TheCreator
Smash Lord
Holy **** if Nintendo bought Sega...I could see it now. A sonic game by the EAD team. That's it. Take my money. I'm donating.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Those are some great franchises to have publishing rights to (except Bayonetta 2, which Nintendo is the publisher because SEGA gave it up cuz they didn't want to fund it).Just to clarify, Sega doesn't actually own any of Platinum, they just entered a publishing agreement with them for a few (I think it was three) IPs. *checks* It was four, Bayonetta, MadWorld (and Anarchy Reigns), Vanquish, and Infinite Space.
Nintendo could buy the rights to those IP's back. MadWorld and Infinity Space from my knowledge and IMO would be great for Nintendo to own to diversify their franchise portfolio.Platinum is privately owned, so if they were bought by Nintendo, Sega really wouldn't have much to do with it. It's also quite possible they'd retain the IPs Platinum made.
It'd be a great mix up for them, and it would diversify their games. As it stands, Nintendo is lacking in high profile 3D shooters and sandbox games.Kind of wish that Nintendo got Saints Row because of how WTF that would be.
We all can. And if they do, Knuckles and Tails would be in Smash-ESPECIALLY KNUCKLES!!! Still, I wouldn't want them to get ride of the Total War franchise (because it is PC-exclusive).EDIT: Also, i can see Nintendo buying SEGA at some point.
That would mean the appearance of numerous Sonic characters which I think you opposed.it would be smart for Nintendo to buy out Sega completely. problem is right now Sega is kind of on an upswing. they've acquired some good ips and the newest games each sold pretty well so i dont see Sega selling at the moment. but in a couple years who knows.
im opposed to it only because they are third party.That would mean the appearance of numerous Sonic characters which I think you opposed.
Nintendo should buy IP that nobody no longer uses. Geno, Mallo, Bomberman come to mind. Banjo-Kazooie would be another Nintendo should look into (Banjo series would go well in joint games with DK as well).
You are in luck then because I consider the chances of both being in the game greater than not being in the game. It would be an upset if neither are in the game. I also think there is a high possibility that they plus the two returning third parties maybe the only 4 third parties to make it.If we get a third party. Pacman.
If we get two. Megaman.
Megaman an Pacman are seriously some of the only characters I'm hoping for, most of the Nintendo characters I want I don't hope for, because they're waaaay more likely and will probably make it in.
Megaman is heavily requested by most everyone.Whoever sees Megaman more likely than Pacman is kidding themselves.
Is is smart to include a character by their image alone, not caring what they actually add to the game?That is true. But Pacman is such an iconic character. It's only smart that they include him.
But Tales and Tekken have the popularity.Pac-Man has a big-name which is why he will likely be chosen, that and I have a hunch Sakurai would like to have him being that Sakurai loves the video game characters that he grew up with.
Id definitely be happy with those, all are iconic to gaming and especially to their respective companies, and all have enough potential to bring good things to the series.Still stick with my 4:
Snake
Sonic
Megaman
Pac-Man
You know, this kinda remind's me of this: http://gonintendo.com/?p=37327 When somebody decided to ask Sakurai and Hino that Layton should be in smash bros. And then of course this http://gonintendo.com/?p=103521A less likely, but real possibility, is Professor Layton. While not a popular choice, he is an important character with a relatively big franchise. What also helps is that the president of Level-5 wants to see Layton in and he has connections with Sakurai as well. One of my dark horse choice and could work as a "WTF?" reveal alas to Snake. I am not expecting four third-parties, but if we do get four, Sonic, Snake, Mega Man and Layton seems to be the most likely combination.
If third-parties return, I think we will see three; Sonic, Snake and Mega Man.
Given Sakurai's positive comments towards Sonic and Snake's inclusion, they could very well be returning for an encore this game (especially Sonic), not to mention that Sega and Konami are obviously going to want them to return (and will likely push for their return). The only way they don't get in is if Sakurai feels guests should only be in one Smash game, which we can't say for sure.
Mega Man is by far the most wanted third-party character for Smash 4. He almost always ranks among the Top 5 and is not uncommon for him to even be the most wanted character (Shortie's poll currently has him in 1st). So not only is he the most wanted third-party character, he's also among the most wanted characters period (among the likes of Ridley, King K. Rool and Mewtwo). Capcom has also expressed interest in having Mega Man in Smash 4 and Sakurai is obviously aware of his massive popularity (heck, he even noticed Mega Man's popularity in the West pre-Melee, before third-parties were taken seriously). There's also the fact that he's an iconic character to video game history and has a large history with Nintendo. Mega Man is one of the very few third-parties I could see Sakurai seriously considering adding in. Now if only Capcom would stop sitting on their butts and ask Sakurai to add Mega Man in (if they haven't already).
A less likely, but real possibility, is Professor Layton. While not a popular choice, he is an important character with a relatively big franchise. What also helps is that the president of Level-5 wants to see Layton in and he has connections with Sakurai as well. One of my dark horse choice and could work as a "WTF?" reveal alas to Snake. I am not expecting four third-parties, but if we do get four, Sonic, Snake, Mega Man and Layton seems to be the most likely combination.
Its a shame that Bomberman and Slime are almost certainly never getting in. Both would make great additions with large history to Nintendo. Bomberman is a great fit for Smash due to his games being multi-player orientated and being in Smash with other characters would be great to see. Slime is the mascot of Dragon Quest, which says a lot. Even if Sakurai is highly unlikely to look past his limbless state, Slime possess a variety of moves and could overcome any limitations with enough effort. Had Bomberman not been sent to his grave last generation and had Sakurai not had the issue of adding Mr. Saturn due to being armless, both would be real contenders of getting into this game.
Had a big write up on Namco characters. Needless to say, I highly doubt we're getting any (and I hope we don't). May post it in a few days.
Wouldn't be surprised if Hino acted in a similar way to Kojima did in Melee; push for Layton's inclusion and push hard. But maybe in this case Hino asked early enough and if Sakurai deems Layton worthy of a spot, add him.You know, this kinda remind's me of this: http://gonintendo.com/?p=37327 When somebody decided to ask Sakurai and Hino that Layton should be in smash bros. And then of course this http://gonintendo.com/?p=103521
These news came during 2008 and 2009 according to GoNintendo, which I believe was still the time during the original trilogy for Japan and then when the prequels came along, Layton showed off that he was a competent battler all the more as well as all those gadget's he's made over the years that can all be pretty useful special moves in smash. Kinda make's you think as if Hino has thought about the idea of Layton in smash and discussed this with Sakurai during that talk show and is sort of trying to convince him that Layton can hold his own perfectly well in smash, especially since people apparently laughed during that suggestion.
I know I'm looking too much into this but still some food for thought.
Hearing that Namco Bandai was hired to help with gameplay is an interesting thing and I look forward to how they refine the game play. There's so much they could do to help make this the best Smash game yet and is a pretty good indication that this is going to be a really big game. Yet when I come across Namco discussion, its almost always discussions over which Namco reps should be in/X Namco rep being this likely. Frankly, I don't see what makes a Namco rep so likely and as such, see a Namco rep as, by far, the most overrated potential addition. Sure its possible, but not much more likely than other third-party reps.volbound1700 said:I am interested in hearing your Namco write-up as I feel a Namco character is very likely.
Yeah in the end, It's all up to Hino and Sakurai. If he really wants Layton in smash and tried to convince Sakurai like Kojima did, he should have approached him by now and showed him all the game's they've made and the thing's Layton has done over the past 6 years. I suppose then if Layton doesn't show up in the first trailers he may as well be deconfirmed right? I hope not... :/Wouldn't be surprised if Hino acted in a similar way to Kojima did in Melee; push for Layton's inclusion and push hard. But maybe in this case Hino asked early enough and if Sakurai deems Layton worthy of a spot, add him.
I'd imagine that if Hino does end up pushing for Layton's inclusion that he'll already have something on his mind for a move set and will attempt to convince Sakurai that Layton can fit in with the rest of the crowd. Sakurai has four criteria and Layton is able to fulfill them all if Sakurai can see the potential in Layton. The hard part is getting Sakurai to see what Layton can do (Slime faces a similar obstacle. The difference is that I don't see Square Enix being interested enough to convince Sakurai that Slime should be in whereas I can see Hino doing such things).