Would brawl be better in 3D?

[Harkness]

Long before I had even heard of super smash bros, me and my cousin used to play a game called Power Stone 2 for the Sega Dreamcast. It was pretty cool, and I liked the style of the game. When i leaned that it was a somewhat popular game for its time, I was even more intrigued. I've though about this for a long time and my question is, if SSB was made into a 3D format like Power Stone would it still be a great popular game?

 

[OmegaXXII]

what do you mean my 3D?, the game is already like that

 

[delicious gooey load]

u act like power stone is some hidden gem you found or something.

everyone knows about power stone.

and everyone knows smash belongs in 2D

 

[Crystallion]

I know what he meant.

My answer: NO! I don't think this would be a good idea, mainly because it would change so much of the initial gameplay.

 

[delicious gooey load]

he means like

2D= street fighter

3D= power stone...egheriz....mario 64 and the such

 

[gigasteve]

Why fix what isn't broken?

 

[The Halloween Captain]

I initially held it against Smash that it was 2-D. However, upon further observation, Smash wouldn't really be Smash if it was 3-D.

I like the idea, but it just would not be a smash game if people would hide behind obstactes, if projectiles need to be aimed across a 3 dimentional surface, if you needed four seperate screens for multiplayer, etc.

Its a great idea for a new game (I suggest the name Battle Royal), but not Super Smash Bros.

 

[TWILTHERO]

What the heck is Power Stone?

On topic: No. why change something that has been done for the past 9 years?

 

[Harkness]

I just wanted to know. I mean, i always though it would be cool and even more challenging, but i see no problem as it is now. I just wanted to know other peoples opinions.

 

[The Halloween Captain]

We should have both a 3D and 2D version of this game with the same concept in each of knocking the opponent off a cliff.

 

[Harkness]

We should have both a 3D and 2D version of this game with the same concept in each of knocking the opponent off a cliff.

Finally, someone who actually agrees with me on this point at least. (no offense to other posters, your opinions are respected)

 

[Johnthegalactic]

Well, the game would not be smash if you moved around in 3D.

But, I would like to see a 3D Nintendo All-Star fighter.

 

[ssbbFICTION]

We should have both a 3D and 2D version of this game with the same concept in each of knocking the opponent off a cliff.

We sort of got a taste of what smash would be like if it were in 3d (which I would HATE) when they added link to one of the sould caliber games.

BTW, 2d games should remain epic 2d games. Metal Slug 3d most people havent even heard of, and after Megaman x6, Megaman x became horrible because x7 was in partial 3d. Thats when everyone went over to 2d battle network(I think thats the name)

 

[AbsoluteZero255]

Eh, i don't think so. A lot of the AT's will be a lot harder.

Also, It will be a lot hard to land aerial attacks... and even ground attacks.

 

[Overload]

dear god no. power stone is great but the awesome thing about smash is it feels like a mario platformer but it is a fighting game. There is nothing else like it, it is practically a perfect formula

 

[Johnthegalactic]

What I was thinking about is how hard it would be to fight in close quarters, although a Melee system like in Halo where you do a small lunge could be implemented.

 

[nightSN]

i like smash being 2d. : D

 

[The Halloween Captain]

I propose that "Nintendo All-Stars" be a game with similar physics to a smash game, but x is the only jump, y is the fast fall, and the game be 3-dimentional with maps with obstacles that you can hide behind and four sperate screens. Spot dodge and all down attacks will be done with the y-button (If that can be practical), and up attacks be done with R, while L is shield and L + directional is roll dodge.

That way, we can have smash and All-Star as legit fighting games.

 

[Sosuke]

No.
10idkwhattoputheres

 

[MarKO X]

No. Do you know what happened when Street Fighter tried to go 3D? It failed. Three times.

Let's be glad that Smash is 2D with a little dodging.

Why Smash would be trash in 3D:
1) No ledgehogging.
2) 4P Budokai Tenkaichi-like split screen.
3) Not enough ground combos to have a good fight.

 

[Duckys]

Think of it this way, if they made it 3D I doubt any previous SSB player would buy it.

 

[globiumz]

The "4 player split screen" problem could be solved in the future, if Nintendo ever attempts a console using virtual technology like visors. The rest..... It would be pretty hard.

Oh yeah now here's something at the bottom of this post.




















hahaha made you look. but you know, I might actually let things "slip" here and there now and then.

 

[Duckys]

Lmao I couldn't imagine a four way split screen, that would totally ruin the game totally.

 

[Union of Darkness]

No. Non. Nej. Nein. Iie. Nullus. Hayir. NYET!

 

[Krug]

NO!

Spoiler

10Robotniks

 

[Randofu]

We should have both a 3D and 2D version of this game with the same concept in each of knocking the opponent off a cliff.

Agreed. For that matter, the 3D version doesn't necessarily need to be about knock-outs, but still.

There's plenty of room in Nintendo's repertoire for both games.

 

[TLMarth]

If it was simple to use.

 

[meleemaster500]

Smash is not 3D
Smash is not 2D
Smash is 2.5D
GET IT RIGHT!

 

[iEatPikmin]

As much as I'd like to see a Smash-like game in 3D, I'd have to disagree. >_>

1) Projectiles would be hard to use.
2) Aerials would be hard to use.
3) There will probably be a pretty big increase in SD's.
4) Recovery might be much harder.
5) L-targeting might be a good or bad thing if Smash went 3D.
6) Camera view would take up C-stick?

 

[AbsoluteZero255]

Also, final destination would be round.

 

[DeliciousCake]

No. Do you know what happened when Street Fighter tried to go 3D? It failed. Three times.

Let's be glad that Smash is 2D with a little dodging.

Why Smash would be trash in 3D:
1) No ledgehogging.
2) 4P Budokai Tenkaichi-like split screen.
3) Not enough ground combos to have a good fight.

I'm assuming you never played PowerStone or an actual 3D fighting game that isn't Budokai. Works perfectly fine without split-screen provided your levels aren't overly cluttered with 15 different levels of platforms.

 

[-Big_-Blue 9]

Look at sonic and his transition from 2-D to 3-D
some things are better the way they are.

 

[Chibi-pika]

well if it were 3-d it wouldn't just would be super smash brothers, it'll be something thats unoriginal

 

[ShadowLink84]

Look at sonic and his transition from 2-D to 3-D
some things are better the way they are.

SA1, SA2, SATSR, Sonic Heroes.

Yeah Shut up fool.

 

[AmigoOne]

Power stone rocks.

 

[Digimonkey]

Many people get headaches from staring at 3-D for a long time (including me), so that wouldn't be a very good idea.

 

[Negi-Kun]

It wouldn't.

 

[Jonkku]

SA1, SA2, SATSR, Sonic Heroes.

Yeah Shut up fool.

I can't really see a good reason why would you use Sonic Heroes as an example of succesful 2D -> 3D..
That game was a complete failure (not just my opinion)..
And before you ask, I do have it, I have beat it, and I hate myself for doing that.. imo 2D sonics > 3D sonics, mostly.. Sonic Adventures we're good..
Sorry if I sound like a jerk, but I'm just giving out my opinion.

 

[Bassoonist]

It would be interesting, but I think it'd be better if it was a Smash SPIN-OFF. Meaning SSB4 would still be 2D..

But personally I think a 3D Super Smash Bros. would be awesome. 2D Super Smash Bros. got really boring for me with Brawl.

 

[istudying]

brawl 3-d would suck *** hell it wouldn't be super smash bros. anymore just a f@g game