Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Thinking about this makes me wonder, isn't smash 4 treated pegi12 in Europe? Isn't that equivalent to teen?(Corect me if I'm wrong.)Hate to be the bringer of some potentially melancholy news, but...
Someone who works in the industry had the opportunity to attend E3 last week and asked a Nintendo Treehouse representative regarding Snake's absence in Smash 4:
https://twitter.com/TheRileyLittle/status/614146111268388865
https://twitter.com/TheRileyLittle/status/614146503754534914
https://twitter.com/TheRileyLittle/status/614146804326748160
Not all is lost, though!
https://twitter.com/TheRileyLittle/status/614148886941302784
If this isn't the case, then maybe the representative is under NDA and could be using this scenario as a smokescreen. What caught me off guard was how the rep said Snake would "never again be included in Smash", but since DLC isn't rated by the ESRB and such, that comment seems to be stretched out a bit.
I was thinking the exact same thing the entire day. In addition to having animated blood, Shadow the Hedgehog encompassed a grim tone that felt as though it was pushing the E10 rating.Considering how a "developer" said that Snake was never even considered for Smash, I find that hard to believe. Also, if Snake's weapons would effect the rating, then how did ShadOW The HEDGEhog get an E10 rating with all of those guns and weapons? Smash doesn't even have bullets, and ShadOW The HEDGEhog has full on miniguns and other automatic weapons. If that game could get away with an E10 rating, then Snake's Rocket Launchers shouldn't be that hard to pass.
Dunno where people get this idea.DLC has no bearing on the ESRB rating though right?
oh wow, this is interesting information. I'm not 100% sure I trust the poster, but if it is true this is definitely something we need to take into considerationHate to be the bringer of some potentially melancholy news, but...
Someone who works in the industry had the opportunity to attend E3 last week and asked a Nintendo Treehouse representative regarding Snake's absence in Smash 4:
https://twitter.com/TheRileyLittle/status/614146111268388865
https://twitter.com/TheRileyLittle/status/614146503754534914
https://twitter.com/TheRileyLittle/status/614146804326748160
Not all is lost, though!
https://twitter.com/TheRileyLittle/status/614148886941302784
If this isn't the case, then maybe the representative is under NDA and could be using this scenario as a smokescreen. What caught me off guard was how the rep said Snake would "never again be included in Smash", but since DLC isn't rated by the ESRB and such, that comment seems to be stretched out a bit.
Actually, all Snake does is simply put gently them on the floor. He never does anything that resembles a kill.It's the down throw of course. Killing them softly.
The update technically puts the DLC characters in the game. You have to purchase them to unlock them. So, yes, all characters will appear in online play even if you don't have them purchased.Do characters you haven't purchased appear in online battles? I imagine this would a problem when it comes to DLC characters. Still, they could further soften it up if they really felt it was necessary. I'm definitely going to be pissed if it turns out he can't make it back in over a minor rating difference in one part of the world (the rating here remains 12+ as it did with Brawl).
Didn't see that, thanks for clearing that up. Like I said before though, Snake really doesn't have anything violent in his moveset that would make the game rated T. I mean in a game where you have bombs, missiles, and the ability to set people on fire, having Snake shouldn't be all that problematic. If you want to be on the safe side, just change his choke hold to something less violent.Dunno where people get this idea.
http://www.esrb.org/ratings/ratings_process.jsp
Downloadable Content
Downloadable content (DLC) that will be appended to a previously-rated product need only be submitted to ESRB for rating if its content exceeds that which is in the existing "core" product. Otherwise, the rating assigned to the core product is applicable to the DLC as well. Where, however, DLC content exceeds the rating assigned to the core product, it must be submitted to ESRB and a different rating may be assigned to the DLC.
It still has to follow the same general guidelines or it gets rerated.
It's actually the cardboard box. Snake throwing the box away for his taunt represents deforestation and needless waste. Nintendo didn't want to be associated with global warming, so that's why he wasn't in the core roster of Sm4sh.It's the down throw of course. Killing them softly.
There was the E10 rank during Brawl era?Melee would probably have been E10 if that was an option.
But there was any complain for " a realistic soldier who uses real grenedes in my son's game" in Brawl? If there wasn't then it shouldn't be a problem.What if Snake finally gets in, against all odds, but huge clamors from moral guardians (Moms, ect.) about some military guy being in their children's game force Sakurai to not release him?
Irrational stuff of nightmares, guys. Also, I know it's completely stupid, but Snake being a more realistic portrayal of an actual fighter (Grenades, rocket launchers ect) does make a bigger stink than Samus having missiles or Bowser Jr blowing people up with his mechakoopas. For some people, a military man chucking grenades is pretty real. Realer than a power suit'd futuristic bounty hunter slinging around bombs and missiles. It's sad how it works, but that is a definite factor.
Won't stop him, though.
Who knows how the ESRB will take it, though.But there was any complain for " a realistic soldier who uses real grenedes in my son's game" in Brawl? If there wasn't then it shouldn't be a problem.
Snake was in dream tv fighters, so lets look at its rating.Who knows how the ESRB will take it, though.
In an age where we always hear about violence in the news and stuff, I don't see how it's a big deal. Especially considering the fact that these parents have no problem buying their kids CoD and other rated M FPS's so Snake in the game shouldn't even be a big problem. I'd argue Samus is just as "violent" as Snake given that she's a bounty hunter for crying out loud. I know i'm sorta overreacting here but there's no way I want Snake's chances of getting back in to the game screwed over by soccer moms.What if Snake finally gets in, against all odds, but huge clamors from moral guardians (Moms, ect.) about some military guy being in their children's game force Sakurai to not release him?
Irrational stuff of nightmares, guys. Also, I know it's completely stupid, but Snake being a more realistic portrayal of an actual fighter (Grenades, rocket launchers ect) does make a bigger stink than Samus having missiles or Bowser Jr blowing people up with his mechakoopas. For some people, a military man chucking grenades is pretty real. Realer than a power suit'd futuristic bounty hunter slinging around bombs and missiles. It's sad how it works, but that is a definite factor.
Won't stop him, though.
Snake is obviously my No. 1 pick out of the group though Wolf and IC's are my No. 2 and No. 3 picks respectively. It would be great if all 3 could get in game though the IC's chances are looking a bit grim unless theirs a miracle and Sakurai says he found a solution to their 3DS problem.http://www.strawpoll.me/4742676/
Found this...
Interviewer: It reminds me of the reaction when Snake was from “Metal Gear” was announced.
He was acknowledged!Sakurai: We’ll never top the shock of that reveal. But it all depends on the presentation. People were extremely excited when Megaman was revealed.
Cartoon violence and crude humor (probably referred to Wario's farts) plus online features.Could someone check the ERSB rating for brawl for a reason it was given a T rating?
"Mei Ling, Samus just took her clothes off!"Cartoon violence and crude humor (probably referred to Wario's farts) plus online features.
I really don't see problems regarding Snake...
Codecs are probably not coming back, sadly."Mei Ling, Samus just took her clothes off!"
I just found the problem. Hopefully they'll change that...
Yeah that is pretty weird.I just realized something; If the reason why Snake isn't in Smash 4 is because of the presence of realistic looking weapons, Smash 4 already has the presence of realistic looking weapons without Snake! For example:
The ESRB does rate trophies. The Tharja trophy was removed due to the E10 rating, and Sharla's rifle is clearly ok.
As long as weapons don't shoot bullets, I think they would be fine for Smash. With this logic, Snake's explosives are probably ok. Idk if this is a bad example, but I thought I'd bring it up anyway.
Yeah. We can't trust them just because they work at NoA. Smash informations have always been top-secret, and even inside the Treehouse just the member in charge of Smash could have seen it. They even had to close the doors and the windows when trying Pac-Man! Besides, do you remember that Treehouse member who said to a GameXPlain guy that there would have been Kraid and a Giant Kremlin as Smash Run bosses? There isn't trace of them (thanks to Swapsaur for remebering it)Yeah that is pretty weird.
I personally think that treehouse guy may have been just speculating.
Honestly, this would pretty much the ideal for me. Aside from Bayonetta (who doesn't seem all that likely), these two would be the only third party characters that I'd really want, so getting them both at once (especially when there's so much uncertainty over how many DLC characters we're getting, and for all we know, we could only be getting two more characters to coincide with those two placeholder "Mario"s) would be absolutely amazing.As a Rayman and Snake supporter, I hope these two will be confirmed as DLC in a Nintendo Direct on September 1st.
Why?
Not only does MGS V release that day, but Rayman is also celebrating his 20th birthday.
As unlikely as it is, I hope that's how they're unveiled.
Actually, Smash 4 had three third party newcomers.I doubt were getting more than one third party character TBH. I would much rather have Snake in over Rayman. If anything, Rayman can be the face of third party newcomers in Smash 5 just like how Sonic was for Brawl and Megaman was for Sm4sH.
It would also make sense given that every Smash Bros game gets 2 third party newcomers.
Brawl: Sonic and Snake
Sm4sH: Megaman and Pac - Man
Smash 5: Rayman and Bomberman
That way, we could insure that Snake gets in future Smash Bros games while having characters like Rayman and Bomberman in the future.
I guess he just meant the base game and didn't include the DLC characters.Actually, Smash 4 had three third party newcomers.
Ryu, Mega Man, and Pac-Man.