Yes, I've stated countless times that I understand why Lucina was put in, clones are easy, she was easy. It has literally nothing against Chrom, I'm simply saying that if Lucina can be put in as a clone, then they can surely think of something for Chrom (who doesn't actually fight like Marth or Lucina mind you.)Because clones are easy to add, and Lucina could more easily be designed as a clone of Marth (since Marth is completely different).
Because Lucina generally speaking had a more positive reception by both the Fire Emblem fanbase and Smash fanbase.
Yeah sure, except Sakurai has outright stated Villager wouldn't come to Smash, and look where he is now.Not after a trailer was made of straight up burying a character and deconfirming them in every way possible.
Not sure what point this is making really.people back in the pre-Brawl days before that August update (wow it's been 7 years, lol! I feel old!) that confirmed Ike thought Michiah could get in over him.
Oh boy, here we go.Overall what I'm getting at is this movement should be more realistic about things.
A bigger audience? No. If anything it'd make some people disappointed, Chrom being an alternate costume wouldn't bring about a bigger audience.Asking for Chrom as an alternate character for Marth or Lucina would garner IMO a bigger audience and would be easier to do.
I'm pretty sure Chrom's deconfirm was about as brutal as it gets.Sure it might not be how you originally wanted it, but hey, it's a lot better than the way the Starfy fans keep getting shafted (on Christmas day no less).
We'll take what we can get, but we're still going to push for Chrom as DLC, there's NOTHING unrealistic about that. Asking for an alt is even worse considering he doesn't necessarily fight like Marth or Ike, like people, including YOURSELF, have said countless times:
Lucina fights like Marth, that's what earned her an extra spot on the roster.