D
Deleted member
Guest
Flavor will come later.
Day 6 begins! Today, you will be rating Shulk's likelihood and how much you want Shulk along with predicting Dixie Kong's score for tomorrow. You also have six nominations at your disposal today. The day will end on June 30th, 2013 sometimes after I get up.
Due to my mistake when putting down the overall score in likelihood and want for characters, I have used a new, more accurate method for this. Everyone gets an extra nomination today to compensate for this.
Xenigma from Smashboards will get five extra nomination today for being the closest to predicting King K. Rool's score. bellagio23 from GameFAQs will earn five extra nomination for being the closest to predicting Isaac's score while Crap-Zapper and Kikaru earn four and three more respectively for having the same score but predicting later (this is to make up for the inaccurate score Isaac got until I fixed my method).
If you are confused, here's the format to use to help you out:
As I said before, I am putting votes together from both Smashboards and GameFAQs when putting in scores together. However, the method I was using was that I simply combined the percentage from both sites for my overall percentage. I noticed the problem yesterday afternoon when putting together King K. Rool's score. I put both scores together, and it came out in the 62% range for his likelihood. The problem with this is that there is a discrepancies between how many people vote on Smashboards and who vote on GameFAQs and realized that it was messing with my ratings. So what I did was changed the way to reflect a more accurate grading system to cover the discrepancies of votes between Smashboards and GameFAQs.
Here is the method I use; I first count the amount of votes Smashboards and GameFAQs made separately and then add them together to see how many votes are overall when both sites are factored in. Afterwards, I then add every vote made on the website and divide by how many votes are made on that website. This gives me the percentage for the website. Afterwards, I divide how many votes are made on that website with the overall amount of votes made. I do this for Smashboards and GameFAQs. When both are done, I then combine both websites for the total score. This is probably confusing to most people and I'm not the best at explaining, but here's an example:
I will put this on the FAQs for everyone to see. Please ask questions if you have them.
Day 6 begins! Today, you will be rating Shulk's likelihood and how much you want Shulk along with predicting Dixie Kong's score for tomorrow. You also have six nominations at your disposal today. The day will end on June 30th, 2013 sometimes after I get up.
Due to my mistake when putting down the overall score in likelihood and want for characters, I have used a new, more accurate method for this. Everyone gets an extra nomination today to compensate for this.
Xenigma from Smashboards will get five extra nomination today for being the closest to predicting King K. Rool's score. bellagio23 from GameFAQs will earn five extra nomination for being the closest to predicting Isaac's score while Crap-Zapper and Kikaru earn four and three more respectively for having the same score but predicting later (this is to make up for the inaccurate score Isaac got until I fixed my method).
If you are confused, here's the format to use to help you out:
Here's is my explanation for the new system of putting overall scores together I am using.Shulk: *Insert likelihood with possible reasoning*
*Insert want score*
Dixie Kong: *Insert prediction for Dixie Kong's score tomorrow. Not the same as voting for likelihood*
Nominations: *insert six nominations*
As I said before, I am putting votes together from both Smashboards and GameFAQs when putting in scores together. However, the method I was using was that I simply combined the percentage from both sites for my overall percentage. I noticed the problem yesterday afternoon when putting together King K. Rool's score. I put both scores together, and it came out in the 62% range for his likelihood. The problem with this is that there is a discrepancies between how many people vote on Smashboards and who vote on GameFAQs and realized that it was messing with my ratings. So what I did was changed the way to reflect a more accurate grading system to cover the discrepancies of votes between Smashboards and GameFAQs.
Here is the method I use; I first count the amount of votes Smashboards and GameFAQs made separately and then add them together to see how many votes are overall when both sites are factored in. Afterwards, I then add every vote made on the website and divide by how many votes are made on that website. This gives me the percentage for the website. Afterwards, I divide how many votes are made on that website with the overall amount of votes made. I do this for Smashboards and GameFAQs. When both are done, I then combine both websites for the total score. This is probably confusing to most people and I'm not the best at explaining, but here's an example:
Code:
Palutena
Likelihood:
- Number of votes: 36 (Smashboards) + 18 (GameFAQs) = 54 (total)
- Votes on Smashboards: 50, 75, 75, 90, 90, 80, 70, 75, 68, 85, 90, 93, 85, 90, 65, 75, 40, 45, 85, 70, 80, 80,
55, 82.47, 80, 90, 90, 90, 85, 60, 50, 85, 90, 85, 85, 65
Individual ratings given by voters/how many votes were made = 76.35%
- Votes on GameFAQs: 80, 90, 50, 85, 30, 20, 87.5, 80, 80, 40, 85, 90, 85, 84, 64.01, 100, 30, 85
Individual ratings given by voters/how many votes were made = 70.31%
36 (Smashboards)/54 (total) * 76.35% (likelihood score for Palutena on Smashboards) = 50.9%
18 (GameFAQs)/54 (total) * 70.31% (likelihood score for Palutena on GameFAQs) = 23.44%
50.9% + 23.44% = 74.34%
Same math applies to want ratings.