Minato
穏やかじゃない
LOL. I sure wasn't expecting that. Awesome.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
LOL. I sure wasn't expecting that. Awesome.
Nah i`m still around. I just havn`t had time to get on recentlyGuess we scared that new guy away haha
Oh I see. Are you goin to that tourney tomorrow?Nah i`m still around. I just havn`t had time to get on recently
I think that you should have posted your new avatar when you were commemorating your 500th post.A sexy new avatar to commence my 501th post. What do you think?
No one played Killer 7. I picked it up last year for 7$ at a game stop. It might have been the best $7 I've ever spent. It really is a wonderful game. The story is really what makes the game coupled with the amazing artwork, I would say it's the most beautiful game I've every played. Everything in it is cel shaded and it's like an art master piece. If you ever see the game for cheap I say buy, buy it right then and there.I think that you should have posted your new avatar when you were commemorating your 500th post.
On a side note, I haven't played Killer 7...
Oh that's a bummer. You should really try and come by sometime. I'm nicer than I appear I'm not great at Brawl but I'm sure I'll give you a run for your money.I would have tried if i didnt have to work tommorrow.
LOL C!Z your more of a blood thirsty dragon coming from the dark pits of the underworld, silently gliding towards his pray.:flame:Oh that's a bummer. You should really try and come by sometime. I'm nicer than I appear
Wow...
but seriously we shouldJust kidding.
OS opening statement in asking if Brawl was worth saving and his closing statement with the Dr. thing was top tier.Its not like Smash would be the first to ban a character, and we have banned items, stages, and AT's before to help better the game I character is no different. A quote from OS "If your a dr. you don't wait for a diease to kill your patience to start die before you cure them."
Banning a stage and banning a character are totally different. I've read discussion on banning a character before, and the fact that character banning is a risky business always comes up. People wanted to ban Fox in Melee back then. But whatever, I don't really care all that much about what happens to Meta Knight. As for the Doctor thing, here's what I'm going to say: "In this situation, you're just a Doctor trying to cure the flu of a cancer patient."Its not like Smash would be the first to ban a character, and we have banned items, stages, and AT's before to help better the game I character is no different. A quote from OS "If your a dr. you don't wait for a diease to kill your patience to start die before you cure them."
What are you talking about? Ivysaur is Meta Knight's weakness....ya theres no way snake would be banned, snake may be good but the fact that Meta has NO WEAKNESSES is quite troublesome indeed...
That's a horrible example; if I didn't know better, I would think you've never played it. There are two Pokémon that have no weaknesses (and 3 immunities), but they lose not because there are many others; they are just plainly weak (so giving that example does nothing)....imagine pokemon, a game with a decent competitive environment, while it has its tier lists and such, there are 493 different choices to use and only 1 of the entire group has no type weaknesses, thankfully due to the vastness of the cast, this pokemon is still quite beatable, but in a game like brawl where the cast size is small, that luxury of plenty of options isnt there, so metaknight stands out as a trump card rather than a regular contender...
Thats what we are doing. When a problem comes up you shouldn't say its there ok that sucks but its there, you say ok how can I fix this. Another example is with grades in school, when you are doing bad in a class should you just say "I am doing bad in this class thats just how it is." or should you say "I am doing bad I should fix this" And the best way to fix it is as early as you can, don't wait until finals.Yea Stop whining about it. Deal with it and go on.
Banning a stage and banning a character are totally different. I've read discussion on banning a character before, and the fact that character banning is a risky business always comes up. People wanted to ban Fox in Melee back then. But whatever, I don't really care all that much about what happens to Meta Knight. As for the Doctor thing, here's what I'm going to say: "In this situation, you're just a Doctor trying to cure the flu of a cancer patient."
I guess you missed my point. The flu=Meta Knight The cancer=Brawl itselfI don't quite see how, its much safer, less expansive and more likly to work along with haveing a much smaller impact on ones life if you try to stop cancer earily rather then later.
If banning each stages and characters are of the same degree, than why aren't half the characters banned? The answer is simply because a banning of the character is riskier business, and needs much more discussion. (Now, I'm not saying that there isn't a lot of discussion.) But whatever; ban Meta Knight...it's not like I care much (Meta Knight is boring to play with, anyway).Stages were banned because it changed the game to be more about avoiding hasards and out live your opponent in that way. MK has changed the game to be less of how this character stands up against another character and more about how they stand up against MK. Things are changed in the game to make it better for the player and more competitive. I don't see how banning a character is that different then banning a stage, they are both taken out to make the game more about how a player is skilled rather then the character.
Now I see what your saying, I don't see brawl as bad but from where your sitting I get it now.I guess you missed my point. The flu=Meta Knight The cancer=Brawl itself
I agree it is more risky and it should be taken more seriously then a stage ban, but I keep hereing the arguement "banning is always bad" or "People will laugh at us if we ban a character" we do ban thing, and wouldn't be the first to ban a character.If banning each stages and characters are of the same degree, than why aren't half the characters banned? The answer is simply because a banning of the character is riskier business, and needs much more discussion. (Now, I'm not saying that there isn't a lot of discussion.) But whatever; ban Meta Knight...it's not like I care much (Meta Knight is boring to play with, anyway).