Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
It'd be hilarious if she won, and if Ken doesn't have a shot at winning I will root for either her or Susie (just for the lulz
)... But to be honest I don't think she will due to jury votes. I think even Susie would beat her with this jury.
This is true, he's been saying in interviews before this episode and before the TC where he was voted that he realized that Ken/Crystal where in control and that they had to go...
I think the difference is that the others always claim to have a nice, honest game while they are actually playing a dirty game, just like Ken is (doesn't fully apply to this case)
Not really, Marcus said he has no hard feelings, I doubt Crystal told Charlie that Ken was behind him going away.
Nah, I think that the Onion alliance would vote for Kenny over Matty if they made it. Corrine favors Bob and Kenny over the rest, and her alliance determines the winner, basically. Bob is the only one whom the Onions would choose over Kenny, Bob being their ally for longer.
Randy even said he thought Kenny really grew up. And the final decision isn't always made by "good and evil." Sometimes it comes down to who played the game better. And Kenny has played well so far.
Inside the game, definitely. I'm just bitter at how the Kota people were treating Crystal at Ponderosa. When the game is over for you, holding a grudge over your loss in a GAME is outright stupid.
I agree with you there
hmm, I guess you're right. Matty and Ken seem like the only people Randy would vote for.
It's also immature and scrubbish. I swear to god, they're the kind of people who would cry about something like chaingrabbing being cheap and unfair and wouldn't admit defeat because of it. I hate people like that.
But that's the thing, they aren't claiming that. They're just saying that in the fight of Good vs. Evil, they are on the Good side while Ken and Crystal are on the Evil side.
Please quote them where they've actually claimed to play an honest game. I think it's just the Ken-fanboy getting the best out of you. You want them to be wrong you hear only what you want to hear.
The thing is that your bias is running so high you're misconstruing the truth. You hear and see what you want to hear and see. Anything done against Ken is 10 times worse than if it had been done against someone else.
Why do people think Bob is some kind of endurance master? He isn't. He's just got determination. He bears through the pain 'til he just can't take it anymore, as opposed to others like Suzie who bow out as soon as they get tired or something.
When did I ever claim that moves done against Ken where somehow worse (or less honorable or some other bs) then moves that he did against others?
Either you didn't read what you just responded to, or you're trying to look stupid. I have no idea lmao.
I'd love to.
No no no, Ken is the next out (if he doesn't win immunity), not Bob. And that's Sugar's fault. Sugar is not playing a strategic game, she is playing an emotional game. She feels that the final three should consist of all "good" people, even if she doesn't win. She views Ken as an "evil" person and doesn't want him to win. She's supporting Bob and Matty to the end because they're "good". And right now, Sugar is calling the shots. She acts like she's this weak, little, meager girl, but she takes out whoever she wants.
