@Nidtendofreak the thing is, you have very little consistency in this argument of yours that you've been restating the last 8 months or so--that characters need to maintain a consistently good level of results in order for a valid shift in the community's opinion to occur. There's nothing here to necessarily disagree with, but you don't use these criteria yourself.
You made a post a while back about how Olimar is going to sink back down to earth following his, "recent surge," of results. Meanwhile, Shuton has placed top 4 at eleven out of fifteen tournaments he has attended, and that was something that had been going on for a long time
when you posted that. That's in addition to Dabuz's increased secondary usage and Myran's good regional results.
Duck Hunt has obviously been getting good results in Japan for a very long time. This matches exactly what you say a character "needs" for an opinion shift. You just have a preconceived notion of Duck Hunt that doesn't align with what his good players achieve. Three or four months before G4, you made a post somewhere about how you were going to have to deal with all of the people who would end up thinking that Duck Hunt is mid tier after G4. And after G4, you made a string of posts about, "Great, now everyone is gonna think Duck Hunt is mid tier or something," when in fact he likely
is and that's been something multiple people in this thread have thought since late 2015/early 2016.
It's pretty frustrating that well before G4 actually happened, during G4, and now, after G4, Duck Hunt discussion immediately got shut down by people who decided that they
think this character is bad and whose consistent Japanese results they don't
think matter, and who think that Zinoto's poor luck and ZeRo's SDs confirm this.
There are more material things to consider here even disregarding Brood's luck.
-G4 was one of the most stacked tournaments ever.
-G4 represents the peak of Smash 4 meta development that's been building for two plus years, or at least since the last patch.
-There were 3 DHs in top 64 and they all beat some of NA's high to top level players.
-This is in addition to two plus years of garnering good results in a top region and beating some of the world's top players that happen to reside there.
There's also actual character analysis or an attempt to understand why this character that NA perceives as bad isn't bad in the right hands. But thus far, there's been no analysis of Duck Hunt following G4 other than a link to a document that Croi made.
Whenever there's something out of the ordinary that happens, such as DH players placing well in NA, Shulk or others doing well, there will be a post that pops up in this thread, "Everyone is gonna overreact now!" Let's say T somehow upsets Ally this weekend. Is the best response to deny discussion of this character being better than he's perceived before the discussion begins?
Saying that a character needs to maintain a consistent level of results for a while before they're moved is correct. Saying it
over and over again about a character means that your personal opinion is repeatedly failing to align with the character's results for a sustained period of time and shows an inability to reassess opinions. I think you've realized this by now and instead are saying, "The Japanese meta is different and doesn't count as much," which is utterly absurd. I wouldn't be surprised if the narrative shifted to, "The DH
players are good, the character is still bad," another common argument that weights personal bias > results and another statement that doesn't require understanding of the character to make.
I remember a long time ago that following a major you were excited three Ike players made top 32 and there was plenty of Ike discussion for a month or so. I don't see what the difference is, except that DH has had objectively mid tier results in a top region for a long time, yet before discussion on him begins, you reply with a grotesquely exaggerated imitation of people who might say the character is good to try to preemptively make them look dumb, "'zoNgzers DH is so gud guyZ !!'"
The statement being correct in the case of Palutena doesn't make it correct all of the time, and doesn't mean that you know more than everyone else and can be constantly abrasive.