• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Are Humans Meant To Be Herbivores?

Status
Not open for further replies.
D

Deleted member

Guest
My god this thread makes my head hurt.



Since you're talking about the role of having giant muscles in natural selection, let's look at some South American men who have had secluded lives with no contact with Western body ideals, no modern medicine, and no supermarkets with plentiful meat (meat that has been mass-farmed, without the consumer having to do anything, which you did not seem to consider at all.)


I don't see any big muscles on these people, and they survived just fine in an environment that requires them to be physically fit, so I don't think your argument works.

I also disagree personally with your assessment that being muscular=having higher chances of reproduction. Being fit sure helps out at first but I think in the long run the large majority of women would like someone who can be a good provider in this world, which usually means being intelligent and good socially, not being a super hunk.




The reason it is so easy for us to get protein from meat now is because, as I mentioned earlier, it's pretty much delivered right to our door. Everything we eat is delivered to our door. Our ancestors didn't have that luxury, they had to find or grow their own food, and catching an animal would have been energy-taxing.

Still, meat is good nutritionally so of course our ancestors wanted to eat it right? But notice how our bodies fare compared those of wild carnivores. (They don't match up.) That's because our ancestors had tools to kill these animals, tools that greatly reduced the amount of physical exertion needed. And our ancestors learned how to track animals and wear them down. And eventually they learned how to farm them. Which is natural selection of the mind, not of a muscular body. And that still applies today, having a super powerful and disease-resistant body is less important for survival today than it was at any earlier point in time, because we have medicine to take care of health problems and we don't have to worry about having a fit body to do anything.

Oh oops, looks like I got off-track, anyway well-educated vegans and vegetarians do a perfectly fine job of meeting their protein requirements, and so do herbivores, like I said earlier:


No, it is not like how a bear hibernates, how a bear hibernates relates to its metabolism and energy storage. And herbivores also have certain daily vitamin and protein requirements, and they acquire them entirely by eating plants. What a completely meaningless paragraph.





____
TL;DR don't make preposterous assumptions about science and present them in debate


Unsubscribing.



I'm debating even replying to you since you apparently unsubscribed after making your post, that's like the lowest blow ever man, making a statement and plugging you ears in denial at the evidence that's going to be presented against you.

Anyway, if I see ONE MORE ****ing post telling me how herbivores also have canine teeth as contradictory evidence in an argument where I don't even talk about teeth I'm unsubscribing from this thread myself. It seems all you Vegan/Vegetaria/Pro-Herbovore***s can only grasp at straws to make your argument.


You talk about how hunting is taxing on the body and this and that, and claim that we can live without meat, yet still you provide no evidence to back up your claim and seem to ignore the fact that despite how "taxing" it is to hunt... people still did it. Hmmmm, Gee, if meat wasn't a necessity, then I wonder WHY they wasted their time hunting and raising animals in the first place.

Second:
Which is natural selection of the mind, not of a muscular body. And that still applies today, having a super powerful and disease-resistant body is less important for survival today than it was at any earlier point in time, because we have medicine to take care of health problems and we don't have to worry about having a fit body to do anything.

Oh oops, looks like I got off-track, anyway well-educated vegans and vegetarians do a perfectly fine job of meeting their protein requirements,

I also disagree personally with your assessment that being muscular=having higher chances of reproduction. Being fit sure helps out at first but I think in the long run the large majority of women would like someone who can be a good provider in this world, which usually means being intelligent and good socially, not being a super hunk.
First off, how can you disagree with a fact? More muscles = more testosterone = higher sex drive, this is a ****ing fact plain and simple:
http://www.gnc8.info/the-benefits-of-increased-testosterone-levels/
http://www.livestrong.com/article/232983-what-are-the-benefits-of-increasing-testosterone/

Sexual Performance
Testosterone replacement therapy can successfully treat erectile dysfunction and loss of libido in men with low testosterone from either advancing age or hypogonadism. Although the effects of increased testosterone are more dramatic in hypogonadal men there are also benefits to the libido of men with normal gonadal, also called eugonadal, function. In a 2004 study published in the "Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism," researchers found that increasing peak testosterone levels to between 400 and 500 percent above baseline in subjects resulted in a significant increase in sexual arousability over placebo subjects.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Testosterone
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Testosterone#Romantic_relationships_and_fatherhood
http://www.ehow.com/list_6721723_benefits-testosterone_.html
Libido and Heart Health
The Mayo Clinic reports that the decline in testosterone production as men age contributes to the decline in libido, as well as the development of infertility. Maintaining higher levels of testosterone can help men to keep the libido active and retain the ability to perform sexually, thereby reducing the likelihood of infertility with aging. Having an active sex life also helps to boost testosterone, making one somewhat interrelated with the other. However, while not a direct effect of testosterone, the active sex life that can occur as an indirect effect of higher testosterone levels does help to prevent strokes and heart attacks, according to a March 9, 2008, article at ABCNews.com.
Energy
Testosterone also contributes to a man's overall energy levels. An Aug. 10, 2009, article appearing on ABCNews.com reports that up to 25 percent of men suffering with lower testosterone levels experience lethargy or feeling of tiredness. Normal levels of testosterone help to keep men feeling energetic and active. A related benefit of testosterone is that it plays a role in maintaining a regular sleep pattern, which can also improve overall energy levels.
I mean **** man, what more do you want me to show you? If having higher Test leads to more energy and a stronger desire to ****, then what more evidence do you want to prove that it is the natural state for men to have high levels of Testosterone? Your Test drops when you get older, hence when you're not able to reproduce. Eating high Protein foods leads to higher levels of Testosterone and increases your metabolism, I could go on and on with this, I've spent years researching and studying this crap. If you have any questions dealing with this I would be more than glad to provide you not only with the HOW, but with multiple viable and credible sources proving I'm right.

Second, I don't know why you seem to think you can either be intelligent or strong exclusively, when in fact, it takes a lot of intelligence and mental strength to build your body into a strong one, but that's a whole different argument.

Again, you claim that vegans and vegetarian can meet proper protein requirements if they stay well informed, but failed to provide evidence. The sources I posted said the exact opposite, and in fact, most vegans and vegetarians tend to meet their protein requirements with Bodybuilding supplements, which are ONCE AGAIN, not natural.

And ONCE AGAIN even more, you made are making comparisons between the body structure and mechanical functions between different species thinking that humans function in the same way, rather than looking at human functions independently like you should. "Gorillas are apes and humans come from apes, Gorillas have incredible strength naturally and thus because humans come from Apes then I too must have such strength." This is what you sound like.
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
@G&W, who exactly are you replying to dude? I'm not exactly sure who you're addressing with that.

:phone:
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
Global-wolf cause he was being overly rude which doesn't help anyone in a debate.

:phone:
Ah, I see. Yeah, her tone of voice was a bit peeving, and I was starting to lose my patience a bit with her. But then I figured that she's probably a Vegan/Vegetarian herself, and that's why she's taking things a bit too personally.
 

Holder of the Heel

Fiat justitia, pereat mundus
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
8,850
Location
Alabama
NNID
Roarfang
3DS FC
1332-7720-7283
Switch FC
6734-2078-8990
*climbs onto the highest horse* I think all of you need to chill out! *wins debate*
 

GwJ

Smash Hero
Joined
Nov 1, 2008
Messages
5,833
Location
Pennsylvania
NNID
Baghul
For those arguing, can you clearly define what you mean by carnivore, herbivore, and omnivore? I feel like we're having misunderstandings, but that may be just me.
 

global-wolf

Smash Champion
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
2,215
Location
Northern Virginia
I'm still checking here, but I don't want to see this thread in my CP anymore. You replied, so I will respond. Now let's see, I was pretty irked myself at the arguments you presented yourself- especially that bear one, because that truly had nothing to do with the discussion at hand. There's nothing I can say if you don't even understand that much. But I apologize for my tone.

I'm debating even replying to you since you apparently unsubscribed after making your post, that's like the lowest blow ever man, making a statement and plugging you ears in denial at the evidence that's going to be presented against you.

Anyway, if I see ONE MORE ****ing post telling me how herbivores also have canine teeth as contradictory evidence in an argument where I don't even talk about teeth I'm unsubscribing from this thread myself. It seems all you Vegan/Vegetaria/Pro-Herbovore***s can only grasp at straws to make your argument.
It should've been obvious that the pictures of herbivores were in response to another person, not you.


You talk about how hunting is taxing on the body and this and that, and claim that we can live without meat, yet still you provide no evidence to back up your claim and seem to ignore the fact that despite how "taxing" it is to hunt... people still did it. Hmmmm, Gee, if meat wasn't a necessity, then I wonder WHY they wasted their time hunting and raising animals in the first place.
My biology teacher is a full vegetarian and has never eaten meat in his life. If you want more evidence, here is a wikipedia article describing vegetarianism in different countries: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vegetarianism_by_country

People hunted and raised animals for meat because meat is nutritionally dense and therefore more desirable. You seem to agree, so I won't provide a source for that. However, just because something is desirable doesn't make it a necessity; people desire money, people desire fame, people desire all sorts of sorts of things that are not necessary for life. People raised and hunted animals because the benefits they provided would help survival, especially because sources of food were less reliable in the past. I don't think I need to provide evidence for that either. However, in today's world, humans can get their nutrition from all sorts of foods because of worldwide trade and better nutritional science, and that creates the possibility of abstaining from meat for ethical and cultural reasons.


Second:





First off, how can you disagree with a fact? More muscles = more testosterone = higher sex drive, this is a ****ing fact plain and simple:
http://www.gnc8.info/the-benefits-of-increased-testosterone-levels/
http://www.livestrong.com/article/232983-what-are-the-benefits-of-increasing-testosterone/


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Testosterone
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Testosterone#Romantic_relationships_and_fatherhood
http://www.ehow.com/list_6721723_benefits-testosterone_.html




I mean **** man, what more do you want me to show you? If having higher Test leads to more energy and a stronger desire to ****, then what more evidence do you want to prove that it is the natural state for men to have high levels of Testosterone? Your Test drops when you get older, hence when you're not able to reproduce. Eating high Protein foods leads to higher levels of Testosterone and increases your metabolism, I could go on and on with this, I've spent years researching and studying this crap. If you have any questions dealing with this I would be more than glad to provide you not only with the HOW, but with multiple viable and credible sources proving I'm right.
I didn't say that muscle is not correlated with testosterone level. I said that higher muscle mass is not necessarily indicative of long-term attractiveness to women, for the reason that muscle mass does not equate to the ability to provide for a family in this world.

Second, I don't know why you seem to think you can either be intelligent or strong exclusively, when in fact, it takes a lot of intelligence and mental strength to build your body into a strong one, but that's a whole different argument.
I suggest presenting some well-accepted evidence on this, because from personal experience I strongly disagree.

Again, you claim that vegans and vegetarian can meet proper protein requirements if they stay well informed, but failed to provide evidence. The sources I posted said the exact opposite, and in fact, most vegans and vegetarians tend to meet their protein requirements with Bodybuilding supplements, which are ONCE AGAIN, not natural.
Evidence supplied above.

And ONCE AGAIN even more, you made are making comparisons between the body structure and mechanical functions between different species thinking that humans function in the same way, rather than looking at human functions independently like you should. "Gorillas are apes and humans come from apes, Gorillas have incredible strength naturally and thus because humans come from Apes then I too must have such strength." This is what you sound like.
I will disagree with you that we should only look at humans independently when discussing human body systems. Other mammals are physiologically very similar to humans and we all require the same types of nutrients, albeit in different forms and in different amounts. I also disagree with your little paraphrase there- that was some wack logic first of all, and humans are apes.

Now, my reason for bring up my herbivore example was because you kept on saying that meat was necessary because it contained protein and humans needed protein. However, herbivores also need protein, and they clearly don't get their protein from meat. And many humans also don't get their protein for meat. If you can find a source that says that humans must get their protein from meat, please present it.



http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=y6ctjcN33Gw

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KTPkmH4hWCs

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Gp-0BtK1zIk


All omnivores, while they're diet is at least 95% vegetation. Now, don't make preposterous assumptions about science and present them in debate, please and thank you.


:phone:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbivore

According to Wikipedia, a herbivore is an organism anatomically and physiologically adapted to plant material, for example foliage, as the main component of its diet.



And one more thing:

Ah, I see. Yeah, her tone of voice was a bit peeving, and I was starting to lose my patience a bit with her. But then I figured that she's probably a Vegan/Vegetarian herself, and that's why she's taking things a bit too personally.
I am not a vegetarian. One of my biggest pet peeves is when people try to use science to justify a personal preference, and I certainly view the question of eating meat as an issue of personal preference. When the person doesn't seem to know anything about science other than little bits they've picked out to support their argument, it's even worse. But you have and you will object to my suggestion that you don't know enough about science, so let's just say that it appears to me that you don't enough and that appearance bothers me a whole lot.
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
My biology teacher is a full vegetarian and has never eaten meat in his life. If you want more evidence, here is a wikipedia article describing vegetarianism in different countries: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vegetarianism_by_country
My High School Lit teacher was also a vegetarian. Just because you witness a vegetarian doesn't mean that there are no negatives to it, nor does it disprove that they are either a. suffering from muscle deterioration, or b. consuming protein supplements to make up for the insufficient amino acids in their diet.

However, in today's world, humans can get their nutrition from all sorts of foods because of worldwide trade and better nutritional science, and that creates the possibility of abstaining from meat for ethical and cultural reasons.
True enough, but you still need to create the complete chain of amino acids in your diet, easy access doesn't mean anything.

I suggest presenting some well-accepted evidence on this, because from personal experience I strongly disagree.

Frank Zane was a 3 time Mr. Olympia and he earned several University degrees and was even a Uni professor for while:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Zane

Arnold Schwarzenegger is another example, his Bodybuilding accomplishments don't need to be mentioned, but his cunning in Business does, he was a business owner well before being an actor and used his BBing money to propel himself economically through investments, the very definition of a self-made man.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arnold_Schwarzenegger

There are more examples, but those are the first two to come to mind, and I'm too lazy to look up more.

If that information is not convincing enough, take stroll to any BBing forum and just look at how controversial and complex physiology, bodybuilding theory and nutrition can be it's not just going to the gym and lifting weights for a long time, hell just look at the current Nutrition discussion we're having now, tons of contradicting evidence is being presented on both sides. Bodybuilding takes a lot of planning and work outside of the gym. Not to mention an incredibly strict diet and sleep schedule, then we also go into the mental will that it takes to actually make it through rough gym sessions.

http://www.t-nation.com/archives.do
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/
http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/bbmainnut.htm
http://4chanfit.wikia.com/wiki/Harsh's_Worksheet_(WIP)

These youtube fitvloggers are also good examples of helpful intelligent people:
http://www.youtube.com/user/vicsnatural?feature=g-user-c
http://www.youtube.com/user/CampbellFitnessTV?feature=chclk
http://www.youtube.com/user/InciteFitness/featured

The stereotype of the stupid meathead is easily one of the most inaccurate and misinformed ones, just because you can have some ****** amateur BBer stick the steroid needle in his arm, get big, and act like a douchebag, doesn't mean that all BBer are idiots.


Now, my reason for bring up my herbivore example was because you kept on saying that meat was necessary because it contained protein and humans needed protein. However, herbivores also need protein, and they clearly don't get their protein from meat. And many humans also don't get their protein for meat. If you can find a source that says that humans must get their protein from meat, please present it.
I've already posted my sources on that a couple posts back. I've already explained all of this:

There are 27 different Amino Acids found in protein, and most of them are found in meat. If you limit meat sources from your diet, that all you have left are Soy products, some wheats, and Dairy to fill your daily protein requirements. Dairy products are high in fats, wheats lack many amino acids, and Soy products are high in estrogen, which to put it simply is bad for males (whose dominant and necessary hormone is testosterone).

Let us not for get that Creatine is found only in red meat, and this is very useful when building muscle, now, sure... You could supplement Creatine and the other Amino Acids missing in your diet, but the fact that you have to supplement them proves my point that we're intended to eat meat.
but you are in fact wrong here. There have been many studies showing the detrimental effects of being a vegan, and it has been reported on several places.

http://www.healthguidance.org/entry/...egetarian.html
http://www.livestrong.com/article/48...f-being-vegan/
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_are_t..._being_a_vegan

Protein is a building block of nutrition, it is a Macronutrient (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_macronutrients), (alongside Lipids and Carbohydrates), you MUST eat a daily quantity of Amino Acids in order to sustain your body. Furthermore, you cannot build nor sustain a muscular Physique like the ones picture above without a minimum daily consumption of protein of 1g per lb of bodyweight. Those men worked very hard to get in that shape, they didn't simply stop eating junk food and start doing martial arts. Both of those men ate vast amounts of diverse healthy foods (including red meat, chicken and fish) and lifted heavy weights (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_L..._and_nutrition). Not eating enough protein causes your body to go into a catatonic state and literally EAT the protein from your muscles to feed itself (http://www.dailygarnish.com/2010/09/...t-athlete.html ; http://www.livestrong.com/protein-deficiency). This is a survival mechanism built into our bodies to allow us to survive when in low times of food. Not eating a varied and diverse amount of protein causes this to happen as your body is malnourished and seeks to feed itself (if you supply other nutrients, but eat a less then sufficient amount of protein then it happens more slowly over time, but the fact remains that you're killing yourself).

Vegans and Vegetarians have a difficult time meeting their protein requirements when trying to stay fit, so much so, many give up on their silly diets after some time. If you must supplement your nutrients from another source, then it is clear that you need them and were made to consume them in the first place. You can refuse to accept this, but the fact remains that humans rely on meat and other high protein sources to stay alive, and cannot be herbivores as plants do not supply us with the necessary amount of nutrients to ensure our survival.
 

Mr. game and watch

Smash Master
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
4,273
Location
Tyler, Texas
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbivore

According to Wikipedia, a herbivore is an organism anatomically and physiologically adapted to plant material, for example foliage, as the main component of its diet.
The only issue we're having is how we want to define an herbivore.

I've always learned in every science course that: Herbivores just eat plants, Carnivores just eat meat, and omnivores eat both.

:phone:
 

global-wolf

Smash Champion
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
2,215
Location
Northern Virginia
My High School Lit teacher was also a vegetarian. Just because you witness a vegetarian doesn't mean that there are no negatives to it, nor does it disprove that they are either a. suffering from muscle deterioration, or b. consuming protein supplements to make up for the insufficient amino acids in their diet.
I dunno man, are you telling me that my biology teacher is experiencing negative effects from never eating meat in his life? Because I certainly don't see any negatives, and his muscles are not deteriorating, and he is most definitely not eating protein supplements. And how on earth would you know that his intake of amino acids was insufficient? He certainly knows a whole lot more about biology and human health than you. He's not suffering from any protein-deficiency disease. Not to mention there have been vegetarians in parts of the world for centuries and if it was so bad for the body they certainly would have died out by now. You're just looking at this whole issue through a ridiculously tinted lens because you're a bodybuilder and have the bodybuilder nutrition "facts" ingrained in you, while completely ignoring evidence presented right in front of you of healthy vegetarians that get all their protein from non-meat sources.

Frank Zane was a 3 time Mr. Olympia and he earned several University degrees and was even a Uni professor for while:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Zane

Arnold Schwarzenegger is another example, his Bodybuilding accomplishments don't need to be mentioned, but his cunning in Business does, he was a business owner well before being an actor and used his BBing money to propel himself economically through investments, the very definition of a self-made man.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arnold_Schwarzenegger

There are more examples, but those are the first two to come to mind, and I'm too lazy to look up more.

If that information is not convincing enough, take stroll to any BBing forum and just look at how controversial and complex physiology, bodybuilding theory and nutrition can be it's not just going to the gym and lifting weights for a long time, hell just look at the current Nutrition discussion we're having now, tons of contradicting evidence is being presented on both sides. Bodybuilding takes a lot of planning and work outside of the gym. Not to mention an incredibly strict diet and sleep schedule, then we also go into the mental will that it takes to actually make it through rough gym sessions.

http://www.t-nation.com/archives.do
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/
http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/bbmainnut.htm
http://4chanfit.wikia.com/wiki/Harsh's_Worksheet_(WIP)

These youtube fitvloggers are also good examples of helpful intelligent people:
http://www.youtube.com/user/vicsnatural?feature=g-user-c
http://www.youtube.com/user/CampbellFitnessTV?feature=chclk
http://www.youtube.com/user/InciteFitness/featured

The stereotype of the stupid meathead is easily one of the most inaccurate and misinformed ones, just because you can have some ****** amateur BBer stick the steroid needle in his arm, get big, and act like a douchebag, doesn't mean that all BBer are idiots.

Lol, I didn't say that bodybuilders are stupid. There certainly are super muscular people that are smart, but that doesn't mean that it requires intelligence to become muscular. It takes eating adequately and lots of exercise to become muscular, neither of which is intellectually exerting.



I've already posted my sources on that a couple posts back. I've already explained all of this:

There are 27 different Amino Acids found in protein, and most of them are found in meat. If you limit meat sources from your diet, that all you have left are Soy products, some wheats, and Dairy to fill your daily protein requirements. Dairy products are high in fats, wheats lack many amino acids, and Soy products are high in estrogen, which to put it simply is bad for males (whose dominant and necessary hormone is testosterone).

Let us not for get that Creatine is found only in red meat, and this is very useful when building muscle, now, sure... You could supplement Creatine and the other Amino Acids missing in your diet, but the fact that you have to supplement them proves my point that we're intended to eat meat.
Nope. I'll give you a basic biology lesson here. Amino acids are the building blocks of protein; we eat things with amino acids that we can use to make proteins for our own body. There are 20 amino acids that the human body uses, not 27. Of those, 9 are essential, meaning we must eat them. Animal protein contains all 9 of those essential amino acids, so if we eat it then we get it all, done deal. This last sentence is what you're trying to argue.

However, some plants also contain complete proteins. I'll just pull up the first source I found: http://www.fitsugar.com/Whats-Complete-Protein-Inquiring-Vegetarians-Want-Know-165298

"Complete proteins can also be obtained through certain plants, such as soy, spirulina, hemp seed, amaranth, buckwheat, and my fave quinoa.

Foods can be combined to make complete proteins like pairing beans with rice or corn. There are other combinations as well. Beans and seeds, beans and nuts, and beans and grains will form a complete protein. When you eat hummus and pita bread, nut butter on whole grain bread, pasta with beans, veggie burgers on bread, split pea soup with whole grain bread, and tortillas with refried beans, you are eating complete proteins."

So there, you don't need meat to get all the amino acids you need. In fact, it is very easy to get all the amino acids you need without meat. Therefore, meat is unnecessary as a source of protein.



The only issue we're having is how we want to define an herbivore.

I've always learned in every science course that: Herbivores just eat plants, Carnivores just eat meat, and omnivores eat both.

:phone:
Teachers often dumb things down, you know. Not to mention that some teachers don't even know what they're talking about. There are very few mammals that are 100% herbivorous or carnivorous. For example, horses eat hamburgers http://www.horsegroomingsupplies.com/horse-forums/meat-eating-horses-54951.html and wolves eat plants http://www.wolfpark.org/aboutwolves.shtml
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
@globalwolf

Very well, I concede. You win. This doesn't prove humans are herbivores, but you certainly disproved the point I was trying to make. Good Show.

:phone:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom