Yeah, well SuSa there was being overly analytical about everything that wasn't necessary to be overly analytical about. He mixed definitions with "attack" and "defense," saying that using Marth's f-air against Samus' Homing Missile could be considered a defensive move, which then only mingles the two words "attack" and "defense," making them both meaningless. He also used the word "jump" to think that it could be considered "defensive," and then went back and used the word "evasive" after I told him to look up the word "jump" and tell me where it says "a defense tactic," &c. (Those aren't the same thing, by the way.) Besides that, I don't like SuSa anyway, and I wasn't ready to put up with his overly analytical garbage. (Not to mention, he bugged me after I closed my thread, even though I told him more than once to buzz off. But, he was being overly analytical about that. If only he were a bee...)
I apologize for sounding like a "meanie," but hey, he was right about one thing, and that was that my information wasn't solely for Samus alone. Still, I should be glad I didn't take it to the Brawl Tactical Discussion. Otherwise, I'd probably be shot down again. If anyone is interested in wondering why the "pummel" system is garbage for Samus, go ahead and try to find out. It's as worthy as trying to find out why there's tripping in Brawl in the first place. You'll just have to get into the game and see how it's set up and if it is different from other characters' pummels. I'll open the thread again, but I don't see any worth in trying to figure it out. It's not going to help Samus in the long run anyway. "But Dryn, that's the kind of attitude that keeps Samus so low." Meh.