• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

vBrawl->B+ Which characters got worse? (Relatively)

Zschalix

Smash Cadet
Joined
Jul 7, 2009
Messages
44
Location
Texas
Alright, as a note, I didn't want to bump old threads and in any case there were none in the workshop area asking what I am.


So in the character threads, matchup discussions are starting up and B+ seems to be past any major changes. In light of the situation, I feel it's time to start asking where characters stand in Brawl Plus in relation to the vBrawl tiers.

However, I don't want a tier discussion; this thread is limited to which characters are not as good as they were in vBrawl (with respect to other characters), at this point.

Who does not have as many good matchups, who has more bad matchups, not who is "crazy good or has so many combos!!!!1!1"


From what I have gathered, mostly heavy characters or those who were previously very highly ranked have dropped positions. ie: Bowser, Ike, metaknight, diddy, ddd, snake... and a few characters that im guessing about: Ice climbers, r.o.b, and pit (yoshi already sucked...) Not to say that any of these characters weren't improved, but that's the point of this thread.


Reasons:

1. Bowser: Not any fault of his own, despite many improvements, hitstun allows combos, many characters can combo, and combos are most effective on heavy characters. Also, with momentum, characters like bowser are more easily gimped.

2. Ike: Like bowser, vulnerable to combos, and easily gimped. His attack speed is fine for playing online but doesn't cut it otherwise.

3. Metaknight: nowhere to go but down. Not necessarily far down, but the fact is that someone else is now king of the hill in B+.

4. Diddy: I'm extremely unsure of this one since i love diddy and he always surprises me; his metagame revolves around bananas, and it seems to me that these can still be effective. However, other characters have become very effective at racking up damage, and I see diddy having a tougher time when he must control a greater portion of the game in order not to fall behind.

5. DDD: no chains, he's big, slow, and still has some absurd lag on quite a few moves. Mostly, though the combination of a previous high position and vulnerability to combos leads to my conclusion.

6. Snake: see other large, heavy characters. Also, campy metagame not as good in B+. Tougher to call than other heavies, as Snake has the uniquely quick and strong attacks still going for him, but i see him falling to characters like fox and falco more easily now.

7. Ice Climbers: given no chaingrab and not as many combos as other characters, this seems like a logical downgrade...

8. Pit: He's just not as buffed as everyone else; i will state right now i have no legitimate proof, just a gut feeling.

Please discuss this politely and kindly ignore the fact that i'm a noob. Im trying to create some general knowledge of where B+ is at.

Keep in mind, so many characters saw improvements that i expect responses to be varied, but I think that at this point a loose agreement can be reached. And since few characters were blatantly nerfed, then logically some characters just didn't get as much better as others.


Support opinions!!
 

ph00tbag

C(ϾᶘϿ)Ͻ
Joined
Mar 16, 2007
Messages
7,245
Location
NC
Well, this depends on what you mean by 'worse'. If you mean relatively, then I agree with some of your picks (not all). If you mean in general, then I disagree with quite a few of them.

Relatively, I'd say you're wrong about Pit, who has good range, good combos to compliment the range, and a decent KO move set. I also suspect you're wrong about Diddy, who doesn't just combo with bananas anymore, but with uair, nair, utilt, uthrow... all sorts of stuff. He's kind of a machine now. His banana game didn't get any worse, either. People just haven't been focusing on Diddy all that much. The same thing happened with vBrawl in its infancy.
 

Zschalix

Smash Cadet
Joined
Jul 7, 2009
Messages
44
Location
Texas
Ya, i meant relatively.. sorry that was just a error in my head because of what was in the post. ><

Hmm, like i said, i'm certainly not familiar with pit, and i actually play diddy the most of any character, i just thought that the change to the metagame wouldn't favor diddy's playstyle... i guess he does still have so many stinkin' options that its a non-issue though!
 

ph00tbag

C(ϾᶘϿ)Ͻ
Joined
Mar 16, 2007
Messages
7,245
Location
NC
That's what I'm thinking with Diddy. In vBrawl, Diddy was good primarily because bananas made his defensive game unbelievably good. Most people still don't know how good Diddy is in vBrawl. Since that aspect hasn't changed, and his ability to capitalize on the openings presented by his bananas has only gotten better, I can't imagine Diddy's much worse.

Of course, with most of the top characters, it's hard to say whether they've gotten worse or not. The list of perceived "good" characters has gotten very crowded, and naturally many characters have a good chance of dropping, relatively, but it's hard to say that being worse at those levels is really getting worse.

Falco, Wario, Diddy, MK, Snake... all five of these characters have improved significantly in general in the changeover, but the fact that Marth and Fox, for instance, have also gotten much better makes it hard to tell where everyone goes.
 

GuruKid

Smash Ace
Joined
Sep 14, 2007
Messages
875
Location
Brooklyn, NY
There really isn't any way to outright tell if a character has indeed gotten relatively worse. Only a steady influx of tournament results can concretely depict character performance and... well... since there haven't been many tournaments for Brawl+ yet, no one knows for sure.
 

Zschalix

Smash Cadet
Joined
Jul 7, 2009
Messages
44
Location
Texas
That's what I'm thinking with Diddy. In vBrawl, Diddy was good primarily because bananas made his defensive game unbelievably good. Most people still don't know how good Diddy is in vBrawl. Since that aspect hasn't changed, and his ability to capitalize on the openings presented by his bananas has only gotten better, I can't imagine Diddy's much worse.

Of course, with most of the top characters, it's hard to say whether they've gotten worse or not. The list of perceived "good" characters has gotten very crowded, and naturally many characters have a good chance of dropping, relatively, but it's hard to say that being worse at those levels is really getting worse.

Falco, Wario, Diddy, MK, Snake... all five of these characters have improved significantly in general in the changeover, but the fact that Marth and Fox, for instance, have also gotten much better makes it hard to tell where everyone goes.
I think we're on completely the same page with Diddy, it simply had occurred to me that other characters had experienced more significant changes.

Your second paragraph states the reason that I felt this thread would be an asset (although PW put out a new code today, so i probably shouldn't have posted this thread yet...). Anyway, I hope people will contribute their specific experiences with matchups and maybe that will give some solid information to discern which characters are truly beating other highly-regarded characters consistently.

@GuruKid: the lack of tournament data is what prompted me to get some preliminary discussion going, so that some idea can be formed of what the general trend in tournaments will be, as well as which characters who are unpopular are experiencing very good outcomes against new characters or more characters in general.

Finally, in addition to the good characters phootbag listed, i would keep an eye on characters such as squirtle, sheik and jigglypuff (melee much?) bumping formerly top characters somewhat. My guesses at who may be bumped are at the top of the page :)

Thanks for the responses, guys!
 

Eternal Yoshi

I've covered ban wars, you know
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
5,450
Location
Playing different games
NNID
EternalYoshi
3DS FC
3394-4459-7089
Yes, Snake is indeed worse in a game where combos exist and Fox, and Falco become his bane on top of Olimar having more advantages over him.

Simply put, his character is still good, but not superb like in Vbrawl.
 

Nybb

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Messages
399
Location
Victoria, BC
I don't really think MK has gotten much worse. I would still say he has the throne, although maybe he is sharing it with Kirby and Marth now. That said, he is definitely a lot closer to the rest of the cast though. I just don't think he has actually become worse than anybody else yet.

Other than MK, I mostly agree with the OP.

Wario is another character that has gotten worse relatively. He has improved from vBrawl, and is likely still going to be in the top ten once the dust settles. He just is not third best any more; other characters have gotten larger improvements than him.
 

FrozenHobo

Smash Hero
Joined
Mar 26, 2007
Messages
5,272
Location
Nowhere Land
lol ICs are still on top in B+. just because we lost CGs doesn't mean ****. with all the buffs we've gotten its still easy as hell to wreck any of the top characters. if anything ICs are now a more versatile character with an easier dash dance desync we can split off at any moment, ****, and then resync to avoid nana gimps. i'll forgive your ignorance since i'm guessing you never actually play ICs (which i can assume if all you noticed was the CGs going).
 

JCaesar

Smash Hero
Joined
May 28, 2004
Messages
9,657
Location
Project MD
NNID
JCaesar
ICs won the 2nd biggest Brawl+ tourney to date (Apex). They don't suck.

And Sheik is nowhere near the bottom.
 

ph00tbag

C(ϾᶘϿ)Ͻ
Joined
Mar 16, 2007
Messages
7,245
Location
NC
ICs don't suck.

But when you lose the ability to kill off of one well-timed grab at any percent, you lose a lot of ground. Yes, they gained combos. But then, so did most of the rest of the cast, and many of them have better combos (Fox, I'm looking at you). The point is, they lost a big part of what made them so dangerous in vBrawl, and now that more characters are dangerous, their overall standing has suffered, because instead of two steps forward, they took two steps forward and one step back.
 

Alphatron

Smash Champion
Joined
Aug 5, 2008
Messages
2,269
Bowser's defense game is still really good at least. Same with Dedede, but at least Bowser can chain attacks.
 

BG3

Smash Journeyman
Joined
May 25, 2009
Messages
294
I'm really curious as to where MK stands in Brawl+. I really don't think he's still the best. Oh, and another completely unrelated question, but does Gimpy play Brawl+ now, since Bowser got much better since the transition?
 
Top Bottom