• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Who thinks the Ice Climber's have been de-confirmed?

Status
Not open for further replies.

the grim lizard

Smash Master
Joined
Nov 26, 2004
Messages
3,130
That's a fair point, but I strongly suspect that lack of inspiration also played a factor. After all, there are dozens of Mario games that could have worked as a stage - but only one Ice Climbers title.
It's not really fair to compare Super Mario Bros. to IceClimber.

Meanwhile, the G&W stage drew inspiration from all the games in the series to create a single stage.
If by "all" you mean two or three out of fifty...


Also, the Fire Emblem stage was cut because of time, too. Same with Mach Rider as a PC and Ditto as a Pokeball Pokemon. There are lots of cuts because of time. I don't think time is a factor here. So, Sakurai will keep all the characters he likes. If he likes ICs, they will stay (obviously).
 

Wizzlecroff

Smash Ace
Joined
May 15, 2006
Messages
552
Location
Hiram, Ga
They have some evidence. Sakurai said that he wanted to have some forgotten retro characters. How would he be supporting that by removing them?
 

the grim lizard

Smash Master
Joined
Nov 26, 2004
Messages
3,130
I don't really see retro characters as guest characters either. I love the retro characters, and I'm glad they're in. In a lot of ways, I feel like they're just as important to Nintendo's success as even Mario. In the early days, games like Balloon Fight, Ice Climber, Clu Clu Land, Kid Icarus, and Punch-Out helped propel Nintendo forward as the leader in video games.

Obviously a plumber saving a princess from a giant turtle has more potential than a man flying over the ocean with two balloons strapped to his back or a hammer-wielding ****** scaling levels of blocks, but they still were important for Nintendo to show its versitility in the gaming industry.
 

Wiseguy

Smash Champion
Joined
Mar 28, 2007
Messages
2,245
Location
Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada (Proud
I strongly suggest you take a look at CrappyCaptureDevice's video series on Youtube. Brinstar was a fusion of at least three different chambers from the first three Metroid games. The Super Mario World stage combined the first two stages, while using music from yet another stage. Green Greens used a gameplay element from The Great Cave Offensive while adding in the Whispy Woods boss battle. Flat Zone took ideas and scenarios from the Oil Panic, Manhole, and Helmet LCD games. The Pokemon stage comprises many different environments--the concept of a shifting stadium actually comes from the anime. The word you're looking for, Wiseguy, is comprehensive, not generic. To give due representation to a broad series of games, it makes sense to include as many elements as possible.

Not only are your generic vs. specific comments wrong, they are irrelevant. The true question here is, "Since it appears that they have used, in part, an element found in the Icicle Mountain stage in Melee, and since similar stages should be avoided, could the Ice Climbers' stage be reimagined or optimized for this game?" As you have already seen, plenty of ideas for a better Ice Climbers stage have been offered, and we're just amateurs.
Maybe I could have phrased my argument better....

What I was trying (poorly) to say was more or less what you said: that many of the stages in Melee draw inspiration from actual games, not that they are 100% copied from said games. For example, in Great Bay the giant turtle never visits that exact spot - but this is still an aspect of Majora's Mask that serves as a fitting homage. What I meant my "generic" was more along the lines of the Great Temple - which captures the feel of a Zelda game without drawing specific elements from specific games.

Wait... where was I going with this again?

Let me try and unscramble this mess I've created:

In my (humble) opinion, Icicle Moutain mirrored the format and feel of an Ice Climbers level extremely well. More so than most stages, it captured the essence of the game it was trying to represent. Ice Climbers consists almost entirely of jumping up and up from one platform to the next, which is precisely what the player does in Icicle Moutain.

Now, since this concept fits the Ice Climbers so well, it seems only logical (to me) that they would incorporate it in the new Ice Climbers map - if one is being included. However, since this exact stage format is used in Dk's new map it seems unlikely that a second Icicle Moutain-esque map will be included.

Therefore, I would argue that there are three possibilities:

1) The ICs will get an entirely new ICs themed map, as some here have suggested.

2) The ICs will be included without a new map (ala Marth and Roy) and Rumble Falls will replace Icicle Moutain.

3) The Ice Climbers will not return and Rumble Falls will replace Icicle Moutain.

The first possibilty seems to be the most popular here, and it is by no means out of the question. However, I personally don't think any potential Ice Climbers stage could capture the essense of the game as well as Icicle Moutain. Therefore, it is my view that if a IC stage were to be included it would be a reworked version of Icicle moutain. I could be wrong, but That's just the way I see it.

The second outcome is also possible, but since it's very unlikely for a character to be included without a stage I can't see it happening.

That leaves me with door number three. Nothing is set in stone, but I truly think that the demise of Melee's dynamic duo is more likely today than it was yesterday. Keep in mind that it's just one guy's opinion.

It's not really fair to compare Super Mario Bros. to IceClimber.
Fair or not, it's true that conceiving of a new stage is far easier when you have several games to draw inspiration from.

If by "all" you mean two or three out of fifty...
Fine, you got me there. But I think my point is still valid.

Also, the Fire Emblem stage was cut because of time, too. Same with Mach Rider as a PC and Ditto as a Pokeball Pokemon. There are lots of cuts because of time. I don't think time is a factor here. So, Sakurai will keep all the characters he likes. If he likes ICs, they will stay (obviously).
Sakurai will keep all the characters that he thinks are worth keeping. Will that include ICs? Maybe, maybe not.

Time is still a factor. With december fast approaching there are deaslines to meet.

They have some evidence. Sakurai said that he wanted to have some forgotten retro characters. How would he be supporting that by removing them?
He would be supporting retro character by including as many new retro characters as possible. ICs are a great character, but frankly, I'd much rather play as an entirely new retro character.

I don't really see retro characters as guest characters either. I love the retro characters, and I'm glad they're in. In a lot of ways, I feel like they're just as important to Nintendo's success as even Mario. In the early days, games like Balloon Fight, Ice Climber, Clu Clu Land, Kid Icarus, and Punch-Out helped propel Nintendo forward as the leader in video games.

Obviously a plumber saving a princess from a giant turtle has more potential than a man flying over the ocean with two balloons strapped to his back or a hammer-wielding ****** scaling levels of blocks, but they still were important for Nintendo to show its versitility in the gaming industry.
Oh, I'm not disputing the importance of retro characters. I just think that since there are so many worthy retro characters, ICS and G&W should step aside so that two other retro characters can chave a chance to shine. I'd much rather see Balloon Fighter and Little Mac playable in Brawl than ICs and G&W, simply becuase I've already played them to death.

That's just an opinion. Feel free to disagree.
 

StarshipGroove

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Apr 30, 2007
Messages
488
Well Wiseguy, guess what? Sakurai actually wanted to give the ICs another stage! This is easily proven by the fact that, using the debug mode, there is a hidden map named IceTop, different from the normal level named IceMT.
Said stage, when played, freezes the game in the same way Akaneia does. The name IceTop can give you an idea of what the stage was supposed to be, the top of the mountain.
 

the grim lizard

Smash Master
Joined
Nov 26, 2004
Messages
3,130
In my (humble) opinion, Icicle Moutain mirrored the format and feel of an Ice Climbers level extremely well. More so than most stages, it captured the essence of the game it was trying to represent. Ice Climbers consists almost entirely of jumping up and up from one platform to the next, which is precisely what the player does in Icicle Moutain.
If this is true, then the Mario stages should only be ones like the first part of Adventure mode. That captured how a Mario game works perfectly. Except...this isn't how they design stages.

Icicle Mountain (like most stages in Melee) was just a concept that they tried out for something different. That one wasn't a huge success, but it helped pave the way for this new up-scroller. I think stage designs are more about concepts than staying true to a particular game. Sure, they use a game's style and aspects to help create a concept, but the concept is the important part, not how well it represents the game.


Time is still a factor. With december fast approaching there are deaslines to meet.
I think people are misconceived about this. I'm pretty sure the final roster has been set for a while. After having the final roster, he went back and decided to include ATs (one of the reasons for the delay). The deadline is not an issue for PCs. I'm willing to bet Sakurai has already decided if a character has made the cut or not; so the new "deadline" is irrelevant whether a character will be in or not.

Besides, even if it was, they would automatically be more likely because they're returning, and they already have the character models and everything; so it wouldn't be difficult at all to include them.
 

Del Money

Smash Champion
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
Messages
2,464
DEAR LORD...this thread need to be closed

ok 3 points to get before the n00bs come a-spamming:

1. the levels of DK: Jungle Beat (a game i never played) scrolled as well so its not as much of a total ripoff off of the ICs as most choose to believe

2. THE ICs ARE NOT DE-CONFIRMED...for God's sake people if melee can have two sideways-scrolling levels (pokefloats and rainbow cruise), why cant brawl have two upward scrolling levels? stop being narrow-minded

3. agreed, this is a dry and lame update. yet another stage ill block out of VS mode completely. predictions for tonight?
nuff said
 

Del Money

Smash Champion
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
Messages
2,464
...and Big Blue.

Not to mention Delfino Island/Mute City.
i know right? i actually completely forgot about Big Blue (mustve that that level blocked for waay too long). and Mute City is more of in and out traversal *lol that sounded dirty*, but at least you get the point. ICs arent de-confirmed. its just stupid speculation with absolutely no licking of intellect or undeniable proof to back it up
 

freeman123

Smash Lord
Joined
Jun 11, 2005
Messages
1,855
Location
GA
NNID
josephf5
Wiseguy
What I was trying (poorly) to say was more or less what you said: that many of the stages in Melee draw inspiration from actual games, not that they are 100% copied from said games. For example, in Great Bay the giant turtle never visits that exact spot - but this is still an aspect of Majora's Mask that serves as a fitting homage. What I meant my "generic" was more along the lines of the Great Temple - which captures the feel of a Zelda game without drawing specific elements from specific games.
And that has what to do with Ice Climbers returning?

Wiseguy
Wait... where was I going with this again?
Nobody knows.

Wiseguy
Now, since this concept fits the Ice Climbers so well, it seems only logical (to me) that they would incorporate it in the new Ice Climbers map - if one is being included. However, since this exact stage format is used in Dk's new map it seems unlikely that a second Icicle Moutain-esque map will be included.
Except that the DK stage isn't exactly the same, as I've pointed out several times. They could easily have both.

They're more different from eachother then Battlefield and Kirby 64, and they still had both of those in the same game.

Wiseguy
The first possibilty seems to be the most popular here, and it is by no means out of the question.
It has nothing to do with popularity. I, for one, couldn't care less if Ice Climbers return or not. It's about common sense. This isn't pro-IC people Vs. anti-IC people, it's reasonably thinking people Vs. people who don't know what they're talking about.

The discussion is whether or not the Rumble Falls stage has anything to do with IC returning. And the answer is no, it doesn't. Anybody who thinks otherwise is wrong.

Wiseguy
1) The ICs will get an entirely new ICs themed map, as some here have suggested.

2) The ICs will be included without a new map (ala Marth and Roy) and Rumble Falls will replace Icicle Moutain.

3) The Ice Climbers will not return and Rumble Falls will replace Icicle Moutain.
Those aren't the only three options. They could bring back Icicle Mountain as a past stage and still cut Ice Climbers from the roster for all we know. The point is we don't know, and Rumble Falls doesn't tell us anything.

Wiseguy
Time is still a factor. With december fast approaching there are deaslines to meet.
They've probably had a complete character list for a year now. Time isn't a factor at all. They've been making the game for over two years now. The fact that they took so long to announce a release date shows that they weren't going to announce one until they were sure the game would be finished by then, rather than announce a release date and then rush to finish the game by that time.

Wiseguy
He would be supporting retro character by including as many new retro characters as possible.
We don't need a whole list of retro characters. Two or three is fine.

StarshipGroove
Well Wiseguy, guess what? Sakurai actually wanted to give the ICs another stage! This is easily proven by the fact that, using the debug mode, there is a hidden map named IceTop, different from the normal level named IceMT.
Said stage, when played, freezes the game in the same way Akaneia does. The name IceTop can give you an idea of what the stage was supposed to be, the top of the mountain.
He'll probably ignore that like he does everything that disproves his arguments.
 

Wiseguy

Smash Champion
Joined
Mar 28, 2007
Messages
2,245
Location
Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada (Proud
Well Wiseguy, guess what? Sakurai actually wanted to give the ICs another stage! This is easily proven by the fact that, using the debug mode, there is a hidden map named IceTop, different from the normal level named IceMT.
Said stage, when played, freezes the game in the same way Akaneia does. The name IceTop can give you an idea of what the stage was supposed to be, the top of the mountain.
Interesting. But was this stage axed because od lack of time or becuase it wasn't very good? I'm not sure, but it is a good point...

If this is true, then the Mario stages should only be ones like the first part of Adventure mode. That captured how a Mario game works perfectly. Except...this isn't how they design stages.
The story mode level did mirror the Mario series very well, this is true.

But again, there is so many different things to draw inspiration from in the Mario series. Rainbow cruise, for example, is a great representation of one of the levels in Mario 64 (though obviously, they took some liberties with the design). There is not nearly as many stage-worthy concepts to draw from in the Ice Climbers series

Icicle Mountain (like most stages in Melee) was just a concept that they tried out for something different. That one wasn't a huge success, but it helped pave the way for this new up-scroller. I think stage designs are more about concepts than staying true to a particular game. Sure, they use a game's style and aspects to help create a concept, but the concept is the important part, not how well it represents the game.
I'd say that both are important. Obviously you want stages that are enjoyable in actual matches, but they should be as true as possible to the series it represents.

I think people are misconceived about this. I'm pretty sure the final roster has been set for a while. After having the final roster, he went back and decided to include ATs (one of the reasons for the delay). The deadline is not an issue for PCs. I'm willing to bet Sakurai has already decided if a character has made the cut or not; so the new "deadline" is irrelevant whether a character will be in or not.

Besides, even if it was, they would automatically be more likely because they're returning, and they already have the character models and everything; so it wouldn't be difficult at all to include them.
Obviously the roster has already been long decided, and Sakurai and his team hammered out a playable roster that they felt could be completed within their expected deadline.

If the Ice Climbers were returning, it would far more complicated than simply cutting and paisting them from one game to another. Their character model would have to be updated and their wireframe and moveset would have to be re-programed into Brawl's modified engine, not to mention that they would have to be rebalanced for a new roster. Then there are the all new moves like the crawl and the final smah - not to mention an all new stage (presumably).

Sadly, it seems to me that characters like were cut when the roster was finalized so as to free up more time for all new characters - which at leats bodes well for the inclusion of new retro characters.

EDIT: By the way Freeman, I don't ignore people who disagree with me. Just people who are rude about it.
 

Espy Rose

Dumb horse.
Joined
May 31, 2006
Messages
30,577
Location
Texas
NNID
EspyRose
I'm ignoring all the posts before mine and the first post.

Just because we get an Icicle Mountain-esque stage, doesn't mean we're not getting the ICs back.

For all we know, Icicle Mountain may be the new Jungle Japes.
 

Del Money

Smash Champion
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
Messages
2,464
This isn't pro-IC people Vs. anti-IC people, it's reasonably thinking people Vs. people who don't know what they're talking about.
QFT

i DARE someone to tell me right now that Brawl CANNOT possibly have more than one vertically scrolling level, assuming the ICs dont get a completely different level for brawl. i DOUBLE DARE actually *pulp fiction reference minus the swearing*.

"Who thinks this thread will be de-confirmed?"
 

the grim lizard

Smash Master
Joined
Nov 26, 2004
Messages
3,130
But again, there is so many different things to draw inspiration from in the Mario series. Rainbow cruise, for example, is a great representation of one of the levels in Mario 64 (though obviously, they took some liberties with the design). There is not nearly as many stage-worthy concepts to draw from in the Ice Climbers series
I'll give you that last part, but Rainbow Cruise is hardly an accurate representation of Rainbow Ride from Mario 64. The similarities are: there was a ship, that swinging pendulum thing was there, there are carpets, there are donut blocks that fall. That's it. Saying they "took some liberties" is a bit of an understatement.

If the Ice Climbers were returning, it would far more complicated than simply cutting and paisting them from one game to another. Their character model would have to be updated and their wireframe and moveset would have to be re-programed into Brawl's modified engine, not to mention that they would have to be rebalanced for a new roster. Then there are the all new moves like the crawl and the final smah - not to mention an all new stage (presumably).
Which, for a programmer, would take oh...an afternoon to accomplish.
 

Wiseguy

Smash Champion
Joined
Mar 28, 2007
Messages
2,245
Location
Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada (Proud
QFT

i DARE someone to tell me right now that Brawl CANNOT possibly have more than one vertically scrolling level, assuming the ICs dont get a completely different level for brawl. i DOUBLE DARE actually *pulp fiction reference minus the swearing*.

"Who thinks this thread will be de-confirmed?"
I'm not saying that it's impossible for two side scrolling stages to be included, or that this update proves conclusively that ICs won't return with a whole new level. I'm just explaining why this update might, maybe, possibly be a sign of that the ICs have been axed. That's all.

EDIT:

Which, for a programmer, would take oh...an afternoon to accomplish.
Now THAT'S an understatment.

EDIT 2: Wait... my mistake. It's an extreme exageration, which is the opposite of an understatment. That was dumb of me.
 

Lemon Drop

Smash Lord
Joined
May 16, 2006
Messages
1,286
Location
KY, USA
Ice Climbers are awesome, I see no reason to remove them since they aren't a clone and have a unique move set that no one else has. Who said we can only have one verticle scrolling level? THey can always make new levels for Characters you know >_>
 

Del Money

Smash Champion
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
Messages
2,464
I'm not saying that it's impossible for two side scrolling stages to be included, or that this update proves conclusively that ICs won't return with a whole new level. I'm just explaining why this update might, maybe, possibly be a sign of that the ICs have been axed. That's all.
apologies for going off like that but it was directed at the community as a whole...especially the nonstop idiot n00b spammers that insist on something so uninsistable upon (if thats a word). and to be honest the ICs never crossed my mind once when looking at the update. the DK level poses a slim to nonexistent threat on the ICs confirmation. id be more worried if the duckhunt duck, balloon fighter, and one more retro character were confirmed beofre ICs

Now THAT'S an understatment.

EDIT 2: Wait... my mistake. It's an extreme exageration, which is the opposite of an understatment. That was dumb of me
true...i am a comp sci/economics major and though i havent work on any insanely large scale projects, i still doubt it would take too long...nice catch though
 

Metaknight X

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Nov 9, 2001
Messages
316
Location
Reading, England
OK, this "Ice Climbers have been de-confirmed!" BS needs to end. NOW...
There is no evidence SUPPORTING the Ice Climbers return.
That's true. And by the same token, there's no evidence supporting the theory that the ICs have been cut either.

And before you go to the same old "There's not enough inspiration for another Ice Climbers- themed level", allow me to point you in the direction of one of Melee's levels: Poke Floats. To the best of my knowledge, there was never any part of Poke Floats in any Pokemon game before or after Melee. The only element of that stage taken from the games is of course the Pokemon depicted. Therefore, is it not so much of a stretch that the Ice Climbers may also get a stage in Brawl that has very little to do with their own games, yet still represents them well?

As has already been mentioned, there were plans to give the ICs a second level. If you use a GS/AR and access Debug Mode, there's a stage there called Icetop. Sadly, it's inaccessible, but it seems extremely likely this was a 2nd Ice Climbers stage. If that is the case, then Sakurai and his team clearly DID have ideas for another IC-themed stage. Again, is it too much of a stretch that those scrapped ideas could pop up in Brawl?

Also, Sakurai has stated that he loved the obscure and retro characters, which bodes well for the Ice Climbers, and Mr G&W as well (to a lesser degree).

As of now, we cannot say whether the ICs will be in Brawl or not. I will admit that they have the lowest chance out of Melee's default cast, and perhaps even less of a chance than some of Melee's hiddens, say Ganondorf, Luigi and Jigglypuff. But ultimately, just because this new DK stage looks like an Icicle Mountain replacement does NOT mean that the Ice Climbers will not be in the game. All this update really does is decrease the chances of Melee's version of Icicle Mountain being in the game, and even then, it may still turn up anyway as either a retro stage or as an updated stage from Melee.

In short, until we receive concrete evidence that the ICs are either in the game or are not, I'm not going to speculate either way. I'm not saying that the Ice Climbers will be in (although I do admit that I hope they will), but I'm not saying that they won't be either. Let's just wait and see, eh?
 

joepinion

Smash Apprentice
Joined
Jul 15, 2007
Messages
138
Location
Columbus, OH
Sheesh.

The point being made is not that Rumble Falls "poses a threat" to the Ice Climbers. They could both exist.

Here's my thought process: Gee, that is certainly reminiscent of the IC stage. Wow, you know what, maybe it's POSSIBLE that the team decided not to bring IC to the new game, but liked their stage, so they decided to bring it back in another form. Maybe it will be "extra" reminiscent to ICs if Diddy and Dixie appear as a duo. This theory is not hurt by the fact that there has been absolutely no evidence of the IC so far, despite two months of updates.

If you could get 2:1 odds that the IC wouldn't show up before, then maybe now you can only get 3:2 odds
 

Del Money

Smash Champion
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
Messages
2,464
Let's just wait and see, eh?
eh? canadian much, eh? lol jk. "Who thinks think thread will be de-confirmed?"

If you could get 2:1 odds that the IC wouldn't show up before, then maybe now you can get 5:2 odds.
umm ok...maybe you could argue that if the ICs had never shown up in melee at all. but with the exception of the clones, virtually everyone in melee has a better chance of being in brawl than anyone who wasnt in melee
 

Bassoonist

Smash Master
Joined
Jun 18, 2003
Messages
4,684
NNID
WoodwindsRock
3DS FC
1032-1351-5240
This is ridiculous.

It doesn't mean that the Ice Climber's aren't in, and it doesn't mean that they won't have a similar stage.

It only means that DK now has a stage similar to it.
 

Metaknight X

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Nov 9, 2001
Messages
316
Location
Reading, England
This is ridiculous.

It doesn't mean that the Ice Climber's aren't in, and it doesn't mean that they won't have a similar stage.

It only means that DK now has a stage similar to it.
Amen! Here speakth the voice of reason!

And another thing to note. We have no evidence yet that Peach will be in Brawl, yet people don't go "OMG! Peach won't be in Brawl!" now do they?
 

Wizzlecroff

Smash Ace
Joined
May 15, 2006
Messages
552
Location
Hiram, Ga
Yea, Yoshi Story, Dream Land, Battlefield, Yoshi Story 64( maybe island?) all have 3 platforms, but they are different in many ways. What makes you think becuase there is a scrolling map, that there can only be one?
 

the grim lizard

Smash Master
Joined
Nov 26, 2004
Messages
3,130
Amen! Here speakth the voice of reason!

And another thing to note. We have no evidence yet that Peach will be in Brawl, yet people don't go "OMG! Peach won't be in Brawl!" now do they?
And what am I chopped liver? I've been saying this all along!
 

Del Money

Smash Champion
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
Messages
2,464
Yea, Yoshi Story, Dream Land, Battlefield, Yoshi Story 64( maybe island?) all have 3 platforms, but they are different in many ways. What makes you think becuase there is a scrolling map, that there can only be one?
what am i, chopped liver? ive been saying this all along!
 

SmashChu

Banned via Warnings
Joined
Jul 14, 2003
Messages
5,924
Location
Tampa FL
Errr... exactly what kind of new stage would Ice Climbers have? That game is all about jumping up and up an endless series of platforms. This is why Icicle Moutain was the only IC stage in Melee - there were no more good concepts from the game to draw upon.
They were going to have a second course named "Ice Top" in Melee before it was scraped due to time so it's possible they'll have another course.

I personal opinion. They'll come back.
 

Gypsy Lee

Smash Champion
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
2,331
Location
Bethany, West Virginia
Who thinks this thread needs to be closed because it contains nothing but over speculation on a simple mundane update that really doesn't confirm or deconfirm anything because it's just a s****y stage that no one will ever play on?

*raises hand*

Stop arguing for the sake of arguing people. If you're that bored, there's always a nature to go play with.
 

the grim lizard

Smash Master
Joined
Nov 26, 2004
Messages
3,130
Who thinks this thread needs to be closed because it contains nothing but over speculation on a simple mundane update that really doesn't confirm or deconfirm anything because it's just a s****y stage that no one will ever play on?

*raises hand*

Stop arguing for the sake of arguing people. If you're that bored, there's always a nature to go play with.
*raises hand*

I think the stage is definitely an improvement of IM, though. I could see me playing this occasionally, although in truth, this was the first stage so far that I said "well, we won't be playing this one..."

Also, I would but it's raining outside (as it's been doing almost all week). Not a whole lot I can do about that...
 

freeman123

Smash Lord
Joined
Jun 11, 2005
Messages
1,855
Location
GA
NNID
josephf5
joepinion
The point being made is not that Rumble Falls "poses a threat" to the Ice Climbers.
Yes it is. That's exactly what people have been saying. That's what this entire topic is about.

joepinion
Here's my thought process: Gee, that is certainly reminiscent of the IC stage. Wow, you know what, maybe it's POSSIBLE that the team decided not to bring IC to the new game, but liked their stage, so they decided to bring it back in another form. Maybe it will be "extra" reminiscent to ICs if Diddy and Dixie appear as a duo.
I understand your thought process, and it's wrong.

joepinion
This theory is not hurt by the fact that there has been absolutely no evidence of the IC so far, despite two months of updates.
No, but there's no evidence of them not being in the game despite two months of updates. Again, this isn't about whether or not they'll be in the game, since none of us could possibly know. This is about whether or not Rumble Falls has anything to do with them being in the game, and the answer is no, it doesn't.

joepinion
If you could get 2:1 odds that the IC wouldn't show up before, then maybe now you can only get 3:2 odds
Nope, their odds are exactly the same.

Del Money
but with the exception of the clones, virtually everyone in melee has a better chance of being in brawl than anyone who wasnt in melee
I would say that every character, including clones, that was in Melee has a better chance of getting in then any character that wasn't.
 

Wiseguy

Smash Champion
Joined
Mar 28, 2007
Messages
2,245
Location
Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada (Proud
apologies for going off like that but it was directed at the community as a whole...especially the nonstop idiot n00b spammers that insist on something so uninsistable upon (if thats a word). and to be honest the ICs never crossed my mind once when looking at the update. the DK level poses a slim to nonexistent threat on the ICs confirmation. id be more worried if the duckhunt duck, balloon fighter, and one more retro character were confirmed beofre ICs
No worries.

true...i am a comp sci/economics major and though i havent work on any insanely large scale projects, i still doubt it would take too long...nice catch though
Yeah, I have no experience with programing, so I'm just guessing. I'm suspecting that it would be more time consuming than we assume, however.

OK, this "Ice Climbers have been de-confirmed!" BS needs to end. NOW...


That's true. And by the same token, there's no evidence supporting the theory that the ICs have been cut either.
This is correct. My point wasn't "Yes, ICs are for sure gone" but rather "we can't be positive that they will return." I honestly have no problem with the ICs, but we simply can't take their imminent return for granted because they are cool and unique.

And before you go to the same old "There's not enough inspiration for another Ice Climbers- themed level", allow me to point you in the direction of one of Melee's levels: Poke Floats. To the best of my knowledge, there was never any part of Poke Floats in any Pokemon game before or after Melee. The only element of that stage taken from the games is of course the Pokemon depicted. Therefore, is it not so much of a stretch that the Ice Climbers may also get a stage in Brawl that has very little to do with their own games, yet still represents them well?
Yes, your obviously right. Nothing can be ruled out at this this point.

Perhaps I was overstating my case, but my point was that there isn't a whole lot of other stage concepts to draw from the Ice Climbers series other than... climbing. Still, that's just my perception of the game and it's certainly not impossible that one of the others ideas mentioned on this thread or an entirely different stage is in the works.

As has already been mentioned, there were plans to give the ICs a second level. If you use a GS/AR and access Debug Mode, there's a stage there called Icetop. Sadly, it's inaccessible, but it seems extremely likely this was a 2nd Ice Climbers stage. If that is the case, then Sakurai and his team clearly DID have ideas for another IC-themed stage. Again, is it too much of a stretch that those scrapped ideas could pop up in Brawl?
I wasn't aware of this before it was pointed out, so it does admittly destroy my argument that no other stage concept for the series could be concieved.

Also, Sakurai has stated that he loved the obscure and retro characters, which bodes well for the Ice Climbers, and Mr G&W as well (to a lesser degree).
Again, it could go either way. These characters might return, or Sakurai might scrap them so as to free up time for Balloon Fighter and all other all new retro characters.

As of now, we cannot say whether the ICs will be in Brawl or not. I will admit that they have the lowest chance out of Melee's default cast, and perhaps even less of a chance than some of Melee's hiddens, say Ganondorf, Luigi and Jigglypuff. But ultimately, just because this new DK stage looks like an Icicle Mountain replacement does NOT mean that the Ice Climbers will not be in the game. All this update really does is decrease the chances of Melee's version of Icicle Mountain being in the game, and even then, it may still turn up anyway as either a retro stage or as an updated stage from Melee.

In short, until we receive concrete evidence that the ICs are either in the game or are not, I'm not going to speculate either way. I'm not saying that the Ice Climbers will be in (although I do admit that I hope they will), but I'm not saying that they won't be either. Let's just wait and see, eh?
I don't disagree. Basically this update doesn't prove anything, and leaves us where we started: with those expect ICs to return (ie: everyone, apparently) still beleive that to be the case and those who expect them to be cut (ie: me) still beleive that as well. We'll just have to wait for future updates to see who is correct.

Sheesh.

The point being made is not that Rumble Falls "poses a threat" to the Ice Climbers. They could both exist.

Here's my thought process: Gee, that is certainly reminiscent of the IC stage. Wow, you know what, maybe it's POSSIBLE that the team decided not to bring IC to the new game, but liked their stage, so they decided to bring it back in another form. Maybe it will be "extra" reminiscent to ICs if Diddy and Dixie appear as a duo. This theory is not hurt by the fact that there has been absolutely no evidence of the IC so far, despite two months of updates.

If you could get 2:1 odds that the IC wouldn't show up before, then maybe now you can only get 3:2 odds
Sounds like a reason observation to me.

eh? canadian much, eh? lol jk. "Who thinks think thread will be de-confirmed?"

umm ok...maybe you could argue that if the ICs had never shown up in melee at all. but with the exception of the clones, virtually everyone in melee has a better chance of being in brawl than anyone who wasnt in melee
Lol, I'm actually from England. I just couldn't think of much else to say lol
Clearly, you've uncovered out secret plot. We Canadians have infilrated Smashboards and implanted subliminal messages in our posts so as to Canadianize your dialect. Soon nothing will stand in our way...

Peace, out.
 

Del Money

Smash Champion
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
Messages
2,464
sorry for mimicking you Grim Lizard but people are blind sometimes

They were going to have a second course named "Ice Top" in Melee before it was scraped due to time so it's possible they'll have another course.

I personal opinion. They'll come back.
and that one piece of fact has officially shut down all n00b speculation (not pointing the finger at Wiseguy). goodbye thread

Who thinks this thread needs to be closed because it contains nothing but over speculation on a simple mundane update that really doesn't confirm or deconfirm anything because it's just a s****y stage that no one will ever play on?

*raises hand*

Stop arguing for the sake of arguing people. If you're that bored, there's always a nature to go play with.
*raised hand 3 minutes late like a dial-up webcam conversation*
 

joepinion

Smash Apprentice
Joined
Jul 15, 2007
Messages
138
Location
Columbus, OH
You can call me a "n00b" if you want. I'm not interested in being a part of your esoteric community. I am just interested in this game, so I've come here the past few days to share my opinions on it and listen to others'.

Let's say, hypothetically, that the IC end up not being in the game. Looking back, won't it look like Rumble Falls is a tribute to them and their old stage? Today's update opens that up as a possibility, since the Dojo has gone over 50 updates without an item, a stage, or anything else related to Ice Climbers.

It's just one (valid) interpretation of the evidence SO FAR.

Of course the original post is overstated. They're not de-confirmed. But now a potential circumstance that points to their death has arisin.
 

Del Money

Smash Champion
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
Messages
2,464
You can call me a "n00b" if you want. I'm not interested in being a part of your esoteric community.
omg calm the heck down. i wasnt pointing the finger at you at all. jeez. you obviously havent seen the Smashbros.com thread around mid-morning otherwise you would understand that we got a couple posts complaining about the ICs being ALLEGEDLY/OFFICIALLY de-confirmed
I am just interested in this game, so I've come here the past few days to share my opinions on it and listen to others'.
good. i listen to all opinions and share mine too. im not ignorant, dislike to be called ignorant, and dislike people who are.
Let's say, hypothetically, that the IC end up not being in the game. Looking back, won't it look like Rumble Falls is a tribute to them and their old stage? Today's update opens that up as a possibility, since the Dojo has gone over 50 updates without an item, a stage, or anything else related to Ice Climbers.

It's just one (valid) interpretation of the evidence SO FAR.

Of course the original post is overstated. They're not de-confirmed. But now a potential circumstance that points to their death has arisin.
ok and the evidence does have basis to it but theres so many counter-arguments that can be made against it that its become pretty close to if not already negligible evidence against the ICs being in brawl. im so saying theyll be there, im not saying they wont. im just saying todays update doesnt have a big enough impact to sway my opinion as well as a lot of the smash community's. i dont feel DK stage update should be too much if at all a pause for concern. and the title of this thread is so ridiculous that it needs to be locked up. so please stop biting my head off, aight?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom