Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Yes, no, noSK do you think Yoshi has a better matchup than Mario against the following characters:
Pika
Kirby
Falcon
?
I can maybe see that against Pika Yoshi is better than Mario (not saying I agree, but I can understand that opinion). But I think that against both Falcon and Kirby Mario is significantly better than Yoshi. Do you think that Yoshi is equal to Mario in those last two matchups, or that Mario is better?Yes, no, no
I'll make a post tonight when I get home at never o'clock explaining my uneducated opinion (I suck with both chars) of why I think yoshi > mario.why shouldn't mario be above yoshi? Again oli is just asking nicely, pondering on peoples opinions.
I think Yoshi is about the same vs Kirby (or slightly worse, not sure) and worse against Falcon.I can maybe see that against Pika Yoshi is better than Mario (not saying I agree, but I can understand that opinion). But I think that against both Falcon and Kirby Mario is significantly better than Yoshi. Do you think that Yoshi is equal to Mario in those last two matchups, or that Mario is better?
If you agree that Mario is better in those matchups then I think you have to say Mario should be above Yoshi on the tier list.
I dont like aa's awarness of things >=(@oli i bet that you asked a random stranger to type that for you
why would anything ever not be just dreamlanddidn't seem like you were talking about dreamland specifically, that's why I brought up fox. If its just dreamland, then yea fox doesn't matter so much. mario/yoshi are real close on DL in my tier list anyway, but I give the edge to yoshi personally. Too late for a post about why (just got home), but I will say this:
Star King is a dirk (not in the good way) for backing down on this, yoshi > mario all day every day
Star King is a dirk (not in the good way) for backing down on this, yoshi > mario all day every day
so good. i literally laughed out loud.Pokemon Stage.
Z Tier
Link
Ness
cheap tier list is definitely kirby > pikachu > falcon > foxI hate Fox with a passion. At times I feel he's cheaper than Kirby.
It takes more skill than utilt, but a ton of peeps online can shdl. I wouldn't say it's a highly exclusive skill. Lasers are too good. The way they can steal your second jump or just stun you just as you're making your approach is maddening, ESPECIALLY when you know it's not planned and it bails someone out at the last second.I don't know, Fox seems gay and stuff, but in fact what he does requires skills. Even a Fox spamming laser must be skilled to low laser and stuff. While only uptilting doesn't require much skill.
who cares how much tech skill something takesI don't know, Fox seems gay and stuff, but in fact what he does requires skills. Even a Fox spamming laser must be skilled to low laser and stuff. While only uptilting doesn't require much skill.
well i don't know about you but I've considered 'cheap' to be something that is more effective than the skill it takes to perform. For example, since it is pretty easy to spam utilt with kirby, and is ridiculously effective, it is cheaper than foxes shdl or shsl since timing the lasers to ground height is much harder and less effective imo. Just explaining why he mentioned tech skill when talking about cheapness. If you're using a different definition of cheapness, then lets pre-emptively agree that we will not proceed to debate a definition for 4 pages like people did with 'scrub.'who cares how much tech skill something takes
kirby's utilt would not be any less cheap if it required a more technically difficult input. if any decent player would be able to do it with some practice (like fox SHDL) then it would still be just as cheapwell i don't know about you but I've considered 'cheap' to be something that is more effective than the skill it takes to perform. For example, since it is pretty easy to spam utilt with kirby, and is ridiculously effective, it is cheaper than foxes shdl or shsl since timing the lasers to ground height is much harder and less effective imo. Just explaining why he mentioned tech skill when talking about cheapness. If you're using a different definition of cheapness, then lets pre-emptively agree that we will not proceed to debate a definition for 4 pages like people did with 'scrub.'
i have to disagree, if a guy takes five minutes practising a move to maximize its effectiveness then that is the definition of cheap (a very small amount of time spent) whereas if a guy spends five hours practising he has spent a lot more time to get the same effectiveness out of his move. the moves might be as effective as the other at the end of the day but one came a lot 'cheaper'if something is "cheap" I don't care whether the guy had to practice for 5 minutes or 5 hours to be able to do it. that's all i'm saying. i think "something easy and good" is an ok definition, i just don't think something taking a tiny bit of tech skill makes it fall out of the "easy" category.