So with the whole Fire Emblem skinship removal thing I'm definitively on the side of ''they shouldn't have removed this" because if nothing else it's the continuation towards a very slippery slope that Nintendo's localization team has been heading down that worries me.
At first it was innocuous aesthetic things or cultural changes that were made in transferring games over to the west, like the Lin costumes or the Fatal Frame ones. Nothing that affected gameplay, and there was replacement content in place of both sets of the removed content.
And then there was the breast slider being removed. An aesthetic feature entirely removed from the game with no replacement. Again, it didn't affect gameplay, but there was nothing offered in lieu of it. So while miniscule, we were given a negligibly oh-so-barely less content version of XCX than Japan was.
Now we come to Fates, where we have a system that ACTUALLY AFFECTS GAMEPLAY being removed with no alternative being offered in it's stead. This isn't some risque costumes being made more appropriate for western audiences, this is an entire portion of the game being denied to western gamers simply based on at best our location, or at worst, for fear of backlash from people who for the most part won't even bother buying the game in the first place.
And if this is to continue escalating as it has been, god knows where it'd stop. What happens if it's revealed Star Fox Zero has a bonus level where you play as Krystal in her SF: Adventures attire that then gets removed from the western version of the game for similar concerns of being too risque? What happens if NOA decides Bayonetta is too sexy for Western audiences and her DLC for Smash Bros. is cancelled because it's considered "too much" for the west? And to go even further, what happens when Bayonetta 3 is announced for NX or whatever, and it's never even brought stateside because of the slippery slope that the localization team has been sliding down?
Now I realize that these are huge leaps and aren't going to happen, but the point of the whole thing is that it's a slow burn. Slowly more and more content gets removed from games and with every success in removing something makes the localization team bolder and more and more likely to remove more and more content from games in the future. It won't happen anytime soon, but it'll be so gradual that people won't notice it happening until it's already too late.
And I don't know about you, but I'd rather have a localization team that acts more like a mail carrier, delivering me exactly what I ordered, warts and all, rather than a butcher that slices and chops it up to serve me what's the "proper" bits. And encouraging the kind of localization that entirely removes GAMEPLAY ELEMENTS of a game is sure as hell leaning more towards butcher than mail carrier.
So no, whilst I could care less about Fire Emblem Amie and think it's out of place in a Fire Emblem game, removing it entirely was a terrible move and one I cannot disagree more with. Because even though it's not something I would have wanted in the game, I can't support it being removed in the slightest.
Because even though it's something I don't like or care about, I'm against removal altogether of any content from region to region. Because I know that if I were on the other end and something I did like in a game was in danger of getting removed, I'd want other people to help prevent it from getting removed. And if I ignored this and let it go just because it wasn't something I specifically cared for, I'd sure as hell not get anyone helping me keep the content I wanted in return.
As the (edited) old saying goes:
"First they came for the alternate costumes
and I did not speak out
because I did not care for alternate costumes.
Then they came for the boob sliders
and I did not speak out
because I did not care for the boob sliders.
Then they came for the petting gameplay
and I did not speak out
because I did not care about the petting gameplay.
Then they came for me
and there was no one left
to speak out for me."