Friended you so I wouldn't have to join the debate hall to talk about this.
Gheb, the reason no American is admitting to be brainwashed is not because the "brainwashing" was successful, but because it's insulting to suggest just. You're telling us that we're victims, but if that's true, then it's not very obvious to us. Since it doesn't seem likely to us that we've been victimized, it instead seems condescending. Are you telling us that we've been brainwashed because you legitimately want to help us, or do you just want to make a point? No matter what your intention truly is, it seems like the latter of the two.
Anyways, my thoughts on the pledge itself.
The constant reciting of the American pledge seems like a product of natural human psychology to me. Like, do you know of children sometimes have "secret" handshakes that they share only with their friends? Why do you think they do that? Imo, I think that children do that for the sense of exclusivity. People seem to like being in a club, especially exclusive clubs that only some people can be it. This gives people a sense of belonging. To me, the pledge is a large scale "secret handshake" (albeit not so secret) meant to install a sense of belonging in Americans.
Not convinced? I got more examples.
You ever wonder why people like to identify with sport teams so much? "I attend this university with this football (talking about American football here) team. I am a fan of this team. When this team wins, I'm happy. When my team loses, I get frustrated. If my team wins against another team that my friend likes, I am prone to 'trash talking' him." Ask yourself, why would anyone actually feel emotional about a sports team that they are not apart of? It's because that sports team gives team a sense of inclusion.
It's not too hard to extend this logic with people identifying themselves with their entire country. I know for a fact that you're a football (soccer) fan. I've seen you post status updates on facebook about the sport. Do you not identify with whatever soccer team you like? During the FIFA world cup, do you not want your country to do well?
The point is, is that people love to find external things to identify themselves with, and costumes (like the pledge) are ways to reinforce this sense of identification. This sense of exclusivity. This sense of belonging.
This all makes sense from an evolutionary stand point. Imagine in the days of old, when people lived only in tribes. I think it likely that each individual tribe had their own unique customs, so to reinforce the idea that their tribe was unique. Other people from other tribes had different customs, and thus they were outsiders. As just, one was to be cautious around an outsider, maybe even hate them. Why? Because maybe that outsider was a threat to their land, their food, their women, ect.. It might seem unethical from a modern PoV, but back then it was probably logical given that ones own survival wasn't guaranteed, like it is today (more or less).
I also think that it would have been logical for authority figures to try to install these customs into the children of the tribes. To try to install their sense of identity with their tribe. Sorry if it seems like I'm jumping from one topic to the next, but I think that you'll get what I'm getting at.
What I'm getting at is that I don't believe the pledge is a result of an attempt to brainwash the public, but rather simply a large scale implication of what I said above. After all, technically the American government doesn't force one to recite the pledge. Usually it's individual adults who reinforce it. I'm not saying that it's right, or that it hasn't been abused. The pledge was originally written simply to honor Columbus Day. Now we recite it every day in our public school systems. Also, the words, "one nation, under God" weren't originally in the pledge. They were edited in during the cold war as a conservative attempt to make it an "us" (Godly democratic Americans) vs. "them" (Godless communist Russians) thing. Is that ethical? Imo, no. Is that cheap patriotism? Imo, yes. Was it an attempt at brainwashing? Imo, kinda in the sense that they wanted to influence the American public, but I don't think that's what they're still using it for today. Today, I just think that it's a thing that's been passed down from generation to generation, because it's a custom that's been installed into the American psyche and, over time, has spread across the country.
Gheb, adults teach children how they believe they should act. Adults also teach them to obey them, do they not? Did your parents not demand obedience on at least some scale? We're they trying to brainwash you, or were they simply teaching you values and customs that they know, a practice in education that has been installed into us by evolution?