#HBC | Joker
Space Marine
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2012
- Messages
- 3,864
- Location
- St. Clair Shores, Michigan
- NNID
- HBCJoker
- 3DS FC
- 1864-9780-3232
You also haven't given explanation for your strongest scumreads or townreads.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I might be wrong.OK, so I've mostly been keeping up with this game as it has progressed, but I'm honestly not feeling the BSP wagon, or the soup hate.
Badwolf's play has been disgusting, to the point where he has openly admitted to a willingness to sheep power players, while simultaneously refusing to vote his supposed scumread because "it will make me look bad". I also distinctly remember him calling soup out for using bad grammar and run-on sentences... and his callout was a run-on sentence, which was marvelous. Other than the for the lols, it was a huge waste of time. The more BW posts, the more I feel ok with him going.
Gonna spend some time rereading to see if I can wrap my head around the BSP wagon. I understand why people dislike him, but I disagree that he couldn't possibly be town, and do what he did.
Again, you have called BSP a scumread, you haven't explained why, and you've openly stated that you're intentionally avoiding the wagon for purposes of appearance.I don't mind seeing BSP or Soup going as of right now. I didn't want to jump on the BSP waggon becasue I'm almost positive that someone would call me out on it because I haven't commented on it. However, I do see him as being scummy.
Do you really want me to put my reasoning out on a silver platter? I can do that but I really don't want to...
Basically what I'm pretty sure what happened:
Soup starts to go down, he sees this and tells others to not say anything, BSP ignores and tries to defend. RF sees that BSP is doing that (a little bit of a thin part here but whatever) and goes for him instead.
Why should we be? Why are you ignoring all the content in the game and just saying "lynch radfic, also whos scum everyone?"aight guys why aren't we voting Radfic>?
yes?
no?
thankyou
and goodnight
It's not a ****ing case. It's what I think happened. You really do need to read better. Stop looking at what's on top and read into it for God's sake.That.... is the worst case I have ever seen in my life. Nothing you just said there proves that anybody is scum. It is ridiculous connection case that maybe establishes a connection between BSP and Soup (it's an unbelievably weak connection, at that). You still haven't established that either BSP or Soup could be scum, all you've said is that you think they are a team.
You're the one who needs to read better. The fact that you think something happened, based on no evidence whatsoever, is a problem. It looks like you're trying to spin things that are decidedly null, into things that are scummy just so you can have an excuse to vote for someone. Do you see the problem I'm having?It's not a ****ing case. It's what I think happened. You really do need to read better. Stop looking at what's on top and read into it for God's sake.
OKI honestly feel like BW saying things like "stop looking at what's on top and read into it for God's sake" is just him straight up parroting what swiss said earlier, and he doesn't understand what it means, or why it doesn't apply here.
He's flailing ridiculously hard. Done talking to him.
That's TERRIBLE reason to lynch somebody though, especially since we've got so much damning stuff against BSP ... scared of bussing your mate?Except that everything you jusy said is false. You specifically called BSP a scumread, and said that the reason you weren't voting him was because you didn't want to get accused of sheeping. Not only is that my own reasoning for not liking you (it is not hanging on soup's coattails), but is isn't something you proved, or could ever prove wrong.
That's very true and I appreciate it. If there's anything you're interested in, hesitate not to go ahead and talk to me.I'm being nice to you. This hasnt happened since Discworld.
I'm sorry that I don't understand how to read into a ****ing sentence. You are the bane of my existence right after soup.I honestly feel like BW saying things like "stop looking at what's on top and read into it for God's sake" is just him straight up parroting what swiss said earlier, and he doesn't understand what it means, or why it doesn't apply here.
See, I don't understand your frustration here at all. All I've asked you to do is explain why soup and BSP are your scumreads, but you have consistently failed to do so. Having scum reads that you want to see lynched, but not knowing why, is a pretty big scumtell.I'm sorry that I don't understand how to read into a ****ing sentence. You are the bane of my existence right after soup.
The very idea that you suggest that I don't understand what I am suggesting for you to do. Instead of just saying that I'm wrong, actually try to use your brain. The only thing that I want you to do is actually use your powers of deduction instead of just throwing out accusations that I literally cannot argue against.
Look at this post. I've quoted, all those for the argument that I've made against them.There are the posts.
Sorry I refuse to hurt myself physically to try and make you understand.That's why it's ok for you to die.
Whatever.Oh I understand perfectly that you have no legitimate explanation for your reads.
there's also a difference between straight inactivity with no content and stuff like kevmo does, where he does put content into the little that he does post.
scummy over inactive, but pressuring inactives into activity works and will lynch if necessary.
dunmo how my other head feels though
I'm noy saying inactivity isn't something that can be scummy, I'm saying that you can't just say "Person X ain't posting, must be scum!"[orbo in celeb was a decent example iirc] You need to look into what they have posted, look at why they might be inactive, and judge from there.
I'll be keeping a close
eye on all of you.
I won't hesitate to lynch inactives this game as they have become the bane of SWFTown, and neither should you. Everyone should tell me their policy towards them and how to handle the situation, I don't want people scrambling for an inactive lynch 2 days to a deadline however, so keep your opinion current and objective. There's a difference between lynching and inactive because we have nothing to go on, and lynching someone who is willingly not participating. My statement made a couple of hours ago was serious and I expect players who fall under the same suit (Badwolf, Krys, Kevin, etc.) to give their full commitment. I'm not going to turn this game into another Mass Effect where I'm posting seven hundred times a day but I want to make myself completely clear here.
Why are you the only one who can see this?wrt to BSP saying "I understand your confidence in the soup read"
I honest to god interpretted that as "I understand that you are displaying immense confidence in your soup read. Would you be willing to lynch him, or are you blowing smoke for purposes of reading reactions?"
That's just how BSP operates, I'm really not seeing the big deal.
You are cherry picking our post. Granted you are right about RF, our other points in the post still stand.#160: They claim I said I like RadFic more than Soup. False; also, doesn’t take into account that I began questioning RF in my first post. I didn’t comment on anything important? RF’s push was pretty notable, and I commented on it.
Let's not jump to conclusions too fast. While I don't fancy inactivity either, we need to give everyone a good look before we just lynch off of inactivity.
Herein lies the difference between you, WATT, and Soup. Soup defined a clear stance he had on inactives and how he was going to approach them this game as well as opening discussion for others. WATT answered his question as well. You, on the other hand, did not acknowledge his question and went straight to his RVS vote on Joey and started playing armchair critic. Your fishing for TownCred comes from telling people how not to play (don't jump to conclusions on inactive Joey, we need to look at everyone first!) instead of scumhunting. Soup doesn't need to be told to jump to a conclusion on Joey when:I felt the need to say this because jumping to conclusions is bad. Obviously, it's expected that Town will have a few mislynches as a buffer, but I don't think it's wise to just assume that inactive = scum; it very well could be, but we need to give the slot proper evaluation first.
I believe Ryker has gotten a rule associated with never trusting him. I suggest you make some effort into looking at his intentions before just sheeping him.
Referring back to my previous point. Telling Vinyl to not sheep Ryker is completely irrelevant at this point!Why did I say this? I think mindless sheeping is bad, and that's what Vinyl (from my experience) is inclined to do. I'd rather he not. Why did I mention the never trust Ryker thing? If he's that good to where he has a rule about him, he'd be the last person I'd sheep.
wow IR your case looks boring and bloatedpeace and ika: