ExLight
Smash Lord
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2020
- Messages
- 1,305
I HAVENT LIED IN THE LAST LIKE 7 GAMESwn because somehow ITS ALWAYS COMPLETELY NECESSARY
EXCEPT ON THE MAGIC ONE
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I HAVENT LIED IN THE LAST LIKE 7 GAMESwn because somehow ITS ALWAYS COMPLETELY NECESSARY
I'm in pretty much all recent games in bulbapedia and ZD forumsIt is better if you just provide links to your most recent town and mafia games. Those will speak for themselves.
yea yeaAlright. Can you look at my #464?
I think I've played 3 games with UP. (maybe 4?)Sigh
Could I maybe get some details here like idk why you feel that way and also how long have you known him and what do you think about him and how long have you played mafia do you know very many people here what do you think about yourself
by that I mean in my last post, I ain't deleting messagesoh apparently I deleted some stuff that I had written oof
:shrug:I don’t disagree with having multiple scum reads it’s simply the “FoS” way of marking it and making it known that always hits me as so slimy
Put them as scum in your reads list, say you’re thinking about lynching them instead or tomorrow but eugh stating it as a FoS is so bark without zero bite
It’s like the easy peasy scum slip I used to find in two minutes of people who tried to get town cred by posting “all these RVS posts aren’t helpful, we should be serious now” in RVS without actually ever doing anything serious and just expecting someone else to do it for them
Its hollow
Blast I debated it anyway
Can't speak for Utopian, but in my case it's not that I don't care, but that it at times is considered scummy to self-meta because it's mostly a whole lot of wine. I personally don't look at meta of previous games. I can get something from you describing yourself, but it's probably not exactly what you're trying to convey, so keep that in mind. I don't always read what people post in the intended spirit; I often will try to look between the lines because that's mafia at its core to me. I don't think that there are definite rules for any of that. A lot of it comes down to gut. But my gut has generally gotten more accurate over the years.One of the first things I said in thread was that I was going to post my meta as an introduction once I were on my computer, I did it
you and Haiku might not care, but some other people might; and it might save everyone some headaches since first days can get pretty turbulent with me around when people don't understand that I might not act like they expect
You need 3 more syllables on the first line and 2 more on the last line.yea yea
working on it, just a sec
just woke up
It's not the interaction which is the problem. It's the fact that the way that you address UtopianPoyzin in those two posts looks like you explicitly consider them to be town. You're talking to them as if they're considering reads. As if what you're saying to them might affect their reading of the game. It's a micro-macro contradiction. I still talk to my scumreads, but I'm clear while I'm doing so that I think that they are scum. I entertain the possibility that I might be wrong, and I (mostly) try to be polite to people. If someone is using an argument that I think that anyone in their right mind should know doesn't hold water, or worse is edging on or even crossing the line between appropriate and inappropriate in a mafia game, I'll tend to be more aggressive. But for example in the case of you, where I thought I caught something, I'm not addressing you as "I think you're definitely developing reads". Instead I'm saying "Why the contradiction?"I don't think I see it as a contradiction to interact with people? Do you avoid talking to people that you have suspicions of? Or do you just make sure to take a harsh tone with anyone that you're suspicious of?
Also, WRT Funnier, do you find it fishy at all that he called Lore early on as 'town but can't explain why' and then is interpreting Lore's replacing out pretty strongly in favor of being town.
I found the town read without explanation fishy to begin with. The latter I would understand regardless of that since it was my first thought, but I also looked back at how Lore handled things, and it just feels too overwrought to be legitimate town frustration.Also, WRT Funnier, do you find it fishy at all that he called Lore early on as 'town but can't explain why' and then is interpreting Lore's replacing out pretty strongly in favor of being town.
I'm not very upset. Mostly just disappointed. I didn't expect them to take this to such an Out-of-Game level. As a host, I'd have to think long and hard about whether or not that slot should be modkilled or replaced. But anyways, it's not really appropriate to discuss in the thread, which is why I've mostly tried to only really talk about them in the context of the game. I'm leaving my vote there until I see something that makes me want to townread that slot.haiku seems legit upset at what resulted from her poking which feels townie
(Or if I decide to go for another scumread.)I'm leaving my vote there until I see something that makes me want to townread that slot.
When you haven't really been active in the thread and when someone asks you a question, you delay on answering, that doesn't exactly encourage asking you questions. I also note that you still haven't answered. But I'll wait. Just know that if you don't answer during Day 1, at this phase length, I'm somewhat more likely to scumread you based on you dodging interaction.The argument there was that I didn’t really see “I’ll answer that later” as discouraging people from talking to me
I know, right!and damn the cooldown here is massive
what a pain
Why? It was a pretty overt misinterpretation. If I hopped on it as scum, someone would eventually be likely to call it out and I'd look bad.Though one of Xi's posts
Number One-Seventy-Eight,
Townleans them for me.
What does it explain?This explains a lot.
Thank you for the correction.
I may oblige later.
I have no idea why I multi-quoted this.I think you're too deep.
Maybe a duck is a duck?
Z could be real.
The bolded seems like TMI.Catching up ( was away because of super bowl),
I don't really commit to strong town or scum reads day one because of how it early it is.
However with Rax's post, I see where they are coming. They haven't played too many games here though so I think its a little early to go and say that funnier is playing to just scrape by like a player in a previous game.
Other then that, they've contributed strong content and I'd be surprised if they weren't town. The only other read I have right now is you. You've been pretty productive and I didn't agree with the early comments of you being agressive, you seem pretty geunie in scum hunting this game and I like how you'd be getting people to interact more.
Other then that I'm 50/50 on other players, but there's a few I'm leaning town. Gotta catch up fully then see what I think of the game.
I agree with the bolded. Feels like he was setting up Lore vote.
Like I said, I think it's more likely to have come from scum. It's just hard to see town reacting that way to the "provocation" whereby Osie called them scum failing at ML. It only makes sense to be aggravated by this if you're scum failing at a ML. That being said, it really is just speculation. Z is scummier and I don't want to lynch someone who doesn't have a chance to claim.Xivii, what are your thoughts on the Lore slot now? Did his ask to be replaced out change anything?
Why does that gain a solid town read for you, and what do you think of the rest of their play?This earns a solid town read from me.
I can see it, but I also don't yet believe that Z25 is the BEST candidate for the lynch today, barring anything that I haven't noticed yet, posted or not. A Z25 scumread at this point in time requires a little too much next-level thinking over a scumread on Lore-slot, on Mamboo-slot, or even Pythag.Day ones tend to be crapshoots in general, yet we commit to stances and votes on people we suspect based on gut and / or logic. We don't look at slips in general, because we don't always have the convenience of having scum slip in the open. So eventually, we'll need y'all (Funnier, Exlight, Rax) to commit to stances on major wagons and votes for paper trail so we can look back over it in later days to see if y'all are being genuine or making **** up. Even if all you can gather is gut, like you did in #485 and #487. I do agree with the feeling that ZZ5 is voting lore to save himself and seem like he's scumhunting when he isn't being proactive or trying to help in any other way. Since you state that, does that also mean you think he may be scum as well?
Because it's exactly what I was thinking, and having been scummates with Raxxel, I know he has a hard time thinking this way as scum.Why does that gain a solid town read for you, and what do you think of the rest of their play?
If Raxxel was Z25's mate there wouldn't be a need to disavow their strongest scum read based on something people are ambiguously reading in favor of Z25But Z25 is definitely, by process of elimination, on the scummier end of the spectrum. Lore WAS my scummiest read, I legitimately thought they were playing up their irritation towards the haikus. But clearly they were actually angered.
It's a correction that as scum you don't need to make. You can just sit back instead as scum. So it looks pure and townie to comment on it without aggression.Why? It was a pretty overt misinterpretation. If I hopped on it as scum, someone would eventually be likely to call it out and I'd look bad.Though one of Xi's posts
Number One-Seventy-Eight,
Townleans them for me.
If you look at the context, ExLight had made a typo in a post where they were suggesting that my last post were I to be lynched later be a 5-7-5-7-7 "Death Poem". They originally had typed "Jusei", which doesn't mean anything, then fixed it by way of double post to "Jisei", the name of the poem.What does it explain?
Did you not understand the context or purpose of the idiom? It's saying that the read was very next-level and sometimes the simplest answer shouldn't be waved away.I have no idea why I multi-quoted this.
Reckon this is just a difference in experience with RaxxelI think it's an easy conclusion to come to, just seems obvious that I wouldn't think to give them town credit for that.
We could get into a long theory argument over whether or not sticking to a read is townie. I'm not convinced that's productive, though. (Avast! Thar lies wine!)ZZ5 is a better candidate than Lore because he's voting with interest in saving his own tail rather than progress the game for town. Lore, voted in a manner which is anti-town, but also against the interests of scum, and he stuck to his direction after you posted the long haiku.
If it's a mislynch they'd prolly also try to save themselves. That's perfectly NAI.ZZ5 is a better candidate than Lore because he's voting with interest in saving his own tail rather than progress the game for town. Lore, voted in a manner which is anti-town, but also against the interests of scum, and he stuck to his direction after you posted the long haiku.
Hahahahaha ahshajjzjakajDepends on his mood. What exactly is this about?
so you like stealing mannerisms huh :excuseme:Hahahahaha ahshajjzjakaj
I generally do keep my promises but you’re right it does depend on my mood usually XD
Comsidering the extraordinary length of phases here it should be no big deal tho
also yes I stole your laughing asdf