• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Total Fire Emblem Lineup Discussion (UPDATED with FE10 info)

GenG

Smash Lord
Joined
Dec 24, 2005
Messages
1,473
Location
Spain
If those are, in fact, villians who appeared in multiple games (are not the original FE and its SNES remake) then I stand corrected. However, BK is still the only villian to appear in multiple internationally released FE games - so he is still the most important villian in the series. The majority of FE fans will never play the Japanese Fire Emblem games.
The majority of fans hasn't bought Path of Radiance. GotD may be the worst selling title in the entire series (worse than Thracia 776), with just 70k in Japan. Let's see how it does in the US and if it reach at least the 150k worlwide. You are dissing the older fanbase without reason, but this isn't something I could simply show to you. Just to say, your points are totally wrong. Totally, totally.

Medeus is the most important villain, no matter how you struggle for it.

Wow. Four male Fire Embelm lords, three of which have blue hair and all which have big swords and capes. Not to mention that three of them are from Japanese only games - so they can hardly be considered the most popular lords (given that most Fire Emblem fans will never play their games).
They are the most popular lords in Japan. However, the GBA FE lords (other than Roy) aren't popular in Japan. And Japan still has the most FE retrogamers.

You vision of these lords are very superficial and noobish, once again. What are you trying to prove? Wow, Pit is like Roy with wings, so Roy is out because having them both is redundant.

He is unoriginal compared to characters like Miciaiah and the Black Knight (who would likely be a clone, but bring a different presence to the roster). With Ike very likely in the game, I don't see why we need Marth - since the two are very similar in appearance.
But that's opinion. I find plain magic boring. I found Zelda in Melee pretty boring, and magic in FE is just that boring. However, jumping swordmen and aerial raves kick ***, and you have Soul Calibur for example with many swords but different styles.

Micaiah isn't important to the franchise, and isn't that important for Tellius as Ike is. Is just another wizard which is used to reivindicate originality in Smash, but that's nonsense. Mario, Falcon, Luigi, Fox, Falco, Kirby, Ganondorf, Bowser, Samus. All of them fight with bare hands. How repetitive! I say remove them all.

There is a rule, which is about medieval fantasy characters having swords, or magical swords of sorts. You can't simply change this fact, as most popular characters always carry a sword, and you can't cut them because they are "redundant". I still think that Marth is one of the most creative characters in Melee, it's completely different from the rest of characters: A good Marth player fights beautifully, tipping all his attacks while advancing in a sucesion of stylish moves, is wonderful. Better than any magician with exploding **** could ever be.

LukeFonFabre said:
I'm not fond of the idea of adding Sigurd. It's partly due to, unlike Marth and Roy, virtually no one outside Japan knows who he is.
I'm all for Sigurd, but as the bulky and awesome Marth clone he should've been in Melee. The true Fire Emblem fanbase, the one which is interested for the franchise and took some looks at its past, knows about Sigurd. The casual players who bought The Sacred Stones and never gave a chance to Path of Radiance, these ones don't know about Sigurd.
 

LukeFonFabre

Smash Lord
Joined
Aug 17, 2006
Messages
1,094
I'm interested in playing FE4 actually. From what I've heard about from people who've played the game it seems pretty well done (practically everyone who's played it seems to like it, which is a good sign). My oppostion to Sigurd isn't really personal against him, I'd just prefer other characters.

Personally I like magical characters, which is why I like the idea of Micaiah (and to a certain extent Isaac, though he fits the magic swordsman type more). Personally I think a magic using character could work quite well in smash, though I agree that Zelda didn't work out that well (didn't help to have such a powerful alter ego that made her insignificant thaough). Ike's the hero of Tellius, no doubt about that, but I'd still like Micaiah as a new addition.
 

GenG

Smash Lord
Joined
Dec 24, 2005
Messages
1,473
Location
Spain
Well, FE4 is just an awesome Fire Emblem in all senses. Sigurd hasn't a very special sword style from what we've seen in other titles, but is a uber powerful character, has a lovely and mature development and a very depressing story, and that made him popular. Is just for character value, which I personally don't think it should be definite when picking a character, but Japan have been demanding him since SSB64 as the second most popular lord over there (after Marth) and he deserves at least being a clone. Jugdral is the best Fire Emblem chronology, no doubts about that, and I think it needs a representative in Smash Bros.

I don't have many hopes though. It would be awesome (from a character perspective) but Ike is top priority here.
 

Wiseguy

Smash Champion
Joined
Mar 28, 2007
Messages
2,245
Location
Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada (Proud
Fire Emblem: Goddess of Dawn.

Speaking of which, has anyone heard a release date for it yet? I would've thought they'd have said something by now?
No release date has been announced yet, unfortunatly. Maybe at E3...

The majority of fans hasn't bought Path of Radiance. GotD may be the worst selling title in the entire series (worse than Thracia 776), with just 70k in Japan. Let's see how it does in the US and if it reach at least the 150k worlwide. You are dissing the older fanbase without reason, but this isn't something I could simply show to you. Just to say, your points are totally wrong. Totally, totally.
Path of Radiance sold exceptionally well in Japan for a Gamecube title. It is still the only Fire Embelm title to be well recieved on both sides of the Atlantic.

Goddess of Dawn was released before the Wii had a chance to get a large installed base. it's too early to judge.

If you think my points are wrong, you should explain why. That's what we in the Brawl Character Discussion Forum like to call: "discussion."

Medeus is the most important villain, no matter how you struggle for it.
Never heard of him. Maybe that's because his game doesn't exist outside of Japan - where the majority of Fire Emblem fans are.

They are the most popular lords in Japan. However, the GBA FE lords (other than Roy) aren't popular in Japan. And Japan still has the most FE retrogamers.
Did you even read my post? I don't want any of the GBA lords in Bralw because they aren't popular in Japan. Nor do I want any of the Japanese-only FE lords in game because they aren't popular outside Japan. Only characters from games that are popular among ALL Fire Embelm fans should be included.

You vision of these lords are very superficial and noobish, once again. What are you trying to prove? Wow, Pit is like Roy with wings, so Roy is out because having them both is redundant.
No, Roy isn't returning becuase he is poor representative of the Fire Emblem franchise. He is extremely different from Pit.


But that's opinion. I find plain magic boring. I found Zelda in Melee pretty boring, and magic in FE is just that boring. However, jumping swordmen and aerial raves kick ***, and you have Soul Calibur for example with many swords but different styles.
You may find magic characters boring, but this does not change the fact that Miciaiah would be a far more unique addition than another sword fighter.

Oh, and Sould Calibur has fighters that weild numerous weapons - not just swords. And it's character roster is far more dull than Smash Bros, which features a wider range of characters.

Micaiah isn't important to the franchise, and isn't that important for Tellius as Ike is. Is just another wizard which is used to reivindicate originality in Smash, but that's nonsense.
Miciaiah is as important to the series as any other lord. More so even, because she appeared in the most recent FE and her game is available around the world - not just Japan.

Mario, Falcon, Luigi, Fox, Falco, Kirby, Ganondorf, Bowser, Samus. All of them fight with bare hands. How repetitive! I say remove them all.
Well, they obviously aren't as different from one another as Marth, Sigurd and Ike but I'd say that Samus and Bowser are still a bit different from one another. Still, I've been wrong before...

There is a rule, which is about medieval fantasy characters having swords, or magical swords of sorts. You can't simply change this fact, as most popular characters always carry a sword, and you can't cut them because they are "redundant". I still think that Marth is one of the most creative characters in Melee, it's completely different from the rest of characters: A good Marth player fights beautifully, tipping all his attacks while advancing in a sucesion of stylish moves, is wonderful. Better than any magician with exploding **** could ever be.
Oh, so we're inventing arbitrary rules now? I've got one: how about every Wednesday the sky will open up and rain M&M's.

The Legend of Zelda is fantasy series. Zelda and Ganondorf don't use sword in Melee. Neither do the majority of characters in Fire Emblem games.
 

GenG

Smash Lord
Joined
Dec 24, 2005
Messages
1,473
Location
Spain
Goddess of Dawn was released before the Wii had a chance to get a large installed base. it's too early to judge.
It dropped quite early from the top 20, it stopped selling at 70k (with maybe some hundreds per week), but it's even worse than PoR. There are 2.3 millions Wiis in Japan, enough for this game.

If you think my points are wrong, you should explain why. That's what we in the Brawl Character Discussion Forum like to call: "discussion."
I think I've discussed these points through many threads already, but I'll sum them again: Nintendo is not going (I emphatize the "going" as reality) to neglect the past of these series. There isn't any reason for deny Medeus (he is mentioned in the Marth trophy in Melee) as a villain, even when the castle stage in the Brawl is directly.

I know you haven't played the old games, and I understand that you thought the BK was the most important villain because it appeared in two (good and seemingly popular) Fire Emblems, but Medeus is known as THE enemy in the franchise by Intelligent Systems, being a fearful dark Dragon, theme that was brought in many games (Idoun in FE6, the Fire Dragon in FE7). Medeus was the the mastermind behind FE1 and 3, was the definitive enemy of Akaneia unlike BK which became "good" at some point, which is very very similar to Camus' issue (bad guy dead > his sister revived him > he didn't remember anything so he adopted a new personality as Sirius Black, a wandering swordman > he joined the good guys when he remembered everything).
So yeah, I won't bully you, everybody may be wrong sometimes, but seriously, BK isn't the most important villain in the franchise. It doesn't have anything to do wether it is known in the US or not: Medeus' two roles, his fearful plot and his "first game in the franchise" value hasn't been matched yet by any bad guy. Other baddies are Alvis, Julius or Manfroy (from FE4), Idoun and Zephiel (from FE6), Nergal (from FE7) or Ashnard (from FE9), but nearly as important. BK isn't your average bad guy, so it doesn't fall in this category. I think he is more like the bad guy who becomes good at some point, like the aforementioned Camus, or the neutral guy like Metaknight in the Kirby franchise.

Oh, I think it should be right as a clone, there aren't many "distinguishable" enemies in the series. But never tooking the place of a potential non clone character.

Never heard of him. Maybe that's because his game doesn't exist outside of Japan - where the majority of Fire Emblem fans are.
There isn't any majority in the US. Many people bought the GBA games, but that makes them fans? How many of them are truly fans? In that aspect, US fails against Japan in tradition. These FEs you don't want to know about are part of the franchise and were both released for the Japanese Virtual Console, and are having a revival from Nintendo's part (with merchandasing like figures or minisites).

You aren't the center of the world. You may've never heard about it but it doesn't make it less important. You should drop that egocentric view of yours if you want people consider your opinions as valid.

Did you even read my post? I don't want any of the GBA lords in Bralw because they aren't popular in Japan. Nor do I want any of the Japanese-only FE lords in game because they aren't popular outside Japan. Only characters from games that are popular among ALL Fire Embelm fans should be included.
Interesting, so how Micaiah is popular worldwide? You are just assuming she is, but the game was poorly received, and you don't know if Nintendo would waste a spot on a failed character who hasn't been released in the US yet. You don't know if she's popular worlwide.

No, Roy isn't returning becuase he is poor representative of the Fire Emblem franchise. He is extremely different from Pit.
It was an example. You can search in the first threads made in the Brawl characters forum: Most people though that Pit was a Roy ripoff. They are very similar nonetheless.

You may find magic characters boring, but this does not change the fact that Miciaiah would be a far more unique addition than another sword fighter.
Unique is just different. That doesn't mean she would be better or more creative, because G&W is an "unique" character but his playstyle is pretty common in Smash. If you want to replace sword swipes with magic bursts, that doesn't make the character any unique: See Zelda in Melee.

Oh, and Sould Calibur has fighters that weild numerous weapons - not just swords. And it's character roster is far more dull than Smash Bros, which features a wider range of characters.
I know, but see:
Mitsurugi = Sword
Yunsung = Sword
Taki = Sword
Talim = Double daggers (which are little swords, I've seen Pit falling into this category even when he has a splitting naginata, never seen before in Smash)
Cassandra and Sophitia= Sword and shield
Raphael = Rapier
Xianghua = Sword
Nightmare = ****ing huge sword
Cervantes = Twin swords
Voldo = Daggers (swords)
Yoshimitsu = Swords

That's just the Soul Calibur 2 cast, I'm not that fond of the SC3 one. But that's a example about swords being used differently, so it's not repetitive when you know what are you doing.

Miciaiah is as important to the series as any other lord. More so even, because she appeared in the most recent FE and her game is available around the world - not just Japan.
Micaiah is as important as Leaf or Lyndis: She isn't the "lord" of the continent as Marth is to Akaneia, Roy is to Elibe, Sigurd (and Celice) to Jugdral or Ike to Tellius. Not enough importance for a Smash representative when there are far more popular and requested characters.

Well, they obviously aren't as different from one another as Marth, Sigurd and Ike but I'd say that Samus and Bowser are still a bit different from one another. Still, I've been wrong before...
Mario's forward tilt (round kick) is a move used by many characters, the halfmoon kick in the air, the "sexy kick" and such. At least, Marth has swipes and styles clearly different from those seen in other swordmen like Link, Metaknight or Pit. Unoriginal? He is a RPG character for god sake. You can't throw him away because he just uses a sword; Instead, he was worked wonderfully and resulted in one of the most interesting characters, which not many people can play correctly (smash spam is just obsolete).


Oh, so we're inventing arbitrary rules now? I've got one: how about every Wednesday the sky will open up and rain M&M's.

The Legend of Zelda is fantasy series. Zelda and Ganondorf don't use sword in Melee. Neither do the majority of characters in Fire Emblem games.
Sorry, I meant main characters in medieval fantasy. I'm not inventing anything, just take a look at any RPG, and see what kind of weapon the main hero wields. Usually is a sword, but there are characters with guns, scythes, axes, etc. "Unfortunately" for you, the most popular Fire Emblem characters have a sword, so instead ignoring them they have to be worked.

Majority? I think you are joking or something. Most jobs in Fire emblem revolve around a sword, and even jobs about axes or spears can use swords after promoting. Because swords are a favourite in medieval fantasy.

Zelda and Ganondorf aren't the main characters which I wanted to point, but have you played Twilight Princess? Both characters have sword there. Ganondorf was about to have a sword in Melee (like the one he has in the victory cutscene from the Spaceworld 2000 Demo) but other characters had more priority over him (like Marth), so he became a Falcon clone to at least be playable.
 

Chidosengan

Smash Lord
Joined
Jun 3, 2006
Messages
1,610
Location
New Jersey, USA
I completely agree with Wiseguy. I mean it's true, characters known worldwide are more important than those known only in Japan, no matter how popular they are there. I believe Ike has more chance than any character in the FE series, followed by the FE7 kids and FE10's Miciaiah and/or possibly Sothe. I'm even beginning to think these guys have better chance the Marth himself, even to the point that makes me think Marth won't be in Brawl.

Now before you kill me with you rant of might, hear me out. All this "Marth is the most important character because he is the first in the series" talk, yea, in my opinion, its just bull. You have to think to the very beginning.

Back in the day, when Melee was in development, the original line up for FE characters was this: Sigurd, followed by Marth, meaning we would had unlocked Sigurd the way we unlock Marth today, and so on. Sakurai himself said he like Sigurd, and the reason Marth was there was beacuse of fan request, (keep in mind, this was Japan-only, way before FE went international, meaning that he didn't have to worry about what the others around the world would say) followed by Sigurd. But at the time, there was no NEW FIRE EMBLEM in a while, till FE6 was announced. Now to promote the game, Nintendo thought it was a good idea to throw in the new FE character, Roy, in Melee.

Now here was the decision. Imagine in a world where were we had Sigurd and Roy instead. A world where Sigurd was the one with the "beautiful" combo moves that were originally supposed to be his. A world where it was Sigurd who introduced the FE world to the rest of the world. Would we give a crap for Marth then? Would we even care who Marth was? Would you even try to find out who he was? Think about that, and be honest with yourself.

Now don't get me wrong, I like Marth.... the way I found out about him. But I think that this "first in series" talk won't completely save him. Even if he still makes it, I doubt he will make it before the likes of Ike or Myciaiah.
 

GenG

Smash Lord
Joined
Dec 24, 2005
Messages
1,473
Location
Spain
Back in the day, when Melee was in development, the original line up for FE characters was this: Sigurd, followed by Marth, meaning we would had unlocked Sigurd the way we unlock Marth today, and so on. Sakurai himself said he like Sigurd, and the reason Marth was there was beacuse of fan request, (keep in mind, this was Japan-only, way before FE went international, meaning that he didn't have to worry about what the others around the world would say) followed by Sigurd. But at the time, there was no NEW FIRE EMBLEM in a while, till FE6 was announced. Now to promote the game, Nintendo thought it was a good idea to throw in the new FE character, Roy, in Melee.
Sakurai never said he likes Sigurd. Those proofless facts are very common in the wikipedia, like Balloon Fight being in the Melee beta and such. Looking at the Melee poll, all I see is this:

- Fire Emblem:
1. Marth (21 votes)
2. Various characters (18 votes)
3. Oguma (8 votes)
4. Celice (4 votes)
5. Sigurd (2 votes)
5. Leaf (2 votes)

People like to make up some "Sakurai said" **** to make themselves important. Fan request? That's what makes Smash Bros! And if the characters was requested, it had to be for a reason. But if you have something to back that, I'll gladly accept it.

No Fire Emblem in a while? I mean, Melee came out in 2001, and Thracia 776 was released for SNES a year before. That isn't a while if you ask me. But if you look closely at FE's status in that time, Roy's addition was very logic: He was like the symbol of the new FE era.

Now here was the decision. Imagine in a world where were we had Sigurd and Roy instead. A world where Sigurd was the one with the "beautiful" combo moves that were originally supposed to be his. A world where it was Sigurd who introduced the FE world to the rest of the world. Would we give a crap for Marth then? Would we even care who Marth was? Would you even try to find out who he was? Think about that, and be honest with yourself.
Interesting question, but I think it would be the same. Sooner or later I'll found out about that Fire Emblem game just like I found FE4. It's like making the question backwards. And there's still fans in Japan who back me up. Somebody who loves Fire Emblem can't possibly miss FE1 and 3 while browsing in fansites. Instead supporting Sigurd, I'll most likely be supporting Marth.

Now don't get me wrong, I like Marth.... the way I found out about him. But I think that this "first in series" talk won't completely save him. Even if he still makes it, I doubt he will make it before the likes of Ike or Myciaiah.
I think the first in the series is one of the reasons that definitely saves him, along his popularity (worldwide, even when this issue is often avoided by anti Marths), his status in the franchise and his status as a retro character.
 

Wiseguy

Smash Champion
Joined
Mar 28, 2007
Messages
2,245
Location
Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada (Proud
It dropped quite early from the top 20, it stopped selling at 70k (with maybe some hundreds per week), but it's even worse than PoR. There are 2.3 millions Wiis in Japan, enough for this game.
2.3 million units is still not enough to make a fair assessment. Compared to other popular Japanese systems (PS2, DS, etc) the Wii is still in its infancy.

But you could be right about the Japanese losing interest in the Fire Eblem series. All the more reason to not include any Japanese-only characters.

I think I've discussed these points through many threads already, but I'll sum them again: Nintendo is not going (I emphatize the "going" as reality) to neglect the past of these series. There isn't any reason for deny Medeus (he is mentioned in the Marth trophy in Melee) as a villain, even when the castle stage in the Brawl is directly.

I know you haven't played the old games, and I understand that you thought the BK was the most important villain because it appeared in two (good and seemingly popular) Fire Emblems, but Medeus is known as THE enemy in the franchise by Intelligent Systems, being a fearful dark Dragon, theme that was brought in many games (Idoun in FE6, the Fire Dragon in FE7). Medeus was the the mastermind behind FE1 and 3, was the definitive enemy of Akaneia unlike BK which became "good" at some point, which is very very similar to Camus' issue (bad guy dead > his sister revived him > he didn't remember anything so he adopted a new personality as Sirius Black, a wandering swordman > he joined the good guys when he remembered everything).
So yeah, I won't bully you, everybody may be wrong sometimes, but seriously, BK isn't the most important villain in the franchise. It doesn't have anything to do wether it is known in the US or not: Medeus' two roles, his fearful plot and his "first game in the franchise" value hasn't been matched yet by any bad guy. Other baddies are Alvis, Julius or Manfroy (from FE4), Idoun and Zephiel (from FE6), Nergal (from FE7) or Ashnard (from FE9), but nearly as important. BK isn't your average bad guy, so it doesn't fall in this category. I think he is more like the bad guy who becomes good at some point, like the aforementioned Camus, or the neutral guy like Metaknight in the Kirby franchise.

Oh, I think it should be right as a clone, there aren't many "distinguishable" enemies in the series. But never tooking the place of a potential non clone character.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Fire Emblem 3 just a remake of the original Fire Emblem with some new chapters added? If that's true, then he hasn't starred in two original Fire Emblem games. The Black Knight has. Also, he has the advantage of starring in a recently released game that most Fire Emblem fans can play without learning Japanese.


There isn't any majority in the US. Many people bought the GBA games, but that makes them fans? How many of them are truly fans? In that aspect, US fails against Japan in tradition. These FEs you don't want to know about are part of the franchise and were both released for the Japanese Virtual Console, and are having a revival from Nintendo's part (with merchandasing like figures or minisites).

You aren't the center of the world. You may've never heard about it but it doesn't make it less important. You should drop that egocentric view of yours if you want people consider your opinions as valid.
My dear friend, if you look at what I've written, you'll notice I'm not arguing an "America First" policy. Far from it. I'm just pointing out the obvious fact that all the Fire Emblems released internationally have sold more in the rest of the world (aka: Canada, the U.S., Europe, Australia, Central & South America and Asia) than in Japan. In my world, that means that the majority of Fire Emblem fans are not Japanese, and will not play any of the old Japanese games.

I'm not rejecting the importance of the the Japanese gamers. I just think that Nintendo will balance the tastes of all Fire emblem fans by inlcuding characters from games that are popular worldwide.


Interesting, so how Micaiah is popular worldwide? You are just assuming she is, but the game was poorly received, and you don't know if Nintendo would waste a spot on a failed character who hasn't been released in the US yet. You don't know if she's popular worlwide.
Obviously, GoD hasn't been relleased worldwide yet. However, her inclusion would undoubtably sell more copies of her game as Roy's inclusion in Melee did.


Unique is just different. That doesn't mean she would be better or more creative, because G&W is an "unique" character but his playstyle is pretty common in Smash. If you want to replace sword swipes with magic bursts, that doesn't make the character any unique: See Zelda in Melee.
Zelda is a unique character. No one takes the time to master her because Sheik is far easier to use. Just becuase Zelda was a dud doeasn't mean a magic user couldn't work in Brawl.


I know, but see:
Mitsurugi = Sword
Yunsung = Sword
Taki = Sword
Talim = Double daggers (which are little swords, I've seen Pit falling into this category even when he has a splitting naginata, never seen before in Smash)
Cassandra and Sophitia= Sword and shield
Raphael = Rapier
Xianghua = Sword
Nightmare = ****ing huge sword
Cervantes = Twin swords
Voldo = Daggers (swords)
Yoshimitsu = Swords

That's just the Soul Calibur 2 cast, I'm not that fond of the SC3 one. But that's a example about swords being used differently, so it's not repetitive when you know what are you doing.
That's exactly my point. With a cast full of sword users, SC is far less interesting that Smash. We need variey. Miciaiah brings that.

Micaiah is as important as Leaf or Lyndis: She isn't the "lord" of the continent as Marth is to Akaneia, Roy is to Elibe, Sigurd (and Celice) to Jugdral or Ike to Tellius. Not enough importance for a Smash representative when there are far more popular and requested characters.
We certainly won't get enough characters in Brawl to represent all the continents. All that matters is the games themselves.


Mario's forward tilt (round kick) is a move used by many characters, the halfmoon kick in the air, the "sexy kick" and such. At least, Marth has swipes and styles clearly different from those seen in other swordmen like Link, Metaknight or Pit. Unoriginal? He is a RPG character for god sake. You can't throw him away because he just uses a sword; Instead, he was worked wonderfully and resulted in one of the most interesting characters, which not many people can play correctly (smash spam is just obsolete).
Ike, Sigurd and Marth are far more similar than the other swordfighters already confirmed for Brawl. Yes, we could use one sword fighter from the FE series. Not four.

Sorry, I meant main characters in medieval fantasy. I'm not inventing anything, just take a look at any RPG, and see what kind of weapon the main hero wields. Usually is a sword, but there are characters with guns, scythes, axes, etc. "Unfortunately" for you, the most popular Fire Emblem characters have a sword, so instead ignoring them they have to be worked.

Majority? I think you are joking or something. Most jobs in Fire emblem revolve around a sword, and even jobs about axes or spears can use swords after promoting. Because swords are a favourite in medieval fantasy.
Swords are no more prominent in Fire Emblem games than axes or spears. There are far more unique units in the FE games I've played than just swordfighters. I repeat: we need greater diversity in our Fire emblem reps.


Zelda and Ganondorf aren't the main characters which I wanted to point, but have you played Twilight Princess? Both characters have sword there. Ganondorf was about to have a sword in Melee (like the one he has in the victory cutscene from the Spaceworld 2000 Demo) but other characters had more priority over him (like Marth), so he became a Falcon clone to at least be playable.
Yes, but your point was that all Fantasy characters in Smash had to be sword fighters. This is obviously false.
 

GenG

Smash Lord
Joined
Dec 24, 2005
Messages
1,473
Location
Spain
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Fire Emblem 3 just a remake of the original Fire Emblem with some new chapters added? If that's true, then he hasn't starred in two original Fire Emblem games. The Black Knight has. Also, he has the advantage of starring in a recently released game that most Fire Emblem fans can play without learning Japanese.
FE3 includes a remake of the first Fire Emblem, but also has 20 new chapters taking place 5 years after the first game, with a new plot about Hardin betraying Marth for some reason and trying to revive Medeus. Counts as 2 games.

I'm not rejecting the importance of the the Japanese gamers. I just think that Nintendo will balance the tastes of all Fire emblem fans by inlcuding characters from games that are popular worldwide.
You've said it! There is no use on cutting Marth then. It isn't like Marth never appeared in a US game before or he's despised.

Obviously, GoD hasn't been relleased worldwide yet. However, her inclusion would undoubtably sell more copies of her game as Roy's inclusion in Melee did.
I won't be so sure. The GBA was a "hardcore" system, different from the Wii. Just today I read a Miyamoto interview, he was deceived with Zelda TP sales in Japan, as well as F-Zero, and I would go a step further and say that Fire Emblem too. The Wii audience in Japan is made from casual gamers which don't are interested in long and deep games.

But however, forget what I've said, after looking through some charts it seems that GotD have sold 140k to date which is just 10k less that PoR sold in Japan :) Is almost a launch title, so in a few months it will surpass PoR in sales and reach at least 500k in a couple years.

Zelda is a unique character. No one takes the time to master her because Sheik is far easier to use. Just becuase Zelda was a dud doeasn't mean a magic user couldn't work in Brawl.
It was just an opinion, like yours. You say magic is unique, but then, exploding and shining things aren't interesting for me. I think a good swordman is more enjoyable and fun to play. It's just another opinion on Smash. A magic user could be nice, of course, but no more unique than any other character.

That's exactly my point. With a cast full of sword users, SC is far less interesting that Smash. We need variey. Miciaiah brings that.
It isn't that SC characters play the same. Katanas can't be wielded like broad swords, and Xianghua uses a hit and run style with her korean sword. I'm not saying "hey, let's put just sword characters!" or nothing like that. I'm just pointing that many Fire Emblem main characters have swords and that shouldn't restrict them, because it could've done (as seen in SC). I'm talking about 3 FE characters here, not 26.

We certainly won't get enough characters in Brawl to represent all the continents. All that matters is the games themselves.
Yes, that's a problem. Marth, Sigurd, Ike, Roy. 4 characters would be enough, but Sigurd is a Japanese exclusive and isn't ver similar from Marth. So we have 3. There are chances for Roy to be cut, but he could stay as a FE GBA representative with a somewhat reworked moveset. This would be OK for me since the rest of characters have to be reworked somehow, leaving 1 or 2 new characters per franchise (not counting clones, BK could work here).

Why people is so sure about Micaiah being another Roy? Roy's appareance was fairly right because the bad times the franchise was passing, as a Marth clone (clone! so it had less work) promoting the new generation of FE titles. Right now everybody knows FE (somehow) and it isn't like Ike doesn't appear in GotD and saves the day there.

Micaiah could result in an interesting character but I'm not sure. I've not played GotD and I don't know if the character is worth it. Leaf wasn't worth it. Lyndis either (to point some main-but not ultimate lord characters).

Ike, Sigurd and Marth are far more similar than the other swordfighters already confirmed for Brawl. Yes, we could use one sword fighter from the FE series. Not four.
Yes, 2 should be right. There are other swordmen in other franchises.

Swords are no more prominent in Fire Emblem games than axes or spears. There are far more unique units in the FE games I've played than just swordfighters. I repeat: we need greater diversity in our Fire emblem reps.
Main lord characters all use swords: The nimble lords like Roy or Marth that end having broad swords, mercenaries (which also have swords; Ike is one of them), myrmidons (with katanas), thieves (daggers are blades too), and jobs like paladin or pegasus knight which can use swords too. It's certainly a majority, but of course aren't the only weapons. I could understand why all main characters in fantasy have swords, since it's a weapon often associated with honor, cavailry, knightmanship and such. Usually the main legendary kickass weapon is a sword, a tradition in the series.

Yes, but your point was that all Fantasy characters in Smash had to be sword fighters. This is obviously false.
No, I said all main characters in fantasy have a sword. Since all the Fire emblem lords (ALL) have a magical sword, this fact can't be avoided. So they has to put the most popular and representative ones wether they all have swords, it isn't something that Sakurai can't change, and from what we've seen in the trailers he likes sword too.
Not all fantasy characters in Smash have (or should have) weapons, but when the most popular ones have similar weapons you can't do anything but think how to portrait them. It's just like that.
See, Link was the swordman until Marth came. And while both have swords, they don't play anything similar.
 

Wiseguy

Smash Champion
Joined
Mar 28, 2007
Messages
2,245
Location
Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada (Proud
FE3 includes a remake of the first Fire Emblem, but also has 20 new chapters taking place 5 years after the first game, with a new plot about Hardin betraying Marth for some reason and trying to revive Medeus. Counts as 2 games.
O.k. So Medeus starred in 2-and-a-half Fire emblem games.

It doesn't matter. Characters from the Japanese-only games and the GBA games should not get in becuase their games aren't popular among Fire Emblem fans everyone. Only the Telius games are.

You've said it! There is no use on cutting Marth then. It isn't like Marth never appeared in a US game before or he's despised.
I was referring to Fire Emblem games that are popular worldwide, but in fairness Marth could still return due to his popularity in Melee. However, given his similarity to Ike and the fact that his games are Japanese-only I think that his place on the roster should be given to another Fire Emblem character.

I won't be so sure. The GBA was a "hardcore" system, different from the Wii. Just today I read a Miyamoto interview, he was deceived with Zelda TP sales in Japan, as well as F-Zero, and I would go a step further and say that Fire Emblem too. The Wii audience in Japan is made from casual gamers which don't are interested in long and deep games.

But however, forget what I've said, after looking through some charts it seems that GotD have sold 140k to date which is just 10k less that PoR sold in Japan :) Is almost a launch title, so in a few months it will surpass PoR in sales and reach at least 500k in a couple years.
Don't worry about it. Everyone makes mistakes.

It was just an opinion, like yours. You say magic is unique, but then, exploding and shining things aren't interesting for me. I think a good swordman is more enjoyable and fun to play. It's just another opinion on Smash. A magic user could be nice, of course, but no more unique than any other character.
Look, while Brawl has plenty of swordfighters (Link, Pit, Metakinght and probably Ike) it has no magic users that we know of (we don't know what moveset Zelda will have) so Miciaiah would be more original than any sword-weilding Fire Emblem lord just because there are alot more sword fighters in the game than magic users. That's all.

It isn't that SC characters play the same. Katanas can't be wielded like broad swords, and Xianghua uses a hit and run style with her korean sword. I'm not saying "hey, let's put just sword characters!" or nothing like that. I'm just pointing that many Fire Emblem main characters have swords and that shouldn't restrict them, because it could've done (as seen in SC). I'm talking about 3 FE characters here, not 26.
True, all the SC characters don't control the same, but compared to Melee they aren't nearly as original. Smash games have always had an incredibly diverse cast of characters.

I'm not opposed to the inclusion more swordfighters, as long as they bring something new to the table. Link has a sword & shield as well as projectiles. Pit uses his dual knives/bow as well as his flying ability and Metaknight is a hybrid of Kirby's floatiness and Marth's lightning fast sword attacks. Ike is a traditional swordfighter in the same vein as Marth and Roy. The Black Knight could be included easily as an ultra-slow, ultra-powerful Ike clone with a teloport ability.

Obviously, any character could be given a unique moveset, but why include more conventional sword fighters when they would vary only slightly from Ike?

Yes, that's a problem. Marth, Sigurd, Ike, Roy. 4 characters would be enough, but Sigurd is a Japanese exclusive and isn't ver similar from Marth. So we have 3. There are chances for Roy to be cut, but he could stay as a FE GBA representative with a somewhat reworked moveset. This would be OK for me since the rest of characters have to be reworked somehow, leaving 1 or 2 new characters per franchise (not counting clones, BK could work here).
One quick question GenG:

What FE characters should be included, in your opinion, if as few as two Fire Emblem characters were included? I know you think that four characters deserve to make the cut (Marth, Sigurd, Ike & Roy) but it's possible that this won't happen given FE's relatively small following compared to series like Zelda and Pokemon.

Why people is so sure about Micaiah being another Roy? Roy's appareance was fairly right because the bad times the franchise was passing, as a Marth clone (clone! so it had less work) promoting the new generation of FE titles. Right now everybody knows FE (somehow) and it isn't like Ike doesn't appear in GotD and saves the day there.

Micaiah could result in an interesting character but I'm not sure. I've not played GotD and I don't know if the character is worth it. Leaf wasn't worth it. Lyndis either (to point some main-but not ultimate lord characters).
True, Roy was far easier to include due to the fact he was a clone, but Miciaiah's inclusion would still serve the same purpose: sell copies of GoD. True, Ike could be a represnetative of GoD but since Miciaiah is the one on the cover of the game, I think her role will be greater than Ike's - making her a better rpe for the game.

Any character could be given an interesting moveset. Miciaiah just has the potential to be more original than any other FE lord given that she is a magic user.

Yes, 2 should be right. There are other swordmen in other franchises.
Two FE sword fighters? I could see that happening if they are drastically different from one another or one is a clone of the other (which would be a big time saver).


Main lord characters all use swords: The nimble lords like Roy or Marth that end having broad swords, mercenaries (which also have swords; Ike is one of them), myrmidons (with katanas), thieves (daggers are blades too), and jobs like paladin or pegasus knight which can use swords too. It's certainly a majority, but of course aren't the only weapons. I could understand why all main characters in fantasy have swords, since it's a weapon often associated with honor, cavailry, knightmanship and such. Usually the main legendary kickass weapon is a sword, a tradition in the series.
Daggers and swords are both blades, but a dagger is not a sword. That's a stretch by anyone's definition.

Look at PoR. That game has bow users, axeweilders, spear users, magic users, Wyvern riders, not to mention all the Laguz. Other than Ike, Mia, Zihark, that sword fighter you get late in the game (can't think of her name right now) the 3 Generals, 3 pegasus knights and 5 (?) paladins everyone else does not use swords. That means that only 15 characters in the game use swords, which is not the majority.

Sure, swords are an important component to Fire Embelm series (they may be far more important in the older games) but the series is about so much more. That's why we should have characters other than swordfighters representing the series.


No, I said all main characters in fantasy have a sword. Since all the Fire emblem lords (ALL) have a magical sword, this fact can't be avoided. So they has to put the most popular and representative ones wether they all have swords, it isn't something that Sakurai can't change, and from what we've seen in the trailers he likes sword too.
Not all fantasy characters in Smash have (or should have) weapons, but when the most popular ones have similar weapons you can't do anything but think how to portrait them. It's just like that.
See, Link was the swordman until Marth came. And while both have swords, they don't play anything similar.
Miciaiah is the main lord in Fire Emblem Goddess of Dawn. Miciaiah does not weild a magical sword. Therefore, not all Fire Embelm lords weild magical swords. Isn't logic fun?

Of the characters confirmed for Brawl, most of them have recieved an updated look from their most recent game (ie: Twilight Princess Link, Commad Fox, etc.) so, while its all just speculation at this point, its not too much of a stretch to say that Sakurai's emphasis appears to be one of "out with the old and in with the new". Given that the newest games in the series are PoR and GoD, I suspect that these games will get greater reprentation than the old games.

Interestingly, I noticed that you neglected to respond to one of my arguments:

My dear friend, if you look at what I've written, you'll notice I'm not arguing an "America First" policy. Far from it. I'm just pointing out the obvious fact that all the Fire Emblems released internationally have sold more in the rest of the world (aka: Canada, the U.S., Europe, Australia, Central & South America and Asia) than in Japan. In my world, that means that the majority of Fire Emblem fans are not Japanese, and will not play any of the old Japanese games.

I'm not rejecting the importance of the the Japanese gamers. I just think that Nintendo will balance the tastes of all Fire emblem fans by inlcuding characters from games that are popular worldwide.
I take your silence to mean that you agree that only characters from universally popular Fire Emblem games will make it into Brawl. As in only from Path of Radiance and its upcoming sequel.
 

GreenMamba

Smash Journeyman
Joined
May 15, 2006
Messages
361
Wiseguy, you sure like making up rules, don't you?

Suited Samus's design is from Metroid Zero Mission, which is not the most recent incarnation, meaning the rule is not entirely true. Hell, this "rule" was just as prevelant in Melee (only Young Link was using an older appearance than his last), and Marth was still very much present.

Think about this--how many Japanese Fire Emblem fans would be pissed off if Marth wasn't present in SSBB? A good amount of them.
Now, how many American Fire Emblem fans would be pissed off if Marth was included? Just by visiting this board and others, I'd say about two.

EDIT: Simply put, most non-Japanese Fire Emblem fans, especially those that are also fans of Smash, realize that there were previous Fire Emblems and realize their significance.
 

GenG

Smash Lord
Joined
Dec 24, 2005
Messages
1,473
Location
Spain
O.k. So Medeus starred in 2-and-a-half Fire emblem games.

It doesn't matter. Characters from the Japanese-only games and the GBA games should not get in becuase their games aren't popular among Fire Emblem fans everyone. Only the Telius games are.
I wasn't talking about adding Medeus (is a giant dragon, it would be totally lame, but as part of a stage it could work). OBVIOUSLY Black Knight have infinitely more chances as a playable character for having the "human" proportions ideal for Smash, but he isn't the most important villain as you claimed him to be. He is the most important villain in the games released in the US, yes.

I was referring to Fire Emblem games that are popular worldwide, but in fairness Marth could still return due to his popularity in Melee. However, given his similarity to Ike and the fact that his games are Japanese-only I think that his place on the roster should be given to another Fire Emblem character.
Marth and Ike aren't nowhere as similar
and
Marth and Ike are enough different to guarantee opposed playstyles

Compare Marth with Ike. Nothing at all! It's like limiting Star Fox characters because they are animals, and many animals could result redundant. Fire Emblem protagonists have similar traits (blue hair) but they act and fight completely different, even more Ike which isn't your pimp and glamurous lord. You should stop bringing this point, is clearly exaggerated.

I'm not opposed to the inclusion more swordfighters, as long as they bring something new to the table. Link has a sword & shield as well as projectiles. Pit uses his dual knives/bow as well as his flying ability and Metaknight is a hybrid of Kirby's floatiness and Marth's lightning fast sword attacks. Ike is a traditional swordfighter in the same vein as Marth and Roy. The Black Knight could be included easily as an ultra-slow, ultra-powerful Ike clone with a teloport ability.

Obviously, any character could be given a unique moveset, but why include more conventional sword fighters when they would vary only slightly from Ike?
Yeah, it's vital for characters to add something new. Marth did it, added another style for Smash, the glamurous swordman. But you said you wanted to cut Marth and replace him with Ike. You are cutting a style to put another, not replacing. Ike would never fight as Marth does, relying in brute force. He isn't traditional in the lines of Marth and Roy. He is a mercenary unit made lord! How is that traditional?

Slighty? No way. If they just portrait Ike as a Marth semiclone, they just simply failed at creating a suitable moveset for the character.

One quick question GenG:

What FE characters should be included, in your opinion, if as few as two Fire Emblem characters were included? I know you think that four characters deserve to make the cut (Marth, Sigurd, Ike & Roy) but it's possible that this won't happen given FE's relatively small following compared to series like Zelda and Pokemon.
Two? Easy: Marth, as the first one, representative of the older fanbase, an image of the traditional lord, most popular character in Melee, blablabla... and Ike, the most recent one, returning of the franchise to the roots, a totally different image of the lord, a wacky swordplay, awesome game, two appareances, etc.

True, Roy was far easier to include due to the fact he was a clone, but Miciaiah's inclusion would still serve the same purpose: sell copies of GoD. True, Ike could be a represnetative of GoD but since Miciaiah is the one on the cover of the game, I think her role will be greater than Ike's - making her a better rpe for the game.
Are you sure? From what I know, Micaiah just stars the first part of the game: There are four, one of them is commanded for Elincia and other by Ike, so Ike isn't certainly a secondary character. He is the key in GotD too, so I don't think Micaiah is more representative than the ultimate lord figure in Tellius. Different enough, not clones, not repetitive or redundant.

Any character could be given an interesting moveset. Miciaiah just has the potential to be more original than any other FE lord given that she is a magic user.
But then, that's opinion again. Magic, swords, flat dudes, brawlers... isn't original if that doesn't change the way you play the character. It's just original in "looks" and aesthetics, but I think Ike could have an awesome air game with a lot of down-to-up and up-to-down moves and combos, and Aether!

Sure, swords are an important component to Fire Embelm series (they may be far more important in the older games) but the series is about so much more. That's why we should have characters other than swordfighters representing the series.
I think representing characters and games are far more important than representing different weapons. Is better to pick characters that do good in popularity - originality - potential playstyle - representation, which Marth and Ike could do. But again, I feel two characters are the minimum, but there should be at least three, even if it's a clone.

Miciaiah is the main lord in Fire Emblem Goddess of Dawn. Miciaiah does not weild a magical sword. Therefore, not all Fire Embelm lords weild magical swords. Isn't logic fun?
She is not! She just plays the first part of the game, but again Ike is the main lord from a whole game perspective and commands the army again.

Of the characters confirmed for Brawl, most of them have recieved an updated look from their most recent game (ie: Twilight Princess Link, Commad Fox, etc.) so, while its all just speculation at this point, its not too much of a stretch to say that Sakurai's emphasis appears to be one of "out with the old and in with the new". Given that the newest games in the series are PoR and GoD, I suspect that these games will get greater reprentation than the old games.
Is just an assumption, it's good to have new things but then Pit appears and bam! And the castle stage in the trailer from Fire Emblem 1-3 isn't certainly new.

Interestingly, I noticed that you neglected to respond to one of my arguments:

I take your silence to mean that you agree that only characters from universally popular Fire Emblem games will make it into Brawl. As in only from Path of Radiance and its upcoming sequel.
Well, I thought that was answered through many of my responses. Universally popular is a rather ambiguous word since there could be (as example) a million Sigurd fans in Japan, but then 200k Ike fans in Japan and 200k fans in the US. If the million fans of Sigurd are going to buy the game if he's in, I (as a developer) would put him in. It's Fire Emblem story so US fans instead of blowing their heads off they will learn something about the awesome games they never got the chance to play (like the trophies). Everybody wins.

From your point of view, since Earthbound was never released in Europe, they should remove Ness and put characters that Europeans know. Don't care if his is loved, but is a waste of a character if I never could play an original copy of Earthbound in my original SNES.
 

Wiseguy

Smash Champion
Joined
Mar 28, 2007
Messages
2,245
Location
Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada (Proud
Wiseguy, you sure like making up rules, don't you?

Suited Samus's design is from Metroid Zero Mission, which is not the most recent
incarnation, meaning the rule is not entirely true. Hell, this "rule" was just as
prevelant in Melee (only Young Link was using an older appearance than his last), and
Marth was still very much present.

Think about this--how many Japanese Fire Emblem fans would be pissed off if Marth wasn't
present in SSBB? A good amount of them.
Now, how many American Fire Emblem fans would be pissed off if Marth was included? Just
by visiting this board and others, I'd say about two.

EDIT: Simply put, most non-Japanese Fire Emblem fans, especially those that are also
fans of Smash, realize that there were previous Fire Emblems and realize their
significance.
My rules are like the Pirate's Code: they're more like guidelines than actual rules.

I'm not saying that all characters have to appear in their most recent incarnation, nor
am I against any retro characters appearing in Smash Bros. I just think that generally,
each installment of smash should reflect the most recently released games in each
respective series. For a series like Legend of Zelda, this means that Twilight Princess
Link, Zelda and Ganondorf replace their OoT counterparts. Applying this same logic to
Fire Emblem, characters from the recent games (aka: Ike) get in over the lords from
older games, like Marth and Roy.

The Young Link in Melee has weapons from his role in OoT (Deku Sheild) as well as
Majora's Mask (fire arrows, hookshot, etc.). Since it is the same character in both
games, it is consistent with my theory.

As for Samus, I was certainly disappointed that they didn't include her superior Prime
suit, but I suppose they went with the older version because it was easier to program
into the game.

As for people who would be upset if Marth were cut, the way I see it they fall into
three groups.

The first are Japanese gamers who know him as the original FE lord. Personally, I could
see why they would be upset if Marth was replaced by a character they didn't like just
to please Nintendo's Western audience. However, this is not the case. Ike is just as
popular in Japan as he is elsewhere (perhapd more so) as is made evident by the fact
that he was ranked as the second most requested character for Brawl in Sakurai's poll.
My point is that the Japanese won't care about Marth being cut nearly as much as you
think - as long as his replacement is popular in Japan.

The second are non-Japanese FE fans who appreciate his importance to the Fire Emblem
series, regardless of whether or not they have played his game. I can sympathize with
these people, however, given that Marth is not nearly as important to his series as
Link or Mario are to theirs (the series has survived over a decade without him for
crying out loud) I think its not unreasonable to replace him with a more contemporary
Fire Emblem character.

The third are people who know nothing about the Fire Emblem series, but like Marth for
his stupidly cheap moveset. These people are afraid that if Marth is cut, they may
actually have to learn to play well rather than simply spamming the same moves over and
over. I have no sympathy for these people because 1) if Marth did return he would be
nerfed, so they would have to pick up a new cheap character and 2) Ike is essentially
Marth, only less girly. Ike would likely control similarly enough to Marth that the
only people who will care in the long run are whiners who are obsessed with Brawl being
exactly the same as Melee.

Regardless, I think Sakurai is more concerned about making Brawl the best game possible
than he is pleasing everyone. Part of what makes Smash so excellent is its diverse cast
of characters. Having two characters as similar as Marth and Ike in the same game runs
contrary to this, as the time spent creating Marth could be better spent on a more
original character.

I wasn't talking about adding Medeus (is a giant dragon, it would be
totally lame, but as part of a stage it could work). OBVIOUSLY Black Knight have
infinitely more chances as a playable character for having the "human" proportions
ideal for Smash, but he isn't the most important villain as you claimed him to be. He
is the most important villain in the games released in the US, yes..
Fair enough. But not just the U.S. He's also the most important villain in Canada,
Europe, Australia ... you get the drill. I'll concede that in Japan, Medeus may be a
more important villain for the series.

Although, a correction is in order. I originally said that Marth and Medeus had starred
in Two-and-a-half games. I meant to say one-and a half, because they starred in one
original game and one remake. Conversely, Ike and BK have starred in two completely
original games.


Marth and Ike aren't nowhere as similar
and
Marth and Ike are enough different to guarantee opposed playstyles

Compare
Marth
with
Ike.
Nothing at all! It's like limiting Star Fox characters because they are animals, and
many animals could result redundant. Fire Emblem protagonists have similar traits (blue
hair) but they act and fight completely different, even more Ike which isn't your pimp
and glamurous lord. You should stop bringing this point, is clearly
exaggerated..
Hmm... let's see. They both have blue hair, capes, and large one-handed swords. They are nearly identical in height and build. If you look closely, you can even see the same dopey expression on their faces. If both Marth and Ike were included in Brawl, they would be the most similar two characters included in a Super Smash Bros game without one of them being a clone of the other. Maybe its not unusual in the Fire Embelm series for lords to look so similar, but in Smash Bros including two characters from the same series who look so similar is just redundant.

Normally, it might be possible for Marth to be Ike’s clone (or vice-versa) but, as you’ve pointed out, Marth and Ike are just dissimilar in their fighting styles that this would be impossible. Marth is faster and uses vertical slashes while Ike uses horizontal slashes and has a sword that shoots projectiles.

Yeah, it's vital for characters to add something new. Marth did it, added another style
for Smash, the glamurous swordman. But you said you wanted to cut Marth and replace him
with Ike. You are cutting a style to put another, not replacing. Ike would never fight
as Marth does, relying in brute force. He isn't traditional in the lines of Marth and
Roy. He is a mercenary unit made lord! How is that traditional?

Slighty? No way. If they just portrait Ike as a Marth semiclone, they just simply failed
at creating a suitable moveset for the character..
If the Smash Team were going to design a completely new moveset for two Fire Emblem sword fighters, then they need to differ in more ways than just how they swing their sword. Pit, Link and Metaknight each bring unique abilities other than their sword fighting technique. In comparison, Marth and Ike are extremely similar.

Two? Easy: Marth, as the first one, representative of the older fanbase, an image of the
traditional lord, most popular character in Melee, blablabla... and Ike, the most recent
one, returning of the franchise to the roots, a totally different image of the lord, a
wacky swordplay, awesome game, two appareances, etc..
Hmm… I see where you’re coming from. I once thought something similar. However, I still want more variety in my Fire Emblem reps than just Marth and Ike. Fans of the series like you and I know that they have extremely different histories and personalities, but to the casual observer I suspect they could be mistaken for twins.

Are you sure? From what I know, Micaiah just stars the first part of the game: There are
four, one of them is commanded for Elincia and other by Ike, so Ike isn't certainly a
secondary character. He is the key in GotD too, so I don't think Micaiah is more
representative than the ultimate lord figure in Tellius. Different enough, not clones,
not repetitive or redundant..
Obviously I havn’t played the game yet, but given that they put her on the cover of the game I suspect that she is the central figure in the game’s story. At any rate, she is at least equally important in GoD as Ike and Elincia.

But then, that's opinion again. Magic, swords, flat dudes, brawlers... isn't original if
that doesn't change the way you play the character. It's just original in "looks" and
aesthetics, but I think Ike could have an awesome air game with a lot of down-to-up and
up-to-down moves and combos, and Aether!.
I’m not say saying that her moveset would be better, just that there are far less magic users than swordfighters in Brawl. This means that she would be more unique than Marth or Sigurd, regardless of how their swing their swords.

Aether would be awesome as Ike’s super smash attack.

I think representing characters and games are far more important than representing
different weapons. Is better to pick characters that do good in popularity -
originality - potential playstyle - representation, which Marth and Ike could do. But
again, I feel two characters are the minimum, but there should be at least three, even
if it's a clone..
I think that when judging a character’s worthiness for Brawl, both the character’s importance in their respective series and whether they bring a unique presence and moveset to the game have to be considered.

Since Miciaiah is a lord in the most recent game, and would undoubtedly be unique, I consider her more likely to appear than Marth.

Is just an assumption, it's good to have new things but then Pit appears and bam! And
the castle stage in the trailer from Fire Emblem 1-3 isn't certainly new..
I’m all for retro characters making a guest appearance in one Smash Bros game. I just don’t want Smash Bros to become a retirement home for outdated and irrelevant characters. In my opinion, only characters who still appear in their respective series deserve to be permanent characters in the Smash Bros series.

Well, I thought that was answered through many of my responses. Universally popular is a rather ambiguous word since there could be (as example) a million Sigurd fans in Japan, but then 200k Ike fans in Japan and 200k fans in the US. If the million fans of Sigurd are going to buy the game if he's in, I (as a developer) would put him in. It's Fire
Emblem story so US fans instead of blowing their heads off they will learn something
about the awesome games they never got the chance to play (like the trophies).
Everybody wins.
Too easy! Ike’s fanbase in Japan far outnumbers that of Sigurd as Ike was one of the top most requested characters in Sakurai’s poll while Sigurd got only one nomination. Also, PoR is universally popular as it is popular in North America, Europe, etc as well as in Japan (once again, in that wonderful poll four of the five Fire Emblem characters were from PoR). It is the only game that bridges the gulf between FE fans in Japan with those in the rest of the world.

Everyone wins when Fire Emblem is represented by characters exclusively from the Telius games.

From your point of view, since Earthbound was never released in Europe, they should
remove Ness and put characters that Europeans know. Don't care if his is loved, but is
a waste of a character if I never could play an original copy of Earthbound in my
original SNES.
I’ve got an even better scenario. It would be like with the original Smash Bros for N64, when they decided to include a character from the Mother series (Earthbound in North America) and they had the choice of including either Ninten (from the Japanese exclusive Mother 1: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ninten ) or Ness from Mother2/Earthbound which was released in both Japan and the United States. Sure they could have including the character from the original Mother game, but instead they went with the character from the more recent game that both Western and Japanese gamers could relate to. Sound familiar?

You know, if I was given credit more the number of words I've used, rather than the
number of posts, I'd be a Smash Master by now.
 

LukeFonFabre

Smash Lord
Joined
Aug 17, 2006
Messages
1,094
Just to clarify, from what I've gathered about GoD, Ike is the most important character, but Micaiah is also very important to the story. It's hard to call either central though, as you kind of alternate between their groups for a considerable amount of time. I think the main reason she (and Sothe) is on the front cover is you simply start out with her group and stick with it for some time, that and she was more promoted than Ike's return was.

Too easy! Ike’s fanbase in Japan far outnumbers that of Sigurd as Ike was one of the top most requested characters in Sakurai’s poll while Sigurd got only one nomination.
That doesn't really mean Ike is more popular in Japan, just that Sakurai took more interest in him (though that's probably more of a bonus in his favour). That said, I would've thought Sigurd would've been given more attention considering how popular he is in Japan, but it seems more like he was given an honourary mention.
 

GenG

Smash Lord
Joined
Dec 24, 2005
Messages
1,473
Location
Spain
I'm not saying that all characters have to appear in their most recent incarnation, nor
am I against any retro characters appearing in Smash Bros. I just think that generally,
each installment of smash should reflect the most recently released games in each
respective series. For a series like Legend of Zelda, this means that Twilight Princess
Link, Zelda and Ganondorf replace their OoT counterparts. Applying this same logic to
Fire Emblem, characters from the recent games (aka: Ike) get in over the lords from
older games, like Marth and Roy.

As for Samus, I was certainly disappointed that they didn't include her superior Prime
suit, but I suppose they went with the older version because it was easier to program
into the game.

As for people who would be upset if Marth were cut, the way I see it they fall into
three groups.

The first are Japanese gamers who know him as the original FE lord. Personally, I could
see why they would be upset if Marth was replaced by a character they didn't like just
to please Nintendo's Western audience. However, this is not the case. Ike is just as
popular in Japan as he is elsewhere (perhapd more so) as is made evident by the fact
that he was ranked as the second most requested character for Brawl in Sakurai's poll.
My point is that the Japanese won't care about Marth being cut nearly as much as you
think - as long as his replacement is popular in Japan.

The second are non-Japanese FE fans who appreciate his importance to the Fire Emblem
series, regardless of whether or not they have played his game. I can sympathize with
these people, however, given that Marth is not nearly as important to his series as
Link or Mario are to theirs (the series has survived over a decade without him for
crying out loud) I think its not unreasonable to replace him with a more contemporary
Fire Emblem character.

The third are people who know nothing about the Fire Emblem series, but like Marth for
his stupidly cheap moveset. These people are afraid that if Marth is cut, they may
actually have to learn to play well rather than simply spamming the same moves over and
over. I have no sympathy for these people because 1) if Marth did return he would be
nerfed, so they would have to pick up a new cheap character and 2) Ike is essentially
Marth, only less girly. Ike would likely control similarly enough to Marth that the
only people who will care in the long run are whiners who are obsessed with Brawl being
exactly the same as Melee.

Regardless, I think Sakurai is more concerned about making Brawl the best game possible
than he is pleasing everyone. Part of what makes Smash so excellent is its diverse cast
of characters. Having two characters as similar as Marth and Ike in the same game runs
contrary to this, as the time spent creating Marth could be better spent on a more
original character.
Quotefest.

As a quick note, Samus in Brawl does have the Prime suit, with the green glowing "eyes" in the chest and a more stylized figure overall.

As for Marth, you fail as looking at the Fire Emblem franchise as it were like the rest of franchises in Nintendo. The world and characters change from title to title, usually having 2 titles each. That makes extremely difficult to pick some characters and replace them as they were mere icons like Mario, Kirby or Link, because many of these characters have personality that made them popular.

Twilight Princess is an inmediate and obvious update from Zelda: OOT, and TP Link's design is the last step in a trend design, embodying the same values of the rest of Links. So it would be right to pick this design.

However, Ike is just the latest lord in the franchise, not the last one in a trend. Since every lord is different, you can't pick Ike and EXPECT to please Marth fans: The characters aren't similar at all. Removing such a popular and creative characters just would result in a stepback. It's not the same case.

So, they should pick lords from different games to please the most fans as possible, which may not like the recent Fire Emblem games (or yes, why not) but are potential Smash buyers. Even the people who like to play Marth as a Smash character, they deserve respect. I don't think Ken have played Fire Emblem, yet I think he would be rather pissed if Marth is cut out. He is already a important member of the Smash franchise, and there couldn't be many other characters more important (or equal) and creative as him.

If you knew the character you won't possibly cut it. Ike isn't the ultimate representative of the FE franchise since there could be people that liked FE1-3 and didn't like PoR, the possibility exists and catering as more people as possible is one of the goals of Smash Bros. Cutting Marth you just would be failing at this goal to some extent, without gaining anything: Replacing Marth with Micaiah would be a bad move, since Marth is an established and popular character worldwide and Micaiah is not.

Fair enough. But not just the U.S. He's also the most important villain in Canada, Europe, Australia ... you get the drill. I'll concede that in Japan, Medeus may be a more important villain for the series.

Although, a correction is in order. I originally said that Marth and Medeus had starred
in Two-and-a-half games. I meant to say one-and a half, because they starred in one
original game and one remake. Conversely, Ike and BK have starred in two completely
original games.
It's not "half". FE1 had 20 chapters. FE3 had 40 or so chapters. It was 2 games in one pack, a remake and a completely new title, labeled as Book 1 and Book 2, so old players could get in the "new game" from the start without replaying the remake of FE 1.

Hmm... let's see. They both have blue hair, capes, and large one-handed swords. They are nearly identical in height and build. If you look closely, you can even see the same dopey expression on their faces. If both Marth and Ike were included in Brawl, they would be the most similar two characters included in a Super Smash Bros game without one of them being a clone of the other. Maybe its not unusual in the Fire Embelm series for lords to look so similar, but in Smash Bros including two characters from the same series who look so similar is just redundant.
You are pushing this too far. Sounds like n00b ranting which doesn't suit you. Ike is taller than Marth, Ike is stronger, Ike has a completely different outfit that can be even more different with his general suit or GotD update, different styles, different swords (just compare the massive Ragnell with the thin and small Falchion). They aren't similar at all.

I think that when judging a character’s worthiness for Brawl, both the character’s importance in their respective series and whether they bring a unique presence and moveset to the game have to be considered.
However they won't pick a lesser character over an already popular character.

Since Miciaiah is a lord in the most recent game, and would undoubtedly be unique, I consider her more likely to appear than Marth.
But that's just nonsense. Most recent doesn't mean importance or representative, that's one fantasy of yours: You want a wizard girl and you don't know how to justify that.

I’m all for retro characters making a guest appearance in one Smash Bros game. I just don’t want Smash Bros to become a retirement home for outdated and irrelevant characters. In my opinion, only characters who still appear in their respective series deserve to be permanent characters in the Smash Bros series.
The Smash Bros. franchise is a retirement for old characters which had special titles but aren't possibly be remade because they aren't interesting, like Balloon Fight or Ice Climbers. Since Fire Emblem is so different because the world and setup change from game to game, is just that simple. And the VC, and the attention given by the developers, the same things I've repeating many many times in this and many other threads. Marth is a classic, worldwide since 2001. Heck, even the Fire Emblem Team logo in Smash Bros pictures the Falchion, showing how important is Marth to his franchise and Smash Bros.

Everyone wins when Fire Emblem is represented by characters exclusively from the Telius games.
I don't win. I think all the people who wanted Marth back in the Sakurai poll won't win. I think most the SSBM and Nintendo communities won't win neither. Whatever the reasons you may find (cheap character, poor worldwide representative) isn't enough for removing a popular character which was accepted by NOA and NOE as the first Fire Emblem lord, so it isn't like they want to hide that history, but rather show it off to us.

I’ve got an even better scenario. It would be like with the original Smash Bros for N64, when they decided to include a character from the Mother series (Earthbound in North America) and they had the choice of including either Ninten (from the Japanese exclusive Mother 1: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ninten ) or Ness from Mother2/Earthbound which was released in both Japan and the United States. Sure they could have including the character from the original Mother game, but instead they went with the character from the more recent game that both Western and Japanese gamers could relate to. Sound familiar?
But again, Ness follows a design trend of kids with caps and shorts started by Ninten, like Link. These two are just the same character, but Mother 2 was a more popular game and was more recent than Ninten's. Still you haven't answered if they should cut the Earthbound franchise (among many others) because they hasn't been released in Europe.

In the same way, Lucas should replace Ness because Ness is just a poor Earthbound representative from a game which was released in the US 10 years ago and sold like pure crap, and so I assume that the fanbase have been dithering away. MOTHER 3 was a highly anticipated title and sold 400k in less of a month. The most recent one, you know. Earthbound isn't popular in the US anymore, and such retro character is just retiring in Smash as you say.

Don't misunderstand me, Marth is going to appear again. I'm just like trying to explain why he is going to ;)
 

GreenMamba

Smash Journeyman
Joined
May 15, 2006
Messages
361
GenG's partly right with the Samus suit--it is the Zero Mission fully powered suit look (minus the purple from the Gravity suit), but it's pretty much identical to Prime 1 suit, just a tad more round in some areas. What it isn't, is the Prime 2 and onward look, which is her most current look.

Selecting characters only from Tellius is like representing Final Fantasy with Vaan and Gabranth. That's not representing a series. That's representing a single section of an extremely expansive series.

I'm bothered by the fact you think you can assume that the Japanese Fire Emblem fans, who worked towards Marth's inclusion in Melee, would automatically be appeased with Ike. If you look at the old poll for Melee, Marth easily, easily outnumbers all of the other Fire Emblem characters, including Sigurd, who is usually seen as more popular. How is he not the face of the franchise?
 

Wiseguy

Smash Champion
Joined
Mar 28, 2007
Messages
2,245
Location
Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada (Proud
Quotefest.
Indeed.


As a quick note, Samus in Brawl does have the Prime suit, with the green glowing "eyes" in the chest and a more stylized figure overall.
Hmm... interesting point. But I still wish that the Brawl version of Samus had the same level of detail as her Prime incarnation.

As for Marth, you fail as looking at the Fire Emblem franchise as it were like the rest of franchises in Nintendo. The world and characters change from title to title, usually having 2 titles each. That makes extremely difficult to pick some characters and replace them as they were mere icons like Mario, Kirby or Link, because many of these characters have personality that made them popular.
Actually, it's precisely because every Fire Emblem game changes from title to title that I want all new Fire Emblem characters. Marth is no longer important to the series because he hasn't appeared in a Fire Emblem game in over a decade. It's time for some of the newer Fire Emblem characters to get the spotlight.

Even Pichu has his own unique (uniquely stupid) personality and a fanbase that will be offended when he is cut. I don't want Brawl to be Melee 2.0, I want an entitrely new game to sink my teeth into. That means some characters have to be cut, and I suspect that Marth will be one of them.

Twilight Princess is an inmediate and obvious update from Zelda: OOT, and TP Link's design is the last step in a trend design, embodying the same values of the rest of Links. So it would be right to pick this design.

However, Ike is just the latest lord in the franchise, not the last one in a trend. Since every lord is different, you can't pick Ike and EXPECT to please Marth fans: The characters aren't similar at all. Removing such a popular and creative characters just would result in a stepback. It's not the same case.

So, they should pick lords from different games to please the most fans as possible, which may not like the recent Fire Emblem games (or yes, why not) but are potential Smash buyers.
Come on, be reasonable. Surely you will admit that Marth and Ike are a bit similar. Sure, they have different outfits, personalities and fighting syles but they both fight exclusively with large, one handed swords. I'm not saying that they would be identical, its just they aren't dissimilar enough to reflect the huge diversity of characters in a Fire Emblem game.

Admittedly, that's just my opinion. For all I know, maybe both marth and Ike will be included. However, I still consider the Black Knight or Miciaiiah more likely.

Even the people who like to play Marth as a Smash character, they deserve respect. I don't think Ken have played Fire Emblem, yet I think he would be rather pissed if Marth is cut out. He is already a important member of the Smash franchise, and there couldn't be many other characters more important (or equal) and creative as him.
I think we've established that Ike is at least as important (arguably more so) than Marth. Regardless, even if Marth did return he would likely be nerfed so Marth's "fans" will likely choose a different main in Brawl.

If you knew the character you won't possibly cut it. Ike isn't the ultimate representative of the FE franchise since there could be people that liked FE1-3 and didn't like PoR, the possibility exists and catering as more people as possible is one of the goals of Smash Bros. Cutting Marth you just would be failing at this goal to some extent, without gaining anything: Replacing Marth with Micaiah would be a bad move, since Marth is an established and popular character worldwide and Micaiah is not.
First off, there is no way to please everyone. No matter what characters are included there will be people offended that their favorite character was cut or that their dream characters wasn't included. I think including characters exclusively from PoR and GoD is a compromise that everyone can at least live with.

I don't see Miciiah as Marth's replacement. The way I see it, Ike will replace Marth as the most important FE lord to date while Roy will be replaced by either BK of Miciaiah (who is just as new to the series as Roy was when he made it into Melee).


You are pushing this too far. Sounds like n00b ranting which doesn't suit you. Ike is taller than Marth, Ike is stronger, Ike has a completely different outfit that can be even more different with his general suit or GotD update, different styles, different swords (just compare the massive Ragnell with the thin and small Falchion). They aren't similar at all.
Since they have never been in the same game, its a little difficult to make such assertions. From the pictures you provided, they certainly look the same heigt. I'm not sure how you could possibly know which is stronger.

However they won't pick a lesser character over an already popular character.
Is Marth really that popular outisde Japan, or do people just like him for his extremely powerful moveset?

The way I see it, Nintendo is more concerned with selling copies of their newer games than they are about representing the older games (which, again, most of the people who buy Fire Embelm games will never play). We'll just have to wait and see which theory is correct.


But that's just nonsense. Most recent doesn't mean importance or representative, that's one fantasy of yours: You want a wizard girl and you don't know how to justify that.
Not particularily. The character I REALLY want is the Black Knight. However, I am willing to conceed that they might put in one of the new lords for GoD to boost sales. Personally, I would rather see Sothe, but once I found out he wasn't a lord I realized that Miciaiah is probably the more likely candidiate.


The Smash Bros. franchise is a retirement for old characters which had special titles but aren't possibly be remade because they aren't interesting, like Balloon Fight or Ice Climbers. Since Fire Emblem is so different because the world and setup change from game to game, is just that simple. And the VC, and the attention given by the developers, the same things I've repeating many many times in this and many other threads. Marth is a classic, worldwide since 2001. Heck, even the Fire Emblem Team logo in Smash Bros pictures the Falchion, showing how important is Marth to his franchise and Smash Bros.
Honouring retro characters is all well and good, but at the expense of worthy characters from the more current games? I have to disagree. I'm all for characters like Game & Watch and Pit making a cameo in one Smash Bros game, but will so many more worthy characters waiting in the wings I don't think they deserve to be made permanent characters. But that's just me.


I don't win. I think all the people who wanted Marth back in the Sakurai poll won't win. I think most the SSBM and Nintendo communities won't win neither. Whatever the reasons you may find (cheap character, poor worldwide representative) isn't enough for removing a popular character which was accepted by NOA and NOE as the first Fire Emblem lord, so it isn't like they want to hide that history, but rather show it off to us.
This history was honored with Marth's inclusion in Melee. Marth has has his five seconds (more like years...) of fame, now its time to give another character that chance. Until he apears in a game that most FE fans can actually buy (in a language they can understand) I will remain convinced that he is not worthy to the be the Fire Embelm representative any longer. Being first does not necessarily mean that he is the most important.

But again, Ness follows a design trend of kids with caps and shorts started by Ninten, like Link. These two are just the same character, but Mother 2 was a more popular game and was more recent than Ninten's. Still you haven't answered if they should cut the Earthbound franchise (among many others) because they hasn't been released in Europe.

In the same way, Lucas should replace Ness because Ness is just a poor Earthbound representative from a game which was released in the US 10 years ago and sold like pure crap, and so I assume that the fanbase have been dithering away. MOTHER 3 was a highly anticipated title and sold 400k in less of a month. The most recent one, you know. Earthbound isn't popular in the US anymore, and such retro character is just retiring in Smash as you say.
Your asking the wrong guy. I have no strong feelings one way or another about Ness or Earthbound. I still think that since his game was the only one in his series to be released outisde Japan he has a better chance than any Lucas.

Should they cut Earthbound for not being released in Europe? No. That series at least saw the light of day in countries other than Japan. All the old Fire Emblems have never been localized at all.


Don't misunderstand me, Marth is going to appear again. I'm just like trying to explain why he is going to ;)
It's cool. I'm always up for a good debate.

GenG's partly right with the Samus suit--it is the Zero Mission fully powered suit look (minus the purple from the Gravity suit), but it's pretty much identical to Prime 1 suit, just more a tad more round in areas. What it isn't, is the Prime 2 and onward look, which is her most current look.

Selecting characters only from Tellius is like representing Final Fantasy with Vaan and Gabranth. That's not representing a series. That's representing a single section of an extremely expansive series.

I'm bothered by the fact you think you can assume that the Japanese Fire Emblem fans, who worked towards Marth's inclusion in Melee, would automatically be appeased with Ike. If you look at the old poll for Melee, Marth easily, easily outnumbers all of the other Fire Emblem characters, including Sigurd, who is usually seen as more popular. How is he not the face of the franchise?
1) Point taken about the Prime suit. Its a shame though.

2) In order to do justice to the Fire Emblem series, you would need one character from each game. That ain't gonna happen (as cool as it would be) so the next best thing is to include characters only from the latest games, which have the advantage of being the only games well reieved in every region of the world. It's not perfect, but it's the least unfair solution, in my view.

3) Marth got in Melee because he was the most important character in the series up to that point. Now, judging by the new poll, that title belongs to Ike. Will there be people disapointed. Yeah, probably. But I think most of them will be too busy playing hours and hours of Smash Bros online to complain too much.
 

GreenMamba

Smash Journeyman
Joined
May 15, 2006
Messages
361
Of course you can't represent the entire thing, but that doesn't mean they should completely eschew representing the series properly. How can you think that the next best thing to "completely representing the series in its full" is "only represent one isolated section of it." No, the next best thing to "completely representing the series in its full" is "representing the series as best as they can by pulling characters from multiple games." Represent the beginning with one character, represent the latest with another, and then represent the middle if time allows. Problem solved.

You can't judge Ike's popularity compared to Marth's popularity on the recent poll, for two very distinct reasons--
1. Were any returning characters specifically requested in the poll? No.
2. We were never shown the quantitative results of the poll--just the characters that got the most frequent mentions in the letters that he chose to respond to, once again, making no mention of specific returning characters.

That's like saying Ike is more popular than Yoshi because he got more responses in the mailbag.

EDIT: And that little bit about "But I think most of them will be too busy playing hours and hours of Smash Bros online to complain too much," swings both ways.
 

GenG

Smash Lord
Joined
Dec 24, 2005
Messages
1,473
Location
Spain
Actually, it's precisely because every Fire Emblem game changes from title to title that I want all new Fire Emblem characters. Marth is no longer important to the series because he hasn't appeared in a Fire Emblem game in over a decade. It's time for some of the newer Fire Emblem characters to get the spotlight.
Marth will never appear in a Fire emblem game never! But Ike neither, any FE character won't appear in a FE game again, that's the nature of the franchise. You can't fight that. More characters can shine, but the past is the past. Marth's still popular, has re-releases and attention from Nintendo's part: Fanbooks, manga, novels, trading card. Fire Emblem characters are one-shot only, this should be accepted when talking about this franchise.

Even Pichu has his own unique (uniquely stupid) personality and a fanbase that will be offended when he is cut. I don't want Brawl to be Melee 2.0, I want an entitrely new game to sink my teeth into. That means some characters have to be cut, and I suspect that Marth will be one of them.
Marth's fanbase is huge, unlike Pichu. It's not the same. Appealing as most people as possible, and you don't know if Ike fanbase is minor than Marth's. You also don't know if Marth's fans like Ike. Here lies your contradiction. Marth has already a spot in the smash family.

Come on, be reasonable. Surely you will admit that Marth and Ike are a bit similar. Sure, they have different outfits, personalities and fighting syles but they both fight exclusively with large, one handed swords. I'm not saying that they would be identical, its just they aren't dissimilar enough to reflect the huge diversity of characters in a Fire Emblem game.
Many characters look similar, and fight similar. As swordmans, there are more differences between Ike and Marth than... Mario and Wario for example.
Diversity fails when the characters picked don't stand to the popular characters.

I think we've established that Ike is at least as important (arguably more so) than Marth. Regardless, even if Marth did return he would likely be nerfed so Marth's "fans" will likely choose a different main in Brawl.
Maybe, we don't know. Maybe Ike ends being a sucky character and nobody plays with him, there's exist that posibilty too.

First off, there is no way to please everyone. No matter what characters are included there will be people offended that their favorite character was cut or that their dream characters wasn't included. I think including characters exclusively from PoR and GoD is a compromise that everyone can at least live with.
Stop inventing compromises and rules. Fire Emblem isn't Path of Radiance.

I don't see Miciiah as Marth's replacement. The way I see it, Ike will replace Marth as the most important FE lord to date while Roy will be replaced by either BK of Miciaiah (who is just as new to the series as Roy was when he made it into Melee).
Ike isn't the most important lord to date either. Why do you say that? Marth's title was more important to the franchise, set up the basics, the gameplay, the plot elements that later were reused, the characters roles. What did Path of Radiance in comparison? Is as important as Marth, as Sigurd or as Roy, but I think it's pretty risky saying Ike is more important as Marth since he always has been (always) the face of the franchise. Ike is the most recent one, which luckily is a kickass lord, and should get representation because the game is just as good as he is.

Since they have never been in the same game, its a little difficult to make such assertions. From the pictures you provided, they certainly look the same heigt. I'm not sure how you could possibly know which is stronger.
Marth is about 170cm tall and over 60kg. He is 19 at the end of the Book 2, and his official age in most material, even Smash Bros Melee. He is weak in constitution, nimble and dependable, regarded as the worst lord in FE history, he couldn't even promote, but he could wield the light Falchion which is the only weapon that can harm Medeus. In Melee he is very light and it's easy to kill, has an overall low hitpower but the tips overcome this.

I don't know Ike's official age, but he should be around 20 in PoR and 23 in GotD. Ike is about 190cm tall. He has muscles, and he can wield those huge broad swords, like Ragnell. Massive and athletic moves which abuse massive strenght. He is one of the best lords, with Sigurd, Celice and Hector. Isn't certainly a Marth, your average nimble lord. This how Ike looks in GotD.

Is Marth really that popular outisde Japan, or do people just like him for his extremely powerful moveset?
Extremely powerful? I don't know how you play Marth, but a good fast player can enter Marth's range and pwn him bad, and he was nerfed in the PAL version (even lighter, less power, spike became a meteor). Marth has overall laggy moves and if they aren't tipped don't provide enough knockback which leaves himself open for retaliation. Sheik is a broken character for example, as there isn't too much logic when playing with her. Many people can play Marth at low levels but it ends being one of the most technical characters.

The way I see it, Nintendo is more concerned with selling copies of their newer games than they are about representing the older games (which, again, most of the people who buy Fire Emblem games will never play). We'll just have to wait and see which theory is correct.
So why don't add characters from all franchises? Let's turn Smash into a playable ad, better than a third party fest!

Roy was a very special case, I don't think it would be repeated again. It's not about just repping, Marth is popular as a smash character too. A friend of mine never played Fire Emblem (and I think he never will), but liked Marth and mained him, he likes how he moves, how he attacks and his style. He mains Samus for the record.

Honouring retro characters is all well and good, but at the expense of worthy characters from the more current games? I have to disagree. I'm all for characters like Game & Watch and Pit making a cameo in one Smash Bros game, but will so many more worthy characters waiting in the wings I don't think they deserve to be made permanent characters. But that's just me.
Marth's appareance would never cut chances for newer characters. It's about balance between the present and the jolly past, not erasing the past as it never happened.
Look at Metroid: Samus was considered obscure until SSB64. That, and SSBM, boosted the franchise and now it's one of the top 4 with Mario, Zelda, Metroid and Smash. Fire Emblem was boosted after Melee, and we don't know if characters like Pit would get a proper revival either.

This history was honored with Marth's inclusion in Melee. Marth has has his five seconds (more like years...) of fame, now its time to give another character that chance. Until he apears in a game that most FE fans can actually buy (in a language they can understand) I will remain convinced that he is not worthy to the be the Fire Embelm representative any longer. Being first does not necessarily mean that he is the most important.
It's not just the first. I've trying to tell you that Marth has been the face of the franchise since 1993 to 2001. Melee powered this image to unseen limits, and there is people who think Marth is the "main character" of Fire Emblem because he appeared in Melee. That's what the impact he caused. Yes, here, in US and Europe.

Again you are leaving behind a fanbase (let's say... 300k?) of FE players in Japan and the Smash fans in Japan and the US.

Your asking the wrong guy. I have no strong feelings one way or another about Ness or Earthbound. I still think that since his game was the only one in his series to be released outisde Japan he has a better chance than any Lucas.

Should they cut Earthbound for not being released in Europe? No. That series at least saw the light of day in countries other than Japan. All the old Fire Emblems have never been localized at all.
It's the same. No games in the US in 10 years, so there are way more fans in Japan and active (important). There is this recent game heavily anticipated and awaited which need representation. US just isn't interested in Earthbound. So Nintendo needs Ness' spot to promote MOTHER 3 sales even more. Isn't it right?
 

Chidosengan

Smash Lord
Joined
Jun 3, 2006
Messages
1,610
Location
New Jersey, USA
I still feel Marth may get kicked out though.... But if Marth makes it again is see the following happening:

-He comes back with his old moveset, but will not be the same. Remember Sakurai said himself he wants to remake all returning characters from ground up, to keep the game from being the same as Melee. Prime example is Kirby: A god-like character in Smash 64 tuned-down in Melee, making him fall to the middle class.

-He comes back without his old moveset. He won't be a starting character, meaning he must be unlocked.

-He doesn't come back, but is incarnated by another character. Meaning his movesets are given to another FE character. Most likely candidate is Ike.

-He doesn't come back, and his moveset is erased, in favor to making new characters.


Remember this is a new game. All characters will be different. There will be new characters, new favorites, and a new tier list. Facts many seems to forget.
 

Wiseguy

Smash Champion
Joined
Mar 28, 2007
Messages
2,245
Location
Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada (Proud
Of course you can't represent the entire thing, but that doesn't mean they should completely eschew representing the series properly. How can you think that the next best thing to "completely representing the series in its full" is "only represent one isolated section of it." No, the next best thing to "completely representing the series in its full" is "representing the series as best as they can by pulling characters from multiple games." Represent the beginning with one character, represent the latest with another, and then represent the middle if time allows. Problem solved.

You can't judge Ike's popularity compared to Marth's popularity on the recent poll, for two very distinct reasons--
1. Were any returning characters specifically requested in the poll? No.
2. We were never shown the quantitative results of the poll--just the characters that got the most frequent mentions in the letters that he chose to respond to, once again, making no mention of specific returning characters.

That's like saying Ike is more popular than Yoshi because he got more responses in the mailbag.

EDIT: And that little bit about "But I think most of them will be too busy playing hours and hours of Smash Bros online to complain too much," swings both ways.
Marth might be the beginning of the franchise for Japanese players, but for the rest of us the franchise started with Fire Emblem GBA.

True, its impossible to compare Ike's popularity to Marth's or any other character from melee, but if Marth's game was as popular as you think, don't you think Sigurd would have reieved more than one nomination? (The way I understand it, Sakurai was taking character ideas via e-mail and he posted the ones he liked on a list along with the number of times they were nominated) Instead, the list showed that those who took the time to vote clearly favored PoR over the older games.

"Swings both ways?" As in, if the Fire Emblem characters I like don't make it I shouldn't complain? Fair enough. I just want to play Brawl ASAP.


Marth will never appear in a Fire emblem game never! But Ike neither, any FE character won't appear in a FE game again, that's the nature of the franchise. You can't fight that. More characters can shine, but the past is the past. Marth's still popular, has re-releases and attention from Nintendo's part: Fanbooks, manga, novels, trading card. Fire Emblem characters are one-shot only, this should be accepted when talking about this franchise.
Actually, we don't know what the future holds. Maybe, the next FE game after GoD will also star Ike and take place in Telius. It would be a first for the franchise, and establish Ike as the main lord of the Fire Emblem series. I know that's all speculation, but given the videogame industry's fondness for trilogies I'd say a third telius game isn't out of the question.


Marth's fanbase is huge, unlike Pichu. It's not the same. Appealing as most people as possible, and you don't know if Ike fanbase is minor than Marth's. You also don't know if Marth's fans like Ike. Here lies your contradiction. Marth has already a spot in the smash family.
But don't you see, if Pichu was as powerful as Marth then everyone would ne agaainst HIS removal.

If your talking about Marth's "fans" who play as him in Melee, I suspect most of them like him more his really powerful sword attacks rather than the character himself.

All the characters in Melee are part of the Smash family. Unfortunately, some of them need to be cut, otherwise Brawl will be the same game as Melee, only with a new coat of paint.

For me, I'm holding onto my copy of Melee, and downloading SSB 64 (when it comes out for the Virtual console) so I can appreciate all three Smash games from time to time.


Many characters look similar, and fight similar. As swordmans, there are more differences between Ike and Marth than... Mario and Wario for example.
Diversity fails when the characters picked don't stand to the popular characters.
Good example. The fact that Sakurai went with the Warioware version of the character (rather than the inverse Mario outfit) means that he is trying to make each character stand out as much as possible. As for Wario's moveset, its a little early to judge, but I beleive that Sakurai mentioned that the character was going to get a wacky moveset based on the Warioware games. Should be aweseome - and original.


Maybe, we don't know. Maybe Ike ends being a sucky character and nobody plays with him, there's exist that posibilty too.
That's my point. Just because a character is really good, and alot of people play as him, doesn't mean the character is particularily popular - just that people like playing as him. If Roy was more powerful than Marth, everyone would like him more. If Pichu was the most powerful, everyone would play as him.

Consider Ness. In SSB 64, he was one of the game's best characters, so many people played as him. In Melee, he was basically nerfed into oblivion - and now hardly anyone takes the time to play as him. Still, for Smashers who apreciate the character, Ness is still playable.

Maybe Ike won't be as powerful as Marth. But I like the character enough that I'd enjoy playing as him, regardless of whether middle tier or bottom tier.

Stop inventing compromises and rules. Fire Emblem isn't Path of Radiance.
No, but Path of Radiance is Fire Embelm. It's also the only common ground between Japanese Fire emblem fans and the rest of us.


Ike isn't the most important lord to date either. Why do you say that? Marth's title was more important to the franchise, set up the basics, the gameplay, the plot elements that later were reused, the characters roles. What did Path of Radiance in comparison? Is as important as Marth, as Sigurd or as Roy, but I think it's pretty risky saying Ike is more important as Marth since he always has been (always) the face of the franchise. Ike is the most recent one, which luckily is a kickass lord, and should get representation because the game is just as good as he is.
Path of Radiance is more important than Fire Emblem 1 because PoR was released around the world, not just in Japan. Hardly anyof the Fire Embelm fans in North America or Europe know anything about the original game other than that Marth starred in it (which we only know because he starred in Melee).


Marth is about 170cm tall and over 60kg. He is 19 at the end of the Book 2, and his official age in most material, even Smash Bros Melee. He is weak in constitution, nimble and dependable, regarded as the worst lord in FE history, he couldn't even promote, but he could wield the light Falchion which is the only weapon that can harm Medeus. In Melee he is very light and it's easy to kill, has an overall low hitpower but the tips overcome this.

I don't know Ike's official age, but he should be around 20 in PoR and 23 in GotD. Ike is about 190cm tall. He has muscles, and he can wield those huge broad swords, like Ragnell. Massive and athletic moves which abuse massive strenght. He is one of the best lords, with Sigurd, Celice and Hector. Isn't certainly a Marth, your average nimble lord. This how Ike looks in GotD.
Props. You really know your stuff. However, while Ike isn't runt like Marth, he isn't that big either. Since we don't know Ike's exact height and we can't directly compare the two. As for the GoD version, I think that the PoR version is more likely as Ike's role in that game was larger than GoD.


Extremely powerful? I don't know how you play Marth, but a good fast player can enter Marth's range and pwn him bad, and he was nerfed in the PAL version (even lighter, less power, spike became a meteor). Marth has overall laggy moves and if they aren't tipped don't provide enough knockback which leaves himself open for retaliation. Sheik is a broken character for example, as there isn't too much logic when playing with her. Many people can play Marth at low levels but it ends being one of the most technical characters.
Yes, the PAL version helped and Sheik is still the cheapest character in existance, but Marth still has a significant advantage. It's sure not impossible to beat Marth, if you play it smart, but he is still unfairly powerful, in my view.


So why don't add characters from all franchises? Let's turn Smash into a playable ad, better than a third party fest!

Roy was a very special case, I don't think it would be repeated again. It's not about just repping, Marth is popular as a smash character too. A friend of mine never played Fire Emblem (and I think he never will), but liked Marth and mained him, he likes how he moves, how he attacks and his style. He mains Samus for the record.
A playable ad? That's going a bit far, although I would like to see the cyborg from Project HAMMER and the dude form Disaster: Day of Crisis. Probably won't happen, though.

True, Roy was a special case. However, that doesn't mean we won't see any GoD characters in Brawl. If I'm not mistaken, Roy's inclusion boosted sales of his game considerably.

I appreciate that your friend likes Marth, but given that there will be plenty of fun new characters in Brawl, I don't think the game would suffer if Marth were cut.


Marth's appareance would never cut chances for newer characters. It's about balance between the present and the jolly past, not erasing the past as it never happened.
Look at Metroid: Samus was considered obscure until SSB64. That, and SSBM, boosted the franchise and now it's one of the top 4 with Mario, Zelda, Metroid and Smash. Fire Emblem was boosted after Melee, and we don't know if characters like Pit would get a proper revival either.
He would lessen the chances of newer FE characters in the sense that development time is limited and only a handful of FE characters will make the cut.

Samus and Pit are the only protagonists in their respective franchises. In Fire Emblem, Marth is only one of many. And, as a Fire emblem lord, his popularity is limited to Japan. North American gamers will remeber him "that guy with the huge freakin' sword".


It's not just the first. I've trying to tell you that Marth has been the face of the franchise since 1993 to 2001. Melee powered this image to unseen limits, and there is people who think Marth is the "main character" of Fire Emblem because he appeared in Melee. That's what the impact he caused. Yes, here, in US and Europe.

Again you are leaving behind a fanbase (let's say... 300k?) of FE players in Japan and the Smash fans in Japan and the US.
Yes, Marth was once the face of Fire Emblem, so the team was right to include him in Melee. However, given that the series has become a series beloved around the globe - the series would be better served if only characters from internationally released games made it into Brawl.

Of the 300k in Japan who love Marth's game, I'd say a large chunk of them probably also like PoR, so they won't be completely burned. The rest, who have lost interest in the franchise, will be very unhappy when they first hear that Marth has been cut. And the sky won't fall.


It's the same. No games in the US in 10 years, so there are way more fans in Japan and active (important). There is this recent game heavily anticipated and awaited which need representation. US just isn't interested in Earthbound. So Nintendo needs Ness' spot to promote MOTHER 3 sales even more. Isn't it right?
If Mother 3 get's an international release then yeah. Otherwise, I'd say the chancezs are 50/50. I have greater faith in Ness's return than Marth's becasue Ness was one of the original 12 in SSB 64, but that's just me.

I still feel Marth may get kicked out though.... But if Marth makes it again is see the following happening:

-He comes back with his old moveset, but will not be the same. Remember Sakurai said himself he wants to remake all returning characters from ground up, to keep the game from being the same as Melee. Prime example is Kirby: A god-like character in Smash 64 tuned-down in Melee, making him fall to the middle class.

-He comes back without his old moveset. He won't be a starting character, meaning he must be unlocked.

-He doesn't come back, but is incarnated by another character. Meaning his movesets are given to another FE character. Most likely candidate is Ike.

-He doesn't come back, and his moveset is erased, in favor to making new characters.


Remember this is a new game. All characters will be different. There will be new characters, new favorites, and a new tier list. Facts many seems to forget.
Excellent points Chidosengan. People need to come to terms with the fact that Melee won't be just an updated version of Melee. It's going to be an entirely new Smash experience. And I can't wait.
 

GreenMamba

Smash Journeyman
Joined
May 15, 2006
Messages
361
I was not aware of the fact that when Fire Emblem came over seas the earlier games of the series ceased to exist.

It's a worldwide series now, but it still got its start in Japan. You can't just ignore its long history for convenience. Nintendo doesn't even ignore its Japanese history.

I'm not sure what you mean by "if Marth's game was as popular as you think, don't you think Sigurd would have reieved more than one nomination?" Please elaborate...

Sakurai didn't just post letters and suggestions he thought were interesting, he merely responded to the e-mails he wanted to, for various reasons. He never tallied them up by how many times they were mentioned in his mailbag, that was us fans who did such. And from it, yes Ike was the most requested, but that still means nothing compared to Marth, who had no suggestions because no character from SSB/SSBM was ever mentioned. I'm not talking about PoR compared to the rest of the games. FE1/3 didn't have very many interesting characters to pick from, other than Marth, who is clearly seen to be the face of the franchise, which was why he was so requested for over the more popular Sigurd in the first place.
 

GenG

Smash Lord
Joined
Dec 24, 2005
Messages
1,473
Location
Spain
But don't you see, if Pichu was as powerful as Marth then everyone would ne agaainst HIS removal.
Well, let's remove Bowser, Ness, Kirby, Pichu, Mewtwo, Zelda, DK and Yoshi because they are bad characters. Of course, Nintendo won't never do it, other than perfomance in Smash (which could be tweaked just adjusting the values of the character) the characters have a story, like Marth. Marth is story of the franchise, was included in Melee and was well received in the US, made the people get interest in the games and then Nintendo released them here. As you said, you don't know what future holds: Maybe IS tomorrow announce a FE remake for the DS with enhanced graphics with a planned worlwide release, just like Square started re-releasing the Final Fantasy 5 years after FF7, and all the franchise titles are now worldwide (even characters appearing in some games, like the ninja or the black wizard from FF1 in Mario Basketball).

Marth is aknowledged by almost the 6 millions players who bought Melee worldwide as THE Fire Emblem character, who has a special fighting style which couldn't be taken by Ike (Ike isn't Marth), who is liked by people (just like the Ness players keep playing with him) worldwide. Even the FE Team emblem in Melee is the Falchion, picturing how important is Marth to the series.

Pichu isn't even important to Pokémon, is a pre-evolution, which are the most unworthy thing that ever happened in the franchise. They just have marketing purposes. Marth is far from that.

However is Sakurai who ultimately decides which characters and in and I believe he knows Marth is one of the favorites (he even said: "I don't think many Japan characters should be used again but the Fire Emblem ones may stay, even a black guy gave me thanks for adding Roy in Melee even when Roy was a Japan only character"), who is again important to his franchise, and important to the fighting series he is directing. He don't want to deceive Marth's fans.

If your talking about Marth's "fans" who play as him in Melee, I suspect most of them like him more his really powerful sword attacks rather than the character himself.
The same could be said about any character. Most people aren't tourney players and like playing with Marth because they like the character, don't throw away that common fact.

All the characters in Melee are part of the Smash family. Unfortunately, some of them need to be cut, otherwise Brawl will be the same game as Melee, only with a new coat of paint.
Marth doesn't have any reason to be cut. Doc is a lame (in character) clone, Pichu is a lame clone, Young Link too. He still holds water as a FE representative and as a Nintendo star, as not many lords act and fight like him, so he adds a glamour and style that Ike doesn't. Sheik is likely to be replaced by Zamus, a ninja-esque character with tight clothes, fast moves and a whip. I'll shut myself when I see a Marth-esque character, which I only see happening with Sigurd, but putting Sigurd in would be like starting from scratch, when Marth is already an established character.

Smash Bros. is about Nintendo all-time stars fighting together, not just the most recent ones.

For me, I'm holding onto my copy of Melee, and downloading SSB 64 (when it comes out for the Virtual console) so I can appreciate all three Smash games from time to time.
It's not like I want another Melee, but if the game uses the same engine and even gave the possibilty to play with the GC pads it means that the game is more likely to retain most features that made Melee great, from gameplay to characters which "execute" that gameplay.

That's my point. Just because a character is really good, and alot of people play as him, doesn't mean the character is particularily popular - just that people like playing as him. If Roy was more powerful than Marth, everyone would like him more. If Pichu was the most powerful, everyone would play as him.
But Marth, other than a good fighter, is cool and makes people be interested on him. The way he moves, the Japanese accent (I've seen myself people not fond of Smash asking how cool he is and from what game he's from, instead playing with Pikachu or Mario), and in Japan he was requested not for having a great character, but to play as Marth, the Fire Emblem lord, just like people requested Pit or Metaknight.

Consider Ness. In SSB 64, he was one of the game's best characters, so many people played as him. In Melee, he was basically nerfed into oblivion - and now hardly anyone takes the time to play as him. Still, for Smashers who apreciate the character, Ness is still playable.
The same could happen with Marth, why not. It could happen with any, ANY character, and I don't think Marth is gonna to be nerfed that hard since the developers are guys who have been playing Smash a lot and know what are they doing.
And, many people haven't played Eartbhound, but from a Smash perspective Ness is already part of the cast. Marth is too.

Maybe Ike won't be as powerful as Marth. But I like the character enough that I'd enjoy playing as him, regardless of whether middle tier or bottom tier.
I enjoy playing with Marth. I main Falcon even when I like the Fire Emblem franchise, because Falcon's horizontal distance, speed and combo ability are just awesome. There may be people that picks characters just to play because they like how they were portrayed in Smash, not neccesarily their favorite in looks and franchise.

I don't think characters are made to be played just by the fans. Star Fox fans may have a better grip on Marth that Fox for example, that comes to tastes.

No, but Path of Radiance is Fire Embelm. It's also the only common ground between Japanese Fire emblem fans and the rest of us.
Marth is in common ground. Smash Bros Melee is a common ground! And I think there are way more Melee players who know about Marth than all the FE players in US and Europe combined.

Path of Radiance is more important than Fire Emblem 1 because PoR was released around the world, not just in Japan. Hardly anyof the Fire Embelm fans in North America or Europe know anything about the original game other than that Marth starred in it (which we only know because he starred in Melee).
Importance doesn't have anything to do with the worldwide releases. More people played FE1-3 in Japan that the people who played the lame Fire Emblem (GBA) in the US. In Japan, Marth is known as the poster boy, and was aknowledged by US and Europeans players. Marth is way more important than Ike in both past and present, and appearing in Melee and being such a popular character (in the Smash and Fire Emblem community, I mean the GOOD Fire Emblem community who post in N-sider, gamefaqs and any FE related forum over US and Europe) makes him more important than Ike. Everybody who knows Fire Emblem, knows Marth, just for appearing in SSBM or just by searching info about who he is.

Props. You really know your stuff. However, while Ike isn't runt like Marth, he isn't that big either. Since we don't know Ike's exact height and we can't directly compare the two. As for the GoD version, I think that the PoR version is more likely as Ike's role in that game was larger than GoD.
They can make alternate outfits.

Yes, the PAL version helped and Sheik is still the cheapest character in existance, but Marth still has a significant advantage. It's sure not impossible to beat Marth, if you play it smart, but he is still unfairly powerful, in my view.
Not anybody can pull out the "Ken combos" which are Marth's more powerful weapon, and the rest of moves, if avoided (the smash is easy to see it coming), can be counterattacked. He isn't broken, pick a Marth and use him in a tourney, and see if you can keep up with the Foxes, Falcos and Falcons. Marth is a character extremely reflexive and technical, more than people tend to believe because they lost to a friend who just spams fsmashes (not know if it's your case, but people who loses agains a fsmash spammer aren't good players).

True, Roy was a special case. However, that doesn't mean we won't see any GoD characters in Brawl. If I'm not mistaken, Roy's inclusion boosted sales of his game considerably.
Is still possible, as is still possible for Megaman and Viewtiful Joe to appear in the game. Micaiah couldn't be possibly requested (since that game came after the poll) and I think people want FE characters they know, from Marth to Ike. However a trophy could be nice to not take the place of the requested FE characters over the world.

I appreciate that your friend likes Marth, but given that there will be plenty of fun new characters in Brawl, I don't think the game would suffer if Marth were cut.
I think originals cut, if not replaced, are a loss. As a Pichu player you can pick Pichu. As a Young Link player, you can pick Link. But as a Marth player... what can I do? I don't think Ike would play as Marth, that would be really lame. Marth is enough important to not to be cut.

He would lessen the chances of newer FE characters in the sense that development time is limited and only a handful of FE characters will make the cut.
There isn't many interesting FE characters other than Ike. Roy was included maybe because Sakurai thought Marth was enough as a old FE representative, but I won't gamble about Marth being cut by the likes of Micaiah (don't know if the players may like her) or the Black Knight (minor villain with clone tendencies). The loss would be higher than the winnings.

Samus and Pit are the only protagonists in their respective franchises. In Fire Emblem, Marth is only one of many. And, as a Fire emblem lord, his popularity is limited to Japan. North American gamers will remeber him "that guy with the huge freakin' sword".
His popularity is worldwide. Smash players, from experts to noobs, aknowledge Marth. Unlike Ike, which is only popular in the cult FE communities.

Yes, Marth was once the face of Fire Emblem, so the team was right to include him in Melee. However, given that the series has become a series beloved around the globe - the series would be better served if only characters from internationally released games made it into Brawl.
But he's still the face, Ike won't change that. Marth is more way popular than Ike, combining all the "fronts" were Marth have appeared.

Of the 300k in Japan who love Marth's game, I'd say a large chunk of them probably also like PoR, so they won't be completely burned. The rest, who have lost interest in the franchise, will be very unhappy when they first hear that Marth has been cut. And the sky won't fall.
I think Smash would sell more if Marth were included and Ike not, since most Smash players know Marth over Ike and would grieve over his loss, unlike Ike which is only known for the 400k players they played PoR and maybe don't like Smash Bros. Is another way to put that.

Excellent points Chidosengan. People need to come to terms with the fact that Melee won't be just an updated version of Melee. It's going to be an entirely new Smash experience. And I can't wait.
But he it's confirmed to be a Melee update. More characters, more stages, wifi, same gameplay. How isn't that an update? Cutting loved characters isn't updating.

GreenMamba said:
And from it, yes Ike was the most requested, but that
still means nothing compared to Marth, who had no suggestions because no
character from SSB/SSBM was ever mentioned. I'm not talking about PoR compared
to the rest of the games. FE1/3 didn't have very many interesting characters to
pick from, other than Marth, who is clearly seen to be the face of the
franchise, which was why he was so requested for over the more popular Sigurd in
the first place.
Actually, the poll was about asking for new and old characters. I read somewhere that Ice Climbers, Marth and Falcon were the most requested returning characters in the poll, selected from possibly many thousands of entries.
 

Wiseguy

Smash Champion
Joined
Mar 28, 2007
Messages
2,245
Location
Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada (Proud
I was not aware of the fact that when Fire Emblem came over seas the earlier games of the series ceased to exist.
No, the earlier games didn't cease to exist. They never existed at all outside Japan.

The old games are still popular and important inside Japan, but internationally released games like PoR are popular and important inside Japan AND the rest of the world. That means that PoR is as important (if not more so) than the original Fire Emblem.

It's a worldwide series now, but it still got its start in Japan. You can't just ignore its long history for convenience. Nintendo doesn't even ignore its Japanese history.
Fire Emblem's past has hardly been ignored, since both Marth and Roy were immortalized in Super Smash Bros Melee.

PoR is a game well received in both Japan and North America. Including FE reps from this game would appeal to Fire Emblem fans in Japan, North America and around the world.

I'm not sure what you mean by "if Marth's game was as popular as you think, don't you think Sigurd would have relieved more than one nomination?" Please elaborate...
My apologies. I was under the mistaken impression that both Marth and Sigurd are from the same game. A little research proved that I was sorely mistaken, as Sigurd is actually from FE 4. My point (as inaccurate as it was) was that even with Marth not on the poll, the relative lack of support for Sigurd showed that Marth’s game is no longer as popular as it once was.

However, while the poll doesn’t register the popularity of Marth it does show that Ike is the most popular FE lord currently (at least from the nominations we know about from the e-mails that Sakurai revealed to the public) other than Marth, and the high number of other characters mentioned from PoR indicates that this game is more popular in Japan right now than the older games.


Sakurai didn't just post letters and suggestions he thought were interesting, he merely responded to the e-mails he wanted to, for various reasons. He never tallied them up by how many times they were mentioned in his mailbag, that was us fans who did such. And from it, yes Ike was the most requested, but that still means nothing compared to Marth, who had no suggestions because no character from SSB/SSBM was ever mentioned. I'm not talking about PoR compared to the rest of the games. FE1/3 didn't have very many interesting characters to pick from, other than Marth, who is clearly seen to be the face of the franchise, which was why he was so requested for over the more popular Sigurd in the first place.
Your point about Marth is valid. I should have researched my facts before claiming than Sigurd’s apparent lack of support reflected poorly on Marth’s. My bad.

However, while nothing is definitive, I suspect that the number of nominations for Path of Radiance characters reflects a greater support for new FE characters than old ones. That bodes well for newer characters like Ike, the Black Knight & Miciaiah and not well for Marth, Roy and Sigurd. Of course, I may be reading into this too much.

Regardless, I’ve heard GenG’s predictions for the FE representatives in Brawl, but I’d like to here what characters you think stand a good chance, Green Mamba. In case you missed it, my predictions (and the reasoning behind them) can be found back on page 8:

http://smashboards.com/showthread.php?t=97281&page=8


Well, let's remove Bowser, Ness, Kirby, Pichu, Mewtwo, Zelda, DK and Yoshi because they are bad characters. Of course, Nintendo won't never do it, other than perfomance in Smash (which could be tweaked just adjusting the values of the character) the characters have a story, like Marth. Marth is story of the franchise, was included in Melee and was well received in the US, made the people get interest in the games and then Nintendo released them here. As you said, you don't know what future holds: Maybe IS tomorrow announce a FE remake for the DS with enhanced graphics with a planned worlwide release, just like Square started re-releasing the Final Fantasy 5 years after FF7, and all the franchise titles are now worldwide (even characters appearing in some games, like the ninja or the black wizard from FF1 in Mario Basketball).
You completely misunderstand my point. You can’t argue that a character should return based on the fact that they are powerful, or that they are fun to play as, or that a lot of good players main as them. This is because any character can be fun and popular as a character in Smash, even Pichu, if were programmed that way. Since we don’t know how much these characters will change in the transition to Brawl, its impossible to say that they will be as powerful or as popular.

Therefore, whether or not a character should appear is completely contingent on their importance to their respective series. If Marth returns (which he might) it will because he is important enough in the Fire Emblem series to justify him representing his series in Smash Bros. It is irrelevant how popular or powerful he was in Melee, because this could easily change – depending on how the developers choose to program him into the game. The examples you used (Bowser, Kirby, etc) will return because of their importance to the Mario and Kirby series, not because of how many people play as them in Melee.

Marth is aknowledged by almost the 6 millions players who bought Melee worldwide as THE Fire Emblem character, who has a special fighting style which couldn't be taken by Ike (Ike isn't Marth), who is liked by people (just like the Ness players keep playing with him) worldwide. Even the FE Team emblem in Melee is the Falchion, picturing how important is Marth to the series.

Pichu isn't even important to Pokémon, is a pre-evolution, which are the most unworthy thing that ever happened in the franchise. They just have marketing purposes. Marth is far from that.
Marth WAS acknowledged. Past tense. Marth was certainly popular back in the day, but since his role in the FE games since then has been none existent I could see more current FE characters taking his place.


However is Sakurai who ultimately decides which characters and in and I believe he knows Marth is one of the favorites (he even said: "I don't think many Japan characters should be used again but the Fire Emblem ones may stay, even a black guy gave me thanks for adding Roy in Melee even when Roy was a Japan only character"), who is again important to his franchise, and important to the fighting series he is directing. He don't want to deceive Marth's fans.
I think the key word in that sentence was “may”. It is true that Marth may still return, but until he is actually confirmed I will remain skeptical. Obviously, Sakurai doesn’t want to disappoint Marth fans, but I still think that he is more concerned about making the game's character roster as diverse as possible, while still including the most important characters from each series. The way I see it, this can be accomplished by including Ike and not Marth.


The same could be said about any character. Most people aren't tourney players and like playing with Marth because they like the character, don't throw away that common fact.
Exactly. Because character popularity is based on their moveset, and not the character itself, the only way to determine whether a character is likely to return is to look at the games he has appeared in.

Marth doesn't have any reason to be cut. Doc is a lame (in character) clone, Pichu is a lame clone, Young Link too. He still holds water as a FE representative and as a Nintendo star, as not many lords act and fight like him, so he adds a glamour and style that Ike doesn't. Sheik is likely to be replaced by Zamus, a ninja-esque character with tight clothes, fast moves and a whip. I'll shut myself when I see a Marth-esque character, which I only see happening with Sigurd, but putting Sigurd in would be like starting from scratch, when Marth is already an established character.

Smash Bros. is about Nintendo all-time stars fighting together, not just the most recent ones.
You may find Doc and Young Link lame, but head over to the Melee discussion forum and you’ll discover that they both have a dedicated following. Even Pichu has his fans, as incredible as it may seem. Personally, Dr. Mario is my favorite playable character in the Smash series to date. Both Dr. Mario and Young Link are more popular in Melee than Roy, so why do you believe that he will return?


However, I realize that in all likelihood Doc will be cut and the former Young Link will be replaced by the new Young Link from Wind Waker. I would like to see them both return in their current forms, but at the expense of more recent characters in the Mario and Zelda series? No way.

Also, I completely agree about Zamus being Sheik’s replacement (may she rest in pieces) but I fail to comprehend how you could see Zamus and Sheik as more similar than Marth and Ike. Sheik and Zamus both have blond hair, skin tight clothing, ninja-like attacks and whip like weapons. Marth and Ike both have blue hair, capes, and fight will large one handed swords. While Samus and Sheik are different genders (Samus is very much female while Sheik is some twisted combination of a male and a female) and come from different series and genres - Marth and Ike are cut from the same cloth, so to speak.

I know the arguments that the two have unique fighting styles. Ike is supposedly slower, (although I don’t remember him being at all sluggish in PoR) and Marth uses vertical slashes as opposed to Ike using horizontal slashes. But I would like to hear one of Marth’s attacks from his Melee moveset that Ike couldn’t do in Brawl.


It's not like I want another Melee, but if the game uses the same engine and even gave the possibilty to play with the GC pads it means that the game is more likely to retain most features that made Melee great, from gameplay to characters which "execute" that gameplay.
To my knowledge, Brawl has an entirely new engine. However, if most of the characters are guaranteed to return, why have a completely new trailer to announce Fox’s return?

The answer: no character is safe. I’ll bet that Sakurai will cut as many characters as he can get away with to make room for more new characters. Remember, Brawl could have as few as 35 characters. Unless a significant number of characters from Melee’s roster are cut, Brawl is going to be nearly identical to Melee.


But Marth, other than a good fighter, is cool and makes people be interested on him. The way he moves, the Japanese accent (I've seen myself people not fond of Smash asking how cool he is and from what game he's from, instead playing with Pikachu or Mario), and in Japan he was requested not for having a great character, but to play as Marth, the Fire Emblem lord, just like people requested Pit or Metaknight.
Stating that something is cool is a personal opinion, not an objective fact. Sure some people find him cool. Others, like myself, don’t consider him to be very cool at all. If he wasn’t so powerful, he would be as unpopular in Melee as Roy.

Again importance to he series is all that matters.


The same could happen with Marth, why not. It could happen with any, ANY character, and I don't think Marth is gonna to be nerfed that hard since the developers are guys who have been playing Smash a lot and know what are they doing.
And, many people haven't played Eartbhound, but from a Smash perspective Ness is already part of the cast. Marth is too.
My point was that just becasue Marth is one of the most popular characters in Melee now, he might not be in Brawl. In the end, his popularity among Fire embelm fans is all that matters, and in most of the world, Ike's game is more popular.

I enjoy playing with Marth. I main Falcon even when I like the Fire Emblem franchise, because Falcon's horizontal distance, speed and combo ability are just awesome. There may be people that picks characters just to play because they like how they were portrayed in Smash, not neccesarily their favorite in looks and franchise.

I don't think characters are made to be played just by the fans. Star Fox fans may have a better grip on Marth that Fox for example, that comes to tastes.
There is nothing wrong with picking up a character just because you like their portrayal in Melee (I main as Dr. Mario, yet I’ve never once played his games) it’s just not a reason to expect them to return. As we know from Fox in Brawl, we don’t know how these characters will be changed or if they will still be popular when they return. Only the character’s importance in their own series matters.

Regardless, Brawl will certainly have a wide range of characters that appeal to everyone, even if currently popular characters like Marth are cut.


Marth is in common ground. Smash Bros Melee is a common ground! And I think there are way more Melee players who know about Marth than all the FE players in US and Europe combined.
Yes, but Marth was put in Melee to represent Fire Emblem fans. Whether or not he returns depends on whether he still represents Fire Emblem’s fanbase.

Again, most of Marth’s "fans" in North America and Europe will remember him as “the dude with the freakin’ big sword” not as the face of Fire Emblem.


Importance doesn't have anything to do with the worldwide releases. More people played FE1-3 in Japan that the people who played the lame Fire Emblem (GBA) in the US. In Japan, Marth is known as the poster boy, and was aknowledged by US and Europeans players. Marth is way more important than Ike in both past and present, and appearing in Melee and being such a popular character (in the Smash and Fire Emblem community, I mean the GOOD Fire Emblem community who post in N-sider, gamefaqs and any FE related forum over US and Europe) makes him more important than Ike. Everybody who knows Fire Emblem, knows Marth, just for appearing in SSBM or just by searching info about who he is.
I wish someone would find sales data to settle this argument one way or another, but I’d be willing to bet that the worldwide sales (not just from the U.S., but everywhere – including Japan) of Fire emblem GBA sold more than the original FE did, since that game was released only to the Japanese.

Yeah, Marth certainly WAS the poster boy for his franchise, but I suspect his superstar status has dimished somewhat in recent years due to his absence from the series that made him famous in the first place. Since Ike is still appearing in FE games, I would argue he is currently more important in the series than Marth is.

Once again, Marth’s popularity in Smash does not indicate an appreciation for the character’s role as a Fire Emblem lord in NA and Europe. Just that Smash players enjoy playing with characters with powerful sword attacks. Ike can fill that void quite nicely.


They can make alternate outfits.
Maybe, but including both version of Ike would require more than a costume change. GoD Ike is older and taller. Still, its possible.


Not anybody can pull out the "Ken combos" which are Marth's more powerful weapon, and the rest of moves, if avoided (the smash is easy to see it coming), can be counterattacked. He isn't broken, pick a Marth and use him in a tourney, and see if you can keep up with the Foxes, Falcos and Falcons. Marth is a character extremely reflexive and technical, more than people tend to believe because they lost to a friend who just spams fsmashes (not know if it's your case, but people who loses agains a fsmash spammer aren't good players).
Some Marth players are better than others, but if you think he isn’t broken you should try playing against an equally skilled Marth player with a non high tier character. You can still win, but if you can't make a single mistake or you're toast.

I have nothing against Marth players. My point is just that Marth gives any player an advantage that most characters don’t have. Here’s hoping that Brawl will be more a more balanced game than melee was.

Is still possible, as is still possible for Megaman and Viewtiful Joe to appear in the game. Micaiah couldn't be possibly requested (since that game came after the poll) and I think people want FE characters they know, from Marth to Ike. However a trophy could be nice to not take the place of the requested FE characters over the world.
Ture, Miciaiah wasn’t included on the poll so I agree she is less likely than some of the FE characters who were (ie: Ike and the Black Knight). But I still thinks she has a shot as the new Roy (a character who can increase sales for their game) and because there are very few magic users would have the potential to become characters in Brawl, making her a potenially unique charcater addition.


I think originals cut, if not replaced, are a loss. As a Pichu player you can pick Pichu. As a Young Link player, you can pick Link. But as a Marth player... what can I do? I don't think Ike would play as Marth, that would be really lame. Marth is enough important to not to be cut.
I know you don’t agree with this, but as a Marth player you could pick up Ike.

Hear me out: they made Ganondorf a Captain Falcon clone due to time constraints. Would it be so impossible for them to give Ike Marth’s moveset? They could make him a bit slower, make his B move a ranged attack and tweak his sword slashes to look more like Ike’s fighting style.

Preferable? Not for everyone. Possible? Yes.

There isn't many interesting FE characters other than Ike. Roy was included maybe because Sakurai thought Marth was enough as a old FE representative, but I won't gamble about Marth being cut by the likes of Micaiah (don't know if the players may like her) or the Black Knight (minor villain with clone tendencies). The loss would be higher than the winnings.
If Miciaiah were included, it wouldn’t be because she is popular now, but to sell copies of GoD. For all I know, she could wind up being the most hated lord in FE history. Her potential moveset in Brawl would likely appeal to different players than the current Marth and Roy fans, but she would certainly have the potential to be a unique addition tom the roster.

As for the Balck Knight, I think we’ve established that his return in GoD makes him one of the most important villains in the series. Also, the fact that he would be a Roy-esque clone actually works in his favor. Clones can be included in a fraction of the development time, and I can’t think of any character better suited to be Ike’s clone.

At any rate, whether the losses outweigh the gains depends on what games and characters you prefer.


His popularity is worldwide. Smash players, from experts to noobs, aknowledge Marth. Unlike Ike, which is only popular in the cult FE communities.
What do you mean by “acknowledge” Marth? Acknowledge his existence? The fact that he is a good character?

If Marth does return, it will be to represent the “cult FE communities”. These are the loyal gamers who actually buy Fire Emblem games. As the most popular Fire Emblem lord among Fire Emblem fans, Ike is better suited to represent the Fire Emblem series.


But he's still the face, Ike won't change that. Marth is more way popular than Ike, combining all the "fronts" were Marth have appeared.
A decade ago, maybe. I doubt most of the people in the world eagerly awaiting the release of Goddess of Dawn still think of Marth whenever they think of the FE series.

I’ve never really visited any Fire Embelm fansites, but my guess is that if this were a Fire Emblem site rather than Smash Boards, there would be more support for my proposal to ditch Marth in favor of new FE characters. (Obviously this would depend on what FE site I went to, but you get my point.)


I think Smash would sell more if Marth were included and Ike not, since most Smash players know Marth over Ike and would grieve over his loss, unlike Ike which is only known for the 400k players they played PoR and maybe don't like Smash Bros. Is another way to put that.
I guess this is where we disagree. I don’t see the inclusion of Marth as a factor that will greatly affect the sales of Brawl one way or another. I can’t imagine any Smash fan actually choosing not to purchase Brawl just because of one character. For players who love fast sword fighters, they can play as Metaknight, Pit or Ike.

I don’t think that the handful of Marth fans who would not buy the game weigh very heavily on the conscious of Sakurai. He will make the Brawl the best game possible, however he chooses to do so. Regardless, this game is going to make a metric butload of cash for the Nintendo Empire one way or another.

But he it's confirmed to be a Melee update. More characters, more stages, wifi, same gameplay. How isn't that an update? Cutting loved characters isn't updating.
More characters? Yes, but he confirmed that some characters will definitely be cut to make room for new ones. How many and which ones remains to be seen. The more characters are cut, the more new ones can be included so I say this is a good thing. I've played as the Melee crew enough for one life time. Its time for a change.

More stages? Yeah, but don’t expect all the old ones to return either.

Same gameplay? Not quite. New moves (like super smash attacks and crawling) have been added. Also, characters like Kirby seem to have been made far more powerful and characters like Fox have been drastically changed (notice how he always has his gun drawn now?). In addition, from the look of the trailer, the game play has been slowed somewhat, making it more of a game of strategy (like SSB 64) than Melee which rewards reflexes over cunning.

In short, the game will be just as awesome, but a different kind of awesome. A completely new game of Smash Bros, but just as deep and addictive as ever.
 

GreenMamba

Smash Journeyman
Joined
May 15, 2006
Messages
361
To GenG--I don't believe I have ever seen evidence to support that returning character whishes were on the list thing, though if you can find some for me, I'll gladly look into it.

Now, to Wiseguy:

No matter how badly you want it to be, FE1 is still the most important for one sole reason--it started the franchise. Without it, there would be no Fire Emblem. PoR didn't start anything as major as the entire series. I like the convenient ignoring of FE7, which brought the series to the rest of the world, too. FE7 is more important to the series in that regard than PoR will ever hope to be, but it still isn't as important as the first game in the series.

Yes, the past hasn't been ignored, but why the heck would the start ignoring it now all of a sudden? The beginning of Fire Emblem didn't just disappear inbetween Melee and Brawl. It still exists, and is still important enough to recognize. And I fail to see how Marth being in Brawl wouldn't appeal to international audiences, considering a huge chunk of international Fire Emblem fans got interested in the series because of his appearance in Melee. Most Fire Emblem fans understand his importance, Japanese or otherwise. You seem to be the only one downplaying it.

As for what Fire Emblem characters I see in Brawl, I see two--Marth and Ike.
 

Diddy Kong

Smash Obsessed
Joined
Dec 8, 2004
Messages
26,584
Switch FC
SW-1597-979602774
BWAHAHAHAH! I'm currently playing a complete illegal badly translated version of the game Fire Emblem 3! So far, I'm hating it... o.o; Well not exactly hating... But just gimme the newer games, but I'll complete it anyways. Gah, this prooved it; Donkey Kong Country REALLY was the best SNES game ever. ;)

Now on topic. I still believe Marth will return, since Marth and Roy did suprisingly well in populairity even here in the west. Marth especially is a character muchos loved both by the casual players and hardcore tournament players. Marth also basically got begged into Melee, and I don't think his populairity went down after Marth actually GOT into Melee. Besides the castle stage in the Brawl trailers is most likely a stage home to Marth himself.

But I still think his returning changes are overated. =/ Especially in the Rate Their Changes thread where it's full of people giving him a 99%. Okay I say it's very likely Marth'll return, but not THAT high, Ike still CAN replace him.
 

GenG

Smash Lord
Joined
Dec 24, 2005
Messages
1,473
Location
Spain
You completely misunderstand my point. You can’t argue that a character should return based on the fact that they are powerful, or that they are fun to play as, or that a lot of good players main as them. This is because any character can be fun and popular as a character in Smash, even Pichu, if were programmed that way. Since we don’t know how much these characters will change in the transition to Brawl, its impossible to say that they will be as powerful or as popular.

Therefore, whether or not a character should appear is completely contingent on their importance to their respective series. If Marth returns (which he might) it will because he is important enough in the Fire Emblem series to justify him representing his series in Smash Bros. It is irrelevant how popular or powerful he was in Melee, because this could easily change – depending on how the developers choose to program him into the game. The examples you used (Bowser, Kirby, etc) will return because of their importance to the Mario and Kirby series, not because of how many people play as them in Melee.
That was my point exactly. If Kirby is a bad character, that can be tweaked with some programming. If Marth is a broken character (which I don't think so) he could be nerfed. Actually they should power up characters to the Samus/Falcon/Peach/Fox/Falco/Sheik/Marth/Jigglypuff level rather than making them SSBM Kirby level, if you know what I mean. The battles among the characters above tend to be fair... somehow.

So, we should stick to the popularity/importance/representation then, as all characters have high chances to be nerfed or powered up. We don't know about that.

Marth WAS acknowledged. Past tense. Marth was certainly popular back in the day, but since his role in the FE games since then has been none existent I could see more current FE characters taking his place.
Marth is still popular, I'll try to make a short "History of Marth" to explain you why Marth is the face of the franchise:

· Fire Emblem was an original idea from game's developer Shouzo Kaga, from Intelligent Systems, of creating a grid map system battle (from Famicom Wars) and RPG elements, such developed characters, a compelling storyline, manga style, experience from battles, levels, etc. Marth was the main character, the exiled prince of Altea which had the blood of the legendary hero who once defeated the black dragon Medeus, which is once again alive. Only the descendant of the hero, wielding the Fire Emblem, can use the Falchion, sword of light. Marth was a very weak and dependable character, but was the key to most battles. It cast of characters was loved by all players. It was an instant classic, in 1990, which assured many sequels. It was the first game of a genre, the S-RPG or tactical role-play.

· After Fire Emblem Gaiden, which was a let down for many fans, the dangerous appareance of many wannabes like Shining Force of Front Mission made Intelligent System to make a stronger, blockbuster Fire Emblem worthy of the original one. So they came with a remake of the original game, so new players could enjoy the original game, and a new story taking place 5 years after the game, for the old fans. At the end, both new and old players could enjoy this Fire Emblem, one of the most succesfull in the franchise. The overall story was about Marth fighting Medeus twice to save Akaneia in a time span of 5 years. The second book featured a more adult Marth, now in his 19, as the king of Altea. The game sold 695k in Japan, and is the most selling Fire Emblem title ever in any territory (not combined).

· Marth, by appearing in two games, was the first main lord in the franchise. He never appeared in any Fire Emblem, but he had a lot of merchandasing which extended his reign as the Fire Emblem face: Some serialized mangas in the GanGan Magazine, voice dramas, artbooks, guidebooks, fanbooks, doujins, soundtracks, the Trading Card Game (which later added characters from Genealogy of Holy War and Thracia 776) and even an anime in 1998 featuring Marth, but was cancelled after 2 episodes. That made Marth even more popular, as a Fire Emblem icon.

· Genealogy of Holy War was released in 1996, regarded as the best Fire Emblem ever. It featureda different cast of characters from previous games: Sigurd and his son Celice in a battle through 2 generations. It sold 577k, being the second most succesful Fire Emblem in sales.

· Nintendo announced Super Smash Bros for N64. Fire Emblem characters were considered by popular demand but they were scrapped in favor to most popular characters worldwide, and the game itself had a low budget.

· Thracia 776 (SNES) was a Genealogy of Holy War sidestory, released in 1999 for the Nintendo Power System, and then in 2000 by the usual means. Sold 250k, not very much, but considering that it was the last SNES title ever, it's more than... Path of Radiance.

· Marth kept having the usual marketing traits. Just to point that out (the Trading Card Game was released around 2000).

· Nintendo announced Super Smash Bros Melee. Marth was one of the most requested characters by the Japanese audience as Fire Emblem character, being the most popular at all. Marth and Roy were about to be scrapped in the US versions for more popular characters, but Nintendo of America decided to keep them by demand of the US fans: The interest on these characters was just that high. Super Smash Bros. Melee sold more than 6 million worldwide (4 in the US, 1.5 in Japan, 1 in Europe), making the best selling Fire Emblem related title. That reinforced ultimately Marth's popularity in Japan, as well presented into the US as the face of a series they couldn't grab before. The character was very good received overall, and that set a precedent for Fire Emblem titles in the US.

· Has something changed? There are new titles, but Marth's still the face of the franchise, for the original Japanese audience, for the Fire Emblem audience who knew about that series through Melee, for the Melee players, and for the non-Melee Fire Emblem players who knew about Marth somewhere.

I think the key word in that sentence was “may”. It is true that Marth may still return, but until he is actually confirmed I will remain skeptical. Obviously, Sakurai doesn’t want to disappoint Marth fans, but I still think that he is more concerned about making the game's character roster as diverse as possible, while still including the most important characters from each series. The way I see it, this can be accomplished by including Ike and not Marth.
They may stay, as many other character could (think about Mewtwo, Jigglypuff, Ness, Ice Climbers, Mr G&W, Roy, etc.). It means they won't be throw away because they were good received, even if they are Japan only. The possibilites, though slim, are still there.

You may find Doc and Young Link lame, but head over to the Melee discussion forum and you’ll discover that they both have a dedicated following. Even Pichu has his fans, as incredible as it may seem. Personally, Dr. Mario is my favorite playable character in the Smash series to date. Both Dr. Mario and Young Link are more popular in Melee than Roy, so why do you believe that he will return?

However, I realize that in all likelihood Doc will be cut and the former Young Link will be replaced by the new Young Link from Wind Waker. I would like to see them both return in their current forms, but at the expense of more recent characters in the Mario and Zelda series? No way.
Doc is just Mario, who doesn't have anything special other than having a coat (which could be easily put as a Mario alternate outfit) and certaing better moves which are already being implemented in Brawl: In the second trailer you can see how Mario fair sends Pikachu upwards (as Doc's fair) and Kirby downwards (as Mario's fair). Doc may be better than Mario in some areas but is still the worst clone in terms of difference in playstyle with the original one. Young Link is a good character, but his speed and projectile spam properties should be given to Link (if not to Wind Waker Link). This should be done with most clones, and the original characters would be even better, aiming for balance.

I'm not talking about being a good character, because Dr Mario is easily better than any Roy. But Dr Mario isn't nearly as representative or unique as Roy. That was my point.

Also, I completely agree about Zamus being Sheik’s replacement (may she rest in pieces) but I fail to comprehend how you could see Zamus and Sheik as more similar than Marth and Ike. Sheik and Zamus both have blond hair, skin tight clothing, ninja-like attacks and whip like weapons. Marth and Ike both have blue hair, capes, and fight will large one handed swords. While Samus and Sheik are different genders (Samus is very much female while Sheik is some twisted combination of a male and a female) and come from different series and genres - Marth and Ike are cut from the same cloth, so to speak.
Don't misunderstand me: In looks, they aren't similar. Tight clothes was just a pun, but they dres completely different. I was pointing at the moves, horribly similar to Sheik's, maybe a tweaked Sheik using a recent character from the underreped Metroid franchise, as well Sheik was a curiosity from OOT's prime. Unlike Marth, Sheik appareances were minor. I think Zelda should've given more protagonism; Is lame to see how Zelda, the princess which named the series, is overshadowed by a minor one-appareance ninja alter ego.

I know the arguments that the two have unique fighting styles. Ike is supposedly slower, (although I don’t remember him being at all sluggish in PoR) and Marth uses vertical slashes as opposed to Ike using horizontal slashes. But I would like to hear one of Marth’s attacks from his Melee moveset that Ike couldn’t do in Brawl.
That's farfetched. Mario could Falcon Punch if he wanted. See, he has a punch too!

To my knowledge, Brawl has an entirely new engine. However, if most of the characters are guaranteed to return, why have a completely new trailer to announce Fox’s return?
SSBB's engine is based on SSBM's one, provided by HAL. In words of Sakurai, "that would shorten game's development a lot", since they already have the engine, just have to do some graphic tweaks.

The answer: no character is safe. I’ll bet that Sakurai will cut as many characters as he can get away with to make room for more new characters. Remember, Brawl could have as few as 35 characters. Unless a significant number of characters from Melee’s roster are cut, Brawl is going to be nearly identical to Melee.
Of course, the infamous poll was for everything: Giving opinions from the trailer or Brawl itself, asking for music, stages, moves, new AND old characters. The front page of the poll stated that "they were seeking for people's opinions about what characters should stay", because they have limited manpower, and they could cut some characters for new ones. But I think Marth's popularity gives him enough chances, and I think that Akaneia stage was made for Marth, but it could be a stage for Fire Emblem characters. Not happening though, just covering possibilites.

Stating that something is cool is a personal opinion, not an objective fact. Sure some people find him cool. Others, like myself, don’t consider him to be very cool at all. If he wasn’t so powerful, he would be as unpopular in Melee as Roy.

Again importance to the series is all that matters.
Importance to the series as well as appareance and looks. Marth have all the detailed ****, the cape, those biker gauntlets, the stance, how he moves... he was made to be cool, although you may not find him cool. But he was portrayed as that in Melee.

My point was that just becasue Marth is one of the most popular characters in Melee now, he might not be in Brawl. In the end, his popularity among Fire embelm fans is all that matters, and in most of the world, Ike's game is more popular.
But Super Smash Bros. Melee is more popular than Path of Radiance. Marth appeared in Melee, the most selling GC title, how's that not popularity?

Yes, but Marth was put in Melee to represent Fire Emblem fans. Whether or not he returns depends on whether he still represents Fire Emblem’s fanbase.
It would've risky to assume that the Marth supporters, players and fans suddenly don't support him anymore. Marth was made to appeal the Japanese players, but they ended pleasing the US Smash players "by accident". Sometimes accidents, like wavedashing and such exploits, make the games better.

Again, most of Marth’s "fans" in North America and Europe will remember him as “the dude with the freakin’ big sword” not as the face of Fire Emblem.
But you don't know. Marth was presented as the Fire Emblem character in Melee, for his trophies and special messages. Not all Smash players are n00bs who just play with da fox because it's quick, there are old Nintendo fans which doesn't play competitively and are very fond of Marth. "The dude with da sword" is just a very superficial depiction which could be said about "the kid of the cap", "the red robot guy", "the eskimos", and such.

I wish someone would find sales data to settle this argument one way or another, but I’d be willing to bet that the worldwide sales (not just from the U.S., but everywhere – including Japan) of Fire emblem GBA sold more than the original FE did, since that game was released only to the Japanese.
I have them:

· In Japan:
Fire Emblem III: Mystery of the Emblem -- 697,750
Fire Emblem IV: Genealogy of Holy War -- 578,000
Fire Emblem V: Thracia 776 -- 257,500
Fire Emblem VI: Sealed Sword -- 393,000
Fire Emblem VII: Sword of Raging Fire -- 293,500
Fire Emblem VIII: The Sacred Stones -- 298,000
Fire Emblem IX: Path of Radiance -- 155,750
Fire Emblem X: Goddess of the Dawn -- 142,934 (to date)

· In the US:
Fire Emblem VII: Sword of Raging Fire -- 409,000
Fire Emblem VIII: The Sacred Stones -- 331,000
Fire Emblem IX: Path of Radiance -- 185,000

· Combined:
Fire Emblem III: Mystery of the Emblem -- 697,750 (Japan only)
Fire Emblem IV: Genealogy of Holy War -- 578,000 (Japan only)
Fire Emblem V: Thracia 776 -- 257,500 (Japan only)
Fire Emblem VI: Sealed Sword -- 393,000 (Japan only)
Fire Emblem VII: Sword of Raging Fire -- 700,500 (Worldwide)
Fire Emblem VIII: The Sacred Stones -- 629,000 (Worldwide)
Fire Emblem IX: Path of Radiance -- 340,570 (Worldwide)
Fire Emblem X: Goddess of the Dawn -- 142,934 (to date, only in Japan for now)

So there you have, it's a pity I didn't find the FE1 and FE2 sales. The GBA ones have the best sales overall, which I think it was due to novelty value, SSBM, hype, casual players, etc.

Yeah, Marth certainly WAS the poster boy for his franchise, but I suspect his superstar status has dimished somewhat in recent years due to his absence from the series that made him famous in the first place. Since Ike is still appearing in FE games, I would argue he is currently more important in the series than Marth is.
But this is natural, Fire Emblem rules are different; Each game features new everything. Or would you want a Fire Emblem: Advent Children, a Fire Emblem: Dirge of Cerberus, a Fire Emblem: Crisis Core? There could be no way for Marth to have another FE of his own, since FE are one-shot stories.

FE3 got released in the Japanese VC. He's still featured as the main character in the Official Fire Emblem World homepage (check it out, but it's Japanese). It was opened by Intelligent Systems and it's the only official Fire Emblem webpage updated with the story of the franchise. The museum is about FE3, with a map, characters pics, grow rates, story, items and such.

Once again, Marth’s popularity in Smash does not indicate an appreciation for the character’s role as a Fire Emblem lord in NA and Europe. Just that Smash players enjoy playing with characters with powerful sword attacks. Ike can fill that void quite nicely.
Does not indicate, but would be true. If about a character with powerful sword attacks, even Link, Pit and Metaknight can fit that role even more than Ike, since these are more popular characters.

Some Marth players are better than others, but if you think he isn’t broken you should try playing against an equally skilled Marth player with a non high tier character. You can still win, but if you can't make a single mistake or you're toast.
Noob Marth players are easy. They just spam fsmashes, so you just have to make them spam it and punish them, even Pichu can do the job.

Ture, Miciaiah wasn’t included on the poll so I agree she is less likely than some of the FE characters who were (ie: Ike and the Black Knight). But I still thinks she has a shot as the new Roy (a character who can increase sales for their game) and because there are very few magic users would have the potential to become characters in Brawl, making her a potenially unique charcater addition.
So why Fire Emblem is the only franchise that can gets "Roys"? If franchises in Smash are threated equally, they should add a "Roy" from every upcoming title of every franchise. So you have Super Smash Future Stars and some old guys.

I know you don’t agree with this, but as a Marth player you could pick up Ike.
As a Marth player I could pick even Fox, but I'm not safe playing with Fox. There is speed, jump, gravity, falling speed, moves, speed of the moves, range of the moves, power and knockback of the moves, special moves, comeback moves, air play, ground play... I don't think a Marth player would automatically like Ike as his new main.

Hear me out: they made Ganondorf a Captain Falcon clone due to time constraints. Would it be so impossible for them to give Ike Marth’s moveset? They could make him a bit slower, make his B move a ranged attack and tweak his sword slashes to look more like Ike’s fighting style.
But that would be lame, very lame, like just Ganondorf. Ganondorf isn't a futuristic racer, and Ike isn't certainly Marth.

At any rate, whether the losses outweigh the gains depends on what games and characters you prefer.
Is not that Marth would cut Ike or any characters chances. I think there are priorities, maybe not for us, but maybe for Sakurai, from oldcomers to newcomers. I could say that Marth has higher priority than the IC, Mr. G&W, Mewtwo, Sheik, Pichu, Jigglypuff, Young Link, Dr Mario, Falco and Roy, because Marth is more important to the FE franchise that those characters to theirs. Hopefully will know soon, as there is a FE stage the FE characters should've revealed soon.

What do you mean by “acknowledge” Marth? Acknowledge his existence? The fact that he is a good character?
Marth was shown as a Fire Emblem representative: "From Fire Emblem, Marth comes with his sword!". Appearing in Smash makes characters massively popular and known, I think most people mistook Hector with Marth (omg Marth is now bulky and have axes!), but that's the mindset that Smash can set on people.
Think for example, in a guy who just unlocked Marth, read the trophy, started to play him: "It has teh style, the sword is pwn, it speaks Japanese". Then goes into a Smash forum and asks about him. He learns that he's from the first Fire Emblem character, and keeps investigating until he buys the games.
Seriously, what's the difference between a guy that doesn't know about Ness, and a guy who doesn't know about Marth? They can't buy any of his games now, so why to put them there? There are more characters like that, so it isn't always like going into a store and buying their games. Earthbound was released in the US but you can buy it anymore, it doesn't exist for Nintendo of America.

If Marth does return, it will be to represent the “cult FE communities”. These are the loyal gamers who actually buy Fire Emblem games. As the most popular Fire Emblem lord among Fire Emblem fans, Ike is better suited to represent the Fire Emblem series.
But Marth is more popular than Ike overall, in Smash and in FE. Almost all FE players know about Marth, and since Melee was such a hit, Marth isn't precisely a lesser character. That title would go to Ike. Ike should represent the new generation of FE titles, while Marth represents the old generation ones and Fire Emblem as a whole.

A decade ago, maybe. I doubt most of the people in the world eagerly awaiting the release of Goddess of Dawn still think of Marth whenever they think of the FE series.
The ones awaiting for GotD are, from my point of view, the ones who know more about Marth, the experts. FE isn't a mainstream franchise, but a cult one.

I’ve never really visited any Fire Embelm fansites, but my guess is that if this were a Fire Emblem site rather than Smash Boards, there would be more support for my proposal to ditch Marth in favor of new FE characters. (Obviously this would depend on what FE site I went to, but you get my point.)
I browsed Velthomer (known a FESS) and found that Marth, Sigurd and Ike are the most requested character from Japan, and these are the forum favourites. If you are fond of the franchise, these are the most obvious choices. For new players, the favourites may be Marth, Lyndis, Hector, Ephraim and Ike.

I guess this is where we disagree. I don’t see the inclusion of Marth as a factor that will greatly affect the sales of Brawl one way or another. I can’t imagine any Smash fan actually choosing not to purchase Brawl just because of one character. For players who love fast sword fighters, they can play as Metaknight, Pit or Ike.
I can't think of anyone DON'T buying Brawl because Marth isn't in it, as well I don't see people buying Brawl just to play with Pit, Metaknight or Wario. Unless you are a freak of that franchise. It work in both ways. But the more the merrier, as isn't that cutting Marth isn't going to bring something new. In the contrary, I think the loss is greater. They can cut all Melee characters except the main 5 too (Mario, Pikachu, Link, Kirby).

I can see, of course, people buying Brawl just to play as Snake or Sonic, but that's different. These ones didn't like Smash in a first place (you can't like Smash if you didn't buy Melee, that's how I see it).

I don’t think that the handful of Marth fans who would not buy the game weigh very heavily on the conscious of Sakurai. He will make the Brawl the best game possible, however he chooses to do so. Regardless, this game is going to make a metric butload of cash for the Nintendo Empire one way or another.
It isn't exactly a handful. There are plenty of them. But then again the game is so important saleswise for the Wii to deceive old players and not to capture the new ones. Smash Bros Brawl was made for the old Nintendo fans who doesn't fall in the Wii casual players category.

More characters? Yes, but he confirmed that some characters will definitely be cut to make room for new ones. How many and which ones remains to be seen. The more characters are cut, the more new ones can be included so I say this is a good thing. I've played as the Melee crew enough for one life time. Its time for a change.
The more? Cutting Marth for... Pichu for example? Why should Marth be cut in the first place? As I said before, let's just have the main 5 and add new characters.

More stages? Yeah, but don’t expect all the old ones to return either.
Same gameplay? Not quite. New moves (like super smash attacks and crawling) have been added. Also, characters like Kirby seem to have been made far more powerful and characters like Fox have been drastically changed (notice how he always has his gun drawn now?). In addition, from the look of the trailer, the game play has been slowed somewhat, making it more of a game of strategy (like SSB 64) than Melee which rewards reflexes over cunning.
From we've seen in both trailers, the gameplay's basics still the same. Same mechanics, same physics, is an updated game. Bad? I rather have this that some innovative Wii swinging ****, so props for Sakurai.

In short, the game will be just as awesome, but a different kind of awesome. A completely new game of Smash Bros, but just as deep and addictive as ever.
****ing yes.

GreenMamba said:
To GenG--I don't believe I have ever seen evidence to support that returning character whishes were on the list thing, though if you can find some for me, I'll gladly look into it.
Well, it's not you couldn't see by yourself, but it's all in Japanese. If you search by マルス through all the pages of the toukouken (poll), you'll see him popping everywhere. I remember clearly the quote about the poll being made for old characters too, but since the front page was removed when the poll was closed I couldn't find it.
There isn't a count of the returning characters, at least not smashboards, just read it in N-siders by some guy who was translating the poll and wanted to share the results almost a year ago. Marth was one of the top requested.
 

Wiseguy

Smash Champion
Joined
Mar 28, 2007
Messages
2,245
Location
Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada (Proud
To GenG--I don't believe I have ever seen evidence to support that returning character whishes were on the list thing, though if you can find some for me, I'll gladly look into it.

Now, to Wiseguy:

No matter how badly you want it to be, FE1 is still the most important for one sole reason--it started the franchise. Without it, there would be no Fire Emblem. PoR didn't start anything as major as the entire series. I like the convenient ignoring of FE7, which brought the series to the rest of the world, too. FE7 is more important to the series in that regard than PoR will ever hope to be, but it still isn't as important as the first game in the series.

Yes, the past hasn't been ignored, but why the heck would the start ignoring it now all of a sudden? The beginning of Fire Emblem didn't just disappear inbetween Melee and Brawl. It still exists, and is still important enough to recognize. And I fail to see how Marth being in Brawl wouldn't appeal to international audiences, considering a huge chunk of international Fire Emblem fans got interested in the series because of his appearance in Melee. Most Fire Emblem fans understand his importance, Japanese or otherwise. You seem to be the only one downplaying it.

As for what Fire Emblem characters I see in Brawl, I see two--Marth and Ike.
Cutting Japanese only characters Marth and Roy may be seen as ignoring Fire Emblem's past, but to me it would be more like passing the torch onto the next generation.

I harbor no ill feelings towards Marth. Although I don't particularly care for the character personally, I respect that it was partially his popularity that convinced Nintendo to bring one of my favorite series, Fire Emblem, to my region of the world. Marth and Roy's place in Melee was richly deserved, to be sure.

Where I think we disagree is the place of retro characters in Smash Bros. I'm all for cool-but-forgotten characters appearing in Smash. The inclusion of Ice Climbers and Game & Watch to Melee added a whole lot to the game. However, I would much rather see these characters cut, and a different pair of retro characters (like Balloon Fighter, Geno or a 3rd party character like Simon Belmont) take their place. Retro characters like Pit are unquestionably awesome, but unless they are part of a currently thriving game series their appearance should be limited to a guest appearance in a single game - in my opinion. Given the huge volume of worthy characters that could be considered for a place in Brawl, I don't want characters from the old games included at the expense of new characters. I'm sure many people disagree with my assessment, but it’s just how I feel.

Marth and Ike eh? Well, I’d be lying if I said that wasn’t a possible outcome. Despite my best efforts, convincing people on Smash Boards of Marth’s relative unimportance compared to the newer FE characters has proved as futile as trying to stop a speeding locomotive by flinging boogers at it (to quote Abraham Lincoln).
But to me, having Fire Emblem represented by two blue haired swordfighters wouldn’t do justice to the diversity of characters within a Fire Emblem game. Path of Radiance, for example, had sword, axe and spear wielders, magic users, paladins, wyvern riders, pegasus riders, and snipers – not to mention beast, bird and dragon laguz. In my view, if only two unique characters from the Fire Emblem series get in Brawl Sakurai should include Ike in addition to one other non-swordfighter. Miciaiah, who is described in the latest issue of Nintendo Power as the “new central character” of PoR’s highly anticipated sequel Goddess of Dawn fills this role quite nicely. However, if they only have time for one unique character and one clone, I’d say that the Black Knight stands the greatest chance of being the new “Roy” to Ike’s “Marth” if you will.

Might Sakurai still include Marth? Yes, I must admit, there is a good chance. But I’m holding onto the hope that the creative genius behind Smash will make the tough decision and create Brawl as unique a game as possible. Unfortunately, that means that characters like Marth will get the boot.


BWAHAHAHAH! I'm currently playing a complete illegal badly translated version of the game Fire Emblem 3! So far, I'm hating it... o.o; Well not exactly hating... But just gimme the newer games, but I'll complete it anyways. Gah, this prooved it; Donkey Kong Country REALLY was the best SNES game ever. ;)

Now on topic. I still believe Marth will return, since Marth and Roy did suprisingly well in populairity even here in the west. Marth especially is a character muchos loved both by the casual players and hardcore tournament players. Marth also basically got begged into Melee, and I don't think his populairity went down after Marth actually GOT into Melee. Besides the castle stage in the Brawl trailers is most likely a stage home to Marth himself.

But I still think his returning changes are overated. =/ Especially in the Rate Their Changes thread where it's full of people giving him a 99%. Okay I say it's very likely Marth'll return, but not THAT high, Ike still CAN replace him.
Yeah, I was a little taken aback by the extreme optimism of some of the posts on “Rate Their Chances”. 99%? Alright, I’ll admit that he has a greater chance of returning than many Melee characters, but not as high as characters like Ganondorf and Donkey Kong.

I went a little overboard the other way, posting 15% (which would only be accurate if Sakurai felt the exact same way about the Fire Emblem series as I do), more to bring the final number a bit more down to earth than anything. Realistically, I’d say it’s about 50/50.

That was my point exactly. If Kirby is a bad character, that can be tweaked with some programming. If Marth is a broken character (which I don't think so) he could be nerfed. Actually they should power up characters to the Samus/Falcon/Peach/Fox/Falco/Sheik/Marth/Jigglypuff level rather than making them SSBM Kirby level, if you know what I mean. The battles among the characters above tend to be fair... somehow.

So, we should stick to the popularity/importance/representation then, as all characters have high chances to be nerfed or powered up. We don't know about that.
You may not want to admit it, but playing as Sheik, Fox, Falco and Marth gives the player an advantage over every other character. Obviously if you master a character like Jiggs, Samus or Captain Falcon you can still be competitive – but the same goes for characters like Mario, Link and Pikachu. If you’re in a match using against an equally skilled opponent using a character like Marth or Sheik, you have to work a lot harder than your opponent - unless you also wimp out and choose one of the top four characters.

Here’s an idea: how about we have a game where every character is as closely matched as possible. Case in Point: back in SSB 64, a Donkey Kong user actually stood a chance against a Fox player. Maybe having a game that balanced is impractical with 40+ characters, but they should at least make sure that we don’t see another Sheik in Brawl.

Marth is still popular, I'll try to make a short "History of Marth" to explain you why Marth is the face of the franchise:

• Fire Emblem was an original idea from game's developer Shouzo Kaga, from Intelligent Systems, of creating a grid map system battle (from Famicom Wars) and RPG elements, such developed characters, a compelling storyline, manga style, experience from battles, levels, etc. Marth was the main character, the exiled prince of Altea which had the blood of the legendary hero who once defeated the black dragon Medeus, which is once again alive. Only the descendant of the hero, wielding the Fire Emblem, can use the Falchion, sword of light. Marth was a very weak and dependable character, but was the key to most battles. It cast of characters was loved by all players. It was an instant classic, in 1990, which assured many sequels. It was the first game of a genre, the S-RPG or tactical role-play.

• After Fire Emblem Gaiden, which was a let down for many fans, the dangerous appareance of many wannabes like Shining Force of Front Mission made Intelligent System to make a stronger, blockbuster Fire Emblem worthy of the original one. So they came with a remake of the original game, so new players could enjoy the original game, and a new story taking place 5 years after the game, for the old fans. At the end, both new and old players could enjoy this Fire Emblem, one of the most succesfull in the franchise. The overall story was about Marth fighting Medeus twice to save Akaneia in a time span of 5 years. The second book featured a more adult Marth, now in his 19, as the king of Altea. The game sold 695k in Japan, and is the most selling Fire Emblem title ever in any territory (not combined).

Marth, by appearing in two games, was the first main lord in the franchise. He never appeared in any Fire Emblem, but he had a lot of merchandasing which extended his reign as the Fire Emblem face: Some serialized mangas in the GanGan Magazine, voice dramas, artbooks, guidebooks, fanbooks, doujins, soundtracks, the Trading Card Game (which later added characters from Genealogy of Holy War and Thracia 776) and even an anime in 1998 featuring Marth, but was cancelled after 2 episodes. That made Marth even more popular, as a Fire Emblem icon.

Genealogy of Holy War was released in 1996, regarded as the best Fire Emblem ever. It featureda different cast of characters from previous games: Sigurd and his son Celice in a battle through 2 generations. It sold 577k, being the second most succesful Fire Emblem in sales.

• Nintendo announced Super Smash Bros for N64. Fire Emblem characters were considered by popular demand but they were scrapped in favor to most popular characters worldwide, and the game itself had a low budget.

• Thracia 776 (SNES) was a Genealogy of Holy War sidestory, released in 1999 for the Nintendo Power System, and then in 2000 by the usual means. Sold 250k, not very much, but considering that it was the last SNES title ever, it's more than... Path of Radiance.

• Marth kept having the usual marketing traits. Just to point that out (the Trading Card Game was released around 2000).

• Nintendo announced Super Smash Bros Melee. Marth was one of the most requested characters by the Japanese audience as Fire Emblem character, being the most popular at all. Marth and Roy were about to be scrapped in the US versions for more popular characters, but Nintendo of America decided to keep them by demand of the US fans: The interest on these characters was just that high. Super Smash Bros. Melee sold more than 6 million worldwide (4 in the US, 1.5 in Japan, 1 in Europe), making the best selling Fire Emblem related title. That reinforced ultimately Marth's popularity in Japan, as well presented into the US as the face of a series they couldn't grab before. The character was very good received overall, and that set a precedent for Fire Emblem titles in the US.

• Has something changed? There are new titles, but Marth's still the face of the franchise, for the original Japanese audience, for the Fire Emblem audience who knew about that series through Melee, for the Melee players, and for the non-Melee Fire Emblem players who knew about Marth somewhere.


Thanks for taking the time to right all that out, it’s a fascinating read. Although I haven’t played any of the Japanese FE games, it doesn’t mean that I’m not interested in them or Marth’s unique place in the FE series. I sincerely hope that the suits at Nintendo have the brains to release all the old FE game for Virtual console. I would download them in a heartbeat.

Anyway, I can see what your getting at. Pokemon, like Fire Emblem, has no Mario-esque mascot for the series, but Pikachu is seen as the “face of Pokemon” if you will – due in large part to his popularity in the non-game aspects of Pokemon culture like the movies, TV show, trading card game etc. even though in the actual games he’s just another Pokemon. (Being a Poke-phobe, I might be off base. Someone with a greater appreciation for the series can correct me if I’m incorrect in my assessment).

However, while Marth’s role in FE themed anime and trading card games as well as his appearance in Melee may be enough to earn him a spot in some people’s eyes, I still think that a character’s worthiness should be judged completely on their role in games of their series of origin. Marth’s popularity in Melee doesn’t prove squat about how much non-Japanese gamers appreciate his role as a Fire Emblem lord. If the sandbag had Marth’s powerful moveset, he would be just as popular as Marth. I’m not saying Marth prominence outside FE games is irrelevant, just that the games are the most important.

Certainly there’s a case to made that Marth being the very first Fire Emblem lord makes him worthy of consideration for a spot in Brawl, and that his non-FE appearances (in Melee and the like) have made him the “Pikachu of Fire Emblem”. But at least Pikachu has appeared in every single Pokemon game to date. Marth hasn’t resurfaced since FE 3 and even that hasn’t seen the light of day outside Japan. That’s not to say that his absence from the FE-verse is because Marth is a poor character, its just the nature of the series that every game in the series has a new cast of characters.

So, that’s why I’m predicting that Marth’s importance to his series, while impressive its enough to get him a place in Brawl. Ike, who will have appeared in two internationally released Fire Emblem games by year’s end is currently the most important lord in the series due solely to the fact that he’s still starring in FE games.

They may stay, as many other character could (think about Mewtwo, Jigglypuff, Ness, Ice Climbers, Mr G&W, Roy, etc.). It means they won't be throw away because they were good received, even if they are Japan only. The possibilites, though slim, are still there.
Roy is the only one on that list who is Japanese only. All the rest are equally popular (or unpopular) around the world, more or less because their games of origin have reached an international audience.

Personally, I could see Dr. Mario, Pichu, Roy, ICs, and G&W being cut while Mewtwo, Young Link, Marth and even Falco being replaced by Lucario, WW Link, Ike and Wolf respectively. That may sound harsh, but given that we may get only 35 characters total, as many old character as possible need to be cut in order to make room for new ones, in my view.


Doc is just Mario, who doesn't have anything special other than having a coat (which could be easily put as a Mario alternate outfit) and certaing better moves which are already being implemented in Brawl: In the second trailer you can see how Mario fair sends Pikachu upwards (as Doc's fair) and Kirby downwards (as Mario's fair). Doc may be better than Mario in some areas but is still the worst clone in terms of difference in playstyle with the original one. Young Link is a good character, but his speed and projectile spam properties should be given to Link (if not to Wind Waker Link). This should be done with most clones, and the original characters would be even better, aiming for balance.

I'm not talking about being a good character, because Dr Mario is easily better than any Roy. But Dr Mario isn't nearly as representative or unique as Roy. That was my point.
Some people appreciate being able to choose which Mario they prefer. If Dr. Mario had been put in Brawl at the expense of an original character, then that would be pretty lame. But since he was a clone, he and Falco, Ganondorf, Luigi, Roy, Pichu and Young Link probably took a matter of weeks to program into the game as opposed to an original character who might take, say, a month or two. (Keep in mind that I know nothing about programming, so I’m just speculating).

Regardless, you know my policy on obscure and minor characters like the Doc: one guest appearance and that’s it. I’ll miss playing as the good doctor, but I know his absesnce will mean that another clone (poosibly equally as cool) will take his place. Anyway, I can always pop in my copy of Melee if I feel so inclined.

Your point about Roy being a better representative (he was included to sell copies of his game, after all) and more original is valid. I just don’t either of these factors as enough to get him a seconf Smash Bros, however. Time for another FE characters to get their five seconds of fame.

Don't misunderstand me: In looks, they aren't similar. Tight clothes was just a pun, but they dres completely different. I was pointing at the moves, horribly similar to Sheik's, maybe a tweaked Sheik using a recent character from the underreped Metroid franchise, as well Sheik was a curiosity from OOT's prime. Unlike Marth, Sheik appareances were minor. I think Zelda should've given more protagonism; Is lame to see how Zelda, the princess which named the series, is overshadowed by a minor one-appareance ninja alter ego.
Your point about Zelda being overshadowed is completely true. I can’t wait for Sheik to gone. Hopefully Zelda will get an undated appearance and moveset that reflects her role in Twilight Princess.

But if it is possible for them to make Zamus Sheik’s replacement (two characters from different games, not to mention genres) why would it be so impossible to make Ike Marth’s replacement? They hail from the same series and are more similar in appearance and fighting style in their respective games than Samus and Sheik are.


That's farfetched. Mario could Falcon Punch if he wanted. See, he has a punch too!
Yeah, but Mario and Falcon don’t game from the same series. Marth and Ike do. They also fight exclusively with large, one handed swords. They could be put in as unique characters. Or they could just make Ike replace Marth. I’m betting on the latter.


SSBB's engine is based on SSBM's one, provided by HAL. In words of Sakurai, "that would shorten game's development a lot", since they already have the engine, just have to do some graphic tweaks.
The key word being “based,” not exactly the same. Still, I believe Twilight Princess was originally based on the Windwaker engine. Granted, Brawl will be far more similar to Melle than WW and TP, but I’m guessing it will have its own unique feel as well.

Of course, the infamous poll was for everything: Giving opinions from the trailer or Brawl itself, asking for music, stages, moves, new AND old characters. The front page of the poll stated that "they were seeking for people's opinions about what characters should stay", because they have limited manpower, and they could cut some characters for new ones. But I think Marth's popularity gives him enough chances, and I think that Akaneia stage was made for Marth, but it could be a stage for Fire Emblem characters. Not happening though, just covering possibilites.
Ah, the infamous Fire Emblem stage in the Brawl trailers. As I’m sure everyone is aware, there is some debate as to which FE game this is from. Obviously, if it’s from Fire Emblem 1-3 then Marth will surely return.

However, I strongly believe that the awesome battle being reenacted in the stage is based on one of the battles in Path of Radiance. The castle, it could be argued, is a Crimean occupied by Daein, under attack by General Ike’s liberation army – hense the black dragon logo on the red flags and banners.

Yes, yes, I know the Daein dragon symbol has a slightly different shape than the one in the trailer. But until I see a screen shot from another FE game where this logo appears, I’m going to attribute it to Sakurai taking a little creative license or perhaps, its an undated Daein symbol from GoD. The point is we don’t know where its from for sure. Until we do, it proves nothing.



Importance to the series as well as appareance and looks. Marth have all the detailed ****, the cape, those biker gauntlets, the stance, how he moves... he was made to be cool, although you may not find him cool. But he was portrayed as that in Melee.
Not only do I not find him cool, but I’m guessing many others who don’t share the Japanese love for girly sword fighters share my point of view. Compared to Ike, the guy looks like a total pansy. Buy hey, that’s just one guy’s opinion.

But Super Smash Bros. Melee is more popular than Path of Radiance. Marth appeared in Melee, the most selling GC title, how's that not popularity?
As I explained before, if Marth gets in it will be because of his level of importance in the FE series. The Fire Emblem character who make it into Brawl should be selected based on who makes the best representative for Fire Emblem fans, not Melee fans (although I realize they aren’t mutually exclusive).

It would've risky to assume that the Marth supporters, players and fans suddenly don't support him anymore. Marth was made to appeal the Japanese players, but they ended pleasing the US Smash players "by accident". Sometimes accidents, like wavedashing and such exploits, make the games better.
Yeah, those “accidents” are what makes Smash so special, but its not enough reason to include a character. Brawl will have its own special qualities that make it unique. It doesn’t need to be the same as Melee.

But you don't know. Marth was presented as the Fire Emblem character in Melee, for his trophies and special messages. Not all Smash players are n00bs who just play with da fox because it's quick, there are old Nintendo fans which doesn't play competitively and are very fond of Marth. "The dude with da sword" is just a very superficial depiction which could be said about "the kid of the cap", "the red robot guy", "the eskimos", and such.
To be honest, I think many people who play Smash do think that way. They choose the more powerful characters because they are easier to use, not because they appreciate their role in videogames. Obviously not everyone feels that way, but that’s just the way I see.

Honestly, since most Smash players have never played Marth’s game, I think they do know him as the random caped swordfighter thrown in amongst videogame greats like Link and Mario. That’s not at all accurate, and some do take the time to learn about Marth and his games, but you have to admit; most non-Japanese Marth players don’t use him because they give a snuff about Fire Emblem, but because they like his fighting style.


I have them:

• In Japan:
Fire Emblem III: Mystery of the Emblem -- 697,750
Fire Emblem IV: Genealogy of Holy War -- 578,000
Fire Emblem V: Thracia 776 -- 257,500
Fire Emblem VI: Sealed Sword -- 393,000
Fire Emblem VII: Sword of Raging Fire -- 293,500
Fire Emblem VIII: The Sacred Stones -- 298,000
Fire Emblem IX: Path of Radiance -- 155,750
Fire Emblem X: Goddess of the Dawn -- 142,934 (to date)

• In the US:
Fire Emblem VII: Sword of Raging Fire -- 409,000
Fire Emblem VIII: The Sacred Stones -- 331,000
Fire Emblem IX: Path of Radiance -- 185,000

• Combined:
Fire Emblem III: Mystery of the Emblem -- 697,750 (Japan only)
Fire Emblem IV: Genealogy of Holy War -- 578,000 (Japan only)
Fire Emblem V: Thracia 776 -- 257,500 (Japan only)
Fire Emblem VI: Sealed Sword -- 393,000 (Japan only)
Fire Emblem VII: Sword of Raging Fire -- 700,500 (Worldwide)
Fire Emblem VIII: The Sacred Stones -- 629,000 (Worldwide)
Fire Emblem IX: Path of Radiance -- 340,570 (Worldwide)
Fire Emblem X: Goddess of the Dawn -- 142,934 (to date, only in Japan for now)

So there you have, it's a pity I didn't find the FE1 and FE2 sales. The GBA ones have the best sales overall, which I think it was due to novelty value, SSBM, hype, casual players, etc.
Gen G, you rock! I’ve been looking for these numbers forever!

While the GBA games are the best selling overall, they had the advantage of the GBA’s huge installed base. PoR, while more well received in Japan than the GBA games, suffered because of the Gamecube’s relative unpopularity. It will be interesting to see how well GoD sells outside Japan, since Nintendo has so many other strong titles lined up.

But this is natural, Fire Emblem rules are different; Each game features new everything. Or would you want a Fire Emblem: Advent Children, a Fire Emblem: Dirge of Cerberus, a Fire Emblem: Crisis Core? There could be no way for Marth to have another FE of his own, since FE are one-shot stories.

FE3 got released in the Japanese VC. He's still featured as the main character in the Official Fire Emblem World homepage (check it out, but it's Japanese). It was opened by Intelligent Systems and it's the only official Fire Emblem webpage updated with the story of the franchise. The museum is about FE3, with a map, characters pics, grow rates, story, items and such.
I’m not saying the FE series needs to change, I’m just saying that we can’t treat Marth as the representative of FE the same way that Link is to the Zelda series, because the FE series works differently. When Smash Bros. 4 comes out, we can have another new batch of FE characters from the recent games, if that makes you feel better.

And I’ll admit, with FE virtual console release in Japan, Marth since has some prominence in that country. Maybe if we see FE released on VC outside Japan, I’ll change my tune. For now, his game still lacks importance to most non-Japanese FE fans.

Does not indicate, but would be true. If about a character with powerful sword attacks, even Link, Pit and Metaknight can fit that role even more than Ike, since these are more popular characters.
True. That’s why Marth shouldn’t be included. Brawl already has its quota of sword fighters. We need more diversity.

Noob Marth players are easy. They just spam fsmashes, so you just have to make them spam it and punish them, even Pichu can do the job.
I’m not talking about N00bs, I’m talking about equally skilled players. No matter your skill level, playing Marth gives you more of an edge than, say, Link.


So why Fire Emblem is the only franchise that can gets "Roys"? If franchises in Smash are threated equally, they should add a "Roy" from every upcoming title of every franchise. So you have Super Smash Future Stars and some old guys.
Because, as you’ve pointed out, the Fire Emblem series is unique from the other franchises. Every game is unique, story wise, so there is not one group of characters that returns game after game. My suggestion is just to treat like cases alike and different cases differently.

As a Marth player I could pick even Fox, but I'm not safe playing with Fox. There is speed, jump, gravity, falling speed, moves, speed of the moves, range of the moves, power and knockback of the moves, special moves, comeback moves, air play, ground play... I don't think a Marth player would automatically like Ike as his new main.
They also might not automatically like the new Marth, since we don’t know how much he will be altered. Since there is no predicting what people will like to play as, just include the most worthy characters from every series and give them as diverse a lineup as possible. That way, they can choose for themselves.


But that would be lame, very lame, like just Ganondorf. Ganondorf isn't a futuristic racer, and Ike isn't certainly Marth.
For a clone, Ganondorf, is anything but lame. He is also an example of how the Smash team will take liberties will characters for convenience’s sake. For example, why is Roy a Marth clone with a fire moveset? Because they wanted to differentiate him from Marth – even though he doesn’t use a fire sword in his game of origin. Making Ike a Marth replacement would be no more of a stretch.



Is not that Marth would cut Ike or any characters chances. I think there are priorities, maybe not for us, but maybe for Sakurai, from oldcomers to newcomers. I could say that Marth has higher priority than the IC, Mr. G&W, Mewtwo, Sheik, Pichu, Jigglypuff, Young Link, Dr Mario, Falco and Roy, because Marth is more important to the FE franchise that those characters to theirs. Hopefully will know soon, as there is a FE stage the FE characters should've revealed soon.
I agree, except with Jiggs. Although she is the lamest character in existence, she is also one of the original 12 – so I don’t her being cut, unfortunately. Everyone else is probably gone. Marth has a better chance of returning than those other characters, but his chances still aren’t great in my opinion.


Marth was shown as a Fire Emblem representative: "From Fire Emblem, Marth comes with his sword!". Appearing in Smash makes characters massively popular and known, I think most people mistook Hector with Marth (omg Marth is now bulky and have axes!), but that's the mindset that Smash can set on people.
Think for example, in a guy who just unlocked Marth, read the trophy, started to play him: "It has teh style, the sword is pwn, it speaks Japanese". Then goes into a Smash forum and asks about him. He learns that he's from the first Fire Emblem character, and keeps investigating until he buys the games.
Seriously, what's the difference between a guy that doesn't know about Ness, and a guy who doesn't know about Marth? They can't buy any of his games now, so why to put them there? There are more characters like that, so it isn't always like going into a store and buying their games. Earthbound was released in the US but you can buy it anymore, it doesn't exist for Nintendo of America.
Giving cool, obscure characters a second life as a Smash character isn’t going to change. Look at Pit? I just think that unless their popularity results in the character getting a revival outside of Smash, they should be cut in favor of another character.

Ness? There’s really no better Earthbound rep. None of the other games have been released outside Japan. If Nintendo announces a new Earthbound game for international release, I’d be in favor of that game’s protagonist taking Ness’ spot.




I can't think of anyone DON'T buying Brawl because Marth isn't in it, as well I don't see people buying Brawl just to play with Pit, Metaknight or Wario. Unless you are a freak of that franchise. It work in both ways. But the more the merrier, as isn't that cutting Marth isn't going to bring something new. In the contrary, I think the loss is greater. They can cut all Melee characters except the main 5 too (Mario, Pikachu, Link, Kirby).

I can see, of course, people buying Brawl just to play as Snake or Sonic, but that's different. These ones didn't like Smash in a first place (you can't like Smash if you didn't buy Melee, that's how I see it).

It isn't exactly a handful. There are plenty of them. But then again the game is so important saleswise for the Wii to deceive old players and not to capture the new ones. Smash Bros Brawl was made for the old Nintendo fans who doesn't fall in the Wii casual players category.
Brawl will sell like crazy, regardless of whether or not Marth is included. Sakurai, being the artist of the masterpiece known as smash, will make his decisions based on what makes the game better. If that means cutting Marth (which, admittedly, is debatable) he will do it.


The more? Cutting Marth for... Pichu for example? Why should Marth be cut in the first place? As I said before, let's just have the main 5 and add new characters.
No, but cutting Marth so that the team has time to program a completely different character (like Diddy King, Sonic or Ridley) is very possible.

Uhh… who are the “main 5”?

From we've seen in both trailers, the gameplay's basics still the same. Same mechanics, same physics, is an updated game. Bad? I rather have this that some innovative Wii swinging ****, so props for Sakurai.
It’s hard to tell for sure, but to my eye it looks a bit slower than Melee’s frantic pace. It could be just the way the people were playing the game, though.


*Whew!* If you’re trying to wear me out Gen G, your doing a pretty good job. Speaking of jobs, I’ll be flipping burgers until midnight, so don’t expect a response from me until tomorrow.
 

GenG

Smash Lord
Joined
Dec 24, 2005
Messages
1,473
Location
Spain
Now, aiming for the new things, since we've reached a stall in the importance and representation vs gameplay and variety (which I don't think we'll ever settle that).

Your point about Roy being a better representative (he was included to sell copies of his game, after all) and more original is valid. I just don’t either of these factors as enough to get him a seconf Smash Bros, however. Time for another FE characters to get their five seconds of fame.
No, I don't like Roy that much, I just pointed out that since FE are so different games they should aim as much characters from different titles as possible. I can see Roy returning (in about 50-60% chances) but denitely not Pichu or Doc, since Doc's moves could be easily passed onto Mario and make Doc an outfit.

Your point about Zelda being overshadowed is completely true. I can’t wait for Sheik to gone. Hopefully Zelda will get an undated appearance and moveset that reflects her role in Twilight Princess.

But if it is possible for them to make Zamus Sheik’s replacement (two characters from different games, not to mention genres) why would it be so impossible to make Ike Marth’s replacement? They hail from the same series and are more similar in appearance and fighting style in their respective games than Samus and Sheik are.
I think there are many differences in the Zamus vs Sheik case with the Marth vs Ike case:
1. Sheik was a minor character, from a great game, but minor at all. There are more important characters in the Zelda franchise other than Sheik.
2. However, her style was interesting, a ninja in smash Bros?
3. Sakurai possibly wanted to cut Sheik and adding a requested character, or just re-making Zelda from scratch.
4. But again, he wouldn't cut an original and interesting style (ninja), so he came with Zero Suit Samus.
5. Zero Suit Samus is Samus, but Metroid wasn't the same as 6 years ago. Now the franchise went from obscure to mainstream and he even said that he wanted to put more Metroid characters on there. Zamus is agile, have fast moves with high combo proficency, a whip. He thought most players will like Zamus since Sheik is Zelda anyway, and Zelda'll be there too. He killed two birds with a single stone. It's a chance for Zelda, Sheik's original form, to shine.

Now:
1. Marth is still a very important character in his franchise: Not many lords have 2 main playable appareances (only Ike), and he started it all.
2. Is the face of the franchise (in Japan), and I think most Nintendo fans here do know.
3. You say that Marth is broken, but how a strong, bulky and fast Marth with sick aerials and tips wouldn't ve (as you imply when talking about making Ike a Marth)? Marth have his things: He is easy to knock out, he is floaty so he is vulnerable to combos, the sword sucks in close quarters and is so technical that if you miss a single L-cancel or spam the same moves they can punish him badly.
4. But Ike should (and I say should as he better be) a strong character, without tippers, with an array of mid-to-strong moves, much less range than Marth, many air combos, not so floaty, maybe brawl touches here and there (punch, kicks, rammings), so not your pompous blue haired kid.
5. I said before that I would accept another FE character catching the baton from Marth and taking his moveset, if Ike where a lord of his style (pompous, stylish, nimble, etc.). But Ike isn't like that. So they wouldn't cut an original moveset (and a popular character by the way) for no reason. Cutting Marth for adding Ridley? Why not cutting other characters? I believe in priorities here.

The key word being “based,” not exactly the same. Still, I believe Twilight Princess was originally based on the Windwaker engine. Granted, Brawl will be far more similar to Melle than WW and TP, but I’m guessing it will have its own unique feel as well.
See, most old characters' moves remain the same, even the models, but with aesthetics changes. It's clearly Melee (already perfect) engine with some tweaks, which will cut the develop time greatly and focus on new content instead of making a new engine. How awesome is that?

Ah, the infamous Fire Emblem stage in the Brawl trailers. As I’m sure everyone is aware, there is some debate as to which FE game this is from. Obviously, if it’s from Fire Emblem 1-3 then Marth will surely return.

However, I strongly believe that the awesome battle being reenacted in the stage is based on one of the battles in Path of Radiance. The castle, it could be argued, is a Crimean occupied by Daein, under attack by General Ike’s liberation army – hense the black dragon logo on the red flags and banners.

Yes, yes, I know the Daein dragon symbol has a slightly different shape than the one in the trailer. But until I see a screen shot from another FE game where this logo appears, I’m going to attribute it to Sakurai taking a little creative license or perhaps, its an undated Daein symbol from GoD. The point is we don’t know where its from for sure. Until we do, it proves nothing.
Since I saw that trailer many things come into my head suddenly.

· Why to put such a stage in the first trailer? It wasn't related to the characters there, so why? So I remembered about the Akaneia thing in Melee: In the debug mode (which anyone can access with an Action Replay device), in the stages you can see clearly an AKANEIA stage, but if you select it the game will crash, since there isn't anything. So everybody assumed that an Akaneia stage was in development for Melee, but it got cut somehow? Maybe another of the things which were cut in Melee due to time constraints?

· In the interview Sakurai put on Dojo, you can read: " So, development would not be occurring at Hal Labs. But, the code and development environment of Super Smash Bros. Melee, which I had developed in the past, was offered. Having this versus not having this means the efficiency of the development changes dramatically, so I'm thankful". My guess is that they took what they had for the Akaneia stage and completed it, tweaking its visuals. They throwed it in the trailer as a random stage but it was clearly a Fire Emblem stage? Why? Because it was they had in the time, because it was a cool stage, and Sakurai loves teasing people.

· Soon after that, people started bringing the flag point, as it where from Daein's. But there isn't any way it was. The user icymatt made a funny explanation to what the flag looked like. So it wasn't a Daein stage anymore; But it even could be a Daein stage without the flag. The flag wasn't from Daein's, but was certainly a Fire Emblem one, since the theme was similar (red flag, black figure, a dragon, a staple in Fire Emblem). And then, the revelation.

· That Fire Emblem flag is from Fire Emblem 1-3, as the Medeus flag army: Medeus was a big black dragon who ruled the Doluan Empire, and the flag pictures that. However, there isn't any trace of that flag in the games, so where's that flag from? Someone got some screencaps from the anime (pic 1 and pic 2), showing flags IDENTICAL in shape and design but not in colours, so it got the Sakurai touch. But why the anime? The anime was an interesting source of material of Marth for Sakurai: Marth's design, his voice actor and most moves are based on the anime, and now the flag.

· The stage is based on FE1-3 last chaptes (chapters 24 and 25 in the original one, 19 and 20 in the remake): In the chapter you have a large scalled battle in the forests and mountains surrounding Medeus' fortress, and in the second (and last chapter) the battle takes place inside the castle. In the Brawl stage, we have a similar landscape, and the stage itself also have a indoors area. Is one of the most climatic FE battles ever, is epic, works with the Brawl's theme, is a stage based on a franchise present in Smash (chapter 19 and chapter 20 pics from the Mystery of the Emblem or FE3 for short).

So at the end it's Akaneia without doubt, and it's one of the reasons I think Marth's return is so inminent. It could happen, though, that Akaneia may your average FE stage for all FE characters and not neccesarily for Marth, but I've never heard about a stage without its playable character. Everybody assumed Yoshi is in the game because its stage this way, so I don't think why Marth couldn't be confirmed "extraofficially" like Yoshi. The problem is that not many people have played FE1 or 3 in the first place.

Yeah, those “accidents” are what makes Smash so special, but its not enough reason to include a character. Brawl will have its own special qualities that make it unique. It doesn’t need to be the same as Melee.
Si if it's not the same, why the returning characters have the same moves? It isn't totally diferent, but more like expanding the concept. There isn't any reason to fix what's not broken. They will retain most characters as possible but add many more.

Honestly, since most Smash players have never played Marth’s game, I think they do know him as the random caped swordfighter thrown in amongst videogame greats like Link and Mario. That’s not at all accurate, and some do take the time to learn about Marth and his games, but you have to admit; most non-Japanese Marth players don’t use him because they give a snuff about Fire Emblem, but because they like his fighting style.
But that would be said about any character. Or do you think that the guys that play as Falcon or Peach in the tourneys have all played their games and have emotional affairs with them?

While the GBA games are the best selling overall, they had the advantage of the GBA’s huge installed base. PoR, while more well received in Japan than the GBA games, suffered because of the Gamecube’s relative unpopularity. It will be interesting to see how well GoD sells outside Japan, since Nintendo has so many other strong titles lined up.
If the same fans who bought PoR buy GotD, the game may reach about 200k in the US. However, and I think this is important, being a very recent game, and one of the first games for the Wii, it could be possible for it to have more than 500k worldwide: Usually fans talk about games their like and more people buys them by the good critics, is a recent game and the Wii's life is long for this to happen.

I’m not saying the FE series needs to change, I’m just saying that we can’t treat Marth as the representative of FE the same way that Link is to the Zelda series, because the FE series works differently. When Smash Bros. 4 comes out, we can have another new batch of FE characters from the recent games, if that makes you feel better.
No, thanks :ohwell: but that doesn't make me feel better. I think for SSB4 we'll have Marth, Ike and new faces, but never neglecting the past. :p

True. That’s why Marth shouldn’t be included. Brawl already has its quota of sword fighters. We need more diversity.
That means that Ganondorf won't ever appear because he has a sword, even when he is the main enemy of the Zelda franchise?

Because, as you’ve pointed out, the Fire Emblem series is unique from the other franchises. Every game is unique, story wise, so there is not one group of characters that returns game after game. My suggestion is just to treat like cases alike and different cases differently.
So I say they should pay homage to most titles as possible, not just the most recent ones. Just think about a Final Fantasy Smash Bros game; They would likely put Cloud, as the most popular one, then Squall, Zidane, Tidus and Vaan as the most recent representative, not just Vaan.

They also might not automatically like the new Marth, since we don’t know how much he will be altered. Since there is no predicting what people will like to play as, just include the most worthy characters from every series and give them as diverse a lineup as possible. That way, they can choose for themselves.
I think most characters are going to play pretty much the same. The changes aren't as "drastic" that the ones from SSB64 to SSBM: SSBB is seem to be made to traditional SSBM players. Of course Marth and the rest of characters are open to changes but I don't see drastic changes in their playstyle.

For a clone, Ganondorf, is anything but lame. He is also an example of how the Smash team will take liberties will characters for convenience’s sake. For example, why is Roy a Marth clone with a fire moveset? Because they wanted to differentiate him from Marth – even though he doesn’t use a fire sword in his game of origin. Making Ike a Marth replacement would be no more of a stretch.
I think Ganondorf is lame because I'm an avid Zelda fan but I've never seen Ganondorf doing Falcon Punches and Kicks.

And Roy does have a fire based sword in The Sealed Sword (it even shot fireballs!), and Roy style was significantly different from Marth. However, Roy's game was like a giant homage to Marth's game, even Roy's being the same lord type as Marth: They made him a Marth clone with the fire effect.

No, but cutting Marth so that the team has time to program a completely different character (like Diddy King, Sonic or Ridley) is very possible.

Uhh… who are the “main 5”?
So if Marth's is cut they should cut too all characters "below" him in the priority and importance list, which will end in a massacre.

The main 5 (currently, IMO) are Mario, Link, Pikachu, Kirby and Samus.

It’s hard to tell for sure, but to my eye it looks a bit slower than Melee’s frantic pace. It could be just the way the people were playing the game, though.
We can argue that the falling speed and walking speed was toned down, but the overall pace was SSBM definitely. They even made the rolls faster compared with SSBM, and the moves of the returning characters had the same speed.

Wiseguy said:
Might Sakurai still include Marth? Yes, I must admit, there is a good chance.
Then my job is done. That's all I really wanted out of this. I'm done.
LoL :laugh:
 

Chidosengan

Smash Lord
Joined
Jun 3, 2006
Messages
1,610
Location
New Jersey, USA
But wait!

You seem to forget how far in development the team has gotten. The game has been in development for 1 year now. If Nintendo press is right, and the game is to be released this year, meaning they only have about 5-7 months left. For all we know, they probably have finished coding the final roster, and now just fixing a few bugs here and there, and putting the finishing touches. This alone may take a very long time.

As Wiseguy said, we don't know for sure how long does it take to code and create just one character, but I'm sure as hell it must take a very long time, a lot of patience, and is very stressing work.

What I'm saying is that if Marth is already cut out, and FE1 or FE3 comes out to US VC within this time, I though the people at SORA are gonna go "Oh snap! Marth is international now! He must be in Brawl! MUST. DELAY. GAME!". Also it's probably too late to add or delete characters by now (I wish people kept this in mind and stop doing all this "X character for Brawl things"; cool once, now annoying).

If that rumor about a magazine getting Brawl news is true, we should see something new this month. Otherwise we wait 2 more months.

Here's hoping Ike made it, and someone from GoD, since it seems we won't get it any time soon....... Just to get a small taste for what's to come. And I have the lightest feeling Marth didn't make it.....
 

GenG

Smash Lord
Joined
Dec 24, 2005
Messages
1,473
Location
Spain
Development started in October 2005. In E3 2006 we saw 5 old characters tweaked, and new 5 characters, Melee's most requested ones. Then Sakurai said in the poll that the new characters (around the end of May) were near completion. Then the polls were closed, and they then had definitive ideas about what characters to add. Furthermore, Dojo's job application was closed; From Sakurai's words: " With The Studio at its nucleus, this office will probably continue to gather and add people. One doesn't get many opportunities to be placed in such a situation". So we don't know how hard was the work after June 2006, but notice how content Melee has by having a year and half development, but they had to make a new GC engine and remake the series almost from scratch too; Now they have the engine, the effort here is adding more and more content.

Of course, The Studio have talks about the characters with their original creators, and maybe IS pushed Marth forward as they wanted to release something related with him, just with Roy (in the SSBM credits you see some IS people who worked and to give advise about the characters and the models).
 

Wiseguy

Smash Champion
Joined
Mar 28, 2007
Messages
2,245
Location
Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada (Proud
Then my job is done. That's all I really wanted out of this. I'm done.
:urg: I feel so used...

Now, aiming for the new things, since we've reached a stall in the importance and representation vs gameplay and variety (which I don't think we'll ever settle that).
Agreed. Although, to be clear, I'm advocating a balance of important representatives and gameplay variety - not just one or the other.

No, I don't like Roy that much, I just pointed out that since FE are so different games they should aim as much characters from different titles as possible. I can see Roy returning (in about 50-60% chances) but denitely not Pichu or Doc, since Doc's moves could be easily passed onto Mario and make Doc an outfit.
50-60%? I don't know, that seems awfully optimistic to me. Roy and Doc are in the same boat: they are both obscure (but cool) characters unworthy of the time consuming process of having a unique moveset designed for them, but were lucky enough to make it into Melee as clones. Honestly, I don't think either have much of a chance of returning. Like you said, Doc's stats seem to have been absorbed into Mario. Roy is more unique than Doc, but he's still just a clone of Marth.

I think there are many differences in the Zamus vs Sheik case with the Marth vs Ike case:
1. Sheik was a minor character, from a great game, but minor at all. There are more important characters in the Zelda franchise other than Sheik.
2. However, her style was interesting, a ninja in smash Bros?
3. Sakurai possibly wanted to cut Sheik and adding a requested character, or just re-making Zelda from scratch.
4. But again, he wouldn't cut an original and interesting style (ninja), so he came with Zero Suit Samus.
5. Zero Suit Samus is Samus, but Metroid wasn't the same as 6 years ago. Now the franchise went from obscure to mainstream and he even said that he wanted to put more Metroid characters on there. Zamus is agile, have fast moves with high combo proficency, a whip. He thought most players will like Zamus since Sheik is Zelda anyway, and Zelda'll be there too. He killed two birds with a single stone. It's a chance for Zelda, Sheik's original form, to shine.

Now:
1. Marth is still a very important character in his franchise: Not many lords have 2 main playable appareances (only Ike), and he started it all.
2. Is the face of the franchise (in Japan), and I think most Nintendo fans here do know.
3. You say that Marth is broken, but how a strong, bulky and fast Marth with sick aerials and tips wouldn't ve (as you imply when talking about making Ike a Marth)? Marth have his things: He is easy to knock out, he is floaty so he is vulnerable to combos, the sword sucks in close quarters and is so technical that if you miss a single L-cancel or spam the same moves they can punish him badly.
4. But Ike should (and I say should as he better be) a strong character, without tippers, with an array of mid-to-strong moves, much less range than Marth, many air combos, not so floaty, maybe brawl touches here and there (punch, kicks, rammings), so not your pompous blue haired kid.
5. I said before that I would accept another FE character catching the baton from Marth and taking his moveset, if Ike where a lord of his style (pompous, stylish, nimble, etc.). But Ike isn't like that. So they wouldn't cut an original moveset (and a popular character by the way) for no reason. Cutting Marth for adding Ridley? Why not cutting other characters? I believe in priorities here.
Too be fair, its not quite fair to equate Marth with Sheik, because Marth has a chance of returning. Sheik was a goner the moment she was MIA in Twilight Princess. So, yes Sheik is more of a minor character than Marth - but setting aside their roles in their respective series, I think its fair to say that Marth and Ike are far more similar characters (in terms of appearance and abilities) than Sheik and Zamus. My point being that IF Sakurai wanted to make Ike Marth's replacement, it would not be impossible.

Regardless, if Marth returns, or his moveset is passed on to Ike, the character will still have to be nerfed. The reason Marth is broken is not because of his power, but because of his incredibly fast attack speed and massive hit box. In order to bring Ike down to the level of Mario and Link, they could drastically reduce his attack and moveset speeds, increase his endurance and keep his attack power and hit box roughly the same. Also, make his B a ranged attack and give him Aether as a supermove, to make him a bit more unique from Marth in Melee. Hypothetically speaking of course.

"Why not cutting other characters?" As I said:

Personally, I could see Dr. Mario, Pichu, Roy, ICs, and G&W being cut while Mewtwo, Young Link, Marth and even Falco being replaced by Lucario, WW Link, Ike and Wolf respectively. That may sound harsh, but given that we may get only 35 characters total, as many old character as possible need to be cut in order to make room for new ones, in my view.
Every character cut means one more new character gets in. And that's a good thing, at least more those of us that want an entirely new Smash Bros experience.


See, most old characters' moves remain the same, even the models, but with aesthetics changes. It's clearly Melee (already perfect) engine with some tweaks, which will cut the develop time greatly and focus on new content instead of making a new engine. How awesome is that?
Most of the old characters have changed at least a little, though. Mario has enhanced aerial attacks, Kirby's Smash attacks have been more ultra powerful, and Fox has his gun drawn at all times. They also have a new crawl move. Whatever other changes have been made are unknown at this time

But yeah, it is awesome that they can save time but simply "tweaking" the Melee engine. I just expect these "tweaks" to be more drastic than most people, resulting in a game that has a completly unique feel than its predesessors.

Since I saw that trailer many things come into my head suddenly.

· Why to put such a stage in the first trailer? It wasn't related to the characters there, so why? So I remembered about the Akaneia thing in Melee: In the debug mode (which anyone can access with an Action Replay device), in the stages you can see clearly an AKANEIA stage, but if you select it the game will crash, since there isn't anything. So everybody assumed that an Akaneia stage was in development for Melee, but it got cut somehow? Maybe another of the things which were cut in Melee due to time constraints?

· In the interview Sakurai put on Dojo, you can read: " So, development would not be occurring at Hal Labs. But, the code and development environment of Super Smash Bros. Melee, which I had developed in the past, was offered. Having this versus not having this means the efficiency of the development changes dramatically, so I'm thankful". My guess is that they took what they had for the Akaneia stage and completed it, tweaking its visuals. They throwed it in the trailer as a random stage but it was clearly a Fire Emblem stage? Why? Because it was they had in the time, because it was a cool stage, and Sakurai loves teasing people.

· Soon after that, people started bringing the flag point, as it where from Daein's. But there isn't any way it was. The user icymatt made a funny explanation to what the flag looked like. So it wasn't a Daein stage anymore; But it even could be a Daein stage without the flag. The flag wasn't from Daein's, but was certainly a Fire Emblem one, since the theme was similar (red flag, black figure, a dragon, a staple in Fire Emblem). And then, the revelation.

· That Fire Emblem flag is from Fire Emblem 1-3, as the Medeus flag army: Medeus was a big black dragon who ruled the Doluan Empire, and the flag pictures that. However, there isn't any trace of that flag in the games, so where's that flag from? Someone got some screencaps from the anime (pic 1 and pic 2), showing flags IDENTICAL in shape and design but not in colours, so it got the Sakurai touch. But why the anime? The anime was an interesting source of material of Marth for Sakurai: Marth's design, his voice actor and most moves are based on the anime, and now the flag.

· The stage is based on FE1-3 last chaptes (chapters 24 and 25 in the original one, 19 and 20 in the remake): In the chapter you have a large scalled battle in the forests and mountains surrounding Medeus' fortress, and in the second (and last chapter) the battle takes place inside the castle. In the Brawl stage, we have a similar landscape, and the stage itself also have a indoors area. Is one of the most climatic FE battles ever, is epic, works with the Brawl's theme, is a stage based on a franchise present in Smash (chapter 19 and chapter 20 pics from the Mystery of the Emblem or FE3 for short).

So at the end it's Akaneia without doubt, and it's one of the reasons I think Marth's return is so inminent. It could happen, though, that Akaneia may your average FE stage for all FE characters and not neccesarily for Marth, but I've never heard about a stage without its playable character. Everybody assumed Yoshi is in the game because its stage this way, so I don't think why Marth couldn't be confirmed "extraofficially" like Yoshi. The problem is that not many people have played FE1 or 3 in the first place.
That is a very thorough, logical argument. I just have a few things to add.

I had never heard of the Akaneia stage until now, but your logic about them completing the unfinished Melee stage is sound. I wouldn't be at all surprised if the map from the trailer evolved from this original map. However, while your detective work certainly points to the new FE map being from Fire emblem 1-3, its little premature to say that it is DEFINITLY from Marth's game. Even if the map was originally intended to be Akaneia, this may have been revised at some point if, hypothetically, they decided to replace Marth with Ike.

While the shape of the dragon symbol from the anime (thanks for digging that up by the way) is certainly more similar in shape to the FE stage's dragon, they aren't identical. If you compare the two, you'll notice that the Stage's dragon has a beak and different shaped torsoe and wings. Again, the fact that the flag has a black dragon is certainly consistent with the map being from Fire Emblem 1-3, but its not enough to rule out all doubt to the contrary.

As I know you are aware, castles and forrests are not a rarity in the series. There are several chapters in PoR that match this scene (I suspect that one of the later castle-related chapters ivolving the liberation of Crimeria is most likely) or an as yet unknown scene from GoD, or possibly another FE game. I doubt that it is a non-specific map in the same vein as Hyrule Temple, but I suppose its possible.

Si if it's not the same, why the returning characters have the same moves? It isn't totally diferent, but more like expanding the concept. There isn't any reason to fix what's not broken. They will retain most characters as possible but add many more.
I guess this is where we disagree. Certain characters, like Mario, are bound to be similar (although I already mentioned that his arial attacks have been enhanced) but characters like Fox seem to be extremlely different (although we haven't realy seem him attack yet...). Melee is undoubtibly the greatest game made to date, but if I bought Brawl and discovered that it was just Melee 2.0, I would be disappointed. I want Brawl to be as different as possible from Melee, while still having the same level of quality we've come to expect from Smash Bros. Those who are afraid of change can always keep playing with the same old characters and maps in Melee, if they prefer.


But that would be said about any character. Or do you think that the guys that play as Falcon or Peach in the tourneys have all played their games and have emotional affairs with them?
Uhhh... no, that's not what I think. Get your mind out of the gutter.

I'm just saying that you can't conclude that Marth's popularity automatically means that Marth is a beloved character, and therefore he should absolutely return. He's one of the most powerful characters in the game, so obviously he's going to be popular.

When selecting which characters deserve a spot in Smash Bros, they should be judged completly on their role in their game of origin. That means Sheik, the character from OoT, needs to be judged based on the Zelda games that he (She? It? Potatoe?) has appeared it, not how many people played as Sheik in Melee. Likewise Marth, the first lord in the Fire Emblem series, needs to be judged based on his importance to the Fire Emblem series. Is he still important enough to justify being one of a select few representatives for his series? Some say yes, some (like me) disagree.

That means that Ganondorf won't ever appear because he has a sword, even when he is the main enemy of the Zelda franchise?
When I was judging what Marth brings to the table, I was counting Ganondorf (along with Ike) a character that will almost certainly be included along with Link, Metakinght and Pit as swordfighters in Brawl.

As the main enemy of Nintendo's most respected franchise, Ganondorf deserves a spot in Brawl more than any FE character. He also has a greater potential for a unique moveset than Marth, as he could use an assortment of potent punches and kicks in addition to his sword from TP.


So I say they should pay homage to most titles as possible, not just the most recent ones. Just think about a Final Fantasy Smash Bros game; They would likely put Cloud, as the most popular one, then Squall, Zidane, Tidus and Vaan as the most recent representative, not just Vaan.
Sorry, I haven't played a Final Fantasy game yet (although I'm considering renting FFIII for the DS) so I'm not the best person to ask.

And Roy does have a fire based sword in The Sealed Sword (it even shot fireballs!), and Roy style was significantly different from Marth. However, Roy's game was like a giant homage to Marth's game, even Roy's being the same lord type as Marth: They made him a Marth clone with the fire effect.
My Bad. I was misinformed about Roy. I thought that the whole Fire Word thing was made up for Melee...

Any way, there are differences between Marth and Roy, but clones like Young Link, Luigi and Ganondorf are far more original.



But wait!

You seem to forget how far in development the team has gotten. The game has been in development for 1 year now. If Nintendo press is right, and the game is to be released this year, meaning they only have about 5-7 months left. For all we know, they probably have finished coding the final roster, and now just fixing a few bugs here and there, and putting the finishing touches. This alone may take a very long time.

As Wiseguy said, we don't know for sure how long does it take to code and create just one character, but I'm sure as hell it must take a very long time, a lot of patience, and is very stressing work.

What I'm saying is that if Marth is already cut out, and FE1 or FE3 comes out to US VC within this time, I though the people at SORA are gonna go "Oh snap! Marth is international now! He must be in Brawl! MUST. DELAY. GAME!". Also it's probably too late to add or delete characters by now (I wish people kept this in mind and stop doing all this "X character for Brawl things"; cool once, now annoying).

If that rumor about a magazine getting Brawl news is true, we should see something new this month. Otherwise we wait 2 more months.

Here's hoping Ike made it, and someone from GoD, since it seems we won't get it any time soon....... Just to get a small taste for what's to come. And I have the lightest feeling Marth didn't make it.....

Yeah, whatever decisions were made about Brawl's character roster, its too late to change them now. Like GenG said, once Sakurai's poll closed they must have decided which characters to include and which to cut. So, Marth's fate is sealed - one way or another.
 

Wiseguy

Smash Champion
Joined
Mar 28, 2007
Messages
2,245
Location
Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada (Proud
IMO Marth and Ike are guaranteed. The third slot will go to either Roy or Black Knight.

Yeah, having four FE characters in the game would rock. However, for the sake of argument Numa Dude, if only two characters get in who will they be?

Assuming you (like almost everyone) agree that Ike is all but guaranteed, who gets the second spot in your opinion? Marth or the Black Knight?
 

Chidosengan

Smash Lord
Joined
Jun 3, 2006
Messages
1,610
Location
New Jersey, USA
Yea but if Marth doesn't come back? How is that possible you ask? Just read most of GenG and Wiseguy's discussions in the previous 3 pages.
 

Dark Sonic

Smash Hero
Joined
Jun 10, 2006
Messages
6,021
Location
Orlando Florida
^^ The question was "who gets the second spot in your opinoin? Marth or the Black Knight?"

We already know that Marth may not come back (though we agree that's highly unlikely), but he was asking whether Marth or the Black Knight should get the spot.

I'm gonna go with Marth. The Black Knight could work, but it would be difficult to work out due to his bulky physique. Marth would take less work and he's already a popular character.
 
Top Bottom