ChikoLad
Purple Boi
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2014
- Messages
- 23,084
Actually, I was more meaning to say that they should have left the Stockholm Syndrome point out of their post, because people see that, and will be distracted from the rest of their point because they don't get what the Stockholm Syndrome remark was supposed to mean.Exactly this. It's literally just being insulting to everyone because you think they can't understand your argument, instead of simply the fact they might just disagree with it.
It isn't the best comparison and I don't agree with it either, but I do know what they meant with the Stockholm Syndrome remark.
I'm not trying to take a side here, the argument was a poor one but at the same time, people in this thread do tend to look at one specific word in a person's statement and focus squarely on that and never let up.
Yes, but people can still find the comparison ridiculous on the basis of inferring that Lucario was forced, especially when you said "people who have Stockholm Syndrome would deny having it". That was you literally saying "if you disagree with me that Lucario was forced, you have Stockholm Syndrome and you fell for Game Freak forcing him on you". Which was silly. I'm honestly pretty indifferent on Lucario and I don't play Pokémon other than the odd time they put out an interesting spin-off, yet I will still heavily disagree with the idea that Lucario is forced, and that it is at all comparable to Stockholm Syndrome.Yeah, seriously. I'm not saying the developers held a gun to their heads and said "enjoy Lucario".