I've decided to take this out of the Senate and preferably through VM. First point: OK, my bad. NOW, Second point: While you do want the best intentions for HOR, True, I may have used the wrong term to describe you but I cannot agree with you on you not being sensitive. You take offense to criticism or you let emotions speak for you, case in point: the time you were the Leader of HOR. Now why do you expect conflicts with MS when he stated:
----------
I only have something against furries who hint at being attracted to their fur things or whatever they're called
----------
Unless someone starts posting furry posts/content/etc or someone wants to question him about his dislike, there will not be any conflicts and not to mention there's a furry Social Group for those who WANT to post furry post/content/ect.
Now a lesson for you Tickykat, I am serious, so when I'm very serious, I suggest that you don't cross me either. I prefer to be friendly but I won't take replies like that without retorting.