I can get behind this. Mala is probably one of my weaker reads, and really only showed up EoD when he was an almost certain vig target.I like pythag's recent posts. I still need to review, but the way things are flowing, I'm actually leaning Mala over Spak. Mala has consistently been in the middle of the pack, and it's like they are skirting the edges of everything. They haven't really pushed the game forward one way or the other.
I don't see a scum!Spak, like at all at this point.
It just so happened to be that Fonti had a vanilla check on my strongest scum read coming into today. Her check yesterday was on Boom, who I knew was a town PR, so there wasn't any reason for me to suspect that her results may have been altered. In short, there was no reason for me to think of it the day before because there was nothing to provoke that thought. The only reason it occurred to me was because of how strongly I thought Jack was scum. And the contradiction with Fonti's results.
that...makes a lot of sense with why you were arguing for Jack to be the vig kill. I get it.For the record, I currently think it's less likely than is that the result was manipulated. The potential for a redirector was a big part of that. But if players are informed of being redirected, as Sabrar pointed out, then Fonti would have known.
So then that would lead me think the team is like Logic/Mala/X?