to throw shade at others who thought this, I just find it funny how trolls use that Strawman to try and justify keeping Banjo out. Plus my sides will be in orbit if our theory of Duck-Hunt's model as a base for Banjo-kazooie is confirmed.