DanteFox
Smash Champion
w/e next time I'll seed us on opposite sides. If you wanna play me you'll have to earn it next time. ;]
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Wasnt huy the one bugging the whole **** time about you two playing in tourney? (which makes no sense btw) You cant seed "properly" if you purposely make match ups like that.I believe Kevin wanted us seeded in the same side of the bracket so we can play each other AND not have me in the LB too soon because then I would **** the LB. I thought it was unfair to Michael that he had to play me too soon.![]()
TL;DRHorrible strawman argument by David. I mentioned that it would be possible for us to play each other and have me win up to a maximum 3 times with pools and up to a maximum of 2 times without pools. Dante assumed I wanted to play him first round, but I argued that doing so would result in a dominant player ****** the loser's bracket. I pushed for a switch where Dante and I were to play at a later round, but he said well let's just play. In other words I wanted to play Dante but not first round since it was unfair to Michael that he had to play me too soon. Dante assumed I would lose to a newbie and doubted by skill since I was sick so he didn't have enough faith in me that I would be guaranteed to win when playing someone who is not SLO, Jeff, Dante, etc. It was possible two seed us together without having one of us **** the loser's bracket AND STILL be able to play each other, so David's argument is invalid.