Levitas
the moon
You missed the zap jump.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I agree. The stats are important, but the skill is what is most important.Hey, at least Lucas isn't last....unlike Captain Falcon =(. Eh, just play whoever you like ;p.
He never became bad, he was always bad.He never became bad.
He has always just had hard matchups (against competent people).
Bowyer for Vincent tier.PKNintendo for scrub tier!!
Read the SBR Tier list explanation. Ters are when all things are equal, at the highest level of play. It ranks how each character does against the rest of the cast.Yeah. People just don't understand that It's YOUR SKILL that matters, not their stats! I mean sure, The stats do have something to say, but really, IT'S THE SKIIIIIIIIL!!!!
Again, read the SBR tier list. This discussion already hapened. The Grab Release was NOT taken into account when they made the list.Lucas is mid weight.
And everytime I see Lucas and tier in the same sentence it's. DEATHGVRA LOLZ.
1. If Ness can escape Marth's CG at with 15% (Super grab break by the way) IMmpretty sure Lucas can escape earlier.
2. Lucas is only grab released downsmash by DK (again, only if they spin and around and it's a 50-50 chance lol)
Plenty of the current characters in mid tier have bad matchups. ex: Luigi, who actually HAS an infinite (via DDD) Fox, who gets CG by Pikachu from 0-60 with little effort e.c.t
I can go on, but in my opinion, it's that DG infinite rumor thats putting Lucas down.
umm... Vincent's bad ***, so... thanks?Bowyer for Vincent tier.
Give me every point onto why Lucas deserves low. (hell, what ARE his bad matchups anyway?)
I definitely agree with that.Metaknight, Snake, Game and Watch, Toon Link, Marth, Diddy, Donkey Kong, Ice Climbers, Ness, and Wario are all matchups in which Lucas has a noticable disadvantage.
Lol, Vincent was pretty bad in FF7 though. Don't quote me on that.umm... Vincent's bad ***, so... thanks?
lol, he's got a ton of bad matchups.
man vincent was the shiznit in every game he was in =PLol, Vincent was pretty bad in FF7 though. Don't quote me on that.
Anyway, I wasn't trying to insult you.
Lucas doesn't have a bad matchup against Wario nor Ice climbers. Thats a farce.
LOL.man vincent was the shiznit in every game he was in =P
you don't need to play as good characters to beat an RPG. In most RPG's you can basically beat every boss with any set of characters. And Vincent is a bad ***. Nothing can change that.Lol, Vincent was pretty bad in FF7 though. Don't quote me on that.
while i would love to agree with you...sadly that is not what this game is likeKnow what I think, the tier system is completely stupid, no character in my opinion is better than any other
What dream world do you live in?Know what I think, the tier system is completely stupid, no character in my opinion is better than any other
Have fun against the high tiers. XDKnow what I think, the tier system is completely stupid, no character in my opinion is better than any other
That's what I thought.Know what I think, the tier system is completely stupid, no character in my opinion is better than any other
where? Dismiss most of what I'm about to say if you're a casual player, or bad at the game.I can get along just fine with Lucas,
tiers are a concept and thus have intrinsic meaning relating to all the other concepts that they arose from, in addition to having inferred meaning based on the context given. In this case, they mean that one character is likely to do better than another in a tournament setting. That's one for me, none for you.tiers mean nothing, absolutely nothing.
So can I. The difference is that I play people like scotu and bowyer, who have some skill and reputation, whereas I've never heard of you or the people you play. And I readily admit that I cannot beat certain people playing certain characters. Now I have to admit that your point is factual, as ANYONE can beat up another character, but there's probably a skill gap between who's holding the controller of the character that's winning despite a bad matchup and the character that's losing because nobody's holding that controller.I can beat the living piss out of any character with Fox or Lucas, who I might add, are low tier characters.
This does not follow from any previous or following statements. try again.The whole tier discussion is void and null.
People who make extreme judgements on trivial things like using strategy in games deserve to be shot. Oh, wait, that would be bad for me to say, wouldn't it? Oh well...People who base their Mains and secondaries off of tier lists deserve to be shot.
In general, Mushroom's statement is true given the following assumptions:Iron Mushroom said that a low tier character will lose against a high tier character, that is a load of bullshat.
Online is a different game. Latency makes certain moves more powerful than they are in in-person games. Now if you happen to live in michigan, I'd be more than happy to beat the tier system into your face, but online is not my arena.I can prove it too. Anybody want to have a match against my Fox/Lucas with a high tier character? PM me.
That thought process is for scrubs.Tiers are for Queers FTW.