- Joined
- Jan 14, 2002
- Messages
- 28,982
So, today, my friends and I went to a casino for dinner and some gambling. While at dinner we briefly discussed tips, but after dinner we had a more practical application: I asked a waitress for a drink, which are free to all people playing games, she jokingly said "You have a dollar?" which I assumed meant "Are you playing a game?" and I was sitting there and pointed to the machine. She comes back with our drinks and waits. I explain I literally have no cash whatsoever outside of twenties and the way the machine works is it pays paper slips that you redeem at these cash machines. She leaves in a huff and shakes her head as she walks away. This lead to my friend and I discussing what was she getting tipped for? Her entire job is based on getting people drinks that the casino gives them for free. In most cases, the people she's serving have their money wrapped up in the machine, in coupons, or in large bills.
I have a friend who waited tables for 6 years. He followed the same principle in receiving tips as I do when giving tips: if someone performs exceptionally well, I tip well (rarely will service be bad, so I regularly leave 20+%; I usually just take the tens-digit, double that, and that's 20%). If someone performs subpar or badly, I'll tip little to nothing. When he worked there, he saw employees expecting no less than 15%. This meant, to them, that if they received nothing it was the customers fault. My problem with this is if they are performing the bare minimum of their job, which is bringing me food, drinks, and refills, they are doing exactly what their job description entails and not worth an incentive.
My perspective comes from this: in the jobs I hold, I am expected to perform at a quality to high quality level. If I decide at work to skimp because I am not receiving extra incentive, my punishment will be suspension or firing. If I perform at an exceptionally high level, I will receive no incentive or an incentive sparingly.
So, PG, what mindset is correct?
I have a friend who waited tables for 6 years. He followed the same principle in receiving tips as I do when giving tips: if someone performs exceptionally well, I tip well (rarely will service be bad, so I regularly leave 20+%; I usually just take the tens-digit, double that, and that's 20%). If someone performs subpar or badly, I'll tip little to nothing. When he worked there, he saw employees expecting no less than 15%. This meant, to them, that if they received nothing it was the customers fault. My problem with this is if they are performing the bare minimum of their job, which is bringing me food, drinks, and refills, they are doing exactly what their job description entails and not worth an incentive.
My perspective comes from this: in the jobs I hold, I am expected to perform at a quality to high quality level. If I decide at work to skimp because I am not receiving extra incentive, my punishment will be suspension or firing. If I perform at an exceptionally high level, I will receive no incentive or an incentive sparingly.
So, PG, what mindset is correct?