Colenstien
Smash Ace
No OP, you aren't the only one.
Sigh..... if only.
Sigh..... if only.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I know that it doesn't have anything to do with inclusion, I'm just saying that's why some people say it would be stereotyping. However, just because a lot of lords have blue hair and capes, doesn't mean all FE characters do - just most of the ones that are viable choices. The only real counterexamples I can think of are Ephraim and Hector (no cape, a lot bulkier), but yeah, neither of them are terribly likely. Like I said, I wouldn't terribly mind Sigurd, I would just be a little disappointed in the monotony.Looks don't have anything to do with brawl inclusion...
Especially since the vast majority of FE lords have blue hair... and all wear capes...
Thank you man scrap marth we already have Ike and he PwnsI don't see why anyone wants Marth back, this is a opinion.
My opinion: Micaiah 4 Brawl!
Marth can beat Micaiah for the 2nd FE Brawl spot easily. You know, he's the first Lord, he's **** popular in japan, and also, he's starring the 11th game in the series. He has done a lot more than Micaiah did.Doubtful, since Lyn was made into an AT. I guess it's still possible, but whatever character is chosen will have a large Japanese fanbase and a small worldwide fanbase more than likely. Lyn had the largest fanbase (worldwide at least) of any GBA game.
Basically that is my thought. It's such a poor representation of the series as a whole to just have three sword users, when a sword is only one of many types of weapons in the game. Would be easier if we could look at FE candidates that were not lords, but I think it's safe to say only lords would get in since none of the other characters represent their games much.
That doesn't change the fact she is the title character of the game, not Ike. Heck, if you use that logic you could say there was no real star in FE10. Same goes for FE7... lot of co-starring going on there.
Only looking at lords, who, besidse Ike and Marth, had a major role in more than one game (not counting brief dialog appearances AFTER the credits, yes, I am talking about you ROY.)
I don't see how Sigurd, Ephraim, Roy, heck, any lord other than Marth and Ike would out prioritize her.
I'll let you know when people start to care.Micaiah? No thank you. I'd much rather have Marth and Hector.
That's not the first time I've seen you say that.I'll let you know when people start to care.
Yeah sure, even though he's the face of Fire Emblem and is getting a remake on the DS in the future.Thank you man scrap marth we already have Ike and he Pwns
yeah I agree I mean I like FE but yeah overkill but I guess for 4 is possible but 3 is more likeleyThree seems like the best number, four or five would be overkill.
Yeah, man! I agree completely. Also, scrap Luigi, we already have Mario! Don't forget about Ganondorf, we have Link! Why stop there, let's get rid of Jigglypuff and Mewtwo, we already have Pikachu and Pokemon Trainer!Thank you man scrap marth we already have Ike and he Pwns
I'm with Shuma on this.3 to 4, no more no less.
Except for the fact that Mario series is Nintendo's most popular and lucrative franchise. And the fact that Donkey Kong isn't a character from the Mario series since, you know, Mario actually got his debut in a Donkey Kong game. And the fact that Donkey Kong is only recurring in the Mario spinoff games - NOT the canon games. And the fact that Sakurai doesn't consider Yoshi, Wario, and Donkey Kong to be part of the Mario universe*, thus why they received their own symbols, rendering that "they're still Mario characters!" argument invalid. And the fact that characters shouldn't be added just because another franchise has/had a certain number of characters.I think there should 4 Fire Emblem Characters since Mario got 5 in Melee and no Matter if they gave Yoshi and DK a different symbol they are still recurring characters in the Mario Games so that goes for 7 Characters.
1. Where did I say Micaiah had a better chance than Marth? If you read my post again, you will notice I actually said just the opposite of that.Marth can beat Micaiah for the 2nd FE Brawl spot easily. You know, he's the first Lord, he's **** popular in japan, and also, he's starring the 11th game in the series. He has done a lot more than Micaiah did.
However, I do agree with the other people. And say, what problem do you have with characters making cameos?
Marth and Ike are the only two that have been playable in multiple games.Me said:I don't see how Sigurd, Ephraim, Roy, heck, any lord other than Marth and Ike would out prioritize her.
It actually seemed like Micaiah over Marth, my bad then.1. Where did I say Micaiah had a better chance than Marth? If you read my post again, you will notice I actually said just the opposite of that.
That doesn't means a thing for Roy, obviously, but for other reasons, he still could make it for Brawl obviously.2. Where did I say I had a problem with cameos? I don't. However, a 2-3 line appearance that is post-credits (basically, the lead in to the next game in the story) does not give a character any sort of advantage over another character. That is what I meant.
Hahahaha Alright Mr. Ridiculous.Except for the fact that Mario series is Nintendo's most popular and lucrative franchise. And the fact that Donkey Kong isn't a character from the Mario series since, you know, Mario actually got his debut in a Donkey Kong game. And the fact that Donkey Kong is only recurring in the Mario spinoff games - NOT the canon games. And the fact that Sakurai doesn't consider Yoshi, Wario, and Donkey Kong to be part of the Mario universe*, thus why they received their own symbols, rendering that "they're still Mario characters!" argument invalid. And the fact that characters shouldn't be added just because another franchise has/had a certain number of characters.
* as far as Smash is concerned
That's quite honestly one of the most ridiculous things I've read today
that may be your personal preferance but be logical here. Think of the series as a whole that's what the main Fire Emblem Characters are like, hence the uniquness of Ike (since he's not a rapier-type using Lord) and why Marth is sure to return (the most popular, ruoccuring rapier-type using lord) fact of the matter is those two will be.are in the game for sure.The next Fire emblem character better not use a sword or be another lord. I want to see an axe or lance using character represented or one of the classic classes like knight or armor. It doesn't need to be a main charater either. As a matter of fact most Fire emblem main characters are basically the same.
You're right...Actually most Fire emblem characers aren't sword using lords.