Sorry if I didn't read OP thoroughly enough to understand this on my own. But I have a question about this process.
Question: Eventhubs.com has a tier list where everyone can vote upwards or downwards any character any time.
http://www.eventhubs.com/tiers/ssb4/ The tier list is clearly horrible. Now, other than smashboards having more "reputable or knowledgeable voters", what is stopping the smashboards tier list from being the same popularity contest full of people with holes in knowledge casting votes?
I mean no disrespect to this thread, the tier list is looking very good actually, I just am wondering.
Theew are two key differences I am trying to achieve with my list. The first is that people only vote on a very few specific characters at any given time. Members of smashboards dont have a great grasp on where every character on the list, it is almost impossible for anyone really to know. Who has played against enough bowser Jr, DK, mario, shulk and jigglypuff tournament level mains, in order to know where they rank compared to each other? This way people are basically encouraged to only vote on the ones they feel strongest about and naturally, that will involve the characters they play, or play against. I sure have never voted on sheik because I dont use her and people here dont use her. But I have a fairly good grasp on how wario for example, plays in this game which is kind of a rare character, so ill vote on him.
The second and bigger difference, is that my method eliminates skew to a large extent by limiting movement through iterations. In the event hubs list, it simply aggregates every vote. Say for example if a character get 20+ votes and 14 down votes, it gets a +6 point boost to its rating (which is then obviously normalised). In my version, I dont care if a character gets 200+ votes and 14 down votes, it is only going up an absolute maximum of 2 spots on the list. It takes a consensus in order to move a character where a character needs a certain amount of votes to even move, and then they need sufficiently high enough ratio of + to - votes to move.
What this simply results in, is characters moving slowly where they cant jump far from popular opinion. Say for example Jigglypuff, she was creeping up the normally voted tier list for weeks, making it into the top 20. As she got closer to there people started to realise and send her back down. If I didnt put these limits on how far a character can move, she might have made it into the top 10 before anyone saw it happen. on eventhubs, she would have gone up that high because there is no limit to how far a character can move.
Its not perfect, but it does stop characters bouncing back and forth and making huge jumps.
Also,
UPDATED
It was close to begin with with Lucina looking to move up to the next tier but Dark Pit eventually ran away with it, it wasnt really close in the end.
Now voting on these characters