I'd like to see an argument besides, "Chrom is bland and boring!". For the most part, that and his appearance are what are used against him. If anything, Lucina suffers from appearance issues because of her similarities to Marth. After all, her purpose in the game was to put on the ruse that she was actually Marth in the first place. Part of her character is to look like Marth.
If you ask me, saying Chrom is a bad choice is basically saying that almost every other lord can't get in because of it. Whats that? Lyn can get in because she's a girl and uses a different type of sword? Big whoop. She's still a sword wielding lord, and probably has just as much potential as Chrom. Think about that. Obviously Lyn would have a seperate play style from those around her, but the same could be said for Chrom. Finding it boring doesn't affect the legitimacy of his potential playstyles either.
For the most part, agreed. Chrom is not inherently more or less interesting than any other lord candidate...
I do actually think the "another blue hair sword lord" point is still valid though.
To an extent. Mostly it's IS's fault for
having that many similar looking protagonists in the first place, it isn't really Smash's responsibility to make the IS characters seem more interesting. IS should be putting a little more effort into avoiding redundant-seeming lords.
'course since Chrom and Lucina are Marth descendants, they of course had to look similar to Marth.
Really, the thing is that they absolutely should have tried harder to make Ike look more different. Marth and his kin are blue-haired, Roy's family are red-heads... what exactly does IS have against just having, say, a blonde lord? Ike would've worked just fine as with blonde, dirty blonde, brunette, purple, green, or yellow hair...
Sigh. This argument portions of this thread probably would've been much smaller if they'd just done that.