Bowserboy3
Asking mum how to talk to a lady
If Brawl can manage to overcome Meta Knight, I'm pretty sure we can overcome a character that is no where near dominating the metagame right now. Yes, perhaps Bayonetta has time to develop further, but again, at the same time, we're seeing counterplay. There is absolutely no way to predict the future in Smash, ever.
Bayonetta might break some of Smash's design rules (don't know who even said there were outright rules in the first place, but w/e), but at least she doesn't have options you outright can't challenge, or the best attacks in almost all situations (transcendent moves, no cooldown moves etc).
I can see the argument of "Brawl is a different game to Smash 4", and yes, this is true. However, what was true in Brawl is that from the get go, it became clear that Meta Knight was far and away the best character, dominating every level of play, and the counterplay was not coming to fruition as planned. This isn't the case with Bayonetta, where there are at least two or three characters on an arguably equal footing at the top of the list, she is not dominating any level of play right now, and the counterplay has shown to be effective to those who can utilise it.
What's more, Smash 4 has many factors than Brawl that make it hard for any character to be overly dominant; you could lose at any moment thanks to Rage, and overall game balance.
Perhaps it's just differing opinions, but I fail to see how we can say "X character will be banned later down the line", especially when said character isn't dominating. Everything now is currently "if's" and "when's"; we're playing a guessing game in a metagame that is proving otherwise basically. It's like trying to say "my sports team is the best in the league" when they haven't won a game all season.
But alas, opinions will differ, as always; nobody's right here.
Bayonetta might break some of Smash's design rules (don't know who even said there were outright rules in the first place, but w/e), but at least she doesn't have options you outright can't challenge, or the best attacks in almost all situations (transcendent moves, no cooldown moves etc).
I can see the argument of "Brawl is a different game to Smash 4", and yes, this is true. However, what was true in Brawl is that from the get go, it became clear that Meta Knight was far and away the best character, dominating every level of play, and the counterplay was not coming to fruition as planned. This isn't the case with Bayonetta, where there are at least two or three characters on an arguably equal footing at the top of the list, she is not dominating any level of play right now, and the counterplay has shown to be effective to those who can utilise it.
What's more, Smash 4 has many factors than Brawl that make it hard for any character to be overly dominant; you could lose at any moment thanks to Rage, and overall game balance.
Perhaps it's just differing opinions, but I fail to see how we can say "X character will be banned later down the line", especially when said character isn't dominating. Everything now is currently "if's" and "when's"; we're playing a guessing game in a metagame that is proving otherwise basically. It's like trying to say "my sports team is the best in the league" when they haven't won a game all season.
But alas, opinions will differ, as always; nobody's right here.